Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U vs Intel Core i3-1115G4

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 PRO 4750U

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U is a processor for thin and light laptops based on the Renoir architecture. The PRO 4750U integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 1.7 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.1 GHz (Turbo) with SMT / Hyperthreading support (16 threads). The chip is manufactured in the modern 7 nm process at TSMC and partly thanks to it AMD advertises a 2x improved performance per Watt for the Renoir chips. Compared to the faster consumer R7 4800U, the PRO 4750U offers lower boost clock speeds.

The PRO processors offer a range of business features like hardware security (e.g., AMD Memory Guard), manageability (e.g., support for Microsoft Endpoint Manager), and longer availability and software stability. 

Thanks to the SMT support, the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U should be slightly faster in some workloads than the consumer Ryzen 7 4700U. However, as the base clock speed is lower, there can be some workloads that are executed slower.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 7 integrated graphics card with 7 CUs and up to 1600 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB level 3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 15 Watt (default) and can be configured from 10 to 25 Watt by the laptop vendor. That means the chip is intended for thin and light laptops (but with fans).

Intel Core i3-1115G4

► remove from comparison Intel i3-1115G4

The Intel Core i3-1115G4 is a dual-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks based on the Tiger Lake-U generation (UP3) that was launched in September 2020. It integrates two Willow Cove processor cores (4 threads thanks to HyperThreading). Each core can clock from 3 GHz (base speed) to 4.1 GHz (single- and dual-core boost). The faster Core i5 and i7 models offer more cores and are therefore significantly faster.

Another novelty is the integrated Xe graphics card based on the completely new Gen 12 architecture. In the i3-1115G4 Intel is naming the GPU UHD Graphics and offers only 48 of the 96 EUs clocked at 400 - 1250 MHz. GPU and CPU can together use the 6 MB of L3 cache.

Furthermore, Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (four lanes), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4 and WiFi 6 in the chip.

The chip is produced on the second-gen 10 nm Intel SuperFin process that should be comparable to the 7 nm TSMC process (e.g. Ryzen 4000 series).

Performance

Multi-thread peformance is most comparable to what the Intel Core i5-8250U and the AMD Ryzen 5 3450U deliver. This makes the i3 a more than decent option for day-to-day tasks; that said, any workload of the more taxing kind (such as exporting a high-bitrate, hour long UHD video) will be enough to bring the i3 to its knees.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 25 W, the ThinkPad L15 G2-20X4S0KU00 is one of the fastest laptops powered by the 1115G4 we know of. It can be more than 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Core i3 series chip has a default TDP of 12 W to 28 W, the expectation being that laptop makers will go for a higher value in exchange for higher performance. Either way, that's a tad too high to allow for passively cooled laptops, tablets, mini-PCs.

The Core i3-1115G4 is built with Intel's third-gen 10 nm process marketed as SuperFin for decent, as of mid 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750UIntel Core i3-1115G4
CodenameRenoir-U PRO (Zen 2)Tiger Lake-UP3
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)Intel Tiger Lake
Series: Tiger Lake Tiger Lake-UP3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U « 1.7 - 4.1 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U compare2.1 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1195G7 compare2.9 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1185G7 compare3 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1165G7 compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1155G7 compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1145G7 compare2.6 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1135G7 compare2.4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1125G4 compare2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1115G4 « 3 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock1700 - 4100 MHz3000 - 4100 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB160 KB
L2 Cache4 MB2.5 MB
L3 Cache8 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 162 / 4
TDP15 Watt28 Watt
Technology7 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C
SocketFP6BGA1449
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-3733 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1600 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 - 1250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 PRO 4750U
29.9 pt (50%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-1115G4
29.1 pt (48%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 8300     avg: 8339     median: 8359 (8%)     max: 8359 Points
min: 2725     avg: 3038     median: 3125 (3%)     max: 3244 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1162     avg: 1197     median: 1215 (49%)     max: 1215 Points
min: 1242     avg: 1299     median: 1312 (53%)     max: 1319 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 461     avg: 470.4     median: 469 (51%)     max: 479 Points
min: 504     avg: 507     median: 504.5 (55%)     max: 515 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2935     avg: 3151     median: 3203 (8%)     max: 3302 Points
min: 961     avg: 1120     median: 1114 (3%)     max: 1251 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1287     avg: 1375     median: 1410 (9%)     max: 1417 Points
min: 384.7     avg: 461.6     median: 480.5 (3%)     max: 507 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 180     avg: 181.4     median: 181 (50%)     max: 184 Points
min: 137     avg: 179.9     median: 190 (53%)     max: 197 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 15.42     avg: 15.8     median: 15.8 (20%)     max: 16.13 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.11     avg: 2.1     median: 2.1 (50%)     max: 2.12 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 5560     avg: 8379     median: 8378.5 (51%)     max: 11197 Points
8018 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 28774     avg: 29574     median: 29573.5 (21%)     max: 30373 Points
16265 Points (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
108.9 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
260.8 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
8 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4215     avg: 4227     median: 4227 (7%)     max: 4239 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 37081     avg: 39995     median: 39649 (23%)     max: 42173 MIPS
min: 11122     avg: 12669     median: 12919.5 (7%)     max: 13422 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4413     avg: 4438     median: 4438 (52%)     max: 4467 MIPS
min: 4497     avg: 4586     median: 4599.5 (54%)     max: 4674 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
79.9 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
201.9 fps (5%)
141.6 fps (4%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 8.33     avg: 9.4     median: 9.5 (17%)     max: 10.3 fps
min: 3.25     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (7%)     max: 4.1 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.768     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (25%)     max: 0.947 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.1     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (22%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 5.6     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (18%)     max: 8.5 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
2408 Seconds (31%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 340     avg: 361.2     median: 352 (2%)     max: 403 Seconds
min: 940     avg: 1037     median: 1021.5 (7%)     max: 1188 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.61     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.621 sec
min: 0.636     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (14%)     max: 0.671 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
11008 Points (23%)
6331 Points (13%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 9.98     avg: 10     median: 10 (2%)     max: 10.09 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 22.97     avg: 24.2     median: 24.2 (1%)     max: 25.35 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 581     avg: 673     median: 673 (3%)     max: 765 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
44669 Points (34%)
16869 Points (13%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 9541     avg: 11430     median: 11889 (29%)     max: 12758 Points
min: 5128     avg: 5771     median: 5579.5 (14%)     max: 6640 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 57115     avg: 59888     median: 60028 (49%)     max: 62520 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
55708 Points (45%)
min: 48647     avg: 55626     median: 56348 (46%)     max: 61883 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 65022     avg: 65592     median: 65591.5 (53%)     max: 66161 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 11538     avg: 12333     median: 12332.5 (31%)     max: 13127 Points
min: 3986     avg: 4871     median: 5038 (13%)     max: 5250 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 15185     avg: 16951     median: 17083 (30%)     max: 18081 Points
min: 6125     avg: 7184     median: 7331.5 (13%)     max: 7786 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5417     avg: 6007     median: 6092.5 (26%)     max: 6426 Points
min: 2227     avg: 2623     median: 2635 (11%)     max: 2937 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
5487 Points (52%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
1786 Points (41%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
3428 Points (13%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1117     avg: 1140     median: 1149 (39%)     max: 1157 Points
min: 1190     avg: 1296     median: 1311.5 (44%)     max: 1352 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5456     avg: 6052     median: 6153 (11%)     max: 6609 Points
min: 2341     avg: 2628     median: 2605 (5%)     max: 2983 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1167 Points (5%)
1328 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
6811 Points (21%)
2399 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4995 Points (50%)
5601 Points (56%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
25564 Points (25%)
9945 Points (10%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 810     avg: 822     median: 819 (1%)     max: 839 ms
min: 657.9     avg: 749     median: 755 (1%)     max: 805 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
145.8 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 46713     avg: 49233     median: 49781 (33%)     max: 50658 Points
min: 49170     avg: 55606     median: 58151 (38%)     max: 59497 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
152.3 Points (40%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 189     avg: 201.2     median: 205 (37%)     max: 207 Points
min: 200     avg: 213.7     median: 204.5 (37%)     max: 257 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
20509 Points (9%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
11801 Points (41%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 950     avg: 1029     median: 1033 (39%)     max: 1094 Points
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
147 Points (81%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
42 Watt (7%)
min: 24.7     avg: 36.1     median: 35.2 (6%)     max: 44.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
43.4 Watt (8%)
min: 25.6     avg: 36.3     median: 39.1 (7%)     max: 41.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
22.5 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
3.7 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.66     avg: 6.2     median: 5.8 (4%)     max: 7.67 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
32.6 Points per Watt (24%)
min: 12.1     avg: 13.5     median: 12.8 (10%)     max: 16.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U → 100% n=39

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-1115G4 → 69% n=39

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 04. 01:28:20

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12191 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12242 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1762216100s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Nov 2025 05:19:33 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12191 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 12191 +0.008s ... 0.017s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12242 +0.004s ... 0.021s

#10 got single benchmarks 12242 +0.021s ... 0.042s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.042s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.049s ... 0.091s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.092s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)