Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 4680U vs Intel Core i7-10850H

AMD Ryzen 5 4680U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 4680U

The AMD Ryzen 5 4680U is a semi-custom APU of the Renoir family designed for Microsoft devices. The 4680U integrates six CPU cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture clocked at 2.2 GHz (base) to 4 GHz (Boost) with SMT support for a total 12 threads. The two advantages a 4680U has over the older Ryzen 5 4600U are its higher base clock speed and a faster iGPU.

Architecture

The chip is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process and in part thanks to this fact, AMD advertises a 2x performance per watt improvement over the 12 nm Ryzen 3000 mobile processors. The built-in dual-channel memory controller supports LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB of L3 cache can be found on the chip.

Just like the other mobile Ryzen 4000 CPUs, a 4680U supports PCI-Express 3.0. Please go to our Renoir processor hub page for additional information on the product family.

Performance

Multi-thread performance is most comparable to the Ryzen 7 4700U and the Core i5-10500H, the latter being a much more power-hungry chip. This makes the Ryzen a more than decent CPU for most tasks, as of early 2022.

Graphics

In addition to the six CPU cores, the APU also integrates a DX 12 compatible Radeon RX Vega 7 graphics adapter with 7 CUs (448 unified shaders) at up to 1,500 MHz. The Vega iGPU will have no trouble HW-decoding AVC, HEVC and VP9 videos, but the newer AV1 codec will only be decoded via software. In terms of gaming, we are looking at an MX150-level performance. Pretty much all games released in 2020 can be played on low to medium settings in 720p on this graphics adapter.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 5 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop makers - Microsoft, in this case - are free to change to anything between 10 W and 25 W, with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. Indeed, we saw the CPU consume roughly 23 watts when subjected to our usual stress testing routine.

The 7 nm TSMC process this Ryzen is built with makes for very decent, as of mid 2022, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-10850H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-10850H

The Intel Core i7-10850H is a high-end processor for laptops with six cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-H, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.7 and 5.1 GHz (with Thermal Velocity Boost and Turbo Boost 3.0). Using only Turbo Boost 3.0 (when the temperatures don't allow the the Thermal Velocity Boost) a single core can reach 4.9 GHz. All six cores can reach 4.4 GHz. The processor is still manufactured on the old 14nm (14nm++) process. 

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced on the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i7-10850H supports the management features vPro, TXT and SIPP.

Performance

The average 10850H in our database proves to be a somewhat disappointing CPU, only matching the Core i5-10500H and the Ryzen 5 5500U in multi-thread performance. While the Core i7 will have no issue running any app or any game you can install in 2021, there are better options out there both in terms of sheer power and in terms of power efficiency.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD 630 in the Core i7-9750H. As a low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power consumption

This Core i7 series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 45 W, a value that laptop makers are free to reduce somewhat (with 35 W being the minimum Intel-recommended value) resulting in lower clock speeds and lower performance. Either way, the CPU is way too power-hungry to be the heart of a passively cooled mini-PC, laptop, tablet.

The i7-10850H is manufactured on one of the old 14 nm Intel processes leading to subpar, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 4680UIntel Core i7-10850H
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)Intel Comet Lake
CodenameRenoir-U (Zen 2)Comet Lake-H
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
AMD Ryzen 7 4980U compare2 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U compare1.8 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U compare2 - 4.1 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U « 2.2 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600U compare2.1 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U compare2.3 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U compare2.7 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H « 2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock2200 - 4000 MHz2700 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB384 KB
L2 Cache3 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache8 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 126 / 12
TDP15 Watt45 Watt
Technology7 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C
SocketFP6BGA1440
FeaturesLPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGX
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1500 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com
$395 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 4680U
31.1 pt (43%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-10850H
34.2 pt (47%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
7073 Points (7%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1163 Points (49%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
451 Points (50%)
494 Points (55%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2478 Points (6%)
2636 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1291 Points (8%)
1232 Points (8%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
170 Points (51%)
203 Points (61%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
15.6 Points (20%)
12.2 Points (16%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (50%)
2.3 Points (56%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5301 Points (32%)
7653 Points (46%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
31826 Points (23%)
34586 Points (25%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
248.6 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
8.2 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
3576 Points (6%)
5519 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
32745 MIPS (19%)
30988 MIPS (18%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4077 MIPS (49%)
5241 MIPS (63%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
7.7 fps (13%)
8.4 fps (15%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.2 GB/s (0%)
0.8 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.4 GB/s (24%)
1.3 GB/s (22%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
8.3 GB/s (22%)
7.8 GB/s (20%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
458 Seconds (3%)
425 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (15%)
0.6 sec (13%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
9471 Points (20%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
10.5 s (2%)
7.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
24.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
581 s (3%)
431.6 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
10051 Points (27%)
10694 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
7254 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
16642 Points (30%)
14601 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
5067 Points (21%)
4313 Points (18%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1078 Points (45%)
1305 Points (55%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
5785 Points (10%)
5753 Points (10%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
877 ms (1%)
737 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
47184 Points (42%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
198 Points (41%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 4680U → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-10850H → 105% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 08. 16:39:22

#0 checking url part for id 13178 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11960 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 07 Jun 2024 05:41:01 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.031s ... 0.032s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 13178 +0.017s ... 0.049s

#7 got single benchmarks 13178 +0.008s ... 0.057s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11960 +0.018s ... 0.076s

#9 got single benchmarks 11960 +0.011s ... 0.086s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.086s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.23s ... 0.316s

#12 return log +0.023s ... 0.339s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)