Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 3 3250U vs Intel Core i7-1255U

AMD Ryzen 3 3250U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 3250U

The AMD Ryzen 3 3250U is an entry-level, dual-core APU that was announced in 2020. The Ryzen features two Zen cores (SMT is enabled for a total of 4 threads) running at 2.6 GHz to 3.5 GHz and a Radeon RX Vega 3 graphics adapter (3 Compute Units = 192 unified shaders) running at up to 1,200 MHz. The specifications are similar to the older Ryzen 3 3200U, with the lower peak operating temperature of Ryzen 3 3250U (95 °C versus the 105 °C) being the only difference between the two.

AMD Ryzen 3 3250C is a special edition of Ryzen 3 3250U designed for use in Chromebooks. The specifications and performance figures appear to be identical between the two.

Architecture

Unlike the costlier Ryzen 5 3500U, Ryzen 3 3250U is not Zen+ based. It makes use of the ageing Zen architecture and is manufactured on the same 14 nm TSMC process as Ryzen 2000-series laptop-grade processors. This has several repercussions; the limited RAM support is one of them. DDR4-3200, DDR4-2933, DDR4-2666 modules are not supported here. It's just the DDR4-2400, DDR4-2133 and lower on.

The CPU has several PCI-Express 3.0 lanes and is thus compatible with NVMe SSDs (read/write rates will be limited to 3.9 GB/s) as well as discrete graphics cards. Ryzen 3 3250U gets soldered permanently on to the motherboard (FP5 socket interface) and is thus not user-replaceable.

Click here for more information on the Raven Ridge product family.

Performance

As far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned, this Ryzen series chip directly competes with the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1110G4 and also the Athlon Gold 3150U. While the 3250U is certainly not a powerhouse, mundane tasks such as web browsing and casual gaming pose little problem to it, as of early 2022.

Graphics

The Vega 3 is fairly close to Intel's UHD Graphics 620 as far as performance and capabilities go. The graphics adapter supports UHD 2160p monitors at 60 fps, and it can HW-decode VP9, AVC, HEVC, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs. The latest AV1 codec is not supported, though. Such a video will have to be decoded via software, with the limited CPU horsepower imposing a hard limit on the resolution that can be played back without stuttering.

The Vega will allow for a bit of light gaming; F1 2021 runs well at 720p / Low, to give you an example. Quality RAM will allow for higher frame rates and the opposite is true as well; please keep in mind that Vega 3 has no VRAM of its own.

Power consumption

Energy efficiency isn't great here. The Ryzen is built with a 14 nm manufacturing process leading to low, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

The APU has a default TDP, also known as the long-term Power Limit, of 15 W. Laptop makers are free to reduce that value a little, with 12 W being the lower limit, or give it a noticeable bump (up to 25 W are possible). Clock speeds and performance will change accordingly as a result.

While not as power-hungry as the Ryzen 3 3100 or any other desktop chip, the R3 3250U is still not likely to ever feature in a passively cooled laptop, tablet or mini-PC.

Intel Core i7-1255U

► remove from comparison Intel i7-1255U

The Intel Core i7-1255U is a high-end mobile CPU for thin and light laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 2  performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 12 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 1.7 to 4.7 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.2 to 3.5 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 12 MB L3 cache. Compared to the i7-1265U (fastest U-series CPU at launch), the 1255 offers 100 MHz lower clocked CPU cores and only "Essentials" vPro management features. Compared to the P-series (28W) or H-series (45W), the 15W TDP may limit the sustained performance.

Performance

The average 1255U in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 5 5600U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Which is nothing to be ashamed of, as of mid 2023.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 28 W, the Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 is among the fastest laptops built around the 1255U that we know of. It can be 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Architecture

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers all 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.25 GHz.

Power consumption

This Core i7 has a "minimum assured" power consumption of 12 W. Its Base power consumption sits at 15 W and its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption isn't supposed to exceed 55 W. All those values are too high to allow for pasisvely cooled designs.

Last but not the least, Core i7-1255U is built with Intel's fourth-gen 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for decent, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 3 3250UIntel Core i7-1255U
CodenameZenAlder Lake-U
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)Intel Alder Lake-M
Clock2600 - 3500 MHz1200 - 4700 MHz
L1 Cache192 KB928 KB
L2 Cache1 MB9.5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 410 / 12
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4500 Million
Technology14 nm10 nm
max. Temp.95 °C100 °C
SocketFP5BGA1744
FeaturesDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, vPro Ess., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Series: Alder Lake-M Alder Lake-U
Intel Core i7-1265U compare1.3 - 4.8 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1255U « 1.2 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1245U compare1.2 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1235U compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1260U compare0.8 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1250U compare0.8 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1240U compare0.8 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1230U compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1215U compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Pentium 8505 compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1210U compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Pentium 8500 compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Celeron 7305 compare0.9 - 1.1 GHz5 / 5 cores8 MB L3
Intel Celeron 7300 compare0.7 - 1 GHz5 / 5 cores8 MB L3
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R3 3250U
22.3 pt (37%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-1255U
34.7 pt (58%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
98.7 Points (55%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
388 Points (7%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 1876     avg: 1989     median: 2010 (2%)     max: 2080 Points
min: 5269     avg: 7970     median: 8285 (8%)     max: 9628 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 768     avg: 785     median: 776 (33%)     max: 810 Points
min: 1408     avg: 1627     median: 1647 (69%)     max: 1775 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 234     avg: 279     median: 300 (33%)     max: 303 Points
min: 550     avg: 634     median: 638 (69%)     max: 682 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 415     avg: 668     median: 783 (2%)     max: 805 Points
min: 2095     avg: 3037     median: 2987 (7%)     max: 3702 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 351     avg: 352.7     median: 353 (2%)     max: 354 Points
min: 919     avg: 1335     median: 1387 (9%)     max: 1577 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 119     avg: 122.2     median: 121.6 (34%)     max: 126 Points
min: 161     avg: 230     median: 237.5 (66%)     max: 251 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
4 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.5 Points (35%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4088 Points (25%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
10251 Points (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
457.3 s (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
14.5 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1710 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 8899     avg: 9153     median: 9063 (5%)     max: 9496 MIPS
min: 24126     avg: 33263     median: 36557 (21%)     max: 37365 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2931     avg: 3225     median: 3291 (39%)     max: 3452 MIPS
min: 5059     avg: 5303     median: 5256 (62%)     max: 5529 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
21.1 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
101 fps (3%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.83     avg: 2.1     median: 2.2 (4%)     max: 2.17 fps
min: 6.31     avg: 9     median: 9.6 (17%)     max: 10.1 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.9 GB/s (5%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 2492     avg: 2541     median: 2541 (32%)     max: 2590 Seconds
min: 683     avg: 792     median: 728 (9%)     max: 1156 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 1319     avg: 1372     median: 1399 (10%)     max: 1399 Seconds
min: 372     avg: 428.7     median: 408 (3%)     max: 601 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.773     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (17%)     max: 0.843 sec
min: 0.4688     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.558 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
3966 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
12.7 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
28.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
668 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3849     avg: 4103     median: 4195 (10%)     max: 4266 Points
min: 8097     avg: 13705     median: 14505 (36%)     max: 16890 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
46375 Points (38%)
62348 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
45549 Points (37%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
44021 Points (35%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 3689     avg: 3727     median: 3703 (9%)     max: 3789 Points
min: 7134     avg: 9823     median: 10079 (25%)     max: 12522 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 5463     avg: 5522     median: 5507 (10%)     max: 5596 Points
min: 11482     avg: 16766     median: 17512 (31%)     max: 20193 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 353     avg: 1254     median: 1692 (7%)     max: 1718 Points
min: 1124     avg: 5246     median: 5994 (25%)     max: 7649 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
1006 Points (24%)
min: 2313     avg: 2319     median: 2319 (56%)     max: 2325 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
1804 Points (7%)
min: 7914     avg: 8273     median: 8273 (32%)     max: 8632 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 1760     avg: 1994     median: 1993.5 (63%)     max: 2227 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 4534     avg: 6663     median: 6662.5 (27%)     max: 8791 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 687     avg: 796     median: 824 (31%)     max: 848 Points
min: 1560     avg: 1645     median: 1661.5 (63%)     max: 1712 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1397     avg: 1634     median: 1662 (3%)     max: 1813 Points
min: 4463     avg: 7335     median: 7947.5 (14%)     max: 8821 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
868 Points (4%)
min: 1523     avg: 1608     median: 1612 (7%)     max: 1684 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1838 Points (6%)
min: 4557     avg: 6901     median: 6905 (22%)     max: 8452 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3829 Points (38%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
7396 Points (7%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1187     avg: 1233     median: 1233 (1%)     max: 1279 ms
min: 476.2     avg: 584     median: 572.5 (1%)     max: 727 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
313.8 ms (3%)
97.3 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
35541 Points (26%)
min: 75963     avg: 82625     median: 82948 (61%)     max: 88687 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
105.2 Points (29%)
min: 183.4     avg: 230.4     median: 232 (64%)     max: 249 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 135.3     avg: 140.2     median: 140.2 (25%)     max: 145 Points
min: 200     avg: 272.9     median: 275 (49%)     max: 366 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
9895 Points (4%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
11617 Points (42%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 588     avg: 624     median: 623.5 (23%)     max: 659 Points
min: 1329     avg: 1465     median: 1475 (55%)     max: 1575 Points
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
173 Points (96%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 20.5     avg: 24.1     median: 24.1 (4%)     max: 27.7 Watt
min: 24.3     avg: 42.3     median: 42.2 (7%)     max: 51.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 25.2     avg: 26.6     median: 26.6 (5%)     max: 28 Watt
min: 27.8     avg: 54.9     median: 54.5 (10%)     max: 75.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
3.5 Watt (2%)
min: 4.09     avg: 6.9     median: 6.2 (4%)     max: 12.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.59     avg: 6     median: 6 (7%)     max: 6.43 Watt
min: 3.55     avg: 9     median: 6.3 (8%)     max: 30.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
13.9 Points per Watt (10%)
min: 18.7     avg: 25     median: 24.8 (18%)     max: 33.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 3250U → 100% n=29

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1255U → 291% n=29

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 21. 08:47:11

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12255 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14074 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1761029231s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 Oct 2025 05:20:51 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12255 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 12255 +0.009s ... 0.02s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14074 +0.004s ... 0.023s

#10 got single benchmarks 14074 +0.02s ... 0.044s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.044s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.042s ... 0.085s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.087s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)