Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G71 MP20 vs Qualcomm Adreno 619L

ARM Mali-G71 MP20

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G71 MP20

The ARM Mali-G71 MP20 is an integrated high-end graphics adapter for ARM SoCs, which was e.g. used in smartphone chip Samsung Exynos 9 8895. It features 20 clusters and is manufactured in 10nm FinFET (in the Exynos 8895). The performance is in the high-end class and therefore all current Android games should run fluently on the chip.

Qualcomm Adreno 619L

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 619L is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is 60% better compared to the Adreno 612 graphics card and in our benchmarks on par with the 700 series cards.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

ARM Mali-G71 MP20Qualcomm Adreno 619L
Adreno 600 Series
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
CodenameMimir
ArchitectureBifrostAdreno 600
Pipelines8 - unified
Core Speed900 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memorynoyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan
technology16 nm8 nm
Date of Announcement29.03.2017 15.12.2015
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.com
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
CPU in Mali-G71 MP20GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa8 x 2300 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 619LGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G8 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 33077     avg: 35410     median: 36347 (4%)     max: 36807 Points
44899 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3222     avg: 3555     median: 3426 (15%)     max: 4016 Points
min: 3122     avg: 3225     median: 3224.5 (14%)     max: 3327 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3896     avg: 4314     median: 4137 (9%)     max: 4908 Points
min: 3307     avg: 3311     median: 3311 (7%)     max: 3315 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2648     avg: 3058     median: 3261 (16%)     max: 3265 Points
min: 2308     avg: 2328     median: 2328 (12%)     max: 2348 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2723     avg: 3293     median: 3571 (11%)     max: 3584 Points
min: 2120     avg: 2154     median: 2153.5 (6%)     max: 2187 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 809     avg: 818     median: 817.5 (0%)     max: 826 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
247 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
5.8 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 15     avg: 15.5     median: 15.5 (1%)     max: 16 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
25 fps (3%)
min: 14     avg: 14.5     median: 14.5 (2%)     max: 15 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 24     avg: 36     median: 42 (1%)     max: 42 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 50     avg: 54.3     median: 51 (3%)     max: 62 fps
min: 36     avg: 36.5     median: 36.5 (2%)     max: 37 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G71 MP20
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 104     avg: 110     median: 105 (1%)     max: 121 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619L
min: 72     avg: 72.5     median: 72.5 (1%)     max: 73 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
76440 Points (10%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 41022     avg: 41847     median: 42183 (96%)     max: 42335 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 41901     avg: 43072     median: 43464 (97%)     max: 43852 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 22.78     avg: 22.8     median: 22.8 (0%)     max: 22.85 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
7552 Points (8%)
13095 Points (13%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
2573 Points (5%)
1751 Points (3%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
2.4 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G71 MP20 → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 85% n=11

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
ultra
Adreno 619L:
60  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
Adreno 619L:
39 40 ~ 40 fps
med.
Adreno 619L:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
high
Adreno 619L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-G71 MP20:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
200%
Adreno 619L:
60  fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
100%
Mali-G71 MP20:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Mali-G71 MP20:
29 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
high
Adreno 619L:
29  fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
Adreno 619L:
60  fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-G71 MP20:
60  fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G71 MP20 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 200%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 200%

Qualcomm Adreno 619Llowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift60
PUBG Mobile404030
Dead Trigger 260
Asphalt 9: Legends29
Real Racing 360
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1


1

1
1
2


1






ARM Mali-G71 MP20lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dead Trigger 230
Asphalt 8: Airborne3030
Temple Run 260
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1





2
1









For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 21. 16:06:25

#0 checking url part for id 7732 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10573 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:37:06 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.083s ... 0.084s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.084s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.084s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 7732 +0.026s ... 0.11s

#8 got single benchmarks 7732 +0.01s ... 0.12s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10573 +0.002s ... 0.121s

#10 got single benchmarks 10573 +0.01s ... 0.131s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.131s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.087s ... 0.219s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.219s

#14 Got 20 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.224s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.224s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.227s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.016s ... 0.243s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.243s

#19 return log +0.037s ... 0.28s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)