Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 5 220H vs AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 vs AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

Intel Core 5 220H

► remove from comparison Intel Core 5 220H

The Intel Core 5 220H is a mid-range mobile CPU for laptops of the Raptor Lake-H refresh series (Alder Lake architecture). It was announced in late 2024 and offers 4 of the 6 performance cores possible (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and all 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading for 16 threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rates range from 2.7 to 4.9 GHz (single core boost, all core up to 4.7 GHz) on the performance cluster and 2 to 3.7 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (comparable to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 18 MB L3 cache.

Compared to the similar but older Core i5-13600H, the Core 5 220H is a slightly higher clocked version.

Performance

Thanks to the higher clock speeds, the Core 5 220H can surpass the old Core i5-13600H (e.g., + 100 MHz boost).

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-5200. The Thread Director (in hardware) can help the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU now supports PCIe 5.0 x8 for a GPU and two PCIe 4.0 x4 for SSDs. The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe architecture and offers 80 of the 96 EUs (Execution Units) possible.

The CPU is rated at 45 W base power (115 W PL2) but most laptops will use a PL1 of around 60 Watt. The SoC is manufactured on an improved 10nm process at Intel, which is known as Intel 7.

AMD Ryzen 7 H 260

► remove from comparison AMD AMD R7 H 260

The AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 is a high-end notebook processor from the Hawk Point series with 8 cores and hyperthreading (SMT), which means it can process up to 16 threads simultaneously. At release, the CPU is only available in China and is technically practically identical to the older AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS or Ryzen 7 7840HS (slower AI engine).

The performance of the second-fastest model in the Hawk Point series should only be slightly behind the Ryzen 9 7940HS (+100 - 200 MHz clock, e.g. only 2% slower Turbo). As a result, the performance at 54W TDP should also be comparable to the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (also 8 Zen 4 cores, max 5.1 GHz, 55W, 32 MB L3) and thus clearly ahead of the old top model AMD Ryzen 9 6980HX resp. 6980HS (with lower TDP).

The chip integrates a modern RDNA 3-based graphics card (iGPU) called Radeon 780M with 12 CUs and up to 2.7GHz including AV1 video engine. Furthermore, a Xilinx FPGA-based XDNA AI accelerator is also integrated, which is now clocked higher. Hawk Point offers 2x USB 4 (40 Gbps), 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes and a dual-channel DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 memory controller (with ECC support).

The Hawk Point series is a single chip (unlike the Dragon Range 7045HX series) and is manufactured at TSMC using the modern 4nm FinFET process.

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 8945HS

The Ryzen 9 8945HS is a rebadged Ryzen 9 7940HS with higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. To be more specific, this is a powerful Hawk Point family laptop chip that has eight Zen 4 cores running at 4.0 GHz to 5.2 GHz. This APU was brought to life in H2 2023 and all of its cores are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads.

The Radeon 780M serves as the integrated graphics adapter.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these chips are promised to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop even more powerful.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8945HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast RAM (up to LPDDR5x-7500 or DDR5-5600; no ECC support). The processor is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt; PCIe support is limited to the 4.0 spec for a throughput of 1.97 GB/s per lane. 20 lanes are available.

OS support is limited to 64-bit editions of Windows 11 and Windows 10 and of course to Linux. Note that the chip isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable as it gets soldered down for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The 8945HS is an R9 7940HS in disguise, so it's realistic to expect the chip to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-12900HK and also the Ryzen 7 7840HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) running at up to 2,800 MHz. This is a very fast iGPU, as of late 2023. It will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p, and it is also capable of HW-encoding and HW-decoding the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1. More importantly, it is fast enough for proper 1080p gaming as long as one is fine with low to medium detail settings.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of the system is, how fast the RAM of the system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving laptop makers a choice between longer battery life and higher performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a system powered by this chip.

The 8945HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core 5 220HAMD Ryzen 7 H 260AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
CodenameRaptor Lake-H RefreshHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-HAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
Intel Core 9 270H2 - 5.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core 7 250H1.8 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core 7 240H1.8 - 5.2 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core 5 220H « 2 - 4.9 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core 5 210H1.6 - 4.8 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 H 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2404.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 H 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 H 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2404.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock2000 - 4900 MHz3800 - 5100 MHz4000 - 5200 MHz
L1 Cache1.1 MB512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache10 MB8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache18 MB16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 16
4 x 4.9 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
8 x 3.7 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP45 Watt45 Watt45 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2115 Watt
Technology10 nm4 nm4 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1744FP7/FP7r2/FP8FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesThread DirectorDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs ( - 1500 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Core 5 220H
37.7 pt (63%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 8945HS
40.7 pt (68%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
108.3 Points (61%)
min: 98     avg: 105.5     median: 107 (60%)     max: 109.2 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
655 Points (12%)
min: 852     avg: 933     median: 952 (18%)     max: 988 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
11198 Points (10%)
min: 15516     avg: 16743     median: 16937 (16%)     max: 17376 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1853 Points (78%)
min: 1719     avg: 1800     median: 1806.5 (76%)     max: 1825 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
709 Points (77%)
min: 676     avg: 700     median: 700.5 (76%)     max: 711 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4301 Points (10%)
min: 6153     avg: 6559     median: 6621.5 (16%)     max: 6785 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1835 Points (12%)
min: 2521     avg: 2654     median: 2649.5 (17%)     max: 2775 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
262 Points (73%)
min: 265     avg: 281.4     median: 282.5 (78%)     max: 288 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
21.7 Points (28%)
min: 29.14     avg: 30.8     median: 31.1 (40%)     max: 31.77 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.2 Points (75%)
min: 3.28     avg: 3.4     median: 3.4 (81%)     max: 3.45 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
10386 Points (63%)
min: 7594     avg: 7767     median: 7785.5 (47%)     max: 7901 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
46980 Points (34%)
min: 46572     avg: 48831     median: 49299 (36%)     max: 50153 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 84253     avg: 87958     median: 89478 (57%)     max: 90144 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 14451     avg: 14535     median: 14561 (18%)     max: 14593 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1250 s (15%)
1467%
1 R9 8945HS +
min: 67.933     avg: 108.7     median: 85.2 (1%)     max: 196.4 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
27.1 s (5%)
1011%
1 R9 8945HS +
min: 2.563     avg: 3.5     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 6.2 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
18732 Points (30%)
min: 7332     avg: 10823     median: 7793.5 (12%)     max: 20374 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
48123 MIPS (28%)
min: 66557     avg: 71014     median: 71534 (41%)     max: 73742 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5683 MIPS (67%)
min: 5994     avg: 6460     median: 6576.5 (78%)     max: 6691 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 141.2     avg: 149     median: 150.7 (50%)     max: 155 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 297     avg: 298.3     median: 298 (69%)     max: 300 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
12.5 fps (22%)
min: 19.8     avg: 21.1     median: 21.1 (37%)     max: 22.2 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (32%)
min: 1.3     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (38%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.9 GB/s (33%)
min: 2     avg: 2.1     median: 2.1 (35%)     max: 2.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.5 GB/s (27%)
min: 14.5     avg: 15     median: 15 (39%)     max: 15.4 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
505 Seconds (6%)
min: 293     avg: 310.8     median: 312 (4%)     max: 326 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
280 Seconds (2%)
min: 186     avg: 194     median: 192.5 (1%)     max: 206 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (10%)
min: 0.4294     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4576 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
13225 Points (28%)
min: 15007     avg: 15716     median: 15691 (33%)     max: 16449 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
6.8 s (1%)
min: 6.962     avg: 7.1     median: 7 (2%)     max: 7.2 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
14.7 s (1%)
min: 17.31     avg: 17.5     median: 17.5 (1%)     max: 17.8 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
368.7 s (2%)
min: 576.7     avg: 615     median: 624.7 (3%)     max: 644.49 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 69373     avg: 82115     median: 84110 (65%)     max: 88101 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
16475 Points (41%)
min: 17239     avg: 21793     median: 22257.5 (55%)     max: 25276 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 82144     avg: 86374     median: 84952.5 (69%)     max: 92815 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 83482     avg: 86934     median: 85496 (69%)     max: 93057 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 86257     avg: 88776     median: 87230 (70%)     max: 94974 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13624     avg: 19839     median: 20539 (52%)     max: 21573 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
21138 Points (38%)
min: 23442     avg: 27506     median: 27488.5 (49%)     max: 30090 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
7894 Points (33%)
min: 8883     avg: 10993     median: 11086 (47%)     max: 11856 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
2501 Points (62%)
min: 2399     avg: 2649     median: 2667.5 (67%)     max: 2745 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
11280 Points (44%)
min: 12015     avg: 13232     median: 13255.5 (51%)     max: 13715 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2575     avg: 2900     median: 3105 (99%)     max: 3105 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12920     avg: 17803     median: 21003 (86%)     max: 21003 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1768 Points (69%)
min: 1835     avg: 1950     median: 1979.5 (77%)     max: 2039 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
9946 Points (18%)
min: 10985     avg: 11970     median: 12008.5 (22%)     max: 12520 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1841     avg: 1903     median: 1907 (8%)     max: 1930 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11804     avg: 12252     median: 12315 (39%)     max: 12573 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7933     avg: 8130     median: 8140 (81%)     max: 8278 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 46366     avg: 48538     median: 49269 (49%)     max: 49654 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
507 ms (1%)
min: 488     avg: 524     median: 507.5 (1%)     max: 586 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
98370 Points (72%)
94227 Points (69%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
260 Points (71%)
min: 226     avg: 259.7     median: 267 (73%)     max: 275 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
281 Points (50%)
min: 268     avg: 313.3     median: 316 (57%)     max: 344 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1792 Points (67%)
min: 1767     avg: 1825     median: 1839.5 (69%)     max: 1866 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
51.7 Watt (9%)
min: 72.5     avg: 89.6     median: 86.8 (15%)     max: 126.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
57.8 Watt (11%)
min: 70.3     avg: 89.4     median: 84.1 (15%)     max: 130.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
5.4 Watt (4%)
min: 4.93     avg: 12.3     median: 10.6 (7%)     max: 21.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
6.2 Watt (7%)
min: 8.62     avg: 16.2     median: 17.6 (19%)     max: 22.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
31.7 Points per Watt (24%)
min: 28.4     avg: 32.8     median: 33.4 (25%)     max: 35.9 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 5 220H → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 18. 13:52:42

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18677 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 19849 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 16397 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755517962s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Aug 2025 05:18:17 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.014s ... 0.014s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.014s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 18677 +0.006s ... 0.02s

#9 got single benchmarks 18677 +0.005s ... 0.024s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 19849 +0.001s ... 0.025s

#11 got single benchmarks 19849 +0s ... 0.025s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 16397 +0.006s ... 0.031s

#13 got single benchmarks 16397 +0.02s ... 0.051s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.051s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.073s ... 0.124s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.124s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)