Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 644 vs Qualcomm Adreno 710 vs Qualcomm Adreno 619

Qualcomm Adreno 644

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 644

The Qualcomm Adreno 644 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 SoC. The chip was announced mid 2022 and was available in early 2023 in upper mid-range Android smartphones.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 644 GPU offers a 20% improved performance over the Adreno 642, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 780G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR5 with 3200 MHz. In our benchmarks with the Mi 13 Lite however, the performance was only on par with the old Adreno 642.

The Adreno 644 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 is manufactured in the modern 4nm process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.

Qualcomm Adreno 710

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 710

The Adreno 710 is a graphics unit for smartphones and tablets, which was first installed in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2. The chip has been available since the end of 2023 and is primarily used in Android-based upper mid-range devices.

HDR gaming with 10-bit color depth is possible with the graphics chip, which supports the APIs OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 FP and Vulkan 1.13.

The GPU is able to control FHD+ displays with up to 144 Hz and offers support for HDR10 and HDR vivid.

Qualcomm Adreno 619

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 619 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is 60% better compared to the Adreno 612 graphics card and in our benchmarks on par with the 700 series cards.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 644Qualcomm Adreno 710Qualcomm Adreno 619
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 750
Adreno 740
Adreno 725 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 722
Adreno 735 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 732
Adreno 730 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan
technology4 nm4 nm8 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
Date of Announcement07.05.2021 30.11.2021 15.12.2015
PredecessorAdreno 642
Core Speed800 (Boost) MHz
ArchitectureAdreno 600
CPU in Adreno 644GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 18 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 710GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 28 x 1950 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 38 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 18 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 619GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 38 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G8 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 18 x 1804 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
275 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 3035     avg: 3133     median: 3137 (2%)     max: 3184 Points
min: 635     avg: 1119     median: 1196 (1%)     max: 1578 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 825     avg: 832     median: 829 (1%)     max: 854 Points
min: 189     avg: 329.9     median: 351 (0%)     max: 410 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 54788     avg: 55662     median: 55911 (6%)     max: 56286 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 6303     avg: 6921     median: 6953.5 (30%)     max: 7472 Points
5762 Points (25%)
min: 3602     avg: 4041     median: 4118 (18%)     max: 4286 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 8656     avg: 8893     median: 8751 (19%)     max: 9414 Points
6231 Points (14%)
min: 3817     avg: 4280     median: 4298 (9%)     max: 4573 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 5501     avg: 6187     median: 6286 (26%)     max: 6466 Points
min: 2536     avg: 2906     median: 2981.5 (13%)     max: 3107 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 6767     avg: 7042     median: 7023 (17%)     max: 7388 Points
min: 2412     avg: 2788     median: 2834 (7%)     max: 3008 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 6114     avg: 6700     median: 6700 (60%)     max: 7285 Points
0 Points (0%)
min: 2825     avg: 3855     median: 3993.5 (35%)     max: 4156 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 8410     avg: 8641     median: 8487 (51%)     max: 9025 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 5090     avg: 5524     median: 5565 (27%)     max: 5876 Points
min: 4087     avg: 4575     median: 4720.5 (23%)     max: 4773 Points
min: 1757     avg: 2728     median: 2812.5 (14%)     max: 2983 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 5779     avg: 6156     median: 6159.5 (21%)     max: 6524 Points
min: 3967     avg: 4639     median: 4845 (16%)     max: 4899 Points
min: 1593     avg: 2593     median: 2655.5 (9%)     max: 2845 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 7     avg: 7.4     median: 7.5 (3%)     max: 7.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 15     avg: 16.4     median: 17 (3%)     max: 18 fps
min: 3.3     avg: 7.4     median: 7.7 (1%)     max: 8.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 41     avg: 45.3     median: 46 (3%)     max: 49 fps
min: 17     avg: 20.2     median: 21 (2%)     max: 23 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 37     avg: 38.2     median: 38 (4%)     max: 40 fps
min: 16     avg: 18.5     median: 19 (2%)     max: 21 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 52     avg: 62.4     median: 65 (1%)     max: 67 fps
min: 26     avg: 32.5     median: 34 (1%)     max: 36 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 86     avg: 89.2     median: 88 (4%)     max: 94 fps
min: 33     avg: 45.5     median: 46 (2%)     max: 68 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 644
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 147     avg: 150.2     median: 148 (1%)     max: 158 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 710
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619
min: 55     avg: 88.2     median: 91 (1%)     max: 100 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 174679     avg: 177977     median: 175343 (18%)     max: 187645 Points
min: 0     avg: 70941     median: 70940.5 (7%)     max: 141881 Points
min: 65241     avg: 91752     median: 97328 (10%)     max: 106719 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
170281 Points (14%)
min: 82963     avg: 85356     median: 83461 (7%)     max: 91538 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 50.74     avg: 51.7     median: 51.7 (1%)     max: 52.63 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
38.5 fps (7%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 2448     avg: 2513     median: 2497 (1%)     max: 2610 Points
min: 1323     avg: 1513     median: 1334 (0%)     max: 2243 Points
min: 1363     avg: 1377     median: 1377.5 (0%)     max: 1391 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 2650     avg: 2776     median: 2729.5 (1%)     max: 2993 Points
min: 1637     avg: 2122     median: 1671.5 (0%)     max: 3509 Points
min: 1119     avg: 1168     median: 1160 (0%)     max: 1231 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
30029 Points (10%)
min: 20418     avg: 26631     median: 27556.5 (9%)     max: 30991 Points
min: 8763     avg: 68002     median: 26723 (9%)     max: 291780 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
42541 Points (70%)
min: 24021     avg: 26637     median: 26957 (45%)     max: 28612 Points
min: 3274     avg: 20485     median: 22822.5 (38%)     max: 28746 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.19     avg: 4.8     median: 4.6 (2%)     max: 5.9 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 100% n=23

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 710 → 73% n=23

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 51% n=23

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
100%
Adreno 644:
42  fps
86%
Adreno 710:
29.9 29.9 30 30 59.2 ~ 36 fps
71%
Adreno 619:
29.7 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
ultra Ultra
100%
Adreno 644:
45  fps
73%
Adreno 710:
29.6 29.8 29.9 30 44.6 ~ 33 fps
67%
Adreno 619:
29.4 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
Adreno 619:
30  fps
high
Adreno 619:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Adreno 710:
28.8 43 43.8 47 47.1 49 59 ~ 45 fps
Adreno 619:
20 29.8 45 54 ~ 37 fps
med.
Adreno 619:
36  fps
ultra
Adreno 710:
24 29.3 30 31 39 44 46.6 ~ 35 fps
Adreno 619:
20 28 29.3 30 ~ 27 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 644:
45 89 ~ 67 fps
90%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 30 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 77 86 89 90 95 98 ~ 60 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 644:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
95%
Adreno 710:
39 58.6 58.8 59.3 59.6 60 60 60 ~ 57 fps
65%
Adreno 619:
29 38.7 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 39 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 644:
40  fps
100%
Adreno 619:
40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
high
100%
Adreno 644:
40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
125%
Adreno 710:
30 39.7 40 58.8 59 59.6 60 ~ 50 fps
78%
Adreno 619:
28 29.3 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 60 ~ 31 fps
ultra
Adreno 710:
39 39.7 40 ~ 40 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 644:
60  fps
130%
Adreno 710:
60 60 115 ~ 78 fps
150%
Adreno 619:
60 60 93 115 121 ~ 90 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
100%
Adreno 644:
60 61 ~ 61 fps
148%
Adreno 619:
90  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 710 → 102%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 95%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 96%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 83%

Qualcomm Adreno 644Qualcomm Adreno 710Qualcomm Adreno 619
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal424536333030
Armajet6760
PUBG Mobile604040575040394031
Dead Trigger 2607890
Subway Surfers6190
Qualcomm Adreno 644Qualcomm Adreno 710Qualcomm Adreno 619
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
1

1


1
3

1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2





1
1

2







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2


1


1
3

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.34
log 08. 09:48:28

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11580 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12307 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 10584 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759909708s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Oct 2025 05:18:57 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.046s ... 0.046s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.046s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.046s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11580 +0.024s ... 0.07s

#10 got single benchmarks 11580 +0.008s ... 0.078s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12307 +0s ... 0.078s

#12 got single benchmarks 12307 +0.013s ... 0.092s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 10584 +0s ... 0.092s

#14 got single benchmarks 10584 +0.038s ... 0.13s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.13s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.012s ... 0.142s

#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.021s ... 0.163s

#18 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.163s

#19 Got 179 rows for game benchmarks. +0.02s ... 0.182s

#20 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.182s

#21 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.183s

#22 benchmarks composed for output. +0.004s ... 0.187s

#23 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.187s

#24 return log +0.001s ... 0.188s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)