Notebookcheck Logo

HMD Skyline review - Easily repairable mid-range phone with an iconic look

Lumia comeback.

The HMD Skyline is the first smartphone from HMD with Gen2 repair capability. This means that you can easily repair the mid-range phone by yourself. But does it work, and is the HMD Skyline enjoyable to use in everyday life?
HMD Skyline
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 8 x 2 - 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.55 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, P-OLED, Gorilla Glass 3, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB 
, 200 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, Card Reader: microSD (shared, up to 512GB) , 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, barometer
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B66/​B71), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n25/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n48/​n66/​n71/​n77/​n78) , Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 159.8 x 75.7 ( = 0.35 x 6.29 x 2.98 in)
Battery
4600 mAh Lithium-Ion, 33 Watt (USB-PD 3.0, Qualcomm Quick Charge 4.0), 15W (Qi2 wireless charging), 5W (wireless reverse charging)
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix phase comparison-AF, OIS, LED-flash, Videos @2160p/​30fps (Camera 1); 50.0MP, telephoto lens (Camera 2); 13.0MP, wide angle lens (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix phase comparison-AF, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid) , USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 1.379W/​kg Head, 1.357W/​kg Body, IP54-certified, eSIM support, fanless
Weight
209.5 g ( = 7.39 oz / 0.46 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
599 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Bewertung
Datum
Modell
Gewicht
Laufwerk
Groesse
Aufloesung
Preis ab
Price
75.7 %v8
08 / 2024
HMD Skyline
SD 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710
209.5 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.55"2400x1080
75.4 %v8
07 / 2024
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
SD 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710
175 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.70"2400x1080
85.8 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
01 / 2024
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
SD 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710
187 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2712x1220
81.9 %v8
07 / 2024
Google Pixel 8a
Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7
188 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2400x1080
87.4 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530
213 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.60"2340x1080

Note: We have updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7 available here.

Case and equipment - Metal body in two colors

The design of the HMD Skyline should be familiar to Nokia fans, Windows Phone nostalgics, and smartphone historians: With its angular frame but rounded screen, it is reminiscent of the Nokia Lumia 900 models, especially the Lumia 920 which appeared in 2012.

This certainly makes the HMD Skyline one of the most unusual mid-range phones on the market in terms of its appearance. The angular corners are familiar from the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, where they can be distracting, especially when watching videos in widescreen mode and holding the phone in your hand for a longer time. Overall, however, the HMD Skyline is ergonomically designed and sits comfortably in the hand.

At 209.5 grams, it is not a light phone, especially when you take into account the slightly smaller screen and the lower-capacity battery than many comparable devices. The frame is made of metal and the back is made of tempered glass. The screen is protected by Gorilla Glass 3.

The Lumia 920 was available in many colors, including yellow and red. There are not quite as many options with the HMD Skyline: a pink and a black variant will have to suffice.

The phone is IP54-protected, but this does not cover immersion in water.

There are a total of 3 memory variants of the HMD Skyline:

  • 128 GB mass storage / 8 GB RAM: 499 euros
  • 256 GB mass storage / 8 GB RAM: 549 euros
  • 256 GB mass storage / 12 GB RAM: 599 euros

Unfortunately, the USB-C port is only connected internally at USB 2.0 speed and therefore does not enable image output to external monitors. NFC is on board, as are 2 nano-SIM slots and support for an eSIM profile. However, you can only use 2 SIM cards at a time.

The microSD reader shares the space with one of the SIM slots. In the test with our Angelbird V60 reference microSD card, it was comparatively slow.

Size comparison

162 mm / 6.38 in 73 mm / 2.87 in 7.9 mm / 0.311 in 175 g0.3858 lbs161.1 mm / 6.34 in 77.4 mm / 3.05 in 8.2 mm / 0.3228 in 213 g0.4696 lbs161.2 mm / 6.35 in 74.3 mm / 2.93 in 8 mm / 0.315 in 187 g0.4123 lbs159.8 mm / 6.29 in 75.7 mm / 2.98 in 8.9 mm / 0.3504 in 209.5 g0.4619 lbs152.2 mm / 5.99 in 72.7 mm / 2.86 in 8.9 mm / 0.3504 in 188 g0.4145 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
  (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
53.26 MB/s +64%
HMD Skyline
  (Angelbird V60)
32.5 MB/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.7 - 77, n=76, last 2 years)
29.2 MB/s -10%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
HMD Skyline Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø37 (30-49)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø38.6 (28.3-52.1)
HMD Skyline Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø79.4 (29.7-87.4)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.6 (44.1-101.9)

Communication, software and operation - Fast WLAN

The HMD Skyline supports WiFi 6E, which means it can also use the less busy 6 GHz band for Wi-Fi networks. This brings advantages in our test with the Asus ROG Rapture AXE 11000 reference router, as up to 939 MBit/s are possible in the receiving direction. This means that a Gigabit Internet line is already being utilized quite well.

Many 4G and 5G frequencies are supported so that the HMD Skyline can also be used internationally. During our test, we repeatedly checked the reception on a random basis and compared it with high-end smartphones in the same location and on the same mobile network. The result: The HMD Skyline occasionally offers slightly less signal strength, but performs well overall.

Android 14 is pre-installed, HMD also changes little in the system overall. However, all icons on the home screen are displayed in black and white by default, which is intended to encourage users not to start apps constantly and generally reduce their phone usage. Keyword "digital detox". The phone can also be completely locked so that it can only be used in an emergency for a certain period.

Unfortunately, the manufacturer is only promising 2 operating system upgrades, which doesn't quite fit in with HMD's sustainable concept. Security updates are supposed to be available for 3 years. At the time of testing, the security patches were up to date as of June 2024, so we assume a 3-month update cycle.

The touchscreen is very sensitive and responds very quickly and smoothly to our inputs. The fingerprint sensor is integrated into the standby button on the right. It unlocks the phone very quickly and reliably. There is a freely assignable button on the left of the casing, which can also be assigned a double press or longer press.

Networking
HMD Skyline
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
570 (min: 489) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
909 (min: 875) MBit/s ∼100%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
617 (min: 494) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
529 (min: 443) MBit/s ∼63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
678 (min: 544) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
581 (min: 491) MBit/s ∼70%
Google Pixel 8a
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
856 (min: 450) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
834 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
521 (min: 418) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
754 (min: 611) MBit/s ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
735 (min: 671) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
823 (min: 704) MBit/s ∼99%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
HMD Skyline; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø570 (489-672)
HMD Skyline; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø909 (875-939)

Sustainability - Self-repair is possible

The manufacturer is committed to sustainability: HMD uses 100% recycled aluminum for the frame; the packaging is plastic-free. However, we cannot find a CO2 analysis for the phone's production and life cycle.

A charger is not included, which is supposed to minimize electronic waste. We think it's cool that HMD doesn't want to earn anything from the additional chargers sold as a result: the proceeds are donated.

With the Gen2 repairability, HMD wants to ensure that the Skyline can be used for a long time: there are relatively inexpensive spare parts, exploded views, and repair guides, created in cooperation with iFixit

The HMD Skyline is designed from the ground up for easy repair, you only have to loosen one screw and then lever off the back.

However, this screw could not have been designed as a Torx screw to make the repair even more effective. The back cover is also glued on, which makes things a little more difficult. But at least HMD goes quite far in terms of ease of repair compared to other manufacturers.

Price list for spare parts in Europe
Price list for spare parts in Europe

Camera - Three full-fledged lenses on the back

Photo from the front camera
Photo from the front camera

The main camera of the HMD Skyline uses a 108-megapixel sensor, which produces images with a resolution of 12 megapixels as standard (9-pixel binning). At zoom levels above 2x, the telephoto camera takes over with 50 megapixels for more detail.

The photos taken with the main camera show a mixed picture: The image of the plant offers natural colors, but is hardly usable in terms of sharpness. The image of the surroundings, on the other hand, shows good details even when enlarged.

In low light and high contrasts, there is a decent level of sharpness, but the dynamic range is low in very bright and very dark areas. In the test laboratory, the main camera displays our test chart quite sharply and with high contrast. However, the camera only produces a black image at an illumination level of just 1 lux.

The sensor also enables video recording in 4K and at 30 fps. The general quality of the images is pleasing, although the autofocus does drag a little from time to time. The exposure compensation works reliably.

For even more flexibility, the smartphone also has an ultra-wide-angle lens with a resolution of 13 megapixels. The resulting images are decent, but you should not enlarge them too much, as details are barely recognizable. The lens is also activated for close-up shots but produces relatively blurred and less accurate images.

There is a 50-megapixel camera on the front, which also usually only uses 1/4 of its possible resolution. The resulting selfies look a little coarse and could be brightened up better.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow LightUltra wide-angle5x zoom
ColorChecker
8.8 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
5 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
ColorChecker HMD Skyline: 6.32 ∆E min: 2.44 - max: 11.45 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
54.3 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
63.7 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
28 ∆E
65.7 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
48.6 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
76.2 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker HMD Skyline: 47.24 ∆E min: 14.02 - max: 93.71 ∆E

Display - OLED screen with low color fidelity

Subpixel structure
Subpixel structure

The screen of the HMD Skyline is a P-OLED screen with 2400 x 1080 pixels. With a diameter of 6.55 inches, it is slightly smaller than many comparable devices.

Unfortunately, the brightness is not exactly exhilarating: We measured around 500 cd/m² in normal operation. On smaller surfaces, the brightness can reach up to 976 cd/m², but that is still less than most comparable devices offer in full-screen mode.

The color reproduction is also not really convincing: While grayscales are still reproduced reasonably accurately, strong colors are displayed too intensely.

In terms of PWM flickering, the display is problematic at 100 Hz and can cause problems for sensitive people.

478
cd/m²
488
cd/m²
489
cd/m²
490
cd/m²
497
cd/m²
468
cd/m²
456
cd/m²
477
cd/m²
488
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 497 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 481.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 497 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.24 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
147.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.219
HMD Skyline
P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Google Pixel 8a
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.1"
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"
Response Times
140%
245%
47%
46%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
9.4 ?(4.6, 4.8)
1.7 ?(0.8, 0.9)
82%
1.49 ?(0.78, 0.71)
84%
2.83 ?(1.338, 1.494)
70%
1.53 ?(0.7745, 0.7575)
84%
Response Time Black / White *
2.2 ?(1, 1.2)
1.1 ?(0.5, 0.6)
50%
1.33 ?(0.65, 0.68)
40%
1.05 ?(0.4965, 0.5575)
52%
1.47 ?(0.754, 0.7145)
33%
PWM Frequency
100.22
389
288%
713.5
612%
120
20%
120
20%
Screen
76%
54%
83%
55%
Brightness middle
497
1213
144%
1205
142%
1518
205%
962
94%
Brightness
481
1190
147%
1177
145%
1466
205%
967
101%
Brightness Distribution
92
93
1%
90
-2%
88
-4%
99
8%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.24
1.36
68%
1.51
64%
1.2
72%
1.6
62%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.37
2.3
73%
4.07
51%
3.3
61%
2.6
69%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.4
1.1
21%
2.5
-79%
2
-43%
1.5
-7%
Gamma
2.219 99%
2.254 98%
2.175 101%
2.2 100%
2.13 103%
CCT
6579 99%
6624 98%
6407 101%
6786 96%
6382 102%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
108% / 97%
150% / 117%
65% / 71%
51% / 52%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
9.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.6 ms rise
↘ 4.8 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 100.22 Hz
Amplitude: 12 %

The display backlight flickers at 100.22 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 100.22 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

minimum brightness
minimum brightness
25% brightness
25% brightness
50% brightness
50% brightness
75% brightness
75% brightness
100% brightness
100% brightness

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings

CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN saturation
CalMAN saturation
CalMAN color space sRGB
CalMAN color space sRGB
CalMAN color space AdobeRGB
CalMAN color space AdobeRGB
CalMAN color space DCI P3
CalMAN color space DCI P3

Performance, emissions and battery life - Comparatively slow

The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 is installed in many mid-range smartphones, but these are usually another 100 euros cheaper than the HMD Skyline. In addition, our test device only achieved lower rankings in most benchmarks. In everyday use, it is sufficient for reasonably smooth operation and achieves 30 fps in simple games. But you shouldn't expect more.

The memory in the HMD Skyline is not really fast either: smartphones like the Google Pixel 8a offer faster memory chips. However, the HMD Skyline's UFS 2.2 storage is sufficient for reasonably fast data transfers and also shortens loading times a little compared to even cheaper phones.

We measured a maximum temperature rise of 45.3 °C under prolonged load, which is quite noticeable, but not yet problematic. Slight performance losses of around 5% are possible after prolonged high loads.

The HMD Skyline has a small speaker on the bottom edge, which is supported by the earpiece as a second speaker. This makes slight stereo effects possible. The overall sound quality is average: voices are easy to understand and the speakers do not overdrive even at maximum volume. However, the reproduction is not really clear and many voices and instruments tend to blur into a mash of sound.

If you want better sound, you can connect speakers or headphones via USB-C or Bluetooth. Both work without any problems and there is a large selection of wireless audio codecs available: From SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, Adaptive, and Wireless to LDAC, LC3, and Opus.

The battery can be replaced by the user with a little effort if the capacity decreases. However, it is also somewhat smaller than many comparable devices: it has 4,600 mAh, and this is noticeable in the runtimes: 14:27 hours is not an embarrassment and is suitable for everyday use, but other smartphones in this price range sometimes offer 2-3 hours more runtime in our WLAN test.

A charger is not included, but the battery can be recharged with a maximum of 33 watts, which takes around 1:30 hours. The phone can also be charged wirelessly with up to 15 watts.

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1699 Points +78%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=165, last 2 years)
1478 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
1157 Points +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
1029 Points +8%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
998 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
  (922 - 1029, n=5)
983 Points +3%
HMD Skyline
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
957 Points
Multi-Core
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
4408 Points +56%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=165, last 2 years)
4126 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
3456 Points +23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
2955 Points +5%
HMD Skyline
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
2821 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
2813 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
  (2616 - 2955, n=5)
2800 Points -1%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1267 Points +58%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=174, last 2 years)
1021 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
891 Points +11%
HMD Skyline
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
800 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
792 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
  (774 - 800, n=5)
787 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
783 Points -2%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=174, last 2 years)
3404 Points +21%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
3366 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
3349 Points +19%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
2888 Points +3%
HMD Skyline
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
2807 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
  (2678 - 2888, n=5)
2794 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
2678 Points -5%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
15308 Points +60%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
13393 Points +40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 26863, n=191, last 2 years)
13055 Points +36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
12967 Points +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
  (9593 - 15308, n=5)
12713 Points +33%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
11565 Points +21%
HMD Skyline
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
9593 Points
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 22303, n=160, last 2 years)
7934 Points +49%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
7856 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
6828 Points +28%
HMD Skyline
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
5318 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
5237 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
  (4894 - 5318, n=5)
5126 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
4993 Points -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
14498 Points +142%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33560, n=160, last 2 years)
11805 Points +97%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
7170 Points +20%
HMD Skyline
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
5990 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
  (5420 - 5990, n=5)
5602 Points -6%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
5526 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
5455 Points -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
5850 Points +29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 10259, n=160, last 2 years)
4663 Points +3%
HMD Skyline
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
4545 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
4428 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
  (3652 - 4545, n=5)
4113 Points -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
3852 Points -15%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
3005 Points -34%
Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
8976 Points +191%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
3897 Points +27%
HMD Skyline
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
3080 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
3049 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
  (2954 - 3088, n=5)
3042 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
3039 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (408 - 13896, n=109, last 2 years)
2859 Points -7%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
8960 Points +189%
Average of class Smartphone
  (413 - 21065, n=181, last 2 years)
7682 Points +148%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
3992 Points +29%
HMD Skyline
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
3098 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
3066 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
  (2998 - 3111, n=5)
3064 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
3046 Points -2%
Wild Life Extreme
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
2359 Points +192%
Average of class Smartphone
  (114 - 7094, n=188, last 2 years)
2114 Points +162%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
926 Points +15%
HMD Skyline
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
808 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
  (789 - 810, n=5)
801 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
800 Points -1%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
799 Points -1%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
2353 Points +193%
Average of class Smartphone
  (112 - 7212, n=186, last 2 years)
2107 Points +163%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
915 Points +14%
HMD Skyline
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
802 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
793 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
  (779 - 803, n=5)
793 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
788 Points -2%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
81 fps +161%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 247, n=203, last 2 years)
51.6 fps +66%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
42 fps +35%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
31 fps 0%
HMD Skyline
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
31 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
  (18 - 31, n=5)
26.8 fps -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
23 fps -26%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
96 fps +174%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 263, n=203, last 2 years)
82.4 fps +135%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
49 fps +40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
35 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
35 fps 0%
HMD Skyline
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
35 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
  (34 - 35, n=5)
34.8 fps -1%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
59 fps +211%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 144, n=203, last 2 years)
38.5 fps +103%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
27 fps +42%
HMD Skyline
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
19 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
18 fps -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
  (11 - 19, n=5)
16.4 fps -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
15 fps -21%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
36 fps +177%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 112, n=203, last 2 years)
33.2 fps +155%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
19 fps +46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
13 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
13 fps 0%
HMD Skyline
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
13 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
  (13 - 13, n=5)
13 fps 0%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
16 fps +171%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.38 - 52, n=203, last 2 years)
15.6 fps +164%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
7.9 fps +34%
HMD Skyline
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
5.9 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
  (5.8 - 5.9, n=5)
5.84 fps -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
5.8 fps -2%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
5.8 fps -2%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
46738 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
41576 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)
37721 Points +4%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
36202 Points 0%
HMD Skyline
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
36117 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
35379 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
  (31340 - 36202, n=5)
34792 Points -4%
Geekbench ML
0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
2488 Points +782%
Average of class Smartphone
  (186 - 3410, n=29, last 2 years)
647 Points +129%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
288 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
  (282 - 288, n=2)
285 Points +1%
HMD Skyline
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
282 Points
0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 1478, n=33, last 2 years)
746 Points +159%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
704 Points +144%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
289 Points 0%
HMD Skyline
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
288 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
  (275 - 289, n=3)
284 Points -1%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
998 Points +83%
Average of class Smartphone
  (246 - 1342, n=34, last 2 years)
824 Points +51%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
561 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
  (545 - 564, n=3)
557 Points +2%
HMD Skyline
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
545 Points
HMD SkylineMotorola Edge 50 FusionXiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5GGoogle Pixel 8aSamsung Galaxy A55 5GAverage 256 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
3%
-3%
-12%
19%
-8%
56%
Sequential Read 256KB
921
967.8
5%
946.8
3%
1509.65
64%
1688.53
83%
Sequential Write 256KB
730.6
800.5
10%
808.2
11%
255.31
-65%
831.44
14%
Random Read 4KB
275.2
281.5
2%
239.2
-13%
165.98
-40%
351.47
28%
Random Write 4KB
255.4
241.4
-5%
220.5
-14%
243.82
-5%
132.11
-48%

Temperature

Max. Load
 44.1 °C
111 F
40.2 °C
104 F
37.7 °C
100 F
 
 44 °C
111 F
40 °C
104 F
39.6 °C
103 F
 
 43.8 °C
111 F
39.4 °C
103 F
38.4 °C
101 F
 
Maximum: 44.1 °C = 111 F
Average: 40.8 °C = 105 F
35.8 °C
96 F
39.2 °C
103 F
43.5 °C
110 F
36.8 °C
98 F
39.5 °C
103 F
45.1 °C
113 F
36.5 °C
98 F
39.4 °C
103 F
45.3 °C
114 F
Maximum: 45.3 °C = 114 F
Average: 40.1 °C = 104 F
Power Supply (max.)  43.3 °C = 110 F | Room Temperature 21 °C = 70 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.3 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


Heatmap Front
Heatmap Front
Heatmap Back
Heatmap Back

3DMark Wild Life

05101520253035404550Tooltip
HMD Skyline Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.63 (4.53-4.85)
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.75 (4.74-4.77)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.75 (4.74-4.76)
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø9.87 (7.57-14.8)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.59 (5.56-5.63)
HMD Skyline Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.1 (17.5-18.5)
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.2 (18.1-18.2)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.1 (18.1-18.2)
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø33.9 (26-50.6)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø23.1 (23.1-23.1)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø23.7 (23.6-23.7)

Speaker

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.640.62538.237.23129.225.84031.229.4503938.66324.525.38018.720.210023.321.312517.321.616014.736.820010.442.825012.545.131512.351.14009.657.650010.160.363013.463.38001371.3100015.572.6125010.671.2160010.373.6200010.773.3250011.271.7315013.168.6400013.662.3500014.664.9630014.466.7800015.464.71000016.368.31250016.367.8160001753.6SPL25.681.9N0.749.4median 13.4median 64.7Delta2.39.627.333.426.235.525.938.429.240.335.642.325.935.822.14117.840.517.146.518.157.414.255.214.15610.758.61159.312.863.711.164.61271.111.774.71279.312.877.412.479.512.379.713.3821384.213.581.613.278.913.878.213.776.113.469.313.360.624.991.40.685.1median 13.2median 74.719.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHMD SkylineSamsung Galaxy A55 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HMD Skyline audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery life

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
5000 mAh
1077 min +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
5100 mAh
1002 min +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (476 - 3244, n=203, last 2 years)
985 min +14%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
5000 mAh
966 min +11%
HMD Skyline
4600 mAh
867 min
Google Pixel 8a
4492 mAh
796 min -8%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
14h 27min

Pros

+ attractive and high-quality chassis
+ self-repairable
+ fast WLAN
+ many mobile phone frequencies
+ eSIM support
+ freely assignable button
+ 4K video recording
+ wireless charging
+ hardly any throttling under load

Cons

- PWM flickering
- Self-repair requires special tools
- only 2 OS updates promised
- Screen could be brighter and more color accurate
- comparatively slow SoC
- high price
- quite heavy

Verdict - Reparability has its price

In the test HMD Skyline. Test device provided by HMD Germany.
In the test HMD Skyline. Test device provided by HMD Germany.

The HMD Skyline has turned out really pretty, especially if you can still remember the Lumia phones and the nostalgia factor kicks in. Apart from pink, HMD could have dared to go for another bold color like green or yellow.

The chassis is solidly built and the good repairability is another step in the right direction. However, it is still not that easy for absolute amateurs, so there is still room for improvement for a possible successor.

It is a pity that HMD only provides very short software updates in view of the numerous promises of sustainability.

The screen could definitely be brighter, and there is also room for improvement in terms of the accuracy of color reproduction. And the performance is very low for the price range of the HMD Skyline.

The HMD Skyline looks cool and is relatively easy to repair yourself. It offers wireless charging and fast Wi-Fi but is also quite heavy and expensive.

The price of 499 euros for the cheapest version is set quite confidently considering that the competitors, such as Motorola Edge 50 Fusion or Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, are 100 euros cheaper. These also offer significantly brighter screens and longer battery life. If you value repairability, you should take a look at the Fairphone 5.

Price and availability

The HMD Skyline is available directly from the manufacturer at for 499 euros with 128 GB mass storage and 8 GB RAM and 599 euros for the 256 GB version with 12 GB RAM.

The 256 GB storage version with 8 GB RAM is mainly available from independent retailers, but with a significant discount: For example, at amazon.de for 529 euros.

The phone is also available at amazon.com starting from US$499.

Note: We have updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7 available here .

HMD Skyline - 08/16/2024 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
85%
Keyboard
69 / 75 → 92%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
46 / 69 → 67%
Weight
88%
Battery
90%
Display
86%
Games Performance
12 / 55 → 21%
Application Performance
61 / 85 → 71%
AI Performance
23%
Temperature
87%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 83%
Camera
65%
Average
64%
76%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
50%
Packaging
75%
Power Use
50%
Repairability
92%
Software Updates
45%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 52%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Read all 2 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > HMD Skyline review - Easily repairable mid-range phone with an iconic look
Florian Schmitt, 2024-08-19 (Update: 2024-08-19)