Qualcomm Adreno 612 vs Qualcomm Adreno 530 vs Qualcomm Adreno 650
Qualcomm Adreno 612 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 612 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).
The performance is similar to the old Adreno 512 graphics card and therefore only in the lower mid-range of modern smartphone SoCs.
The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).
Qualcomm Adreno 530 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 530 is an integrated graphics card for (mostly Android based) smartphones and tablets . It was introduced in the last quarter of 2015 and is integrated in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 SoC. It supports OpenGL ES 3.1 and DirectX 11.1.
The GPU uses a still unknown amount of unified shaders clocked at up to 624 MHz. In 2015 it belongs to the fastest GPU for smartphones. Compared to the predecessor Adreno 430 , the 530 is especially faster in demanding benchmarks.
Qualcomm Adreno 650 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 650 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 , 865+ and 870 SoCs. The chip will be available from early 2020 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices. The base clock speed of the GPU is 250 MHz and the boost depends on the used SoC. For the 865 it is 587 MHz, the 865 Plus increased to 846 MHz and the 2021 870 reached 670 MHz.
According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 650 GPU offers a 25% improved performance over the Adreno 640 , its predecessor, which is integrated into the Snapdragon 855 SoC. The enhanced performance is achieved by the Adreno 650 having 50% more compute units (ALUs) than the Adreno 640. Furthermore, the clock speed of the pixel shaders was also increased by 50%.
The performance in our first benchmarks of a reference system positions itself above the ARM Mali-G76 MP16 and e.g. in 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme even on the top spot. In GFXBench only the Apple A13 GPU is able to best the Adreno 650 (regarding smartphone GPUs).
As a novelty, the GPU driver can be updated in the Android Play Store. Furthermore, some features are running under the Elite Gaming brand (e.g., 144 Hz display support, desktop forward rendering).
The Adreno 650 supports Vulkan 1.1, DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, and OpenCL 2.0 FP. Furthermore, games and videos can use HDR10+ and Dolby Vision (with a supported display). The 650 supports 2 displays with up to 4K 60 Hz / QHD+ 144 Hz.
Qualcomm Adreno 612 Qualcomm Adreno 530 Qualcomm Adreno 650 Adreno 600 Series Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600 Shared Memory yes yes yes API DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan DirectX 11.1, OpenGL ES 3.1 AEP DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2 technology 14 nm 14 nm 7 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) OpenGL ES 3.1 AEP, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 11.1 (FL 11_1) OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 Date of Announcement 15.12.2015 15.12.2015 04.12.2019 Core Speed 624 MHz 250 - 670 (Boost) MHz
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 26320 avg: 28142 median: 26734 (3%) max: 31129 Points
min: 24310 avg: 32869 median: 32997 (4%) max: 40761 Points
min: 110875 avg: 149779 median: 149017 (17%) max: 180392 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 1621 avg: 1897 median: 1737 (8%) max: 2344 Points
min: 2649 avg: 3348 median: 3425 (15%) max: 3806 Points
min: 7970 avg: 9563 median: 9684 (42%) max: 11492 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1571 avg: 1784 median: 1614 (4%) max: 2245 Points
min: 3401 avg: 4503 median: 4661.5 (10%) max: 5006 Points
min: 11617 avg: 13051 median: 12858 (28%) max: 16809 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 1057 avg: 1207 median: 1110 (6%) max: 1499 Points
min: 2252 avg: 2605 median: 2594.5 (13%) max: 2893 Points
min: 6960 avg: 8089 median: 8085 (40%) max: 8975 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 851 avg: 1030 median: 955 (3%) max: 1303 Points
min: 2488 avg: 2996 median: 3108 (9%) max: 3253 Points
min: 8593 avg: 9728 median: 9498 (28%) max: 11999 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
482 Points (0%)
min: 3789 avg: 4168 median: 4230 (2%) max: 5039 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
143 Points (0%)
min: 1103 avg: 1218 median: 1223 (1%) max: 1246 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 9.7 avg: 9.9 median: 10 (4%) max: 10 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 3 avg: 3.6 median: 3.3 (1%) max: 4.8 fps
min: 7.1 avg: 8.4 median: 7.2 (1%) max: 11 fps
min: 18 avg: 21.1 median: 21 (4%) max: 27 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 9 avg: 9.4 median: 9.1 (1%) max: 10 fps
min: 15 avg: 17.7 median: 19 (1%) max: 19 fps
min: 27 avg: 55 median: 55 (4%) max: 67 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 8 avg: 8.5 median: 8.2 (1%) max: 9.2 fps
min: 14 avg: 18.3 median: 19 (2%) max: 20 fps
min: 39 avg: 52.6 median: 51 (6%) max: 62 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 14 avg: 15.7 median: 15 (0%) max: 18 fps
min: 12 avg: 28.6 median: 31 (1%) max: 34.02 fps
min: 67 avg: 87.2 median: 88 (2%) max: 103 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 20 avg: 22 median: 21 (1%) max: 25 fps
min: 26 avg: 43 median: 44.5 (3%) max: 49 fps
min: 96 avg: 125.1 median: 125 (7%) max: 151 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 612 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 41 avg: 43 median: 41 (0%) max: 47 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 530
min: 47.19 avg: 83.3 median: 88 (1%) max: 96 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 650
min: 168 avg: 209.5 median: 206 (2%) max: 266 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
43224 Points (5%)
min: 214123 avg: 240087 median: 240035 (30%) max: 276746 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 21420 avg: 30602 median: 33028 (75%) max: 35449 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 28538 avg: 37215 median: 38353 (85%) max: 41500 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
14.3 fps (0%)
min: 72.6 avg: 75.5 median: 75 (0%) max: 78.57 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
2688 Points (1%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
2532 Points (1%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 9815 avg: 16853 median: 16853 (17%) max: 23891 Points
min: 4781 avg: 5512 median: 5612.5 (6%) max: 6042 Points
54110 Points (54%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1491 avg: 8575 median: 8575 (15%) max: 15659 Points
min: 1913 avg: 2183 median: 2178.5 (4%) max: 2461 Points
42627 Points (75%)
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
4410 Points (96%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 5.18 avg: 8.2 median: 7.6 (3%) max: 12.7 Watt
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 100% n=13 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 530 → 194% n=13 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 650 → 615% n=13
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Adreno 650:
60 119 [X] Asus ROG Phone 3 2.0.0.3727
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) 2.4GHz
Adreno 650
min:
106 fps, max:
122 fps
~ 90 fps
Adreno 650:
60 [X] Xiaomi Poco F4 3.3.0.5735
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G 2.4GHz
Adreno 650
min:
54 fps, max:
61 fps
117 [X] Asus ROG Phone 3 2.0.0.3727
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) 2.4GHz
Adreno 650
min:
97 fps, max:
121 fps
~ 89 fps
Adreno 650:
60 118 [X] Asus ROG Phone 3 2.0.0.3727
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) 2.4GHz
Adreno 650
min:
111 fps, max:
121 fps
~ 89 fps
Adreno 650:
60 [X] Asus ROG Phone 3 1.0.17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) 2.4GHz
Adreno 650
min:
56 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 650:
60 60 [X] OnePlus 8T 1.0.0_1112729_1135452
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 2.4GHz
Adreno 650
min:
54 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 60 fps
Adreno 650:
59 60 [X] OnePlus 8T 1.0.0_1112729_1135452
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 2.4GHz
Adreno 650
min:
50 fps, max:
61 fps
60 [X] Asus ROG Phone 3 1.1.1_1437351_1398019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) 2.4GHz
Adreno 650
min:
29 fps, max:
61 fps
60 [X] Xiaomi Poco F3 1.5.0_2574575_2578841
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G 2.4GHz
Adreno 650
min:
37 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 60 fps
72%
Adreno 530:
0 (!) [X] HTC U Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro 2.4GHz
Adreno 530
Problem during benchmarking occured: game wont start 30 [X] HTC 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 2.2GHz
Adreno 530
min:
25 fps, max:
32 fps
30 30 30 [X] LG G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro 2.4GHz
Adreno 530
56 58 59 [X] OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro 2.4GHz
Adreno 530
59 60 [X] Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 2.2GHz
Adreno 530
min:
50 fps, max:
61 fps
60 ~ 43 fps
Adreno 530:
0 (!) [X] HTC U Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro 2.4GHz
Adreno 530
Problem during benchmarking occured: game wont start 29 [X] Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 2.2GHz
Adreno 530
min:
27 fps, max:
30 fps
29 29 30 [X] OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 2.2GHz
Adreno 530
30 30 30 [X] OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro 2.4GHz
Adreno 530
30 30 30 [X] LG G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro 2.4GHz
Adreno 530
30 30 [X] ZTE Axon M Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro 2.4GHz
Adreno 530
48 [X] HTC 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 2.2GHz
Adreno 530
min:
30 fps, max:
50 fps
~ 29 fps
100%
Adreno 612:
20 30 ~ 25 fps
180%
Adreno 650:
30 [X] OnePlus 8 Pro 2.1.2a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 2.4GHz
Adreno 650
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
30 60 60 ~ 45 fps
100%
Adreno 612:
16 30 ~ 23 fps
Adreno 530:
35 [X] OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 2.2GHz
Adreno 530
min:
28 fps, max:
42 fps
51 ~ 43 fps
Adreno 650:
60 144 ~ 102 fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 530 → 72% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 72%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 650 → 182% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 172%
Qualcomm Adreno 612 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Armajet 30 PUBG Mobile 40 30 Shadow Fight 3 60 Dead Trigger 2 60 Asphalt 9: Legends 25 23 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 2 2
Qualcomm Adreno 530 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Dead Trigger 2 43 Asphalt 8: Airborne 30 29 Real Racing 3 60 43 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 2
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.27
log 15. 23:01:51
#0 checking url part for id 9876 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 7062 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 9971 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 05:35:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.157s ... 0.158s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.158s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.158s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9876 +0.039s ... 0.198s
#9 got single benchmarks 9876 +0.018s ... 0.216s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 7062 +0.002s ... 0.218s
#11 got single benchmarks 7062 +0.049s ... 0.267s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 9971 +0.002s ... 0.269s
#13 got single benchmarks 9971 +0.091s ... 0.36s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.36s
#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.032s ... 0.392s
#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.397s
#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.149s ... 0.546s
#18 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.546s
#19 Got 207 rows for game benchmarks. +0.04s ... 0.586s
#20 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.586s
#21 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.006s ... 0.592s
#22 benchmarks composed for output. +0.027s ... 0.619s
#23 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.619s
#24 return log +0.002s ... 0.62s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)