OnePlus 3 Smartphone First Impressions

For the original German preview, see here.
Three follows two and thus, the name of the new flagship killer is not surprising. The OnePlus 3 is the successor of the OnePlus 2. The look remained almost unchanged. The OnePlus dismisses the sanded rear side and uses a aluminium unibody case now. Inside, the current Snapdragon 820 makes for fast performance. 6 GB of RAM are an enormous capacity and the future will show if this is really necessary. The internal storage device features 64 GB and cannot be expanded. In return, there is a dual SIM slot. A 16 MP rear camera and an 8 MP front camera are suitable for this class; at least on paper.
The display brings similar specs as its predecessor: a diagonal of 5.5 inch and a resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels. As the OnePlus 3 also is designed for use of VR content, we would have wished for an QHD panel at least. OnePlus does no longer use the IPS technology, but incorporates an AMOLED screen. In addition, the OnePlus 3 is finally also available with NFC.
OnePlus offers a powerful product for just under 399 Euros. Definitely, the price is an incentive to buy. Learn how the device compares to the high-end competitors in our in-depth review in a few days.
Please comment if you have questions or constructive suggestions for our review and we will cover as much as possible.
Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Wanted:
- Specialist News Writer
- Magazine Writer
- Translator (DE<->EN)
Details here
Join our Support Satisfaction Survey 2023: We want to hear about your experiences!
Participate here
Display
Top 10 Laptops
Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks
under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1,000 USD/Euros, for University Students, Best Displays
Top 10 Smartphones
Smartphones, Phablets, ≤6-inch, Camera Smartphones
|
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 419 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.1 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.2
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
89.38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
100% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.1
OnePlus 3 Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.50 | OnePlus 2 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50 | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.50 | LG G5 IPS Quantum, 2560x1440, 5.30 | HTC 10 Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.20 | Huawei P9 IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.20 | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.70 | Apple iPhone 6S Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -6% | 31% | -6% | 15% | 6% | 5% | 4% | |
Brightness middle | 419 | 451 8% | 554 32% | 784 87% | 445 6% | 582 39% | 297 -29% | 583 39% |
Brightness | 431 | 446 3% | 552 28% | 774 80% | 434 1% | 563 31% | 297 -31% | 560 30% |
Brightness Distribution | 84 | 90 7% | 96 14% | 91 8% | 93 11% | 91 8% | 93 11% | 91 8% |
Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.43 | 0.36 | 0.38 | 0.46 | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.1 | 3.84 6% | 1.59 61% | 6.5 -59% | 2.8 32% | 4.4 -7% | 2.67 35% | 3.55 13% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12 | 2.56 79% | 11.7 2% | 5.8 52% | 7.4 38% | 3.98 67% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.3 | 3.97 -20% | 2.01 39% | 8 -142% | 3.7 -12% | 4.8 -45% | 2.81 15% | 3.88 -18% |
Gamma | 2.1 105% | 2.46 89% | 2.01 109% | 2.22 99% | 2.31 95% | 2.2 100% | 2.08 106% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 6550 99% | 7283 89% | 6321 103% | 8699 75% | 7164 91% | 6175 105% | 6379 102% | 7280 89% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 89.38 | 58.07 -35% | 82.12 -8% | 68.08 -24% | 77.78 -13% | 66.31 -26% | 59.05 -34% | |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 90.14 -10% | 99.98 0% | 97.46 -3% | 99.44 -1% | 99.79 0% | 92.8 -7% | |
Contrast | 1503 | 1823 | 1236 | 1532 | 1267 |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise | |
↘ 5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.3 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise | |
↘ 5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.2 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 243.9 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 243.9 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 243.9 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18889 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Performance
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 3 | |
OnePlus 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
HTC 10 | |
Huawei P9 | |
Google Nexus 6P | |
Motorola Moto X Force | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 3 | |
OnePlus 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
HTC 10 | |
Huawei P9 | |
Google Nexus 6P | |
Motorola Moto X Force | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 3 | |
OnePlus 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
HTC 10 | |
Huawei P9 | |
Google Nexus 6P | |
Motorola Moto X Force | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 3 | |
OnePlus 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
HTC 10 | |
Huawei P9 | |
Google Nexus 6P | |
Motorola Moto X Force | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 3 | |
OnePlus 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
HTC 10 | |
Huawei P9 | |
Google Nexus 6P | |
Motorola Moto X Force | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium | |
Apple iPhone 6S Plus |
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 3 | |
OnePlus 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
LG G5 | |
HTC 10 | |
Huawei P9 | |
Google Nexus 6P | |
Motorola Moto X Force | |
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium |
Emissions
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 34.9 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.6 °C / 91 F.
Power Consumption
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
OnePlus 3 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | Apple iPhone 6S Plus 2750 mAh | Huawei P9 3000 mAh | LG G5 2800 mAh | HTC 10 3000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 4% | -4% | -20% | -13% | -19% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.57 | 0.63 -11% | 0.5 12% | 0.77 -35% | 0.55 4% | 0.68 -19% |
Idle Average * | 1.24 | 1.1 11% | 1.9 -53% | 2.36 -90% | 1.37 -10% | 1.49 -20% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.36 | 1.56 -15% | 2.2 -62% | 2.37 -74% | 2.25 -65% | 1.91 -40% |
Load Average * | 5.92 | 5.95 -1% | 3.2 46% | 3.09 48% | 6.24 -5% | 7.4 -25% |
Load Maximum * | 10.53 | 6.7 36% | 6.4 39% | 5.35 49% | 9.12 13% | 9.71 8% |
* ... smaller is better