Notebookcheck Logo

Apple A10 Fusion vs AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

Apple A10 Fusion

► remove from comparison Apple A10 Fusion

The Apple A10 Fusion is a system on a chip (SoC) from Apple that is built into the iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus. It integrates four 64 Bit cores that are divided in two clusters. Two high performance cores are clocked at up to 2.34 GHz and should be around 40% faster than the Apple A9 (according to Apple) and two low power cores (up to 1.1 GHz?). Up to now its unclear if all four cores can be used at once (that need only 1/5 th of the energy in some use cases). At the release of the iPhone 7 it looks like that IOS is only using two cores at a time and automatically switches between the two clusters. Therefore, apps are seeing only a dual core. The principle is similar to the first generation of ARMs big.LITTLE concept.

The integrated graphics card of the SoC will most likely stem from PowerVR (again) and perform 50% faster at 2/3 of the power consumption (according to Apple). 

All in all the chip includes 3.3 billion transistors, which is more than a current AMD Bristol Ridge (3.1) and Skylake Quad-Core (1.75)  X86 SoCs.

Sources: Apple Keynote, Ars Technica

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is a powerful Phoenix family chip that saw the light of day in H1 2023. The processor features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at 3.8 GHz. The highest Boost clock speed achievable is 5.1 GHz.

Not only does this APU has full might of the Zen 4 architecture at its disposal, it also comes with the new Ryzen AI technology that's set to make generative AI more ubiquitous than ever before. Last but not the least, the Radeon 780M serves as the integrated GPU.

Architecture & Features

Phoenix family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Dragon Range family chips are. The latter however lacks hardware AI workload acceleration capabilities that Phoenix has. Ryzen AI is coming after Intel's DL Boost and GNA technologies; time will tell if this move by AMD is a good idea.

Perhaps more importantly, Zen 4 introduces AVX512 support (which Zen 3 chips did not have) and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is set to bring a double-digit IPC improvement.

Elsewhere, the 7840HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600, ECC-enabled memory included). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

This Ryzen 7 series chip is designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 or Linux; please note that it isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The average 7840HS in our database is in the same league as the Core i7-12700H, Core i7-12850HX, Core i9-12900H, Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very fast chip, as of Q3 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with moderate quality settings. Long story short, this is the best iGPU money can buy, as of H2 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing insanely fast. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.

The 7840HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelApple A10 FusionAMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
SeriesApple Apple A-SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
CodenameAPL1021 Hurricane / ZephyrPhoenix-HS (Zen 4)
Clock2340 MHz3800 - 5100 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 28 / 16
Transistors3300 Million
Technology16 nm4 nm
FeaturesARMv8 Instruction SetDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUApple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR (900 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
ArchitectureARMx86
Announced
Series: Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
L1 Cache512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB
TDP35 Watt
Die Size178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8
Manufacturerwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 7840HS
45.6 pt (63%)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
45.6
max:
72.1 58%
0%
100%
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
min: 101     avg: 104.5     median: 105 (73%)     max: 107 Points
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
min: 880     avg: 918     median: 918 (17%)     max: 956 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 15515     avg: 16393     median: 16194.5 (15%)     max: 17214 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1718     avg: 1770     median: 1775 (75%)     max: 1812 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 668     avg: 687     median: 689 (77%)     max: 705 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6061     avg: 6395     median: 6346.5 (15%)     max: 6744 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2473     avg: 2592     median: 2573 (16%)     max: 2729 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 270     avg: 277.7     median: 278.5 (84%)     max: 286 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 29.7     avg: 30     median: 30 (39%)     max: 30.25 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.29     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (82%)     max: 3.33 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7574     avg: 7642     median: 7641.5 (46%)     max: 7709 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 45602     avg: 47933     median: 47933 (35%)     max: 50264 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 83726     avg: 85395     median: 85395 (59%)     max: 87064 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 14015     avg: 14096     median: 14096 (17%)     max: 14177 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 71.922     avg: 72.4     median: 72.4 (1%)     max: 72.819 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.626     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (1%)     max: 2.658 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6428     avg: 7064     median: 7063.5 (11%)     max: 7699 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 59538     avg: 69127     median: 70330 (40%)     max: 73035 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6049     avg: 6561     median: 6618 (79%)     max: 6754 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 144.1     avg: 146.7     median: 146.7 (51%)     max: 149.3 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 281.5     avg: 289.8     median: 289.8 (67%)     max: 298 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 11.7     avg: 19.8     median: 20.4 (36%)     max: 21.8 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.1 GB/s (36%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 14.7     avg: 14.8     median: 14.8 (39%)     max: 14.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 298     avg: 324.4     median: 318.5 (4%)     max: 463 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 185     avg: 198.6     median: 196 (1%)     max: 229 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4184     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4739 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 15312     avg: 15685     median: 15663 (33%)     max: 16073 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.112     avg: 7.9     median: 7.9 (2%)     max: 8.774 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.697     avg: 19.5     median: 19.5 (1%)     max: 21.271 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 655.388     avg: 690     median: 689.9 (3%)     max: 724.411 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 76708     avg: 82457     median: 83358.5 (73%)     max: 85884 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17320     avg: 22172     median: 22611 (61%)     max: 25584 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 77280     avg: 89035     median: 91414 (74%)     max: 93910 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 84349     avg: 89853     median: 91645 (74%)     max: 93208 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 9189     avg: 14249     median: 15479 (13%)     max: 15626 Points
min: 84416     avg: 91454     median: 92596 (78%)     max: 95508 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13602     avg: 19764     median: 20637 (52%)     max: 21602 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 24338     avg: 27673     median: 27816 (50%)     max: 29343 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8903     avg: 10942     median: 11131 (47%)     max: 12218 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 1252     avg: 1437     median: 1434.5 (17%)     max: 1627 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 1408     avg: 1525     median: 1518 (17%)     max: 1690 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2585     avg: 2661     median: 2670 (72%)     max: 2721 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 12111     avg: 12994     median: 13112 (52%)     max: 13498 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 766     avg: 773     median: 777 (33%)     max: 777 Points
min: 1837     avg: 1966     median: 1963.5 (83%)     max: 2017 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1361     avg: 1403     median: 1421 (3%)     max: 1426 Points
min: 8446     avg: 11674     median: 11874 (21%)     max: 12339 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 767     avg: 771     median: 771 (3%)     max: 775 Points
min: 1834     avg: 1891     median: 1895.5 (8%)     max: 1936 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1426     avg: 1429     median: 1429 (5%)     max: 1432 Points
min: 8572     avg: 11483     median: 11905 (38%)     max: 12278 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2672     avg: 3233     median: 3499 (35%)     max: 3527 Points
min: 7924     avg: 8100     median: 8148 (81%)     max: 8166 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4508     avg: 5461     median: 5922 (6%)     max: 5952 Points
min: 47599     avg: 48417     median: 48498 (53%)     max: 48906 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3476     avg: 3483     median: 3483 (47%)     max: 3490 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5585     avg: 5608     median: 5607.5 (14%)     max: 5630 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1026     avg: 1178     median: 1113 (1%)     max: 1531 ms
min: 485     avg: 509     median: 512 (1%)     max: 544 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 19783     avg: 25316     median: 26053 (23%)     max: 27967 Points
min: 91356     avg: 91588     median: 91577 (82%)     max: 91831 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 232     avg: 263.8     median: 263 (76%)     max: 319 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 79     avg: 95     median: 95 (20%)     max: 111 Points
min: 288     avg: 317.1     median: 321 (67%)     max: 339 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 142532     avg: 153966     median: 153966 (52%)     max: 165399 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 6141     avg: 9979     median: 10439 (32%)     max: 12895 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 32746     avg: 45782     median: 47936.5 (59%)     max: 54510 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 45772     avg: 54850     median: 52519 (16%)     max: 68591 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 50770     avg: 65083     median: 60084.5 (37%)     max: 89394 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 160578     avg: 175694     median: 165802 (29%)     max: 210596 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 49294     avg: 49329     median: 49329 (6%)     max: 49364 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
359 Points (14%)
min: 1566     avg: 1763     median: 1801 (69%)     max: 1891 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 64.7     avg: 93.2     median: 87.2 (15%)     max: 137.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 74.7     avg: 98.9     median: 88.8 (16%)     max: 135.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.73     avg: 13.9     median: 11.6 (8%)     max: 59.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 7.09     avg: 13.7     median: 12.6 (14%)     max: 35.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 20.1     avg: 28.1     median: 29.7 (22%)     max: 33.2 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Apple A10 Fusion → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS → 464% n=11

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 17. 10:50:11

#0 checking url part for id 8178 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14948 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.039s ... 0.04s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.04s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8178 +0.004s ... 0.044s

#7 got single benchmarks 8178 +0.013s ... 0.057s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14948 +0.023s ... 0.08s

#9 got single benchmarks 14948 +0.071s ... 0.152s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.152s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.265s ... 0.417s

#12 return log +0.055s ... 0.472s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)