Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-8700 vs Intel Core i5-9400F vs Intel Core i7-8086K

Intel Core i7-8700

► remove from comparison Intel i7-8700

The Intel Core i7-8700 is a high-end desktop processor with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture and was announced in September 2017. The processor clocks at between 3.2 and 4.6 GHz and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the slightly higher clocked Core i7-8700K, the i7-8700 offers a lower TDP and no unlocked multiplier (no easy overclocking).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 50% compared to the previous quad-core Kaby Lake models. Single-core performance has not improved much. As a high-end model, the i7-8700 is suitable for the most demanding applications and games.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz. The build is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 65 watts. Therefore, well-dimensioned cooling systems should easily manage to deal with the created heat. We expect increased efficiency due to the higher performance.

Intel Core i5-9400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-9400F

The Intel Core i5-9400F is a six-core desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture introduced in October 2018 along with the flagship Intel Core i9-9900K. The processor clocks at 2.9-4.1 GHz and can process up to 6 threads simultaneously. The Intel Core i5-9400F is manufactured in the improved 14-nm process (14nm++).

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i5-8400, the performance could only be increased slightly. Performance increases of up to 10 percent can be expected. Both processors (old and new) still do not offer hyperthreading. The performance increase therefore only adds up to small architecture improvements and a slightly higher basic and turbo clock rate. This CPU is suitable for everyday office use, which does not require large coolers due to the low waste heat. But games are also among the application areas, because in games the Intel Core i5-9400F clearly beats the Intel Core i3-9100F. Here the six cores are paying off in the meantime. 

Graphics unit

The Intel Core i5-9400F is a processor without integrated graphics unit. If you value an iGPU, you should take a closer look at the Intel Core i5-9400, as it offers the entry level Intel UHD Graphics 630.

Power consumption

Intel puts the Thermal Design Power (TDP) at 65 watts. This means there is no need for large cooling systems, which also allows installation in very compact housings.

Intel Core i7-8086K

► remove from comparison Intel i7-8086K

The Intel Core i7-8086K is a high-end desktop processor with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture and was announced in mid 2018. It is a limited edition for the 40 year X86 anniversary and at the time of announcement the fastest Coffee-Lake CPU. The processor clocks at between 3.7 and 5 GHz and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. The i7-8086K is comparatively easy to overclock thanks to the unlocked multiplier. Compared to the cheaper i7-8700K (-66 Dollars) only the single core Turbo clock speed is faster (5 GHz versus 4.7 GHz).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 50% compared to the Core i7-7700K when all cores are in use. Compared to the cheaper Core i7-8700K, the 8086K offers only a higher single core Turbo Boost and therefore in daily usage and gaming not faster. As a high-end model, the i7-8086K is suitable for the most demanding applications and games.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz. The build is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 95 watts. Therefore, well-dimensioned cooling systems should easily manage to deal with the created heat. We expect increased efficiency due to the higher performance.

ModelIntel Core i7-8700Intel Core i5-9400FIntel Core i7-8086K
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee Lake
CodenameCoffee Lake-SCoffee Lake-RCoffee Lake-S
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-S
Intel Core i7-8086K3.7 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8700K3.7 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8700 « 3.2 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8600K3.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-85003 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-84002.8 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8500T2.1 - 3.5 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900KS4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-97003 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F « 2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8086K « 3.7 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8700K3.7 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-87003.2 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8600K3.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-85003 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-84002.8 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8500T2.1 - 3.5 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Clock3200 - 4600 MHz2900 - 4100 MHz3700 - 5000 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB384 KB384 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB1.5 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache12 MB9 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 126 / 66 / 12
TDP65 Watt65 Watt95 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm, 10014 nm
SocketFCLGA1151LGA 1151-2FCLGA1151
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR3(L)-1600/DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX, Quick Sync, VirtualizationDual-Channel DDR3(L)-1600/DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
Die Size149 mm2
$182 U.S.$425 U.S.
max. Temp.100 °C

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-9400F
30.9 pt (43%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-8086K
35.2 pt (49%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
8686 Points (8%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1260 Points (54%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
416 Points (46%)
min: 488     avg: 495     median: 495 (55%)     max: 502 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2378 Points (6%)
min: 2998     avg: 3111     median: 3111 (8%)     max: 3224 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1167     avg: 1194     median: 1199 (8%)     max: 1215 Points
984 Points (6%)
min: 1340     avg: 1366     median: 1349 (9%)     max: 1408 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 190     avg: 193     median: 192 (58%)     max: 197 Points
173 Points (52%)
min: 202     avg: 205     median: 206 (62%)     max: 207 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 12.9     avg: 13     median: 13 (17%)     max: 13.04 Points
11.3 Points (15%)
min: 14.67     avg: 15     median: 15 (20%)     max: 15.41 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.16     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (54%)     max: 2.18 Points
2 Points (49%)
min: 2.2     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (57%)     max: 2.35 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6992     avg: 7140     median: 7171 (43%)     max: 7257 Points
6490 Points (39%)
min: 6541     avg: 7216     median: 7216 (44%)     max: 7891 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 34532     avg: 36153     median: 35384 (26%)     max: 38543 Points
31523 Points (23%)
min: 33064     avg: 35896     median: 35896 (26%)     max: 38728 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 i7-8700 +
43704 Points (30%)
40065 Points (28%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 i7-8700 +
9187 Points (11%)
8182 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 143.7     avg: 198.4     median: 198.4 (2%)     max: 253.1 s
198.7 s (2%)
min: 119.7     avg: 119.8     median: 119.8 (1%)     max: 119.9 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 5.469     avg: 6.8     median: 6.8 (1%)     max: 8.061 s
6.8 s (1%)
min: 4.041     avg: 4.1     median: 4.1 (1%)     max: 4.21 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 5912     avg: 6252     median: 6332 (10%)     max: 6511 Points
5794 Points (9%)
min: 6637     avg: 6752     median: 6751.5 (11%)     max: 6866 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
25639 MIPS (15%)
min: 35473     avg: 36060     median: 36059.5 (21%)     max: 36646 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4678 MIPS (56%)
min: 5325     avg: 5417     median: 5416.5 (65%)     max: 5508 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 70.9     avg: 75.7     median: 75.2 (26%)     max: 81.1 fps
64 fps (22%)
min: 85.1     avg: 85.5     median: 85.5 (30%)     max: 85.8 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 221.6     avg: 230.6     median: 234.6 (54%)     max: 235.5 fps
234 fps (54%)
min: 227.5     avg: 230.6     median: 230.6 (53%)     max: 233.6 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
9.5 fps (17%)
9.1 fps (16%)
min: 11.2     avg: 11.3     median: 11.3 (20%)     max: 11.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.74     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (0%)     max: 0.822 GB/s
0.5 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.792     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (0%)     max: 0.795 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (22%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
0.9 GB/s (15%)
1.4 GB/s (24%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 7.2     avg: 7.5     median: 7.7 (20%)     max: 7.7 GB/s
5.2 GB/s (14%)
min: 7.8     avg: 7.9     median: 7.9 (20%)     max: 7.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
388.2 Seconds (3%)
468.5 Seconds (3%)
min: 315     avg: 383.7     median: 316 (2%)     max: 520 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (14%)
min: 0.567     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.5974 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 i7-8700 +
min: 8738     avg: 10526     median: 11193 (24%)     max: 11646 Points
min: 10397     avg: 11218     median: 11218 (24%)     max: 12039 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.126     avg: 8.3     median: 8.4 (2%)     max: 8.4 s
9.3 s (2%)
min: 7.74     avg: 8.5     median: 8.5 (2%)     max: 9.261 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 18.11     avg: 18.4     median: 18.5 (1%)     max: 18.6 s
20.8 s (1%)
min: 17.06     avg: 18.8     median: 18.8 (1%)     max: 20.59 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 460.1     avg: 469.3     median: 472.2 (2%)     max: 475.7 s
499.8 s (2%)
min: 429.9     avg: 467     median: 467 (2%)     max: 504 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 i7-8700 +
45569 Points (40%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 13159     avg: 13302     median: 13310 (36%)     max: 13436 Points
11185 Points (30%)
min: 11434     avg: 12861     median: 11554 (31%)     max: 15596 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 i7-8700 +
64904 Points (53%)
70546 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 i7-8700 +
64897 Points (53%)
70482 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 i7-8700 +
63875 Points (54%)
72413 Points (61%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 i7-8700 +
min: 11130     avg: 11692     median: 11885 (30%)     max: 12060 Points
8275 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 i7-8700 +
min: 16818     avg: 17487     median: 17458 (31%)     max: 18184 Points
12616 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6755     avg: 6874     median: 6873.5 (29%)     max: 6992 Points
5777 Points (24%)
6745 Points (28%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1170 Points (49%)
1139 Points (48%)
1240 Points (52%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
6250 Points (11%)
5715 Points (10%)
5485 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1132 Points (5%)
min: 1234     avg: 1276     median: 1276 (6%)     max: 1318 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5698 Points (18%)
min: 5618     avg: 5644     median: 5644 (18%)     max: 5670 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5565 Points (56%)
5347 Points (53%)
min: 5768     avg: 5821     median: 5792 (58%)     max: 5904 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
23220 Points (25%)
21830 Points (24%)
min: 22817     avg: 24618     median: 24527 (27%)     max: 26509 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 i7-8700 +
min: 21806     avg: 23062     median: 23061.5 (41%)     max: 24317 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 i7-8700 +
min: 4484     avg: 4486     median: 4486 (88%)     max: 4488 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 i7-8700 +
min: 22753     avg: 23926     median: 23925.5 (37%)     max: 25098 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 i7-8700 +
min: 4703     avg: 4709     median: 4708.5 (71%)     max: 4714 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
986 ms (1%)
867 ms (1%)
min: 861     avg: 862     median: 862 (1%)     max: 863 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 i7-8700 +
64.5 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
211 Points (44%)
min: 216     avg: 217     median: 217 (45%)     max: 218 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i7-8700 +
112.3 Watt (19%)
131.6 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i7-8700 +
112.8 Watt (21%)
122.5 Watt (22%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 i7-8700 +
10.6 Points per Watt (8%)
8 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8700 → 100% n=26

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-9400F → 90% n=26

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8086K → 103% n=26

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 13. 23:35:23

#0 checking url part for id 9932 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12197 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10106 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 05:33:43 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.04s ... 0.041s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.041s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9932 +0.003s ... 0.044s

#8 got single benchmarks 9932 +0.016s ... 0.059s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12197 +0.017s ... 0.076s

#10 got single benchmarks 12197 +0.008s ... 0.084s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 10106 +0.016s ... 0.1s

#12 got single benchmarks 10106 +0.019s ... 0.119s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.119s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.431s ... 0.551s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.551s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)