Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-7Y75 vs Intel Celeron J4005

Intel Core i7-7Y75

► remove from comparison Intel i7-7Y75

The Intel Core i7-7Y75 is a very efficient dual-core SoC for tablets and passively cooled notebooks based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in the end of August 2016. The CPU consists of two processor cores clocked at 1.3-3.6 GHz (2-core Turbo not specified yet). Thanks to Hyper Threading, the processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously. The chips also includes the Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L/LPDDR3) as well as VP9 and H.265 video de- and encoder. It is still produced in a 14 nm process with FinFET transistors. 

Architecture

Intel basically used the familiar micro architecture from the Skylake generation, so the per-MHz performance is identical. Only the Speed-Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of the voltages and clocks was improved, and the matured 14 nm process now also enables much higher frequencies and better efficiency than before. 

Performance

Despite the changed designation, the Core i7-7Y75 is the successor to the Core m7-6Y75 (Skylake Y-series), so the chip does not reach the performance level of other Core i processors due to the lower TDP. Thanks to its high Turbo clock, the 7Y75 can sometimes keep up with the 15 Watt models for short peak load and single-thread scenarios, but the clocks will drop significantly under sustained workloads. The CPU is still suitable for many more demanding applications as well as multitasking. 

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU has 24 Execution Units (EUs) like the old HD Graphics 515 and runs with clocks between 300 and 1050 MHz in combination with this processor. The performance heavily depends on the TDP limit as well as the memory configuration; with fast LPDDR3-1866 RAM in dual-channel mode, the GPU should sometimes be able to compete with the HD Graphics 520, but can also be much slower in other scenarios. Modern games from 2016 will, if at all, only run smoothly in the lowest settings.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake now also supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14 nm process with FinFET transistors, so the power efficiency was once again improved significantly. The typical TDP for the Y-series is specified at 4.5 Watts, and can be adjusted in both directions depending on the usage scenario.

Intel Celeron J4005

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron J4005 is a dual-core desktop SoC primarily for mini PCs and mini ITX mainboards. It runs at 2 - 2.7 GHz (Single Core Burst) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, a smaller package, a new generation of monitor outputs (Gen 10) and a partly integrated WiFi chip. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is permanently soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture was slightly reworked and is now called Goldmont Plus. It features an increased level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not anywhere near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average J4005 in our database is in the same league as the Celeron N3450 and the Celeron 3865U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is an abysmally poor result, as of early 2023.

Power consumption

This Celeron series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 10 W. That's not much at all and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops and mini-PCs.

The J4005 is built with one of Intel's old 14 nm processes for poor, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i7-7Y75Intel Celeron J4005
SeriesIntel Kaby LakeIntel Gemini Lake
CodenameKaby LakeGemini Lake
Series: Gemini Lake Gemini Lake
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y75 « 1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron J4105 compare1.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5000 compare1.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4005 « 2 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J4115 compare1.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4100 compare1.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4000 compare1.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1300 - 3600 MHz2000 - 2700 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB112 KB
L2 Cache512 KB4 MB
L3 Cache4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 42 / 2
TDP4.5 Watt10 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketBGABGA1090
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-1866 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, vPro, TXTDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 615 (300 - 1050 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$393 U.S.$107 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-7Y75
23.8 pt (33%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
1390 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
721 Points (31%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
min: 202     avg: 234.5     median: 234.5 (26%)     max: 267 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
min: 482     avg: 493.5     median: 493.5 (1%)     max: 505 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 236     avg: 251.3     median: 258 (2%)     max: 260 Points
144 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 121     avg: 125.7     median: 126 (38%)     max: 130 Points
77 Points (23%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.87     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (4%)     max: 2.98 Points
1.4 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.44     avg: 1.5     median: 1.5 (37%)     max: 1.54 Points
0.9 Points (21%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5496 Points (33%)
2085 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
9392 Points (7%)
3500 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
11682 Points (8%)
4741 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
6449 Points (8%)
3365 Points (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
619 s (7%)
1042 s (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
17.4 s (3%)
33.1 s (7%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
798 Points (1%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
9657 MIPS (6%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
4617 MIPS (55%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
16 fps (6%)
10 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
91.2 fps (21%)
49.9 fps (12%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
2 fps (3%)
0.9 fps (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (6%)
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2 GB/s (5%)
1 GB/s (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
1921 Seconds (14%)
4124 Seconds (29%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
0.9 sec (20%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
3309 Points (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
10.7 s (2%)
16.3 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
24.5 s (1%)
35.9 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
585 s (3%)
1245 s (6%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3347     avg: 3582     median: 3688 (10%)     max: 3710 Points
1877 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 34113     avg: 34681     median: 34680.5 (28%)     max: 35248 Points
18895 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 31394     avg: 32948     median: 32948 (27%)     max: 34502 Points
18968 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 35750     avg: 40104     median: 37884 (32%)     max: 46679 Points
19351 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2706     avg: 2924     median: 2994 (8%)     max: 3072 Points
1577 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3838     avg: 4174     median: 4289 (8%)     max: 4395 Points
2241 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
1387 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
864 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
1393 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1997 Points (20%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3491 Points (4%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
min: 1142     avg: 1305     median: 1305 (2%)     max: 1468 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
89.4 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
min: 22300     avg: 24506     median: 24506 (22%)     max: 26712 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
min: 110     avg: 127     median: 127 (26%)     max: 144 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
654 Points (25%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
18.5 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
17.9 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 i7-7Y75 +
13.2 Points per Watt (10%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-7Y75 → 100% n=26

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J4005 → 60% n=26

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 29. 18:17:13

#0 checking url part for id 8161 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10044 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 05:39:51 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.037s ... 0.039s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.039s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8161 +0.018s ... 0.056s

#7 got single benchmarks 8161 +0.018s ... 0.074s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10044 +0.003s ... 0.077s

#9 got single benchmarks 10044 +0.007s ... 0.084s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.084s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.235s ... 0.319s

#12 return log +0.022s ... 0.342s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)