Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-1260P vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100

Intel Core i7-1260P

► remove from comparison Intel i7-1260P

The Intel Core i7-1260P is an upper mid-range 28 W Alder Lake CPU designed for use in ultra-light laptops. It was announced in early 2022 and it features 4 performance cores as opposed to the 6 cores of the top-of-the-line i7-1280P (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) mated to 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores are Hyper-Threading-enabled for a total of 16 threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock speeds range from 2.1 GHz to 4.7 GHz for the performance cluster and 1.5 GHz to 3.4 GHz for the efficient cluster. The i7's shortcomings as compared to Intel Core i7-1270P include the marginally lower clock speeds and limited vPro feature set ("Essentials" tier only, not allowing for remote device management).

Architecture

The i7 is a continuation of Intel's efforts to use the ARM-developed big.LITTLE technology for its own benefit. A single "littile" Alder Lake core is supposed to be just as fast as a Skylake core (as found in the venerable Core i7-6700HQ among other options) which is six years old at this point. All of an Core i7-1260P's CPU cores enjoy access to 18 MB of L3 cache. The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to LPDDR5-5200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR4x-4267 or DDR4-3200; Intel recommends using no more than 64 GB, for reference. Just like the other 12th Gen Intel Core processors, Intel Core i7-1260P comes with Thread Director which is a new functionality designed to help Windows 11 decide which cores to use for what workload for best performance and efficiency possible. Hardware acceleration of AI algorithms is supported via GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). PCI-Express 5.0 support has not found its way into Alder Lake P processors, so users will have to be content with PCI-Express 4.0 for the time being. Four PCI-Express 4 lanes allow for a read/write rate of up to 7.9 GB/s, provided a suitably fast NVMe SSD is used.

Please note this is not a user-replaceable CPU. It gets soldered permanently on to the motherboard (BGA1744 socket interface).

Performance

Multi-thread performance is most comparable to the Ryzen 7 5800U, Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U and also the Core i5-11260H. This makes the 1260P a great little CPU - one capable of punching above its weight.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 35 W, the Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN is among the fastest laptops featuring the 1260P that we know of. It can be about 2 times as fast in CPU-bound workloads as the slowest system built around the same chip in our database (as of August 2023).

Graphics

The built-in graphics adapter in the form of the 96 EU Iris Xe running at up to 1.4 GHz has seemingly seen no change from what was built into certain Tiger Lake-UP3 processors, like a i7-1165G7. Which is hardly a downside as this iGPU is loaded with modern features such as AV1 video decoding capability and SUHD 4320p monitor support. Up to 4 monitors can be used simultaneously with this graphics adapter. Its gaming performance is bound to be tied to how high the Power Limits and how good the cooling solution of a laptop are; expect something close to NVIDIA's MX350 or in other words, acceptable framerates in most games when playing at 1080p / Medium settings. Fast RAM is a prerequisite for decent performance as the Iris Xe has to make do with no dedicated video memory. Last but not the least, we discovered that the GPU utilization when playing YouTube UHD 2160p60 videos is higher than it was with Tiger Lake chips.

Power consumption

The i7's base power consumption (also known as the default TDP or Power Limit 1) is 28 W, with 64 W being its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption (also known as the PL2). Its "Minimum Assured" power consumption sits at 20 W. All in all, an active cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this one here.

The i7-1260P is manufactured on Intel's fourth-gen 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for decent, as of late 2022, energy efficiency. Despite that, many 7 nm U-class AMD Ryzen 5000 parts are less power-hungry while being as fast (or even faster, depending on the workload) as the i7.

Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD X1-26-100

The 8-core Snapdragon X (X1-26-100) is an affordable ARM architecture processor for use in Windows laptops. Unveiled in Jan 2025, this Qualcomm SoC features 8 Oryon CPU cores running at up to 2.98 GHz, along with the 1.7 TFLOPS X1-45 iGPU and the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU. The super-fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller, USB 4.0 support, TB 4 support and PCIe 4 support are all onboard as well.

Architecture and Features

The Oryon cores (2 clusters of essentially identical cores; 8 threads) are mostly based on Nuvia IP and reportedly make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 (with no eGPU support).

The X1-26-100 is based on the smaller die codenamed Purwa, unlike most X Elite and some X Plus processors. It is believed to have at least 8 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5x-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU present for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

The CPU should be about 10% slower than its faster brother named X1P-42 due to the latter's higher CPU clock speeds. Generally speaking, a performance level similar to recent U-class Intel Core 5 chips is to be expected.

Graphics

The X1-45 used here delivers up to 1.7 TFLOPS of performance. Unlike the much faster 3.8 TFLOPS and 4.6 TFLOPS X1-85 iGPUs, this little guy here has much fewer unified shaders and runs at lower clock speeds, too. Games put it a little behind the GeForce MX350; this kind of performance is sufficient for older games and sub-900p resolutions only.

AVC, HEVC and AV1 video codecs can be both hardware-decoded and hardware-encoded whereas with VP9, only decoding is possible. The highest monitor resolution supported is UHD 2160p.

Power consumption

Expect to see anything between 15 W and 30 W under long-term workloads depending on the system and the power profile chosen. The number includes RAM power consumption.

The SoC is built with TSMC's N4P process for decent power efficiency, as of H1 2025.

ModelIntel Core i7-1260PQualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100
CodenameAlder Lake-POryon
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-PQualcomm Snapdragon X
Series: Snapdragon X Oryon
Intel Core i7-1280P compare1.3 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1270P compare1.6 - 4.8 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1260P « 1.5 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1250P compare1.2 - 4.4 GHz12 / 16 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1240P compare1.2 - 4.4 GHz12 / 16 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1220P compare1.1 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE compare3.8 - 4.3 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 compare - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 compare - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 compare - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100 compare - 4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 compare - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 « - 2.98 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Clock1500 - 4700 MHz <=2980 MHz
L1 Cache1.1 MB2.3 MB
L2 Cache10 MB12 MB
L3 Cache18 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 168 / 8
8 x 3.0 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
TDP28 Watt
Technology10 nm4 nm
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketBGA1744
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thread Director, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1400 MHz)Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
Architecturex86ARM
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-1260P
36 pt (60%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - SD X1-26-100
28.1 pt (47%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
94 Points (53%)
96 Points (54%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
435 Points (8%)
min: 646     avg: 672     median: 672 (13%)     max: 698 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 6860     avg: 9551     median: 9711 (9%)     max: 12150 Points
min: 6897     avg: 7172     median: 7171.5 (7%)     max: 7446 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1433     avg: 1695     median: 1737.5 (73%)     max: 1812 Points
min: 975     avg: 977     median: 976.5 (41%)     max: 978 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 541     avg: 653     median: 670 (73%)     max: 698 Points
min: 359     avg: 362.5     median: 362.5 (40%)     max: 366 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2634     avg: 3694     median: 3761.5 (9%)     max: 4748 Points
min: 2644     avg: 2743     median: 2743 (7%)     max: 2842 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1081     avg: 1625     median: 1626 (10%)     max: 2034 Points
min: 1338     avg: 1371     median: 1371 (9%)     max: 1404 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 174.8     avg: 236.8     median: 243 (68%)     max: 260 Points
min: 181.5     avg: 183.8     median: 183.8 (51%)     max: 186 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 20.06     avg: 21.9     median: 22 (28%)     max: 23.6 Points
14.8 Points (19%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.93     avg: 3.1     median: 3.1 (74%)     max: 3.15 Points
1.9 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8490     avg: 8737     median: 8793 (53%)     max: 8927 Points
2299 Points (14%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 33137     avg: 41867     median: 44516 (32%)     max: 47948 Points
14395 Points (10%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 53950     avg: 63721     median: 63721 (41%)     max: 73492 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 13568     avg: 14036     median: 14036 (17%)     max: 14504 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 235.874     avg: 262.5     median: 237.1 (3%)     max: 314.4 s
308.5 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.641     avg: 6     median: 4.5 (1%)     max: 9.8 s
9.5 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6559     avg: 10179     median: 7200 (11%)     max: 16777 Points
9297 Points (15%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 29214     avg: 39648     median: 41260.5 (24%)     max: 47064 MIPS
min: 29312     avg: 29610     median: 29609.5 (17%)     max: 29907 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4668     avg: 5335     median: 5373 (63%)     max: 5791 MIPS
min: 4088     avg: 4095     median: 4095 (48%)     max: 4102 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 77.75     avg: 94.1     median: 94.1 (31%)     max: 110.5 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 224     avg: 245     median: 245 (57%)     max: 266 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 7.57     avg: 11     median: 11.5 (20%)     max: 13.6 fps
min: 4.44     avg: 5     median: 5 (9%)     max: 5.52 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (32%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.8     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (33%)     max: 1.9 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 10.4     avg: 11.2     median: 11.6 (30%)     max: 11.6 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 494     avg: 638     median: 623 (8%)     max: 861 Seconds
min: 791     avg: 821     median: 821 (10%)     max: 851 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 264     avg: 344.2     median: 328 (2%)     max: 463 Seconds
min: 440     avg: 458.5     median: 458.5 (3%)     max: 477 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4559     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.569 sec
min: 0.861     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (19%)     max: 0.888 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 8954     avg: 12154     median: 12963.5 (28%)     max: 14103 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.718     avg: 7.8     median: 7.8 (2%)     max: 7.842 s
20 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.183     avg: 17.4     median: 17.4 (1%)     max: 17.587 s
43.1 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 407.751     avg: 420.7     median: 424.8 (2%)     max: 429.697 s
995 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 44438     avg: 56424     median: 62250 (48%)     max: 66354 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 6250     avg: 14081     median: 14251 (35%)     max: 18968 Points
min: 11816     avg: 11947     median: 11946.5 (29%)     max: 12077 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 58070     avg: 71340     median: 72467.5 (59%)     max: 81448 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 61536     avg: 73824     median: 76374 (62%)     max: 81012 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 67100     avg: 76553     median: 78260 (65%)     max: 82492 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 7812     avg: 12377     median: 12296 (31%)     max: 16042 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 12122     avg: 18172     median: 18321 (33%)     max: 22877 Points
min: 12446     avg: 12499     median: 12498.5 (22%)     max: 12551 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 3678     avg: 6925     median: 6852 (29%)     max: 10150 Points
5659 Points (24%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
2424 Points (61%)
min: 2070     avg: 2106     median: 2121 (53%)     max: 2126 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
9532 Points (37%)
min: 10492     avg: 10553     median: 10550 (41%)     max: 10618 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2268     avg: 2271     median: 2271 (72%)     max: 2274 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 9157     avg: 9648     median: 9648 (40%)     max: 10139 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1528     avg: 1704     median: 1719 (67%)     max: 1786 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6499     avg: 8967     median: 9298 (17%)     max: 10570 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1557     avg: 1655     median: 1668 (7%)     max: 1694 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6440     avg: 9445     median: 9907 (31%)     max: 10411 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 6698     avg: 7261     median: 7531 (75%)     max: 7554 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 36974     avg: 38338     median: 38187 (38%)     max: 39852 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 531     avg: 555     median: 543 (1%)     max: 604 ms
min: 518.4     avg: 520     median: 519.5 (1%)     max: 520.6 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 92.2     avg: 102.6     median: 102.6 (1%)     max: 112.9 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 70338     avg: 81728     median: 83695 (63%)     max: 86881 Points
min: 65692     avg: 68056     median: 68055.5 (51%)     max: 70419 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 224     avg: 244.7     median: 247 (68%)     max: 258 Points
min: 248     avg: 248.5     median: 248.5 (68%)     max: 249 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 250     avg: 280.9     median: 283 (51%)     max: 298 Points
min: 353     avg: 355     median: 355 (64%)     max: 357 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1482     avg: 1630     median: 1662 (62%)     max: 1811 Points
min: 1093     avg: 1104     median: 1103.5 (41%)     max: 1114 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 30     avg: 50.2     median: 52.5 (9%)     max: 68.4 Watt
59 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 10.7     avg: 58.5     median: 60.5 (11%)     max: 89.1 Watt
min: 41.4     avg: 44.1     median: 44.1 (8%)     max: 46.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.52     avg: 7.4     median: 7 (5%)     max: 12.2 Watt
min: 3.25     avg: 4.1     median: 4.1 (3%)     max: 4.99 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.38     avg: 6.8     median: 7 (8%)     max: 8.33 Watt
min: 4.16     avg: 4.4     median: 4.4 (5%)     max: 4.72 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 21.2     avg: 28.4     median: 26.4 (20%)     max: 50.3 Points per Watt
min: 28.6     avg: 31.3     median: 31.3 (23%)     max: 33.9 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1260P → 100% n=34

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 → 75% n=34

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 29. 19:02:49

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14064 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18623 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751216569s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 28 Jun 2025 05:20:10 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14064 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#8 got single benchmarks 14064 +0.032s ... 0.044s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18623 +0.004s ... 0.048s

#10 got single benchmarks 18623 +0.005s ... 0.053s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.053s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.053s ... 0.106s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.109s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)