Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-13420H vs AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

Intel Core i5-13420H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13420H

The Intel Core i5-13420H is a mid-range mobile CPU for laptops based on the Raptor Lake-H series (Alder Lake architecture). It was announced in early 2023 and offers 4 of the 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 16 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.1 to 4.6 GHz (single core boost, all core up to 4.5 GHz) on the performance cluster and 1.5 to 3.4 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 12 MB L3 cache. 

Performance

Thanks to the higher clock speeds of the improved Intel 7 process, the Core i5-13420H can surpass the old Core i5-12450H (e.g., + 200 MHz boost).

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-5200 (up from DDR5-4800 of the i5-12500H). The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU now supports PCIe 5.0 x8 for a GPU and two PCIe 4.0 x4 for SSDs.

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 48 of the 96 EUs (Execution Units).

The CPU is rated at 45 W base power (115 W PL2) but most laptops will use a PL1 of around 60 Watt. The SoC is manufactured in a further improved 10nm process at Intel, which is known as Intel 7.

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 8945HS

The Ryzen 9 8945HS is a rebadged Ryzen 9 7940HS with higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. To be more specific, this is a powerful Hawk Point family laptop chip that has eight Zen 4 cores running at 4.0 GHz to 5.2 GHz. This APU was brought to life in H2 2023 and all of its cores are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads.

The Radeon 780M serves as the integrated graphics adapter.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these chips are promised to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop even more powerful.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8945HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast RAM (up to LPDDR5x-7500 or DDR5-5600; no ECC support). The processor is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt; PCIe support is limited to the 4.0 spec for a throughput of 1.97 GB/s per lane. 20 lanes are available.

OS support is limited to 64-bit editions of Windows 11 and Windows 10 and of course to Linux. Note that the chip isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable as it gets soldered down for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The 8945HS is an R9 7940HS in disguise, so it's realistic to expect the chip to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-12900HK and also the Ryzen 7 7840HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) running at up to 2,800 MHz. This is a very fast iGPU, as of late 2023. It will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p, and it is also capable of HW-encoding and HW-decoding the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1. More importantly, it is fast enough for proper 1080p gaming as long as one is fine with low to medium detail settings.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of the system is, how fast the RAM of the system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving laptop makers a choice between longer battery life and higher performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a system powered by this chip.

The 8945HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i5-13420HAMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
CodenameRaptor Lake-HHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-HAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
Intel Core i9-13900HK compare1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13905H compare1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900H compare1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13800H compare1.8 - 5.2 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13705H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13620H compare1.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600H compare2.1 - 4.8 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13505H compare1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500H compare1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13420H « 1.5 - 4.6 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 H 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS compare3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock1500 - 4600 MHz4000 - 5200 MHz
L1 Cache704 KB512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache12 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 12
4 x 4.6 GHz Intel Golden Cove P-Core
4 x 3.4 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
8 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology10 nm4 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1700FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesThread DirectorDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs ( - 1400 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.comwww.amd.com
Die Size178 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13420H
35.7 pt (59%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 8945HS
40.7 pt (68%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 100     avg: 101.4     median: 101.4 (57%)     max: 102.7 Points
min: 98     avg: 105.5     median: 107 (60%)     max: 109.2 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 450     avg: 489     median: 489 (9%)     max: 528 Points
min: 852     avg: 933     median: 952 (18%)     max: 988 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 8691     avg: 10138     median: 9851 (9%)     max: 11871 Points
min: 15516     avg: 16743     median: 16937 (16%)     max: 17376 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1673     avg: 1692     median: 1697 (71%)     max: 1705 Points
min: 1719     avg: 1800     median: 1806.5 (76%)     max: 1825 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 641     avg: 649     median: 652 (71%)     max: 655 Points
min: 676     avg: 700     median: 700.5 (76%)     max: 711 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3329     avg: 4021     median: 4211 (10%)     max: 4524 Points
min: 6153     avg: 6559     median: 6621.5 (16%)     max: 6785 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1492     avg: 1659     median: 1671 (11%)     max: 1815 Points
min: 2521     avg: 2654     median: 2649.5 (17%)     max: 2775 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 237     avg: 241     median: 242 (67%)     max: 244 Points
min: 265     avg: 281.4     median: 282.5 (78%)     max: 288 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 20.51     avg: 21     median: 21 (27%)     max: 21.5 Points
min: 29.14     avg: 30.8     median: 31.1 (40%)     max: 31.77 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.93     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (70%)     max: 2.94 Points
min: 3.28     avg: 3.4     median: 3.4 (81%)     max: 3.45 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 9237     avg: 9270     median: 9269.5 (56%)     max: 9302 Points
min: 7594     avg: 7767     median: 7785.5 (47%)     max: 7901 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 45040     avg: 46270     median: 46270 (34%)     max: 47500 Points
min: 46572     avg: 48831     median: 49299 (36%)     max: 50153 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
70487 Points (45%)
min: 84253     avg: 87958     median: 89478 (57%)     max: 90144 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
13682 Points (17%)
min: 14451     avg: 14535     median: 14561 (18%)     max: 14593 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
501 s (6%)
min: 67.933     avg: 108.7     median: 85.2 (1%)     max: 196.4 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
5.4 s (1%)
min: 2.563     avg: 3.5     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 6.2 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 5163     avg: 5541     median: 5541 (9%)     max: 5919 Points
min: 7332     avg: 10823     median: 7793.5 (12%)     max: 20374 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 35680     avg: 39095     median: 36636 (21%)     max: 44970 MIPS
min: 66557     avg: 71014     median: 71534 (41%)     max: 73742 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5203     avg: 5285     median: 5320 (63%)     max: 5331 MIPS
min: 5994     avg: 6460     median: 6576.5 (78%)     max: 6691 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 98.75     avg: 105.5     median: 105.5 (35%)     max: 112.2 fps
min: 141.2     avg: 149     median: 150.7 (50%)     max: 155 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 277     avg: 298.5     median: 298.5 (69%)     max: 320 fps
min: 297     avg: 298.3     median: 298 (69%)     max: 300 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 8.75     avg: 11.3     median: 11.9 (21%)     max: 13.3 fps
min: 19.8     avg: 21.1     median: 21.1 (37%)     max: 22.2 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.89     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (27%)     max: 0.919 GB/s
min: 1.3     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (38%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.7 GB/s (29%)
min: 2     avg: 2.1     median: 2.1 (35%)     max: 2.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 8     avg: 8.8     median: 8.8 (23%)     max: 9.6 GB/s
min: 14.5     avg: 15     median: 15 (39%)     max: 15.4 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 502     avg: 611     median: 610.5 (8%)     max: 719 Seconds
min: 293     avg: 310.8     median: 312 (4%)     max: 326 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 289     avg: 334     median: 310 (2%)     max: 403 Seconds
min: 186     avg: 194     median: 192.5 (1%)     max: 206 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.501     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.522 sec
min: 0.4294     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4576 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 12802     avg: 13399     median: 13399 (29%)     max: 13996 Points
min: 15007     avg: 15716     median: 15691 (33%)     max: 16449 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.455     avg: 7.6     median: 7.6 (2%)     max: 7.8 s
min: 6.962     avg: 7.1     median: 7 (2%)     max: 7.2 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 16.5     avg: 16.7     median: 16.7 (1%)     max: 16.823 s
min: 17.31     avg: 17.5     median: 17.5 (1%)     max: 17.8 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
422.7 s (2%)
min: 576.7     avg: 615     median: 624.7 (3%)     max: 644.49 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 54081     avg: 55301     median: 55301 (42%)     max: 56521 Points
min: 69373     avg: 82115     median: 84110 (65%)     max: 88101 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 12080     avg: 14534     median: 14220.5 (35%)     max: 17616 Points
min: 17239     avg: 21793     median: 22257.5 (55%)     max: 25276 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 81932     avg: 87240     median: 84220 (68%)     max: 95567 Points
min: 82144     avg: 86374     median: 84952.5 (69%)     max: 92815 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 81026     avg: 82286     median: 82285.5 (67%)     max: 83545 Points
min: 83482     avg: 86934     median: 85496 (69%)     max: 93057 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 87499     avg: 88702     median: 88701.5 (71%)     max: 89904 Points
min: 86257     avg: 88776     median: 87230 (70%)     max: 94974 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 12495     avg: 14189     median: 14110 (36%)     max: 15963 Points
min: 13624     avg: 19839     median: 20539 (52%)     max: 21573 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 18374     avg: 20857     median: 20588.5 (37%)     max: 23877 Points
min: 23442     avg: 27506     median: 27488.5 (49%)     max: 30090 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5527     avg: 6833     median: 6528 (28%)     max: 8748 Points
min: 8883     avg: 10993     median: 11086 (47%)     max: 11856 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2254     avg: 2312     median: 2318 (58%)     max: 2365 Points
min: 2399     avg: 2649     median: 2667.5 (67%)     max: 2745 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 7216     avg: 8573     median: 9241 (36%)     max: 9262 Points
min: 12015     avg: 13232     median: 13255.5 (51%)     max: 13715 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
min: 2575     avg: 2900     median: 3105 (99%)     max: 3105 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
min: 12920     avg: 17803     median: 21003 (86%)     max: 21003 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1606     avg: 1646     median: 1664 (65%)     max: 1669 Points
min: 1835     avg: 1950     median: 1979.5 (77%)     max: 2039 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6895     avg: 7719     median: 7925 (14%)     max: 8336 Points
min: 10985     avg: 11970     median: 12008.5 (22%)     max: 12520 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1581 Points (7%)
min: 1841     avg: 1903     median: 1907 (8%)     max: 1930 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
6828 Points (22%)
min: 11804     avg: 12252     median: 12315 (39%)     max: 12573 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6910 Points (69%)
min: 7933     avg: 8130     median: 8140 (81%)     max: 8278 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
28457 Points (28%)
min: 46366     avg: 48538     median: 49269 (49%)     max: 49654 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
7053 Points (78%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
31808 Points (42%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 546     avg: 560     median: 557 (1%)     max: 576 ms
min: 488     avg: 524     median: 507.5 (1%)     max: 586 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
94227 Points (69%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 237     avg: 242     median: 238 (65%)     max: 251 Points
min: 226     avg: 259.7     median: 267 (73%)     max: 275 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 254     avg: 261.3     median: 263 (47%)     max: 267 Points
min: 268     avg: 313.3     median: 316 (57%)     max: 344 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1470     avg: 1504     median: 1504 (56%)     max: 1538 Points
min: 1767     avg: 1825     median: 1839.5 (69%)     max: 1866 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 43.7     avg: 55.1     median: 47.1 (8%)     max: 74.4 Watt
min: 72.5     avg: 89.6     median: 86.8 (15%)     max: 126.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 61.2     avg: 81.3     median: 81.3 (15%)     max: 101.4 Watt
min: 70.3     avg: 89.4     median: 84.1 (15%)     max: 130.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 6.12     avg: 10.2     median: 11.6 (8%)     max: 12.8 Watt
min: 4.93     avg: 12.3     median: 10.6 (7%)     max: 21.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 6.57     avg: 7.4     median: 7.4 (8%)     max: 8.2 Watt
min: 8.62     avg: 16.2     median: 17.6 (19%)     max: 22.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 16.5     avg: 20.5     median: 20.5 (15%)     max: 24.4 Points per Watt
min: 28.4     avg: 32.8     median: 33.4 (25%)     max: 35.9 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13420H → 100% n=54

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS → 141% n=54

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 20. 15:54:20

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14729 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 16397 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755698060s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Aug 2025 05:19:27 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14729 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 14729 +0.013s ... 0.022s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 16397 +0.005s ... 0.026s

#10 got single benchmarks 16397 +0.018s ... 0.045s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.045s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.062s ... 0.107s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.109s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)