Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-12600K vs Intel Core i5-10600K

Intel Core i5-12600K

► remove from comparison Intel i5-12600K

The Intel Core i5-12600K is a mid-range CPU for desktops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was first announced in November 2021 and offers 6 performance cores and 4 efficiency cores. The performance cores (P-cores) support HyperThreading, leading to 16 Threads that can be processed at once. The performance cores can clock with up to 4.9 GHz, the efficiency cores can clock with up to 3.6 GHz. All cores can use 20 MB Smart Cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 128 GB DDR5 with 4800 MT/s (dual channel).

Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficiency cores for the best performance.

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and called Intel UHD Graphics 770. It clocks between 300 and 1.45 GHz.

For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost. Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC and AV1 decode in hardware.

Performance

The average 12600K in our database is way ahead of the Ryzen 9 3900 and the Core i9-10900K, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very fast CPU that should have no trouble running triple-A games for at least a couple of years.

Power consumption

This Core i5 series chip has a Base power consumption of 125 W, with its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption sitting at 150 W.

The i5-12600K is built with Intel's fourth generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for lower-than-average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i5-10600K

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10600K

The Intel Core i5-10600K is a mid-range processor for desktops with six cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 4.1 and 4.8 GHz and can execute up to twelfe threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. 

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Thanks to the free multiplicator, the CPU can also be easily overclocked (but may not have much headroom).

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

Thanks to the high clock speeds (and possible TDP settings with most mainboards), the Core i5-10600K offers a similar speed than the old Core i7-9700K quad core. Compared to current AMD offerings, the multi-core performance is on par with a Ryzen 5 3600, single core and gaming performance with a faster Ryzen 9 3900.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9900K. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 125 Watts (PL1) but under full load up to 250 Watt are consumed (PL2). In default mode these 250 Watt and therefore high clock speeds can be maintained for up to 56 seconds, however, all boards offer the option to alter these settings.

ModelIntel Core i5-12600KIntel Core i5-10600K
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-SIntel Comet Lake
CodenameAlder LakeComet Lake
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake
Intel Core i9-12900K compare3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900 compare2.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K compare2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700 compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K « 2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10900K compare3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700K compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700 compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10600K « 4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400F compare2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100F compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Clock2800 - 4900 MHz4100 - 4800 MHz
L2 Cache9.5 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache20 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 166 / 12
TDP125 Watt125 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA1700LGA1200
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enterp., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-2666 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGX
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1450 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$289 U.S.$262 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache384 KB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-12600K
44.9 pt (62%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10600K
35.1 pt (49%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
17491 Points (16%)
10475 Points (10%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1907 Points (81%)
1385 Points (59%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
734 Points (82%)
464 Points (52%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6692 Points (16%)
3443 Points (8%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2555 Points (16%)
1452 Points (9%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
275 Points (83%)
205 Points (62%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
30 Points (39%)
15.8 Points (21%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (82%)
2.2 Points (54%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9381 Points (57%)
7343 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
55462 Points (40%)
40074 Points (29%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
89478 Points (62%)
51816 Points (36%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15180 Points (18%)
9594 Points (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
202.7 s (2%)
113.2 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.7 s (1%)
4.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6239 Points (10%)
6536 Points (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
64260 MIPS (37%)
40379 MIPS (23%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5944 MIPS (71%)
5289 MIPS (63%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
148 fps (52%)
88.2 fps (31%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
333.5 fps (77%)
251.5 fps (58%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
30.1 fps (53%)
12.2 fps (21%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (0%)
0.8 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.2 GB/s (38%)
1.4 GB/s (24%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
12.8 GB/s (33%)
8 GB/s (21%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
189.5 Seconds (1%)
302.4 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (10%)
0.6 sec (13%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
15722 Points (33%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.4 s (2%)
7.8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.4 s (1%)
17.5 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
363.2 s (2%)
438.7 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
85458 Points (75%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
25017 Points (68%)
15961 Points (43%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
78037 Points (63%)
68275 Points (55%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
79174 Points (64%)
68908 Points (56%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
77742 Points (65%)
70668 Points (60%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
20161 Points (51%)
13014 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
29671 Points (53%)
20040 Points (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
13869 Points (58%)
8290 Points (35%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1904 Points (80%)
1286 Points (54%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
12797 Points (23%)
7248 Points (13%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1821 Points (8%)
1281 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
12746 Points (40%)
7237 Points (23%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8223 Points (82%)
5821 Points (58%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
46557 Points (52%)
28391 Points (32%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
511 ms (1%)
760 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
293 Points (61%)
239 Points (50%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1637 Points (63%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
256.5 Watt (44%)
204.4 Watt (35%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
205.9 Watt (38%)
172.5 Watt (31%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
12.4 Points per Watt (9%)
8.4 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-12600K → 100% n=43

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10600K → 74% n=43

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 04. 17:50:39

#0 checking url part for id 13886 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12212 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.024s ... 0.025s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 13886 +0.017s ... 0.042s

#7 got single benchmarks 13886 +0.011s ... 0.053s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12212 +0.016s ... 0.069s

#9 got single benchmarks 12212 +0.008s ... 0.076s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.076s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.357s ... 0.433s

#12 return log +0.028s ... 0.462s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)