Verdict - ProArt P14 is a sleek laptop, but does not make much sense with 32 GB RAM
The Asus ProArt P14 is currently the only 14-inch laptop with the new Nvidia RTX Spark SoC. Asus also decided to use the faster version with 20 CPU cores and 6144 GPU cores, so the performance is decent, even though it is a bit slower than the 16-inch models we have tested so far and the fans can also get quite noisy, but you get the same performance whether you are plugged-in or running on battery power.
Asus also uses a sleek metal chassis with excellent build quality and stability. You also get a very comfortable keyboard, a great haptic touchpad, decent connectivity (even though only the larger ProArt P16 gets SD-Express support) and you also get an excellent sound system. The tandem OLED screen also offers great color accuracy and impressive brightness values (700 nits SDR, up to ~1700 nits HDR), but the touchscreen layer slightly affects the image quality with a visible grid, especially on brighter contents.
There are three major issues we have with this device. Firstly, the battery runtime is not great, even though Asus already implements a massive 90 Wh battery. Secondly, it is expensive with at $3700 for the SKU with 32 GB RAM. And right now, you can only get the ProArt P14 with up to 32 GB RAM, which is not great when you consider the purpose of these machines is to run large AI models locally. The ProArt P14 also competes with the brand-new MacBook Pro 14 OLED, which we will review soon and we are already eager to compare the two models.
Pros
Cons
Specifications
Case, Connectivity and Input Devices
The ProArt P14 uses a black (or white) metal chassis and it is sleeker than the ROG Zephyrus G14, for example, and also a bit more compact compared to the Apple MacBook Pro 14 Mini-LED. Both the build quality and the stability are excellent, but our black review unit quickly attracts fingerprints and is also not that easy to clean. The hinges are a bit too lose considering this is a touchscreen, but there is not too much display wobble in regular use. Maintenance options include the fans, the battery, the M.2-2280 SSD as well as the Wi-Fi module.
We were slightly worried about the keyboard quality due to the slimmer chassis, but it is fortunately still an excellent model and typing is extremely comfortable. The haptic trackpad also works great, even though you do not get a dial pad as on previous ProArt laptops anymore. Connectivity is very good with sufficient USB ports, fast Wi-Fi 7 and a speedy full-size SD-card reader, but it does not support the SD Express standard. The 1080p webcam does not take good pictures.
| SD Card Reader | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max | |
| Networking | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Display
Asus uses a tandem OLED touchscreen from Samsung with a resolution of 2880 x 1800 pixels and 120 Hz refresh rate. The subjective image quality is very good, even though the touch layer slightly affects the image quality, especially on brighter content. Response times are very fast and the PWM frequency is pretty high (960 Hz) with a small amplitude, so this should not be an issue for most users.
Our analysis with the professional CalMAN software confirms that Asus once again ships very accurate color profiles for P3 as well as sRGB and picture editing is no problem. We measured a brightness of ~700 nits for SDR content and almost 1700 nits peak brightness for HDR content (~900 nits on a completely white image), which are excellent results.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 697 cd/m²
Contrast: 69700:1 (Black: 0.01 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.1 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.68}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.93}
89% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
CCT: 6503 K
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 ATNA40LE04-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro MiniLED, 3024x1964, 14.2", 120 Hz | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR ATNA40HQ06-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 LEN140WUXGA, OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H LG Philips 140WT2, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Razer Blade 14 2025 ATNA40CU05-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 Samsung SDC41B3, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | -7% | 4% | 3% | -19% | 2% | |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 1682 | 1706 1% | 1140 -32% | 440 -74% | |||
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 99.9 | 99.6 0% | 99.8 0% | 100 0% | 99.7 0% | 99.5 0% | 99.7 0% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 99.9 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 89 | 89 0% | 94.1 6% | 99 11% | 98.2 10% | 89.2 0% | 95.6 7% |
| Response Times | -6729% | -33% | -77% | -22% | 14% | -40% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 1.67 ? | 77.2 ? -4523% | 2 ? -20% | 1.6 ? 4% | 0.75 ? 55% | 0.59 ? 65% | 0.94 ? 44% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.46 ? | 71.6 ? -15465% | 0.49 ? -7% | 1.85 ? -302% | 1.03 ? -124% | 0.63 ? -37% | 1.01 ? -120% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 960 ? | 14880 ? | 960 ? | 482.1 ? | 240.62 ? | 960 ? | 492.6 |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 30 | 90 -200% | 52 -73% | 10.3 66% | 29 3% | 26 13% | 43 -43% |
| Screen | 25% | -26% | -70% | -13% | -26% | -51% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 697 | 638 -8% | 508 -27% | 367.1 -47% | 393.8 -44% | 361 -48% | 384.7 -45% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 706 | 621 -12% | 514 -27% | 338 -52% | 389 -45% | 363 -49% | 387 -45% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 98 | 95 -3% | 98 0% | 86 -12% | 96 -2% | 98 0% | 99 1% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.01 | 0.02 -100% | |||||
| Contrast (:1) | 69700 | 25400 -64% | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 0.6 45% | 1.3 -18% | 3.91 -255% | 1.27 -15% | 1.7 -55% | 3.36 -205% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.8 | 1.4 63% | 3.5 8% | 7.49 -97% | 3.35 12% | 3.9 -3% | 6.45 -70% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 0.8 67% | 2 17% | 1.3 46% | 2 17% | 2.4 -0% | 1 58% |
| Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.22 99% | 2.13 103% | 2.23 99% | 2.19 100% | 2.14 103% | 2.26 97% |
| CCT | 6503 100% | 6430 101% | 6588 99% | 6269 104% | 6379 102% | 6571 99% | 6380 102% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.71 | 0.65 | |||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2235% /
-1541% | -22% /
-22% | -48% /
-53% | -11% /
-11% | -10% /
-14% | -30% /
-35% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.25 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.21 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.6 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.67 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.81 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.86 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.6 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 960 Hz Amplitude: 30 % | ≤ 70 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 960 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 70 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 960 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7559 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Performance - RTX Spark N1X with 32 GB RAM
The ProArt P14 is equipped with the faster RTX Spark N1X chip, but right now you can only get models with 24 or 32 GB unified memory. Our 32 GB unit has allocated 16 GB RAM to the GPU by default, so you only have 16 GB left for the system.
Testing Conditions
We used Performance mode for our benchmarks and measurements, but we recommend Silent mode for everyday tasks to ensure quieter fans.
| Profile | TDP | CB24 Multi | Steel Nomad | Cyberpunk 2077 QHD Ultra | max. fan noise |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whisper | 40/25 W | 1409 points | 2094 points | 34 fps | 38.4 dB(A) |
| Standard | 50/35 W | 1522 points | 2503 points | 43.1 fps | 44.9 dB(A) |
| Performance | 75/58 W | 1647 points | 2872 points | 53 fps | 54.9 dB(A) |
| Battery (Performance) | 75/58 W | 1597 points | 2863 points | 53 fps | 54.9 dB(A) |
Processor Performance
The RTX Spark N1X features 20 CPU cores and can consume 75/58 Watts in the ProArt P14. The performance is pretty good in general and it beats all the rivals except Apple's M5 Pro and M5 Max chips. The N1X is also faster than AMD's fastest Strix Halo SoC. For more technical information and efficiency results, please see our comprehensive analysis article of Nvidia's RTX Spark SoC.
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
| CPU Native Performance rating | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (1635 - 1726, n=4) | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| Average of class Multimedia (327 - 2490, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (72.5 - 201, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (128 - 133, n=4) | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Multi-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (20031 - 20296, n=3) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4983 - 30057, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Single-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (3092 - 3139, n=3) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1591 - 4336, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Emulated Performance rating | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 -1! | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (16591 - 17944, n=4) | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4861 - 33362, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1237 - 2459, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (1308 - 1321, n=4) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1887 - 12912, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (6184 - 6679, n=4) | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| Average of class Multimedia (456 - 833, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (485 - 491, n=4) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (3479 - 3677, n=4) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (856 - 5224, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (184.8 - 326, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (255 - 263, n=4) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Average of class Multimedia (100 - 557, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (192 - 197, n=4) | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (80534 - 82825, n=4) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Multimedia (26062 - 130368, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4526 - 7337, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (5658 - 5708, n=4) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6.08 - 36.1, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (12.2 - 12.6, n=4) | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (59.5 - 75.3, n=4) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (23.9 - 75.3, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (0.52 - 0.538, n=4) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (0.3903 - 0.609, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR -1! | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 -1! | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core -1! | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (2214 - 50388, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (11198 - 11989, n=4) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (12867 - 201874, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (43306 - 45056, n=4) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (4247 - 4431, n=4) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (626 - 8623, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (13483 - 181505, n=30, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (886 - 28794, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (3995 - 4153, n=4) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6395 - 105740, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (24870 - 26051, n=4) | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (107456 - 116546, n=4) | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8171 - 126790, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (1365 - 1445, n=4) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (143.8 - 2022, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1014 - 26875, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (6235 - 6472, n=4) | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (75337 - 77724, n=4) | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8187 - 88533, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 (v8.20.8100) | |
System and Storage Devices
System performance is very good and we did not encounter any stability issues. Please keep in mind that some apps still have compatibility issues with the ARM version of Windows. Some of our SSD benchmarks also seem to have an issue, as they report low transfer rates. DiskSpeed, however, shows good and stable results for a PCIe 4.0 drive, so there should not be any issues. The slot actually supports PCIe 5.0, so it is unfortunate that Asus does not implement a corresponding drive considering the high base price.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 4: Overall
WebXPRT 5: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 -2! | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core, NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H -1! | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 -1! | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 -1! | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Multimedia (866 - 3231, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core, NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU (1579 - 1750, n=4) | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| Average of class Multimedia (931 - 2677, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core, NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU (1343 - 1510, n=4) | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (907 - 4522, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core, NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU (1838 - 2246, n=4) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Multimedia (605 - 2073, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core, NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU (1208 - 1667, n=4) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core, NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU (111 - 408, n=3) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (111 - 415, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| WebXPRT 5 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| Average of class Multimedia (56 - 124, n=21, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core, NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU (107 - 108, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (228 - 835, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core, NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU (283 - 293, n=3) | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max | |
* ... smaller is better
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (153516 - 158370, n=4) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (11299 - 158370, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (132805 - 134029, n=4) | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (11624 - 174586, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core (222938 - 225987, n=4) | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (11755 - 225987, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 | |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU and Gaming Performance
The RTX Spark N1X Blackwell GPU offers 6144 CUDA cores and sits between a mobile GeForce RTX 5060 and RTX 5070 in terms of raw performance. As we have seen in our analysis article, it is also faster than the current M5 Pro GPU from Apple, but cannot keep up with the M5 Max GPU. While RTX Spark laptops are primarily designed for content creators with large projects and/or agentic AI workloads, gaming is obviously possible as well including all the features we know from the current Blackwell generation including DLSS 5 and multi frame generation. The gaming performance is decent, but keep in mind that there are currently still compatibility issues with some games like Battlefield, Call of Duty or F1 2025, for example.
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 26797 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 22619 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 12598 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 2872 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 12955 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
| Average of class Multimedia (12 - 105, n=20, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU (20 - 21, n=2) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (20 - 186, n=21, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU (32 - 33, n=3) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL | |
| Average of class Multimedia (17.8 - 68, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (133 - 1042, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU (337 - 360, n=4) | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | |
| Average of class Multimedia (105 - 492, n=16, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
* ... smaller is better
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7.61 - 144.4, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (13.3 - 303, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (30.3 - 170.9, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 49.2 | 39.8 | ||||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 111.3 | 105.4 | 101.7 | 97.8 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 144 | 121.7 | 100.2 | 81.7 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 67.6 | 63 | 54.6 | |||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 344 | 233 | 212 | 192 | 135 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 125 | 108.6 | 99.9 | 98.9 | 75.4 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 100.8 | 96.7 | 84 | 76.8 | 60 | 53 |
Emissions & Power Consumption
System Noise
The ProArt P14 uses two fans and the laptop is silent while idling and also pretty quiet under lighter workloads, even in Performance mode. The fan noise under full load depends on the power profile and the fan curve of the Performance profile is actually not ideal, because the fan noise fluctuates between 51.1 and 54.9 dB(A) while gaming and during our stress test. We did not hear any other electronic noises like coil whine.
Noise level
| Idle |
| 24.5 / 24.5 / 24.5 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 36 / 54.9 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.5 dB(A) | ||
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 Spark RTX N1X 20-Core, RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max M5 Max, M5 Max 40-Core GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 X2E-88-100, X2-90 | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Razer Blade 14 2025 Ryzen AI 9 365, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395, Radeon 8060S | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 5% | -14% | 6% | 9% | -3% | 0% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24.5 | 23.1 6% | 26 -6% | 23.8 3% | 22.9 7% | 23.7 3% | 23.9 2% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 24.5 | 23.1 6% | 26 -6% | 23.8 3% | 23.3 5% | 23.7 3% | 23.9 2% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 24.5 | 23.1 6% | 35.1 -43% | 23.8 3% | 23.3 5% | 23.7 3% | 23.9 2% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 24.5 | 23.1 6% | 35.1 -43% | 23.8 3% | 23.3 5% | 27 -10% | 26.8 -9% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 36 | 36.8 -2% | 35.1 2% | 41.4 -15% | 34 6% | 44.9 -25% | 42.2 -17% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 54.9 | 47.8 13% | 55.5 -1% | 42.4 23% | 43.5 21% | 54.6 1% | 49.1 11% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 54.9 | 53.2 3% | 55.5 -1% | 42.4 23% | 45.7 17% | 54.6 1% | 49.2 10% |
* ... smaller is better
Temperature
The surface temperatures surprised us, because the ProArt P14 stays comparatively cool even under maximum load. We only measured little more than 40 °C at a few spots on the bottom, so using it on your lap is absolutely no problem. We are pretty sure the high fan noise is not necessary and maybe a software update will improve the situation. The 140W PSU on the other hand gets quite toasty at up to 55 °C.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.4 °C / 81.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (+1.3 °C / 2.4 F).
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 Spark RTX N1X 20-Core, RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max M5 Max, M5 Max 40-Core GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 X2E-88-100, X2-90 | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Razer Blade 14 2025 Ryzen AI 9 365, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395, Radeon 8060S | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 6% | 6% | 6% | 12% | -12% | -7% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 39.3 | 47 -20% | 41.7 -6% | 40.6 -3% | 34 13% | 47 -20% | 41.4 -5% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 42.7 | 40.5 5% | 41.5 3% | 39.2 8% | 35.8 16% | 49.6 -16% | 36.6 14% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 28.3 | 23.3 18% | 25 12% | 25.4 10% | 25.6 10% | 29.8 -5% | 34 -20% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 28.8 | 23.4 19% | 24.8 14% | 26.4 8% | 26.4 8% | 30.7 -7% | 33.6 -17% |
* ... smaller is better
Speakers
The sound system with speaker grilles next to the keyboard offers excellent sound quality on par with the best multimedia laptops like the ROG Zephyrus G14 or the current MacBook Pro 14 Mini-LED.
Asus ProArt P14 H7407 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Razer Blade 14 2025 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 17%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Power Consumption and Battery Life
The power consumption is actually not too bad while idling considering the bright screen and the 140W PSU is sufficient under load, but the battery runtime is a bit sobering. Asus implements a large 90 Wh battery, which has much more capacity compared to the rivals, but the battery runtime is still worse in many cases. In our Wi-Fi test at 150 nits, the ProArt P14 only lasts 12 hours, while both the Zephyrus G14 and the MacBook Pro 14 manage ~3 additional hours.
| Off / Standby | 0.14 / 0.69 Watt |
| Idle | 5.8 / 10.8 / 11.3 Watt |
| Load |
98.4 / 136 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus ProArt P14 H7407 Spark RTX N1X 20-Core, RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max M5 Max, M5 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP8192Z, Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2" | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNV1T02, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 X2E-88-100, X2-90, , OLED, 1920x1200, 14" | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Razer Blade 14 2025 Ryzen AI 9 365, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395, Radeon 8060S, WDC PC SN810 2TB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Average NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 16% | -2% | 50% | 44% | -25% | 0% | -20% | 9% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 5.8 | 2.5 57% | 3.9 33% | 3.1 47% | 3.1 47% | 9.3 -60% | 6.9 -19% | 6.65 ? -15% | 5.46 ? 6% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 10.8 | 11.6 -7% | 7.8 28% | 4.2 61% | 3.6 67% | 11.1 -3% | 7.7 29% | 13.9 ? -29% | 10.4 ? 4% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 11.3 | 11.8 -4% | 8.1 28% | 9.1 19% | 10 12% | 11.2 1% | 14.7 -30% | 16.9 ? -50% | 12.6 ? -12% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 98.4 | 95.6 3% | 82.2 16% | 40.2 59% | 39.2 60% | 91.9 7% | 83.3 15% | 98.4 ? -0% | 66.1 ? 33% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 111.4 | 89.4 20% | 162.9 -46% | 43 61% | 51.4 54% | 171.5 -54% | 110.9 -0% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 136 | 98.8 27% | 230.7 -70% | 67.7 50% | 101.4 25% | 195 -43% | 126.3 7% | 142.2 ? -5% | 113.9 ? 16% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 86.4 | 161.6 | 47.7 | 51.2 | 168.6 | 110.5 |
* ... smaller is better
Notebookcheck Rating
Asus ProArt P14 H7407
- 11/04/2026 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Total Sustainability Score: Potential Competitors in Comparison
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 90%  | Asus ProArt P14 H7407 Nvidia RTX Spark N1X 20-Core ⎘ NVIDIA RTX Spark N1X 6144-Core Blackwell GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $53.99 Laptop Case for ASUS ProArt ... 2. $71.20 ASUS ProArt Wireless Mouse M... 3. $1,249.99 ASUS ProArt PZ13 2in1 13.3" ... List Price: 3299€ | 1.5 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
2. 90.2%  | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max Apple M5 Max ⎘ Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU ⎘ 128 GB Memory, 8192 GB SSD | List Price: 8589€ | 1.6 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.20" 3024x1964 254 PPI Mini-LED |
3. 89.9%  | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR Intel Core Ultra 9 386H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $3,999.00 HIDevolution [2026] ASUS ROG... 2. $3,299.00 HIDevolution [2026] ASUS ROG... 3. $2,049.00 ASUS ROG Zephyrus G14 AI Gam... List Price: 3299€ | 1.6 kg | 16.3 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
4. 85.9%  | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8Y11 Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 ⎘ 32 GB Memory | List Price: 1150 USD | 1.3 kg | 13.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED |
5. 87.4%  | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Intel Core Ultra X7 358H ⎘ Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,591.62 Dell XPS 14 Premium Laptop D... 2. $1,449.99 Dell Latitude 5450 Laptop, I... 3. $2,399.00 Dell XPS 14 9440 14.5" Noteb... List Price: 2200 USD | 1.4 kg | 14.62 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
6. 87.2%  | Razer Blade 14 2025 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 2399€ | 1.6 kg | 16.2 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
7. 87.4%  | HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 ⎘ AMD Radeon 8060S ⎘ 128 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | List Price: 4000 USD | 1.6 kg | 18.5 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
