Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX vs AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX vs AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX

► remove from comparison AMD R9 7845HX

The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Dragon Range series. It offers 12 of the 16 cores based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (24 threads). The cores clock from 3 (base) up to 5.2 GHz (single core boost). The 7845HX is the second-fastest mobile Ryzen CPU at launch and derived from the desktop Ryzen 9 7900X.

The Dragon Range series still uses a chiplet design with two CCD-clusters (each with 8 possible cores) in 5nm and an IO-die (including the memory controller and the Radeon 610M iGPU) in 6nm. The chip integrates 4x USB 3.2 Gen2 (10 Gbps) ports (no USB4), 28 PCIe 5.0 lanes (for GPU and SSDs) and a dual-channel DDR5-5200 memory controller.

Performance

The average 7845HX in our database is in the same league as the Core i9-13900HX, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a super-fast chip, as of mid 2023; of course, your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the CPU power limits are.

The R9 7845HX is rated at a TDP of 55 Watt and can be configured from 45 to 75 Watt (cTDP).

AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX

► remove from comparison AMD R5 7645HX

The AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Dragon Range series. It offers 6 cores based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (12 threads). The cores clock from 4 (base) up to 5 GHz (single core boost).

The performance of the R5 7645HX should be significantly higher than the fastest 6-core CPU of the Ryzen 6000 mobile series the Ryzen 5 6600H. Especially single threaded performance should be very good thanks to the new Zen 4 cores and relatively high clock speeds. This means even the old Ryzen 9 6980HX (also 5 GHz, but Zen 3) should be slightly slower in single threaded workloads.

The Dragon Range series still uses a chiplet design with two CCD-clusters (each with 8 possible cores, the 7645HX only uses one CCD with 6 of the 8 cores) in 5nm and an IO-die (including the memory controller and the Radeon 610M iGPU) in 6nm. The chip integrates 4x USB 3.2 Gen2 (10 Gbps) ports (no USB4), 28 PCIe 5.0 lanes (for GPU and SSDs) and a dual-channel DDR5-5200 memory controller.

The R5 7645HX is rated at a TDP of 55 Watt and can be configured up to 75 Watt (cTDP).

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX

► remove from comparison AMD R9 7945HX

The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Dragon Range series. It offers 16 cores based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (32 threads). The cores clock from 2.5 (base) up to 5.4 GHz (single core boost). The 7945HX is the fastest mobile Ryzen CPU at launch and derived from the desktop Ryzen 9 7950X.

The Dragon Range series still uses a chiplet design with two CCD-clusters (each with 8 possible cores) in 5nm and an IO-die (including the memory controller and the Radeon 610M iGPU) in 6nm. The chip integrates 4x USB 3.2 Gen2 (10 Gbps) ports (no USB4), 28 PCIe 5.0 lanes (for GPU and SSDs) and a dual-channel DDR5-5200 memory controller.

Performance

The Ryzen 9 7945HX is among the fastest processors in our database, as of August 2023. It is in the same league as the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D and noticeably ahead of the Core i9-13980HX, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. It is outrageously, unbelievably fast, and those fortunate enough to purchase a laptop built around this CPU will have no performance issues for at least three years.

Thanks to its powerful cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 128 W, the ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 is one of the fastest laptops built around the 7945HX that we know of.

The R9 7945HX is rated at a TDP of 55 Watt and can be configured up to 75 Watt (cTDP).

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 7845HXAMD Ryzen 5 7645HXAMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
SeriesAMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045)AMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045)AMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045)
CodenameDragon Range-HX (Zen 4)Dragon Range (Zen4)Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4)
Series: Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045) Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D2.3 - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX2.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX2.4 - 5.2 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX « 3 - 5.2 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7840HX2.9 - 5.1 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D2.3 - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX « 2.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX2.4 - 5.2 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX3 - 5.2 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7840HX2.9 - 5.1 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
Clock3000 - 5200 MHz4000 - 5000 MHz2500 - 5400 MHz
L1 Cache768 KB384 KB1 MB
L2 Cache12 MB6 MB16 MB
L3 Cache64 MB32 MB64 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 24
12 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4
6 / 1216 / 32
16 x 5.4 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP55 Watt55 Watt55 Watt
Transistors9900 Million9900000 Million9900 Million
TechnologyCCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm5 nmCCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketFL1FL1
FeaturesDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 5, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 5, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon 610M (400 - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon 610M (400 - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon 610M (400 - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 7845HX
51.8 pt (72%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 7645HX
45.7 pt (63%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 7945HX
56.8 pt (79%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
26876 Points (25%)
13985 Points (13%)
min: 32379     avg: 33960     median: 34202 (32%)     max: 34613 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1852 Points (79%)
1809 Points (77%)
min: 1863     avg: 1912     median: 1936 (82%)     max: 1948 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
719 Points (80%)
699 Points (78%)
min: 712     avg: 738     median: 747 (83%)     max: 756 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
10492 Points (26%)
5467 Points (13%)
min: 10025     avg: 12753     median: 13308 (32%)     max: 13769 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
4320 Points (27%)
2276 Points (14%)
min: 5205     avg: 5497     median: 5541 (35%)     max: 5663 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
295 Points (89%)
289 Points (87%)
min: 294     avg: 303.8     median: 307 (92%)     max: 309 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
25.7 Points (33%)
64.3 Points (84%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.7 Points (91%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7717 Points (47%)
8481 Points (51%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
44716 Points (32%)
71582 Points (52%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
158.7 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.9 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
81.7 s (0%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
2.9 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
13352 Points (21%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
106033 MIPS (61%)
60373 MIPS (35%)
min: 123364     avg: 136237     median: 140471 (81%)     max: 140932 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
7018 MIPS (84%)
7124 MIPS (85%)
min: 7319     avg: 7398     median: 7379 (88%)     max: 7581 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
135.9 fps (47%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
328.4 fps (76%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
29.7 fps (52%)
18.6 fps (33%)
min: 33.8     avg: 35.9     median: 36.2 (64%)     max: 37.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1 GB/s (0%)
2.7 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.7 GB/s (29%)
4 GB/s (69%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
12.6 GB/s (33%)
25.3 GB/s (66%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
185 Seconds (2%)
360 Seconds (5%)
min: 138     avg: 146.8     median: 145.5 (2%)     max: 158 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
117 Seconds (1%)
224 Seconds (2%)
min: 87     avg: 93.2     median: 93 (1%)     max: 100 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (9%)
0.4 sec (9%)
min: 0.3982     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4159 sec
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8 s (2%)
6.4 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.2 s (1%)
13.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
410.8 s (2%)
337 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
101153 Points (89%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
22073 Points (60%)
20726 Points (56%)
min: 24553     avg: 26479     median: 26667 (72%)     max: 27859 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
84416 Points (69%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
16892 Points (43%)
min: 22457     avg: 23170     median: 23169.5 (59%)     max: 23882 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
36557 Points (65%)
26756 Points (48%)
min: 35353     avg: 38709     median: 39027 (70%)     max: 42342 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
11961 Points (50%)
8601 Points (36%)
min: 6283     avg: 11710     median: 13082 (55%)     max: 13244 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2729 Points (83%)
2717 Points (82%)
2876 Points (87%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
12585 Points (50%)
11717 Points (46%)
16316 Points (64%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2008 Points (85%)
1971 Points (83%)
min: 2047     avg: 2092     median: 2103 (89%)     max: 2132 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
15068 Points (27%)
10145 Points (18%)
min: 18372     avg: 19407     median: 19583 (35%)     max: 19954 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1924 Points (8%)
1984 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
10185 Points (32%)
19315 Points (61%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7927 Points (79%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
41241 Points (46%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
475 ms (1%)
481 ms (1%)
min: 449     avg: 460.5     median: 457 (1%)     max: 479 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
87916 Points (79%)
min: 92275     avg: 95873     median: 95872.5 (86%)     max: 99470 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
282 Points (81%)
273 Points (78%)
min: 283     avg: 289     median: 289 (83%)     max: 295 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
357 Points (74%)
331 Points (69%)
min: 314     avg: 350.8     median: 351 (73%)     max: 387 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1992 Points (76%)
1939 Points (74%)
min: 1929     avg: 2009     median: 2015 (77%)     max: 2078 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
190.6 Watt (33%)
124 Watt (21%)
min: 136.4     avg: 184.3     median: 187.9 (32%)     max: 225 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
207 Watt (38%)
128 Watt (23%)
min: 164.4     avg: 193.4     median: 194.2 (35%)     max: 221 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
39.7 Watt (26%)
19.4 Watt (13%)
min: 13.9     avg: 30     median: 27.7 (18%)     max: 50.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
41.9 Watt (46%)
24.6 Watt (27%)
min: 17.1     avg: 24.5     median: 23.8 (26%)     max: 33.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
20.9 Points per Watt (16%)
min: 25.1     avg: 27.4     median: 27.3 (20%)     max: 29.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX → 100% n=23

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX → 85% n=23

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX → 111% n=23

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 28. 11:42:20

#0 checking url part for id 14938 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14942 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14936 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 05:39:51 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.036s ... 0.037s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.037s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14938 +0.021s ... 0.058s

#8 got single benchmarks 14938 +0.015s ... 0.073s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14942 +0.02s ... 0.093s

#10 got single benchmarks 14942 +0.012s ... 0.105s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 14936 +0.012s ... 0.117s

#12 got single benchmarks 14936 +0.024s ... 0.141s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.141s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.375s ... 0.516s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.516s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)