Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX vs AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX

► remove from comparison AMD R9 7845HX

The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Dragon Range series. It offers 12 of the 16 cores based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (24 threads). The cores clock from 3 (base) up to 5.2 GHz (single core boost). The 7845HX is the second-fastest mobile Ryzen CPU at launch and derived from the desktop Ryzen 9 7900X.

The performance of the R9 7845HX is significantly faster than the old top model Ryzen 9 6980HX (8 Zen 3 cores, 5 GHz max) thanks to the higher core count, improved architecture and higher clock speed.

The Dragon Range series still uses a chiplet design with two CCD-clusters (each with 8 possible cores) in 5nm and an IO-die (including the memory controller and the Radeon 610M iGPU) in 6nm. The chip integrates 4x USB 3.2 Gen2 (10 Gbps) ports (no USB4), 28 PCIe 5.0 lanes (for GPU and SSDs) and a dual-channel DDR5-5200 memory controller.

The R9 7845HX is rated at a TDP of 55 Watt and can be configured from 45 to 75 Watt (cTDP).

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX

► remove from comparison AMD R9 7945HX

The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Dragon Range series. It offers 16 cores based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (32 threads). The cores clock from 2.5 (base) up to 5.4 GHz (single core boost). The 7945HX is the fastest mobile Ryzen CPU at launch and derived from the desktop Ryzen 9 7950X.

The performance of the R9 7945HX should be similar to a Core i9-13900HX (Raptor Lake, 24 Hybrid cores, 5.4 GHz max) in the high end segment of mobile CPUs for gaming laptops. AMD advertised the R9 7945HX as significantly faster than the old Ryzen 9 6900HX (8 Zen 3 cores, 4.9 GHz max) which makes sense due to the higher core count, clock speed and improved architecture.

The Dragon Range series still uses a chiplet design with two CCD-clusters (each with 8 possible cores) in 5nm and an IO-die (including the memory controller and the Radeon 610M iGPU) in 6nm. The chip integrates 4x USB 3.2 Gen2 (10 Gbps) ports (no USB4), 28 PCIe 5.0 lanes (for GPU and SSDs) and a dual-channel DDR5-5200 memory controller.

The R9 7945HX is rated at a TDP of 55 Watt and can be configured up to 75 Watt (cTDP).

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 7845HXAMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
SeriesAMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045)AMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045)
CodenameDragon Range-HX (Zen 4)Dragon Range (Zen 4)
Clock3000 - 5200 MHz2500 - 5400 MHz
L1 Cache768 KB1 MB
L2 Cache12 MB16 MB
L3 Cache64 MB64 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 2416 / 32
TDP55 Watt55 Watt
Transistors9900 Million9900 Million
TechnologyCCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm5 nm (CCD), 6 (I/O) nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFL1FL1
iGPUAMD Radeon 610M (400 - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon 610M (400 - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerAMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045) R9 7845HXAMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045) R9 7945HX
Series: Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045) Dragon Range (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX « 2.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX compare3.6 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 7945HX
79.6 pt (89%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 32379     avg: 33797     median: 34144.5 (56%)     max: 34521 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1863     avg: 1903     median: 1904.5 (84%)     max: 1940 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 712     avg: 735     median: 736.5 (85%)     max: 756 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 10025     avg: 12615     median: 13332.5 (57%)     max: 13769 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 5205     avg: 5486     median: 5537.5 (57%)     max: 5663 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 294     avg: 302.5     median: 304 (93%)     max: 308 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
64.3 Points (91%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.7 Points (12%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8481 Points (51%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
71582 Points (52%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
158.7 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.9 s (1%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 123364     avg: 135174     median: 138199 (85%)     max: 140932 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 7319     avg: 7403     median: 7355.5 (88%)     max: 7581 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 33.8     avg: 35.4     median: 34.8 (75%)     max: 37.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
2.7 GB/s (90%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
4 GB/s (74%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
25.3 GB/s (78%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 144     avg: 149.7     median: 147 (2%)     max: 158 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 91     avg: 94.8     median: 94 (1%)     max: 100 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3982     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4159 sec
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
6.4 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
13.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
337 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
101153 Points (94%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 25699     avg: 26961     median: 27143 (73%)     max: 27859 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
84416 Points (70%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 22457     avg: 23170     median: 23169.5 (59%)     max: 23882 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 35353     avg: 38629     median: 38411 (71%)     max: 42342 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6283     avg: 11367     median: 12970 (64%)     max: 13244 Points
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2047     avg: 2084     median: 2078 (90%)     max: 2132 Points
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 18372     avg: 19309     median: 19454 (68%)     max: 19954 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1984 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
19315 Points (61%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 449     avg: 461     median: 455 (1%)     max: 479 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 92275     avg: 95873     median: 95872.5 (91%)     max: 99470 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 283     avg: 287     median: 288 (86%)     max: 290 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 314     avg: 338.7     median: 349 (81%)     max: 353 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1993     avg: 2036     median: 2037 (79%)     max: 2078 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 136.4     avg: 170.7     median: 172.7 (30%)     max: 203 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 164.4     avg: 184.2     median: 186.3 (39%)     max: 202 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 13.9     avg: 29.2     median: 23.3 (20%)     max: 50.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 17.1     avg: 21.5     median: 23.4 (28%)     max: 24.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 27.3     avg: 28.6     median: 28.6 (33%)     max: 29.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2023, 2022
v1.22
log 06. 05:58:57

#0 checking url part for id 14938 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14936 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 02 Jun 2023 13:55:08 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.023s ... 0.024s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.024s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14938 +0.002s ... 0.026s

#7 got single benchmarks 14938 +0s ... 0.026s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14936 +0.01s ... 0.036s

#9 got single benchmarks 14936 +0.017s ... 0.053s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.053s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.12s ... 0.173s

#12 return log +0.027s ... 0.2s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)