Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 7840HX vs Intel Core i9-12900HK

AMD Ryzen 9 7840HX

► remove from comparison AMD R9 7840HX

The AMD Ryzen 9 7840HX is a high-end notebook processor from the Dragon Range series with 12 cores and hyperthreading (SMT), which means it can process up to 24 threads simultaneously. The CPU uses the current Zen 4 architecture for the 12 cores and clocks these from 2.9 GHz (base clock) up to 5.1 GHz (single-core boost). The CPU offers 12 MB L2 cache and 64 MB L3 cache (i.e. a total of 76 MB cache). The 7840X consists of three chiplets, two CCD clusters with a maximum of 8 CPU cores on 5nm (71mm²) and one IO die on 6nm (122mm²) which are all manufactured by TSMC.

The performance of the Ryzen 9 should be significantly faster than the old Ryzen 9 6980HX (top model Rembrandt H, 8 cores, max 5 GHz). This is achieved by the additional cores, higher clock rate and improved architecture. Compared to the one year older Ryzen 9 7845HX, the 7840HX is clocked 100 MHz lower.

The chip also integrates 4x USB 3.2 Gen2 (10 Gbps) ports (no USB 4), 28 PCIe 5.0 lanes (for GPUs and SSDs), a dual-channel DDR5-5200 memory controller and a small AMD Radeon 610M graphics card (2CUs, 400 - 2200 MHz).

The R9 7840HX is specified with 55 watts TDP and can be configured from 45 to 75 watts (cTDP).

Intel Core i9-12900HK

► remove from comparison Intel i9-12900HK

The Intel Core i9-12900HK is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.5 to 5 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.8 to 3.8 GHz on the efficiency cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare with the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. As a K-variant, the CPU offers an open multiplicator and therefore the possibility to overclock the CPU cores. Compared to the similar i9-12900H, the 12900HK only offers the "Essentials" features of vPro.

Performance

The average 12900HK in our database is in the same as the Core i9-13900H, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. It's also almost as fast as the Ryzen 7 7745HX and the Core i5-13500HX. This is a super-fast processor, as of mid 2023; it will have no issues running any app or any game for at least two more years.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 134 W, the Alienware x17 R2 P48E is among the fastest laptops built around the 12900HK that we know of. It can be more than 40% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.45 GHz.

Power consumption

This Core i9 series chip has a "minimum assured" power consumption of 35 W, with 45 W being its Base power consumption. The maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption sits at 115 W.

The i9-12900HK is manufactured on Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for lower-than-average, as of mid-2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 7840HXIntel Core i9-12900HK
CodenameDragon Range-HX (Zen 4)Alder Lake-H
SeriesAMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7X4X/8X4X)Intel Alder Lake-P
Series: Alder Lake-P Alder Lake-H
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D compare2.3 - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX compare2.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX compare2.4 - 5.2 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX compare3 - 5.2 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7840HX « 2.9 - 5.1 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900HK « 1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12800H compare1.8 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12650H compare1.7 - 4.7 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600H compare2 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12500H compare1.8 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12450H compare1.5 - 4.4 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock2900 - 5100 MHz1800 - 5000 MHz
L1 Cache768 KB1.2 MB
L2 Cache12 MB11.5 MB
L3 Cache64 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 24
12 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
14 / 20
TDP55 Watt45 Watt
Transistors9900 Million
Technology5 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFL1BGA1744
FeaturesDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 5, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Ess., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon 610M (400 - 2200 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1450 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900HK
37.4 pt (62%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 77     avg: 98.5     median: 101.5 (57%)     max: 114 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 708     avg: 763     median: 734 (14%)     max: 876 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 11694     avg: 16712     median: 18288 (17%)     max: 19282 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1266     avg: 1732     median: 1673 (70%)     max: 1940 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 487     avg: 657     median: 643 (70%)     max: 739 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4842     avg: 6417     median: 6941 (17%)     max: 7366 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1975     avg: 2580     median: 2786 (18%)     max: 2944 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 185     avg: 249.3     median: 242 (67%)     max: 279 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 23.44     avg: 26.5     median: 25.2 (33%)     max: 33 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.22     avg: 2.9     median: 2.8 (67%)     max: 3.28 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6388     avg: 8158     median: 7884 (48%)     max: 9412 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 42338     avg: 48599     median: 48838 (35%)     max: 57202 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 66662     avg: 71594     median: 71882.5 (46%)     max: 75947 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 10299     avg: 12716     median: 12631.5 (15%)     max: 15303 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 186.394     avg: 317.5     median: 225.7 (3%)     max: 632.336 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.375     avg: 3.8     median: 3.8 (1%)     max: 4.209 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7387     avg: 8097     median: 7402 (12%)     max: 9573 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 51249     avg: 65829     median: 69146 (40%)     max: 75564 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4240     avg: 5592     median: 5442 (64%)     max: 6186 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 109.9     avg: 126.4     median: 123.9 (3%)     max: 159.6 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 250     avg: 281.4     median: 276 (7%)     max: 317.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 13.6     avg: 18.5     median: 19.9 (35%)     max: 21.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.1     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (35%)     max: 1.5 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.8     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (38%)     max: 2.6 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 12.2     avg: 13.6     median: 13 (34%)     max: 16.3 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 413     avg: 439.3     median: 430 (5%)     max: 475 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 172.5     avg: 203.5     median: 185 (1%)     max: 266 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4155     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.637 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 11679     avg: 14567     median: 14439 (31%)     max: 16864 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.281     avg: 8.4     median: 8.1 (2%)     max: 10.896 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 16.1     avg: 18.8     median: 18.1 (1%)     max: 24.152 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 383.9     avg: 405.7     median: 397.4 (2%)     max: 435.936 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 59631     avg: 64239     median: 59969 (46%)     max: 77386 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 16492     avg: 21190     median: 21008 (52%)     max: 25556 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 64571     avg: 76919     median: 73220.5 (59%)     max: 96663 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 63938     avg: 77709     median: 74583.5 (61%)     max: 97730 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 66915     avg: 86516     median: 88770 (71%)     max: 102779 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 14717     avg: 17828     median: 17626.5 (45%)     max: 21231 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 21092     avg: 26767     median: 27257 (49%)     max: 31045 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 9145     avg: 11773     median: 11928.5 (50%)     max: 14252 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2709 Points (66%)
min: 1797     avg: 2237     median: 2304 (56%)     max: 2611 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
14822 Points (58%)
min: 9804     avg: 10270     median: 10285 (40%)     max: 10721 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2148     avg: 2272     median: 2175 (69%)     max: 2494 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 9888     avg: 10759     median: 10342 (42%)     max: 12046 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1298     avg: 1732     median: 1774.5 (67%)     max: 1918 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9969     avg: 12547     median: 13333 (24%)     max: 14294 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1257     avg: 1674     median: 1795 (8%)     max: 1859 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9934     avg: 11502     median: 10276 (32%)     max: 13757 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5823     avg: 7378     median: 7925 (79%)     max: 8015 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 38751     avg: 43856     median: 39617 (39%)     max: 51184 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 490     avg: 548     median: 520 (1%)     max: 737 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 102.4     avg: 107.1     median: 107.1 (1%)     max: 111.7 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
94352 Points (69%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 191.4     avg: 237.4     median: 244.5 (67%)     max: 269 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 216     avg: 287.8     median: 293 (53%)     max: 331 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
43.3 MB/s (30%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
2539 MB/s (72%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
81.5 MB/s (39%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
3600 MB/s (90%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
20584 Points (75%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1418     avg: 1841     median: 1853.5 (69%)     max: 2138 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 66.1     avg: 109.7     median: 114 (20%)     max: 174.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 67.1     avg: 121.5     median: 134 (24%)     max: 166 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 11.3     avg: 29.2     median: 13.2 (9%)     max: 63 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 17.2     avg: 22.1     median: 21.7 (16%)     max: 30.2 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 7840HX → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900HK → 77% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 01. 16:21:28

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17468 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14041 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759328487s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 01 Oct 2025 05:17:55 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17468 +0s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 17468 +0s ... 0.005s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14041 +0.005s ... 0.01s

#10 got single benchmarks 14041 +0.018s ... 0.028s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.028s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.046s ... 0.074s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.075s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)