Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS vs Intel Core i7-13620H vs AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 8845HS

The Ryzen 7 8845HS is a powerful Hawk Point family chip that we believe to be a Ryzen 7 7840HS in disguise. The R7 8845HS was brought to life in H2 2023; it features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at up to 5.1 GHz. Not only does this APU have full might of the Zen 4 architecture at its disposal, it also boasts the 2nd generation Ryzen AI technology. Last but not the least, the Radeon 780M serves as the integrated GPU.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say that there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD uncorks its 2nd generation Ryzen AI technology meaning the new processors are expected to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs. Dozens of popular apps such as DaVinci Resolve support this technology, as of late 2023.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8845HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600, ECC-enabled memory included). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

This Ryzen 7 series chip is designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 or Linux; please note that it isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since the 8845HS is a 7840HS in disguise, it's safe to expect it to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This is a very fast chip, as of Q3 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with moderate quality settings. Long story short, this is the best iGPU money can buy, as of H2 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing insanely fast. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.

The R7 8845HS is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-13620H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-13620H

The Intel Core i7-13620H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops of the Raptor Lake-H series (based on the Alder Lake architecture). It was announced in early 2023 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 16 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.4 to 4.9 GHz (single-core boost, all-core boost up to 4.7 GHz) on the performance cluster and 1.8 to 3.6 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. Compared to the older i7-12650H, the 13620H offers higher clock speeds.

Performance

Thanks to the improved clock speeds, the i7-13620H should be able to clearly best the old i7-12650H. Still, the faster i7 models of the 13th gen offer more e-Cores and therefore a clearly better multi-threaded performance.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-5200 (up from DDR5-4800 of the 12th gen.). The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU now supports PCIe 5.0 x8 for a GPU and two PCIe 4.0 x4 for SSDs.

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 64 of the 96 EUs (Execution Units) clocked at up to 1.5GHz.

Power consumption

The i7-13620H is rated at a TDP of 55W (PL1, 115W PL2) and is manufactured in a further improved 10nm process (Intel 7) that allows the higher clock speeds compared to the 12th gen CPUs.

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 8945HS

The Ryzen 9 8945HS is a rebadged Ryzen 9 7940HS with virtually no differences between the two to report. To be more specific, the 8945HS is a powerful Hawk Point family laptop chip that has eight Zen 4 cores running at 4.0 GHz to 5.2 GHz. This APU was brought to life in H2 2023 and all of its cores are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads.

This powerful Ryzen 9 series processor comes with the 2nd generation Ryzen AI technology. The Radeon 780M serves as the integrated graphics adapter.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these chips are promised to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop even more powerful.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8945HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast RAM (up to LPDDR5x-7500 or DDR5-5600; no ECC support). The processor is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt; PCIe support is limited to the 4.0 spec for a throughput of 1.97 GB/s per lane. 20 lanes are available.

OS support is limited to 64-bit editions of Windows 11 and Windows 10 and of course to Linux. Note that the chip isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable as it gets soldered down for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The 8945HS is an R9 7940HS in disguise, so it's realistic to expect the chip to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-12900HK and also the Ryzen 7 7840HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) running at up to 2,800 MHz. This is a very fast iGPU, as of late 2023. It will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p, and it is also capable of HW-encoding and HW-decoding the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1. More importantly, it is fast enough for proper 1080p gaming as long as one is fine with low to medium detail settings.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of the system is, how fast the RAM of the system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving laptop makers a choice between longer battery life and higher performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a system powered by this chip.

The 8945HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 8845HSIntel Core i7-13620HAMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040)Intel Raptor Lake-HAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040)
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Raptor Lake-HHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HK1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13905H1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900H1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13800H1.8 - 5.2 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13705H1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700H1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13620H « 1.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600H2.1 - 4.8 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13505H1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500H1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13420H1.5 - 4.6 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3800 - 5100 MHz1800 - 4900 MHz4000 - 5200 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB864 KB512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB9.5 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB24 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
10 / 168 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP45 Watt45 Watt45 Watt
Technology4 nm10 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8BGA1700FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEThread DirectorDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) ( - 1500 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8845HS
45.6 pt (63%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-13620H
43.4 pt (60%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 8945HS
45.6 pt (63%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
min: 102     avg: 104.5     median: 104.5 (73%)     max: 107 Points
110 Points (76%)
min: 103     avg: 105.7     median: 106.1 (74%)     max: 108 Points
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
min: 902     avg: 918     median: 917.5 (17%)     max: 933 Points
691 Points (13%)
min: 934     avg: 963     median: 967 (18%)     max: 988 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 15889     avg: 16685     median: 16130 (15%)     max: 18037 Points
min: 15176     avg: 15337     median: 15339 (14%)     max: 15496 Points
min: 16795     avg: 17082     median: 17079 (16%)     max: 17376 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1716     avg: 1758     median: 1775 (75%)     max: 1783 Points
min: 1805     avg: 1845     median: 1860 (79%)     max: 1871 Points
min: 1805     avg: 1810     median: 1805 (77%)     max: 1825 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 677     avg: 686     median: 690 (77%)     max: 691 Points
min: 693     avg: 708     median: 711 (79%)     max: 719 Points
min: 698     avg: 701     median: 698 (78%)     max: 711 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6231     avg: 6534     median: 6346 (15%)     max: 7026 Points
min: 5626     avg: 5786     median: 5828 (14%)     max: 5905 Points
min: 6591     avg: 6670     median: 6652 (16%)     max: 6785 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2537     avg: 2667     median: 2555 (16%)     max: 2908 Points
min: 2278     avg: 2373     median: 2349 (15%)     max: 2492 Points
min: 2640     avg: 2683     median: 2659 (17%)     max: 2775 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 274     avg: 277.7     median: 279 (84%)     max: 280 Points
min: 258     avg: 261.7     median: 263 (79%)     max: 264 Points
min: 281     avg: 282.5     median: 281 (85%)     max: 287 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 29.28     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (38%)     max: 29.76 Points
27.1 Points (35%)
min: 30.85     avg: 31.1     median: 31.1 (40%)     max: 31.31 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.29     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (82%)     max: 3.32 Points
3.3 Points (81%)
min: 3.38     avg: 3.4     median: 3.4 (85%)     max: 3.45 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7426     avg: 7475     median: 7474.5 (45%)     max: 7523 Points
10181 Points (62%)
min: 7748     avg: 7786     median: 7785.5 (47%)     max: 7823 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 47332     avg: 47416     median: 47416 (34%)     max: 47500 Points
54809 Points (40%)
min: 49273     avg: 49299     median: 49299 (36%)     max: 49325 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
85872 Points (60%)
90144 Points (63%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14163 Points (17%)
14561 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 98.896     avg: 134.4     median: 134.4 (2%)     max: 170 s
1021 s (12%)
min: 67.933     avg: 132.2     median: 132.2 (2%)     max: 196.4 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.703     avg: 4     median: 4 (1%)     max: 5.3 s
3.1 s (1%)
min: 2.563     avg: 4.4     median: 4.4 (1%)     max: 6.2 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7327     avg: 13168     median: 13167.5 (21%)     max: 19008 Points
8682 Points (14%)
min: 7843     avg: 14109     median: 14108.5 (22%)     max: 20374 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 65072     avg: 70156     median: 70733 (41%)     max: 74664 MIPS
min: 55381     avg: 59045     median: 59430 (34%)     max: 62324 MIPS
min: 71534     avg: 71941     median: 71704 (41%)     max: 72821 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6274     avg: 6496     median: 6571 (79%)     max: 6644 MIPS
min: 5742     avg: 5849     median: 5890 (70%)     max: 5915 MIPS
min: 5994     avg: 6290     median: 6249.5 (75%)     max: 6668 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
143.7 fps (50%)
138.2 fps (48%)
150.7 fps (53%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
289 fps (67%)
345.4 fps (80%)
298 fps (69%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 18.6     avg: 20.6     median: 20.5 (36%)     max: 22.7 fps
min: 16.6     avg: 16.8     median: 16.6 (29%)     max: 17.1 fps
min: 20.9     avg: 21.4     median: 21.3 (37%)     max: 22.2 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (0%)
1.3 GB/s (0%)
min: 1.3     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (0%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
2.3 GB/s (40%)
2 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 14     avg: 14.2     median: 14.2 (37%)     max: 14.4 GB/s
13.8 GB/s (36%)
min: 15.3     avg: 15.4     median: 15.4 (40%)     max: 15.4 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 288     avg: 320     median: 320 (4%)     max: 352 Seconds
min: 353     avg: 393     median: 391 (5%)     max: 435 Seconds
min: 293     avg: 307.5     median: 312 (4%)     max: 313 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 179     avg: 197.3     median: 197 (1%)     max: 216 Seconds
min: 215     avg: 227     median: 223 (2%)     max: 243 Seconds
min: 186     avg: 191.5     median: 192 (1%)     max: 196 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4383     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4464 sec
min: 0.4438     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.4509 sec
min: 0.4294     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4452 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 15479     avg: 15724     median: 15724 (33%)     max: 15969 Points
13632 Points (29%)
min: 15675     avg: 15938     median: 15691 (33%)     max: 16449 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.1     avg: 7.2     median: 7.2 (2%)     max: 7.331 s
6.7 s (1%)
min: 7.045     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (2%)     max: 7.2 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.6     avg: 17.9     median: 17.9 (1%)     max: 18.138 s
15.2 s (1%)
min: 17.549     avg: 17.7     median: 17.7 (1%)     max: 17.8 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 659.5     avg: 662     median: 662.4 (3%)     max: 665.289 s
380 s (2%)
min: 576.7     avg: 601     median: 600.7 (3%)     max: 624.748 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 82048     avg: 82496     median: 82495.5 (72%)     max: 82943 Points
75313 Points (66%)
min: 82048     avg: 83552     median: 84110 (74%)     max: 84498 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 21241     avg: 23256     median: 22786 (62%)     max: 26212 Points
min: 20445     avg: 20796     median: 20532 (56%)     max: 21410 Points
min: 17239     avg: 22081     median: 22576.5 (61%)     max: 25276 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 84429     avg: 86446     median: 86445.5 (70%)     max: 88462 Points
min: 91770     avg: 95935     median: 95934.5 (78%)     max: 100099 Points
min: 84862     avg: 86157     median: 84884 (69%)     max: 88725 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 84932     avg: 86619     median: 86618.5 (70%)     max: 88305 Points
100899 Points (82%)
min: 83482     avg: 85818     median: 84852 (69%)     max: 89119 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 86520     avg: 89786     median: 89786 (76%)     max: 93052 Points
98837 Points (83%)
min: 86520     avg: 88108     median: 87230 (73%)     max: 90575 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 19445     avg: 20650     median: 20290 (51%)     max: 22215 Points
min: 16051     avg: 17310     median: 17885 (45%)     max: 17993 Points
min: 13624     avg: 18526     median: 20539 (52%)     max: 21416 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 26194     avg: 28139     median: 27823.5 (50%)     max: 30715 Points
min: 24434     avg: 25623     median: 25096 (45%)     max: 27338 Points
min: 23442     avg: 27420     median: 27447.5 (49%)     max: 30090 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 10069     avg: 10962     median: 10636.5 (45%)     max: 12505 Points
min: 9400     avg: 10748     median: 10616 (45%)     max: 12228 Points
min: 10444     avg: 11103     median: 11174.5 (47%)     max: 11856 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2540     avg: 2648     median: 2676.5 (72%)     max: 2698 Points
min: 2592     avg: 2597     median: 2596.5 (70%)     max: 2601 Points
min: 2632     avg: 2671     median: 2684 (72%)     max: 2707 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 12578     avg: 13305     median: 13314.5 (52%)     max: 14014 Points
min: 12557     avg: 12817     median: 12817 (51%)     max: 13077 Points
min: 13155     avg: 13385     median: 13283 (52%)     max: 13715 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1875     avg: 1949     median: 1964.5 (83%)     max: 1991 Points
min: 1793     avg: 1830     median: 1831 (77%)     max: 1865 Points
min: 1835     avg: 1934     median: 1965 (83%)     max: 2039 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11802     avg: 12169     median: 12074.5 (22%)     max: 12726 Points
min: 11289     avg: 11647     median: 11430 (20%)     max: 12223 Points
min: 11564     avg: 12071     median: 12368 (22%)     max: 12481 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1900     avg: 1907     median: 1907 (8%)     max: 1914 Points
1767 Points (8%)
min: 1906     avg: 1918     median: 1918 (8%)     max: 1930 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11742     avg: 11914     median: 11914 (38%)     max: 12086 Points
11205 Points (35%)
min: 12315     avg: 12351     median: 12350.5 (39%)     max: 12386 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8034     avg: 8049     median: 8048.5 (80%)     max: 8063 Points
7977 Points (80%)
min: 8178     avg: 8228     median: 8228 (82%)     max: 8278 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 47602     avg: 47690     median: 47689.5 (52%)     max: 47777 Points
42882 Points (47%)
min: 49269     avg: 49462     median: 49461.5 (54%)     max: 49654 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 496     avg: 515     median: 517 (1%)     max: 531 ms
min: 508     avg: 510     median: 508.5 (1%)     max: 516 ms
min: 488     avg: 501     median: 505 (1%)     max: 509 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
91639 Points (82%)
94227 Points (85%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 247     avg: 255.7     median: 256 (74%)     max: 264 Points
min: 264     avg: 267     median: 267 (77%)     max: 270 Points
min: 250     avg: 259.7     median: 260 (75%)     max: 269 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 295     avg: 300     median: 300 (63%)     max: 305 Points
min: 282     avg: 303     median: 305.5 (64%)     max: 319 Points
min: 303     avg: 314.3     median: 316 (66%)     max: 324 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1852     avg: 1893     median: 1889 (72%)     max: 1939 Points
min: 1857     avg: 1894     median: 1881 (72%)     max: 1944 Points
min: 1767     avg: 1821     median: 1830 (70%)     max: 1866 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 74     avg: 101.6     median: 83.6 (14%)     max: 147.2 Watt
min: 121     avg: 127.3     median: 125.9 (22%)     max: 135 Watt
min: 72.5     avg: 97.5     median: 93.6 (16%)     max: 126.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 78.1     avg: 101.9     median: 82.1 (15%)     max: 145.6 Watt
min: 124.9     avg: 142.5     median: 132.6 (24%)     max: 170 Watt
min: 73.7     avg: 99.2     median: 93.5 (17%)     max: 130.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.78     avg: 9.4     median: 10 (7%)     max: 14.4 Watt
min: 19.7     avg: 20.8     median: 21.2 (14%)     max: 21.4 Watt
min: 4.93     avg: 11     median: 6.3 (4%)     max: 21.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 6.4     avg: 9.1     median: 9.1 (10%)     max: 11.8 Watt
min: 12.6     avg: 15.2     median: 15.2 (17%)     max: 17.7 Watt
min: 8.62     avg: 15.6     median: 15.6 (17%)     max: 22.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 20     avg: 26.4     median: 26.4 (20%)     max: 32.7 Points per Watt
min: 14.7     avg: 16.9     median: 17.2 (13%)     max: 18.8 Points per Watt
min: 28.4     avg: 32.1     median: 32.1 (24%)     max: 35.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS → 100% n=50

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-13620H → 98% n=50

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS → 102% n=50

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 15. 21:06:28

#0 checking url part for id 16399 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14723 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 16397 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 05:33:43 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.035s ... 0.036s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.036s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 16399 +0.017s ... 0.053s

#8 got single benchmarks 16399 +0.019s ... 0.072s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14723 +0.017s ... 0.088s

#10 got single benchmarks 14723 +0.027s ... 0.115s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 16397 +0.013s ... 0.128s

#12 got single benchmarks 16397 +0.02s ... 0.148s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.148s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.612s ... 0.76s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.76s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)