Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS vs Intel Core i7-13620H

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 8845HS

The Ryzen 7 8845HS is a powerful Hawk Point family chip that we believe to be a Ryzen 7 7840HS in disguise. The R7 8845HS was brought to life in H2 2023; it features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at up to 5.1 GHz. Not only does this APU have full might of the Zen 4 architecture at its disposal, it also boasts the 2nd generation Ryzen AI technology. Last but not the least, the Radeon 780M serves as the integrated GPU.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say that there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD uncorks its 2nd generation Ryzen AI technology meaning the new processors are expected to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs. Dozens of popular apps such as DaVinci Resolve support this technology, as of late 2023.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8845HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600, ECC-enabled memory included). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

This Ryzen 7 series chip is designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 or Linux; please note that it isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since the 8845HS is a 7840HS in disguise, it's safe to expect it to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This is a very fast chip, as of Q3 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with moderate quality settings. Long story short, this is the best iGPU money can buy, as of H2 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing insanely fast. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.

The R7 8845HS is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-13620H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-13620H

The Intel Core i7-13620H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops of the Raptor Lake-H series (based on the Alder Lake architecture). It was announced in early 2023 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 16 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.4 to 4.9 GHz (single-core boost, all-core boost up to 4.7 GHz) on the performance cluster and 1.8 to 3.6 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. Compared to the older i7-12650H, the 13620H offers higher clock speeds.

Performance

Thanks to the improved clock speeds, the i7-13620H should be able to clearly best the old i7-12650H. Still, the faster i7 models of the 13th gen offer more e-Cores and therefore a clearly better multi-threaded performance.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-5200 (up from DDR5-4800 of the 12th gen.). The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU now supports PCIe 5.0 x8 for a GPU and two PCIe 4.0 x4 for SSDs.

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 64 of the 96 EUs (Execution Units) clocked at up to 1.5GHz.

Power consumption

The i7-13620H is rated at a TDP of 55W (PL1, 115W PL2) and is manufactured in a further improved 10nm process (Intel 7) that allows the higher clock speeds compared to the 12th gen CPUs.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 8845HSIntel Core i7-13620H
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040)Intel Raptor Lake-H
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Raptor Lake-H
Series: Raptor Lake-H Raptor Lake-H
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HK compare1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13905H compare1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900H compare1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13800H compare1.8 - 5.2 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13705H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13620H « 1.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600H compare2.1 - 4.8 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13505H compare1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500H compare1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13420H compare1.5 - 4.6 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock3800 - 5100 MHz1800 - 4900 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB864 KB
L2 Cache8 MB9.5 MB
L3 Cache16 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
10 / 16
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology4 nm10 nm
Die Size178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8BGA1700
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEThread Director
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) ( - 1500 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8845HS
44.5 pt (62%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-13620H
43.4 pt (60%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
102 Points (71%)
110 Points (76%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
902 Points (17%)
691 Points (13%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15889 Points (15%)
min: 15176     avg: 15337     median: 15339 (14%)     max: 15496 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1716 Points (73%)
min: 1805     avg: 1845     median: 1860 (79%)     max: 1871 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
677 Points (75%)
min: 693     avg: 708     median: 711 (79%)     max: 719 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6231 Points (15%)
min: 5626     avg: 5786     median: 5828 (14%)     max: 5905 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2555 Points (16%)
min: 2278     avg: 2373     median: 2349 (15%)     max: 2492 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
274 Points (83%)
min: 258     avg: 261.7     median: 263 (79%)     max: 264 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
29.3 Points (38%)
27.1 Points (35%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (82%)
3.3 Points (81%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7523 Points (45%)
10181 Points (62%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
47332 Points (34%)
54809 Points (40%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
170 s (2%)
1021 s (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
5.3 s (1%)
3.1 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
19008 Points (30%)
8682 Points (14%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
65072 MIPS (37%)
min: 55381     avg: 59045     median: 59430 (34%)     max: 62324 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
6274 MIPS (75%)
min: 5742     avg: 5849     median: 5890 (70%)     max: 5915 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
138.2 fps (48%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
345.4 fps (80%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
18.6 fps (33%)
min: 16.6     avg: 16.8     median: 16.6 (29%)     max: 17.1 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (0%)
1.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
2.3 GB/s (40%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
14 GB/s (36%)
13.8 GB/s (36%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
352 Seconds (4%)
min: 353     avg: 393     median: 391 (5%)     max: 435 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
216 Seconds (2%)
min: 215     avg: 227     median: 223 (2%)     max: 243 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (10%)
min: 0.4438     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.4509 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
13632 Points (29%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.1 s (2%)
6.7 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.6 s (1%)
15.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
660 s (3%)
380 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
75313 Points (66%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
21241 Points (57%)
min: 20445     avg: 20796     median: 20532 (56%)     max: 21410 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 91770     avg: 95935     median: 95934.5 (78%)     max: 100099 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100899 Points (82%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
98837 Points (83%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16051     avg: 17310     median: 17885 (45%)     max: 17993 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
27660 Points (49%)
min: 24434     avg: 25623     median: 25096 (45%)     max: 27338 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
10069 Points (42%)
min: 9400     avg: 10748     median: 10616 (45%)     max: 12228 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2540 Points (69%)
min: 2592     avg: 2597     median: 2596.5 (71%)     max: 2601 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
12578 Points (50%)
min: 12557     avg: 12817     median: 12817 (51%)     max: 13077 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1875 Points (79%)
min: 1793     avg: 1830     median: 1831 (77%)     max: 1865 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
11802 Points (21%)
min: 11289     avg: 11647     median: 11430 (20%)     max: 12223 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1767 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
11205 Points (35%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7977 Points (80%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
42882 Points (47%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
531 ms (1%)
min: 508     avg: 510     median: 508.5 (1%)     max: 516 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
91639 Points (82%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
247 Points (71%)
min: 264     avg: 267     median: 267 (77%)     max: 270 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
295 Points (61%)
min: 282     avg: 303     median: 305.5 (64%)     max: 319 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1852 Points (71%)
min: 1857     avg: 1894     median: 1881 (72%)     max: 1944 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
74 Watt (13%)
min: 121     avg: 127.3     median: 125.9 (22%)     max: 135 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
78.1 Watt (14%)
min: 124.9     avg: 142.5     median: 132.6 (24%)     max: 170 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
3.8 Watt (3%)
min: 19.7     avg: 20.8     median: 21.2 (14%)     max: 21.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
6.4 Watt (7%)
min: 12.6     avg: 15.2     median: 15.2 (17%)     max: 17.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
32.7 Points per Watt (24%)
min: 14.7     avg: 16.9     median: 17.2 (13%)     max: 18.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS → 100% n=38

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-13620H → 99% n=38

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 18. 00:07:37

#0 checking url part for id 16399 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14723 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:21:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.031s ... 0.032s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 16399 +0.021s ... 0.054s

#7 got single benchmarks 16399 +0.011s ... 0.065s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14723 +0.016s ... 0.081s

#9 got single benchmarks 14723 +0.036s ... 0.117s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.117s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.3s ... 0.417s

#12 return log +0.024s ... 0.441s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)