Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS vs AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 8845HS

The Ryzen 7 8845HS is a powerful Hawk Point family chip that we believe to be a Ryzen 7 7840HS in disguise but with higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. The R7 8845HS was brought to life in H2 2023; it features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at up to 5.1 GHz. Last but not the least, the Radeon 780M serves as the integrated GPU.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say that there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD uncorks its 2nd generation Ryzen AI technology meaning the new processors are expected to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs. Dozens of popular apps such as DaVinci Resolve support this technology, as of late 2023.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8845HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600, ECC-enabled memory included). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

This Ryzen 7 series chip is designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 or Linux; please note that it isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since the 8845HS is a 7840HS in disguise, it's safe to expect it to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This is a very fast chip, as of Q3 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with moderate quality settings. Long story short, this is the best iGPU money can buy, as of H2 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing insanely fast. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.

The R7 8845HS is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 8840HS

The Ryzen 7 8840HS is a powerful processor (APU) of the Hawk Point family. This isn't an entirely new laptop chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 7 7840U with a slightly higher wattage as well as higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. The 8840HS has eight Zen 4 cores running at 3.3 GHz to 5.1 GHz that are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads, while the great Radeon 780M is responsible for 3D processing and similar duties.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these processors are set to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs, making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop more useful than ever before.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8840HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM. The chip is compatible with USB 4 and therefore with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes, giving NVMe SSDs up to 7.8 GB/s of throughput.

Systems built around this Ryzen 7 series APU are designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since this is a 7840U in disguise that we are dealing with here, it is safe to expect the 8840HS to be about as fast as the Core i7-12650H, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,700 MHz. This is exactly the right iGPU for people looking for a bit more horsepower than what Intel's aging Xe options can provide. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (including AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. In terms of gaming, the thing is good enough for 1080p and medium-to-low settings, as of late 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to tune to their liking, with values between 20 W and 30 W greenlighted by AMD. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The 8840HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 8845HSAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3800 - 5100 MHz3300 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP45 Watt28 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8845HS
39.8 pt (66%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8840HS
38.8 pt (65%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 102     avg: 104.1     median: 103 (58%)     max: 107.8 Points
min: 99     avg: 99.3     median: 99.3 (56%)     max: 99.6 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 567     avg: 853     median: 890 (17%)     max: 956 Points
min: 677     avg: 734     median: 733.5 (14%)     max: 790 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 14895     avg: 16146     median: 16130 (15%)     max: 18037 Points
min: 12720     avg: 13674     median: 13888 (13%)     max: 14621 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1623     avg: 1747     median: 1762 (75%)     max: 1783 Points
min: 1712     avg: 1732     median: 1737 (74%)     max: 1746 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 673     avg: 685     median: 685 (76%)     max: 698 Points
min: 649     avg: 670     median: 671 (74%)     max: 681 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5808     avg: 6309     median: 6346 (15%)     max: 7026 Points
min: 4854     avg: 5316     median: 5414 (13%)     max: 5760 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2342     avg: 2556     median: 2568 (16%)     max: 2908 Points
min: 1934     avg: 2178     median: 2176 (14%)     max: 2489 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 269     avg: 275.8     median: 275 (77%)     max: 283 Points
min: 261     avg: 268.2     median: 270 (76%)     max: 272 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 29.28     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (38%)     max: 29.76 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.29     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (79%)     max: 3.32 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7426     avg: 7475     median: 7474.5 (45%)     max: 7523 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 47332     avg: 47416     median: 47416 (34%)     max: 47500 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
85872 Points (55%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14163 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 98.896     avg: 134.4     median: 134.4 (2%)     max: 170 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.703     avg: 4     median: 4 (1%)     max: 5.3 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7327     avg: 13168     median: 13167.5 (21%)     max: 19008 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 62669     avg: 67906     median: 67167 (39%)     max: 74664 MIPS
min: 54768     avg: 59958     median: 60670 (35%)     max: 63624 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5197     avg: 6288     median: 6305 (74%)     max: 6714 MIPS
min: 5702     avg: 6126     median: 6205 (73%)     max: 6493 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
143.7 fps (48%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
289 fps (67%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 18.6     avg: 20     median: 19.6 (34%)     max: 22.7 fps
min: 14.6     avg: 16.5     median: 17 (30%)     max: 17.8 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 14     avg: 14.2     median: 14.2 (37%)     max: 14.4 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 288     avg: 328.8     median: 320 (4%)     max: 367 Seconds
min: 364     avg: 383.4     median: 375 (5%)     max: 405 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 179     avg: 201.8     median: 200 (1%)     max: 216 Seconds
min: 222     avg: 231     median: 229 (2%)     max: 246 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4304     avg: 0.5     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.4935 sec
min: 0.439     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4774 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 15479     avg: 15724     median: 15724 (33%)     max: 15969 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.1     avg: 7.2     median: 7.2 (2%)     max: 7.331 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.6     avg: 17.9     median: 17.9 (1%)     max: 18.138 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 659.5     avg: 662     median: 662.4 (3%)     max: 665.289 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 82048     avg: 82496     median: 82495.5 (63%)     max: 82943 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 19492     avg: 22246     median: 22193.5 (56%)     max: 26212 Points
min: 17511     avg: 18536     median: 18019 (45%)     max: 20839 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 81825     avg: 84905     median: 84429 (69%)     max: 88462 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 84932     avg: 86619     median: 86618.5 (70%)     max: 88305 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 86520     avg: 89786     median: 89786 (74%)     max: 93052 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 18507     avg: 20159     median: 20247 (51%)     max: 22215 Points
min: 16214     avg: 16905     median: 16660 (42%)     max: 17842 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 25099     avg: 27245     median: 27241 (49%)     max: 30715 Points
min: 18812     avg: 22330     median: 23044 (41%)     max: 23922 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8550     avg: 11294     median: 10838.5 (46%)     max: 19164 Points
min: 7391     avg: 8440     median: 8585 (36%)     max: 9011 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
min: 2510     avg: 2617     median: 2617 (67%)     max: 2698 Points
min: 2477     avg: 2548     median: 2552 (65%)     max: 2594 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
min: 11073     avg: 12791     median: 12721 (49%)     max: 14014 Points
min: 11081     avg: 11646     median: 11327 (44%)     max: 12843 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2577     avg: 2582     median: 2582 (82%)     max: 2587 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12719     avg: 12721     median: 12720.5 (52%)     max: 12722 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1765     avg: 1924     median: 1950 (76%)     max: 2004 Points
min: 1822     avg: 1906     median: 1925 (75%)     max: 1946 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11256     avg: 11855     median: 11819 (21%)     max: 12726 Points
min: 9779     avg: 10410     median: 9949 (18%)     max: 11542 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1895     avg: 1903     median: 1900 (8%)     max: 1914 Points
min: 1796     avg: 1825     median: 1817 (8%)     max: 1863 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11742     avg: 11979     median: 12086 (38%)     max: 12109 Points
min: 9436     avg: 10052     median: 9866 (31%)     max: 10854 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8034     avg: 8049     median: 8048.5 (80%)     max: 8063 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 47602     avg: 47690     median: 47689.5 (48%)     max: 47777 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 496     avg: 537     median: 530 (1%)     max: 664 ms
min: 518     avg: 537     median: 538 (1%)     max: 563 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 85632     avg: 90739     median: 90496 (75%)     max: 96330 Points
89899 Points (75%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 176.4     avg: 252.9     median: 255 (70%)     max: 314 Points
min: 246     avg: 249.8     median: 248 (68%)     max: 257 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 275     avg: 303.7     median: 305 (55%)     max: 334 Points
min: 297     avg: 328     median: 298 (54%)     max: 440 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1531     avg: 1765     median: 1790 (67%)     max: 1939 Points
min: 1643     avg: 1666     median: 1658 (62%)     max: 1698 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 65.9     avg: 86.3     median: 83.6 (14%)     max: 147.2 Watt
min: 39.5     avg: 49.7     median: 46.6 (8%)     max: 62.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 60.5     avg: 83.3     median: 78.1 (14%)     max: 145.6 Watt
min: 22.3     avg: 41     median: 44.3 (8%)     max: 53.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.78     avg: 8.7     median: 7.1 (5%)     max: 16.5 Watt
min: 4.62     avg: 5.9     median: 5.8 (4%)     max: 7.55 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.42     avg: 8.1     median: 7.2 (8%)     max: 11.8 Watt
min: 5.36     avg: 6.1     median: 5.8 (6%)     max: 7.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 20     avg: 32.2     median: 33.7 (25%)     max: 38.7 Points per Watt
min: 42.3     avg: 46     median: 45.9 (34%)     max: 49.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS → 100% n=29

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS → 91% n=29

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 17. 06:07:43

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16399 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 16413 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1737090463s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 16 Jan 2025 05:19:15 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 16399 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 16399 +0.016s ... 0.025s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 16413 +0.004s ... 0.029s

#10 got single benchmarks 16413 +0.007s ... 0.037s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.037s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.047s ... 0.084s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.085s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)