Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 8840U vs Intel Core Ultra 7 266V vs Intel Core Ultra 5 228V

AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 8840U

The Ryzen 7 8840U is a powerful laptop processor (APU) of the Hawk Point family. This isn't an entirely new APU; instead, the R7 8840U is a rebadged R7 7840U with higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. Its eight Zen 4 cores run at 3.3 GHz to 5.1 GHz and are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads. The great Radeon 780M iGPU is responsible for 3D processing and similar duties.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these chips are promised to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop more powerful than ever before.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to deliver a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8840U has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM. The chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes, giving fast NVMe SSD up to 7.8 GB/s of throughput.

Systems built around the 8840U are designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since the 8840U is a 7840U in disguise, it's safe to expect it to be about as fast as the Core i7-12650H, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This means the chip is fast enough to make 99% of consumers happy, as of December 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,700 MHz. This is exactly the right iGPU for people looking for a bit more horsepower than what Intel's aging Xe options can provide. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (including AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. In terms of gaming, the thing is good enough for 1080p and medium-to-low settings, as of late 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W. Laptop makers are free to change that value significantly, with values as low as 15 W and as high as 30 W greenlighted by AMD. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The 8840U is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core Ultra 7 266V

► remove from comparison Intel Core Ultra 7 266V

The Intel Core Ultra 7 266V is a higher-end Lunar Lake family processor. This is an SoC for use in tablets and laptops of the slimmer kind that was unveiled in Autumn 2024. It sports 4 new Skymont E-cores and 4 new Lion Cove P-cores running at up to 3.7 GHz and 5.0 GHz respectively, along with the new Arc 140V iGPU and 16 GB of on-package LPDDR5x-8533 RAM. A new 48 TOPS neural engine, Thunderbolt 4 and PCIe 5 SSD support are included as well. A vPro-enabled version of the CPU became available in early 2025.

The only difference between this chip and the Ultra 7 268V is the amount of on-package, non-replaceable RAM: 16 GB vs 32 GB respectively.

Architecture and Features

Lunar Lake is built using the Foveros technology (stacking several dies on top of each other and next to each other), just like Meteor Lake was. The new chips make use of the enormous BGA2833 socket interface. Of the 8 cores, not a single one is Hyper-Threading-enabled which is the opposite of what AMD currently does with its Zen 5/5c chips.

Intel claims Lion Cove cores bring a 14% IPC improvement over Redwood Cove. For Skymont and Crestmont, the difference is much higher at 68%. Several tweaks and improvements are present here, such as the Low Latency Fabric that is supposed to make small data transfers between cores/caches a lot faster. The 266V has a very healthy 12 MB of level 3 cache; elsewhere, it has 4 PCIe 5 and 4 PCIe 4 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices, including NVMe SSDs at up to 15.75 GB/s. Thunderbolt 4 support is onboard by default, as is support for CNVi WiFi 7 + BT 5.4 cards from Intel. The 48 TOPS "AI Boost" neural engine is present along with technologies such as Threat Detection to make AI-enabled applications such as the Windows Defender more powerful.

Intel is predicted to get short of on-package RAM in subsequent CPU generations.

Performance

The 266V should be just a couple of percentage points faster than the 256V for an Core Ultra 7 165U or Core i7-1360P-like multi-thread performance, provided it's running at the default long-term TDP power target which is 17 W.

Generally speaking, the 288V, 268V, 266V, 258V, 256V are faster than the 238V, 236V, 228V and 226V due to the difference in their last-level cache size (8 MB vs 12 MB) as well as clock speeds. However, the difference in performance between the slowest Lunar Lake chip, the 226V, and the fastest chip, the 288V is fairly small at around 10% to 15%. It depends on the TDP figures of the laptops being pitted against each other more than on anything else.

Graphics

The Arc Graphics 140V is here to replace the Arc 8 iGPU. Its 8 Xe² architecture "cores" run at up to 2,000 MHz and it also has 8 ray tracing units at its disposal. The adapter is DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled and able to HW-decode a long list of popular video codecs such as h.266 VVC, h.265 HEVC, h.264 AVC, AV1 and VP9. Three SUHD 4320p monitors can be used simultaneously with this iGPU.

All 2023 and 2024 games are playable at 1080p on low graphics settings or higher with this iGPU. We got well over 30 fps in Ghost of Tsushima and almost 40 fps in Baldur's Gate 3. This means the Radeon 780M gets left behind while the Radeon 890M reigns supreme.

Power consumption

This 2nd generation Core Ultra processor is supposed to consume 17 W when under long-term workloads. The Intel-recommended short-term power limit for the chip sits at 37 W.

Intel Core Ultra 5 228V

► remove from comparison Intel Core Ultra 5 228V

The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V is one of the 2 slowest Lunar Lake family processors as of Nov 2024. This is an SoC for use in tablets and laptops of the slimmer kind that was unveiled in Autumn 2024. It features 4 new Skymont E-cores and 4 new Lion Cove P-cores running at up to 3.5 GHz and 4.5 GHz respectively, along with the new Arc 130V iGPU and 32 GB of on-package LPDDR5x-8533 RAM. A new 40 TOPS neural engine, Thunderbolt 4 and PCIe 5 SSD support are included as well.

The only difference between this chip and the Ultra 5 226V is the amount of on-package, non-replaceable RAM: 32 GB vs 16 GB respectively.

Architecture and Features

Lunar Lake is built using the Foveros technology (stacking several dies on top of each other and next to each other), just like Meteor Lake was. The new chips make use of the enormous BGA2833 socket interface. Of the 8 cores, not a single one is Hyper-Threading-enabled which is the opposite of what AMD currently does with its Zen 5/5c chips.

Intel claims Lion Cove cores bring a 14% IPC improvement over Redwood Cove. For Skymont and Crestmont, the difference is much higher at 68%. Several tweaks and improvements are present here, such as the Low Latency Fabric that is supposed to make small data transfers between cores/caches a lot faster. The 228V's level 3 cache is pretty small as compared to more expensive Ultra 7 2xxV and Ultra 9 2xxV chips at 8 MB vs 12 MB. Elsewhere, the 228V has 4 PCIe 5 and 4 PCIe 4 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices, including NVMe SSDs at up to 15.75 GB/s. Thunderbolt 4 support is onboard by default, as is support for CNVi WiFi 7 + BT 5.4 cards from Intel. The 40 TOPS "AI Boost" neural engine is present along with technologies such as Threat Detection to make AI-enabled applications such as the Windows Defender more powerful.

Intel is predicted to get short of on-package RAM in subsequent CPU generations.

Performance

Our in-house testing of an Acer laptop powered by the 226V which is essentially the same chip revealed the latter to be about as fast as the Ryzen 7 7730U and the Ryzen 7 7735U in multi-threaded tasks which is OK but not mind-blowing for late 2024. It is worth noting that the laptop in question does not use the Intel-recommended 17 W long-term power target; instead, the processor gets 30 W to eat which affects its benchmark scores significantly.

Generally speaking, the 226V, 228V, 236V and 238V are slower than the 256V, 258V, 266V, 268V, 288V due to the difference in their last-level cache size as well as clock speeds. However, the difference in performance between the slowest Lunar Lake chip, the 226V, and the fastest chip, the 288V is fairly small at around 10% to 15%. Exact figures depend on the TDP values of the laptops being pitted against each other more than on anything else.

Graphics

The Arc Graphics 130V has 7 Xe² architecture "cores" running at up to 1,850 MHz, as well as 7 ray tracing units at its disposal. This is a direct successor to the Arc 7 iGPU; it is DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled and able to HW-decode a long list of video codecs such as h.266 VVC, h.265 HEVC, h.264 AVC, AV1 and VP9. Three SUHD 4320p monitors can be used simultaneously with this iGPU.

Its performance can be vastly different depending on which benchmarks and games one runs. Oftentimes, it isn't much faster than its direct predecessor, the Arc 7. It is clear the 130V isn't fast enough to run most triple-A 2024 games at 1080p. However, it's still more than good enough for an occasional gaming session.

Power consumption

This 2nd generation Core Ultra processor is supposed to consume 17 W when under long-term workloads. The Intel-recommended short-term power limit for the chip sits at 37 W.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 8840UIntel Core Ultra 7 266VIntel Core Ultra 5 228V
CodenameHawk Point-U (Zen 4)Lunar LakeLunar Lake
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)Intel Lunar LakeIntel Lunar Lake
Series: Lunar Lake Lunar Lake
AMD Ryzen 7 2503.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2503.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z23.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2303.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2303.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640U3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 266V « 2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 238V2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 236V2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 266V2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 238V2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 236V2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V « 2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock3300 - 5100 MHz2200 - 5000 MHz2100 - 4500 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB1.4 MB1.4 MB
L2 Cache8 MB14 MB14 MB
L3 Cache16 MB12 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 8
4 x 5.0 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
8 / 8
4 x 4.5 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
4 x 3.5 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
TDP28 Watt17 Watt17 Watt
Technology4 nm3 nm3 nm
Die Size178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8BGA2833BGA2833
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3LPDDR5x-8533 RAM, PCIe 5 + PCIe 4, USB 4, AI Boost NPU (48 TOPS), Thread Director, PSE, Threat Detection, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNi, FMA3, SHALPDDR5x-8533 RAM, PCIe 5 + PCIe 4, USB 4, AI Boost NPU (40 TOPS), Thread Director, PSE, Threat Detection, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNi, FMA3, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)Intel Arc Graphics 140V (300 - 2000 MHz)Intel Arc Graphics 130V (300 - 1850 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
TDP Turbo PL237 Watt37 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8840U
38.1 pt (63%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Core Ultra 5 228V
36.2 pt (60%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
98 Points (55%)
112.5 Points (63%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
748 Points (14%)
506 Points (9%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 10162     avg: 12191     median: 12972 (12%)     max: 13563 Points
9787 Points (9%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1088     avg: 1619     median: 1703 (72%)     max: 1740 Points
1755 Points (74%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 427     avg: 621     median: 665 (72%)     max: 680 Points
677 Points (74%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3987     avg: 4817     median: 5067 (12%)     max: 5336 Points
3820 Points (9%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1539     avg: 2003     median: 2024 (13%)     max: 2453 Points
1470 Points (9%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 176.6     avg: 249.7     median: 266 (74%)     max: 275 Points
261 Points (72%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
24.1 Points (31%)
18.8 Points (24%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.2 Points (76%)
3.3 Points (79%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7381 Points (45%)
10037 Points (61%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
41306 Points (30%)
41480 Points (30%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
71128 Points (45%)
66113 Points (42%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
13618 Points (17%)
15516 Points (19%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
84.3 s (1%)
285.1 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.3 s (1%)
9.2 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4978 Points (8%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 47579     avg: 54539     median: 57550 (33%)     max: 59549 MIPS
33631 MIPS (19%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4168     avg: 5727     median: 6012 (71%)     max: 6469 MIPS
5257 MIPS (62%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
118.7 fps (3%)
91.4 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
267 fps (7%)
290.3 fps (7%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 12.5     avg: 15.2     median: 15.8 (28%)     max: 16.5 fps
11.8 fps (21%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (32%)
0.7 GB/s (20%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.7 GB/s (29%)
1.3 GB/s (22%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
11.5 GB/s (30%)
6.8 GB/s (18%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 383     avg: 423.6     median: 405 (5%)     max: 517 Seconds
702 Seconds (9%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 239     avg: 264.4     median: 246 (2%)     max: 315 Seconds
388 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4514     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.678 sec
0.5 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 13841     avg: 14195     median: 14245 (30%)     max: 14498 Points
11286 Points (24%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.8 s (2%)
8.6 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
21.3 s (1%)
19 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
754 s (3%)
417 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 67701     avg: 68184     median: 68141 (52%)     max: 68709 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 13875     avg: 16398     median: 17132 (42%)     max: 18587 Points
13540 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 51143     avg: 64986     median: 64712.5 (53%)     max: 79375 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 51152     avg: 61249     median: 51313 (42%)     max: 81282 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 78859     avg: 83002     median: 84626 (68%)     max: 85520 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 10973     avg: 14368     median: 13601 (34%)     max: 17112 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 17856     avg: 20716     median: 21341 (38%)     max: 23864 Points
18054 Points (32%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6208     avg: 8025     median: 8271 (35%)     max: 9004 Points
5987 Points (25%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 1654     avg: 2354     median: 2528 (63%)     max: 2607 Points
2670 Points (67%)
min: 2562     avg: 2574     median: 2573.5 (64%)     max: 2585 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 9609     avg: 10699     median: 10366 (40%)     max: 12664 Points
10865 Points (42%)
min: 10036     avg: 10175     median: 10174.5 (39%)     max: 10313 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2384 Points (76%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
10532 Points (43%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1278     avg: 1761     median: 1879 (73%)     max: 1937 Points
min: 1811     avg: 1858     median: 1857.5 (73%)     max: 1904 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8205     avg: 9600     median: 9258 (17%)     max: 11296 Points
min: 8979     avg: 9015     median: 9015 (16%)     max: 9051 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1817 Points (8%)
1840 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
8056 Points (25%)
9020 Points (28%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8099 Points (81%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
32114 Points (32%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 515     avg: 581     median: 539 (1%)     max: 779 ms
499 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 170.4     avg: 225.3     median: 240.8 (66%)     max: 249 Points
266 Points (73%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 216     avg: 286.2     median: 303 (54%)     max: 306 Points
288 Points (52%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1541     avg: 1639     median: 1625 (61%)     max: 1766 Points
1570 Points (59%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 31.5     avg: 43.2     median: 48.2 (8%)     max: 50 Watt
51.7 Watt (9%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 28.2     avg: 41.9     median: 41.9 (8%)     max: 55.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 5.47     avg: 9.5     median: 6.2 (4%)     max: 16.9 Watt
6.3 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.93     avg: 10.8     median: 9.4 (10%)     max: 22.5 Watt
4.7 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
54.6 Points per Watt (41%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8840U → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 266V → 105% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 5 228V → 100% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 08. 07:55:34

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16401 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18008 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 17999 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1757310934s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 07 Sep 2025 05:18:17 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.011s ... 0.011s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.012s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 16401 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#9 got single benchmarks 16401 +0.011s ... 0.026s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 18008 +0.001s ... 0.027s

#11 got single benchmarks 18008 +0.003s ... 0.03s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 17999 +0.004s ... 0.033s

#13 got single benchmarks 17999 +0.004s ... 0.038s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.038s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.05s ... 0.088s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.088s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)