Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS vs AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS vs AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS

► remove from comparison AMD R5 8640HS

The Ryzen 5 8640HS is a mid-range, Hawk Point family processor that was unveiled in Q4 2023. The 8640HS isn't actually a new chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 5 7640U, with slightly higher wattage of the 8640HS being the only meaningful difference between the two. The 8640HS has 6 SMT-enabled cores (12 threads) running at 3.5 GHz to 4.9 GHz. Those Zen 4 architecture cores are mated to the Radeon 760M integrated graphics adapter, and the Ryzen AI technology, now in its 2nd generation, is onboard as well to make apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop more powerful than ever before.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these processors are set to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to deliver a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8640HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and USB 4 support (therefore, Thunderbolt is supported as well). The chip is compatible with DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM which is still impressive as of late 2023.

A system powered by this Ryzen 5 will have access to twenty PCIe 4 lanes; this means a speedy enough NVMe SSD will be able to deliver speeds up to 7.8 GB/s.

Systems powered by this APU are expected to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Like most laptop chips, the 8640HS is neither overclockable nor user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

It's safe to expect the APU to be at least 15% faster than the Zen 3 Plus-powered Ryzen 5 6600U (6 cores, 12 threads, up to 4.5 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 760M has 8 CUs (512 shaders) running at up to 2,600 MHz. While not great for gaming (unless you are fine with resolutions such as 900p and low detail settings), the iGPU will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It also HW-decodes and HW-encodes the most widely used video codecs including AV1, HEVC, AVC without breaking a sweat.

Power consumption

The 8640HS has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to change to anything between 20 W and 30 W. Most companies will probably go for a higher value to get better performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by the chip.

Last but not the least, the 8640HS is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 8945HS

The Ryzen 9 8945HS is a rebadged Ryzen 9 7940HS with virtually no differences between the two to report. To be more specific, the 8945HS is a powerful Hawk Point family laptop chip that has eight Zen 4 cores running at 4.0 GHz to 5.2 GHz. This APU was brought to life in H2 2023 and all of its cores are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads.

This powerful Ryzen 9 series processor comes with the 2nd generation Ryzen AI technology. The Radeon 780M serves as the integrated graphics adapter.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these chips are promised to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop even more powerful.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8945HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast RAM (up to LPDDR5x-7500 or DDR5-5600; no ECC support). The processor is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt; PCIe support is limited to the 4.0 spec for a throughput of 1.97 GB/s per lane. 20 lanes are available.

OS support is limited to 64-bit editions of Windows 11 and Windows 10 and of course to Linux. Note that the chip isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable as it gets soldered down for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The 8945HS is an R9 7940HS in disguise, so it's realistic to expect the chip to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-12900HK and also the Ryzen 7 7840HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) running at up to 2,800 MHz. This is a very fast iGPU, as of late 2023. It will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p, and it is also capable of HW-encoding and HW-decoding the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1. More importantly, it is fast enough for proper 1080p gaming as long as one is fine with low to medium detail settings.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of the system is, how fast the RAM of the system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving laptop makers a choice between longer battery life and higher performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a system powered by this chip.

The 8945HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 8840HS

The Ryzen 7 8840HS is a powerful processor (APU) of the Hawk Point family. This isn't an entirely new laptop chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 7 7840U, the slightly higher wattage of the 8840HS being the only meaningful difference between the two. The 8840HS has eight Zen 4 cores running at 3.3 GHz to 5.1 GHz that are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads, while the great Radeon 780M is responsible for 3D processing and similar duties. The 8840HS also features the Ryzen AI technology, now in its 2nd generation.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these processors are set to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs, making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop more useful than ever before.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8840HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM. The chip is compatible with USB 4 and therefore with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes, giving NVMe SSDs up to 7.8 GB/s of throughput.

Systems built around this Ryzen 7 series APU are designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since this is a 7840U in disguise that we are dealing with here, it is safe to expect the 8840HS to be about as fast as the Core i7-12650H, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,700 MHz. This is exactly the right iGPU for people looking for a bit more horsepower than what Intel's aging Xe options can provide. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (including AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. In terms of gaming, the thing is good enough for 1080p and medium-to-low settings, as of late 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to tune to their liking, with values between 20 W and 30 W greenlighted by AMD. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The 8840HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 8640HSAMD Ryzen 9 8945HSAMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040)
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS « 3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3500 - 4900 MHz4000 - 5200 MHz3300 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache6 MB8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 12
6 x 4.9 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP28 Watt45 Watt28 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8FP7/FP7r2/FP8FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3DDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
iGPUAMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 8945HS
45.6 pt (63%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8840HS
42.6 pt (59%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
min: 103     avg: 105.7     median: 106.1 (74%)     max: 108 Points
99 Points (69%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
min: 934     avg: 963     median: 967 (18%)     max: 988 Points
677 Points (13%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 16795     avg: 17082     median: 17079 (16%)     max: 17376 Points
min: 13082     avg: 13485     median: 13485 (13%)     max: 13888 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1805     avg: 1810     median: 1805 (77%)     max: 1825 Points
min: 1745     avg: 1746     median: 1745.5 (74%)     max: 1746 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 698     avg: 701     median: 698 (78%)     max: 711 Points
min: 649     avg: 664     median: 664 (74%)     max: 679 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6591     avg: 6670     median: 6652 (16%)     max: 6785 Points
min: 4994     avg: 5204     median: 5204 (13%)     max: 5414 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2640     avg: 2683     median: 2659 (17%)     max: 2775 Points
min: 2045     avg: 2111     median: 2110.5 (13%)     max: 2176 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 281     avg: 282.5     median: 281 (85%)     max: 287 Points
min: 261     avg: 264.5     median: 264.5 (80%)     max: 268 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 30.85     avg: 31.1     median: 31.1 (40%)     max: 31.31 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.38     avg: 3.4     median: 3.4 (85%)     max: 3.45 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7748     avg: 7786     median: 7785.5 (47%)     max: 7823 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 49273     avg: 49299     median: 49299 (36%)     max: 49325 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
90144 Points (63%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14561 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 67.933     avg: 132.2     median: 132.2 (2%)     max: 196.4 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.563     avg: 4.4     median: 4.4 (1%)     max: 6.2 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7843     avg: 14109     median: 14108.5 (22%)     max: 20374 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 71534     avg: 71941     median: 71704 (41%)     max: 72821 MIPS
min: 54768     avg: 57908     median: 57907.5 (33%)     max: 61047 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5994     avg: 6290     median: 6249.5 (75%)     max: 6668 MIPS
min: 5912     avg: 6059     median: 6058.5 (72%)     max: 6205 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
150.7 fps (53%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
298 fps (69%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 20.9     avg: 21.4     median: 21.3 (37%)     max: 22.2 fps
min: 15.7     avg: 16.4     median: 16.4 (29%)     max: 17 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.3     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (0%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 15.3     avg: 15.4     median: 15.4 (40%)     max: 15.4 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 293     avg: 307.5     median: 312 (4%)     max: 313 Seconds
min: 369     avg: 387     median: 387 (5%)     max: 405 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 186     avg: 191.5     median: 192 (1%)     max: 196 Seconds
min: 226     avg: 236     median: 236 (2%)     max: 246 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4294     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4452 sec
min: 0.4521     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4638 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
15691 Points (33%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.045     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (2%)     max: 7.2 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.549     avg: 17.7     median: 17.7 (1%)     max: 17.8 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
577 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
82048 Points (72%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 20927     avg: 22330     median: 22175 (60%)     max: 23888 Points
min: 17511     avg: 17765     median: 17765 (48%)     max: 18019 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
88725 Points (72%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
89119 Points (72%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
90575 Points (76%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
21416 Points (54%)
16660 Points (42%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 26862     avg: 27751     median: 27163 (48%)     max: 29228 Points
min: 22488     avg: 22766     median: 22766 (41%)     max: 23044 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 10479     avg: 11007     median: 11051 (47%)     max: 11492 Points
min: 8297     avg: 8654     median: 8654 (36%)     max: 9011 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2632     avg: 2662     median: 2658 (72%)     max: 2698 Points
min: 2525     avg: 2539     median: 2538.5 (68%)     max: 2552 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 13155     avg: 13411     median: 13387 (53%)     max: 13715 Points
min: 11081     avg: 11180     median: 11180 (44%)     max: 11279 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1835     avg: 1908     median: 1900 (80%)     max: 1996 Points
min: 1894     avg: 1918     median: 1918 (81%)     max: 1942 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11564     avg: 11994     median: 11966 (21%)     max: 12481 Points
min: 9897     avg: 9923     median: 9923 (18%)     max: 9949 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1906 Points (8%)
1817 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
12386 Points (39%)
9866 Points (31%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8178 Points (82%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
49269 Points (54%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 488     avg: 501     median: 505 (1%)     max: 509 ms
min: 518     avg: 528     median: 528 (1%)     max: 538 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
94227 Points (85%)
89899 Points (81%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 250     avg: 259.7     median: 260 (75%)     max: 269 Points
min: 246     avg: 247     median: 247 (71%)     max: 248 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 303     avg: 314.3     median: 316 (66%)     max: 324 Points
min: 297     avg: 368.5     median: 368.5 (77%)     max: 440 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1767     avg: 1821     median: 1830 (70%)     max: 1866 Points
min: 1643     avg: 1671     median: 1670.5 (64%)     max: 1698 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 93.6     avg: 110     median: 110 (19%)     max: 126.4 Watt
46.6 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 93.5     avg: 112     median: 112 (20%)     max: 130.5 Watt
min: 41.1     avg: 44.3     median: 44.3 (8%)     max: 47.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 6.34     avg: 14     median: 14 (9%)     max: 21.6 Watt
min: 5.32     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (4%)     max: 6.09 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 8.62     avg: 15.6     median: 15.6 (17%)     max: 22.5 Watt
min: 5.67     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (6%)     max: 5.75 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
28.4 Points per Watt (21%)
min: 45.9     avg: 47.9     median: 47.9 (36%)     max: 49.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 20. 10:16:29

#0 checking url part for id 16411 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16397 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 16413 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:35:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.039s ... 0.04s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.04s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 16411 +0.002s ... 0.042s

#8 got single benchmarks 16411 +0s ... 0.043s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 16397 +0.017s ... 0.059s

#10 got single benchmarks 16397 +0.021s ... 0.081s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 16413 +0.016s ... 0.097s

#12 got single benchmarks 16413 +0.009s ... 0.106s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.106s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.136s ... 0.242s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.247s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.252s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.257s

#18 min, max, avg, median took s +0.103s ... 0.36s

#19 return log +0s ... 0.36s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)