Notebookcheck Logo

PowerVR GE8320 vs Qualcomm Adreno 642

PowerVR GE8320

► remove from comparison

The PowerVR GE8320 by Imagination Technologies is an integrated graphics card for mid-range ARM SoCs. It belongs to the Series8XE series of GPUs (GE8xx0) and supports OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 1.2, Android NN HAL API and Vulkan 1.0.

Qualcomm Adreno 642

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 642

The Qualcomm Adreno 642 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G SoC. The chip will be available from mid 2021 and will be used mainly in upper mid-range Android devices.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 642 GPU offers a 50% improved performance over the Adreno 620, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 768G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR4X-4200 memory support of the SoC.

The Adreno 642 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

The Snapdragon 780G is manufactured in the modern 5nm LPPE process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.

show full text
PowerVR GE8320Qualcomm Adreno 642
Adreno 600 Series
PowerVR GE8320 @ 0.4 - 0.65 GHz
PowerVR GE8300 compare @ 0.66 GHz
PowerVR GE8100 compare @ 0.57 GHz
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
ArchitecturePowerVR Series8XE
Core Speed400 - 650 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memorynoyes
APIDirectX 10, OpenGL 3.x, 4.x, OpenGL ES 3.0OpenGL ES 3.2
technology20 nm5 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 1.2, Android NN HAL API SupportOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement09.09.2014 07.05.2021
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.imgtec.com
CPU in PowerVR GE8320GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Mediatek Helio G378 x 1800 MHz? MHz680 MHz
Mediatek Helio G358 x 2300 MHz? MHz680 MHz
Mediatek Helio G368 x 2200 MHz? MHz680 MHz
» show 7 more
min. - max.? - 650 MHz? - 680 MHz
CPU in Adreno 642GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G8 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 6785     avg: 11520     median: 11994 (1%)     max: 13939 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 6867     avg: 7128     median: 7128 (1%)     max: 7389 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
9534 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 494     avg: 806     median: 812 (4%)     max: 1214 Points
5587 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 445     avg: 750     median: 765 (2%)     max: 881 Points
8380 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 302     avg: 499     median: 493 (2%)     max: 1166 Points
4478 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 253     avg: 424.3     median: 428 (1%)     max: 516 Points
6148 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
0 Points (0%)
3212 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
0 Points (0%)
786 Points (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 0.6     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (0%)     max: 0.65 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 0.85     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (0%)     max: 1.6 fps
18 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 2.3     avg: 3.9     median: 3.9 (0%)     max: 7.4 fps
50 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 1.8     avg: 3     median: 2.9 (0%)     max: 6.1 fps
40 fps (5%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 3.7     avg: 6.6     median: 6.7 (0%)     max: 8.3 fps
65 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 6.3     avg: 10.4     median: 10.5 (1%)     max: 12 fps
90 fps (5%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + PowerVR GE8320
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 13     avg: 19.9     median: 20 (0%)     max: 23 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642
153 fps (1%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 15496     avg: 16406     median: 16655 (2%)     max: 17214 Points
162946 Points (20%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
0 fps (0%)
48 fps (0%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
0 Points (0%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 2578     avg: 7793     median: 6525 (7%)     max: 13202 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 575     avg: 2322     median: 2965 (5%)     max: 3666 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 1.84     avg: 2.3     median: 2.2 (1%)     max: 2.91 Watt

Average Benchmarks PowerVR GE8320 → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 1059% n=11

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
42  fps
high
PowerVR GE8320:
0 (!)  fps
ultra
PowerVR GE8320:
0 (!)  fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
48  fps
high
PowerVR GE8320:
0 (!)  fps
ultra
PowerVR GE8320:
0 (!)  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
15  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
24 30 33.5 ~ 29 fps
103%
Adreno 642:
30  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
22 24 24 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 ~ 25 fps
240%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
med.
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
22 23 24 24 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 ~ 24 fps
246%
Adreno 642:
59  fps
high
PowerVR GE8320:
0 (!) 0 (!) ~ 0 fps
Adreno 642:
60  fps
ultra
PowerVR GE8320:
0 (!)  fps
Adreno 642:
40  fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
30 31 31 56 ~ 37 fps
ultra
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
29 30 31 43 ~ 33 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
47 58 ~ 53 fps
high
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
57  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
30  fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
28  fps
high
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
21 30 ~ 26 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
10 19 27 28 ~ 21 fps
286%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
high
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
12 22 24 ~ 19 fps
316%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
24 24 26 ~ 25 fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
44.5 59 ~ 52 fps

Average Gaming PowerVR GE8320 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 238%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 272%

PowerVR GE8320lowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift42
Call of Duty Mobile48
Genshin Impact15
Armajet29
PUBG Mobile25240
Arena of Valor3733
Shadow Fight 35357
Dead Trigger 230
Asphalt 8: Airborne2826
Asphalt 9: Legends2119
Real Racing 325
Temple Run 252
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		4
4

1


4
3


1







Qualcomm Adreno 642lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Armajet30
PUBG Mobile60596040
Asphalt 9: Legends6060
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2

1


1
2

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 18. 17:13:13

#0 checking url part for id 9411 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10693 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 16 May 2024 05:40:59 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.103s ... 0.104s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.104s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.104s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9411 +0.032s ... 0.136s

#8 got single benchmarks 9411 +0.207s ... 0.343s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10693 +0.002s ... 0.344s

#10 got single benchmarks 10693 +0.007s ... 0.351s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.351s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.066s ... 0.417s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.008s ... 0.425s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.032s ... 0.457s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.46s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.462s

#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.005s ... 0.467s

#18 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.467s

#19 Got 69 rows for game benchmarks. +0.03s ... 0.497s

#20 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.497s

#21 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.005s ... 0.502s

#22 benchmarks composed for output. +0.028s ... 0.53s

#23 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.53s

#24 return log +0.038s ... 0.568s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)