Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU vs NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

► remove from comparison NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

The Nvidia RTX 4000 Ada Generation, not to be confused with the A4000, P4000 or RTX 4000 Turing Generation, is a very powerful professional graphics card for use in laptops that sports 7,424 CUDA cores and 12 GB of ECC GDDR6 VRAM. Brought into existence in 2023, this graphics adapter leverages TSMC's 5 nm process and Nvidia's Ada Lovelace architecture to achieve great performance combined with moderate power consumption. The Nvidia-recommended TGP range for the card is very wide at 60 W to 175 W leading to bizarre performance differences between different systems powered by what is supposed to be the same product.

Hardware-wise, the RTX 4000 is a GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop in disguise. Consequently, both make use of the AD103 chip and have little difficulty running triple-A games at QHD 1440p.

Quadro series graphics cards ship with much different BIOS and drivers than GeForce cards and are targeted at professional users rather than gamers. Commercial product design, large-scale calculations, simulation, data mining, 24 x 7 operation - if any of this sounds familiar, then a Quadro card will make you happy.

Architecture and Features

Ada Lovelace brings a range of improvements over older graphics cards utilizing the outgoing Ampere architecture. It's not just a better manufacturing process and a higher number of CUDA cores that we have here (up to 16,384 versus 10,752); under-the-hood refinements are plentiful, including an immensely larger L2 cache and an optimized ray tracing routine (a different way to determine what is transparent and what isn't is used) and other changes. Naturally, these graphics cards can both encode and decode some of the most widely used video codecs, AVC, HEVC and AV1 included; they also support a host of Nvidia technologies, including Optimus and DLSS 3, and they can certainly be used for various AI tasks.

The RTX 4000 features 58 RT cores of the 3rd generation, 232 Tensor cores of the 4th generation and 7,424 CUDA cores, making it a lot faster than the RTX 3500 Ada Generation. Elsewhere, the graphics card comes with 12 GB of 192-bit wide ECC GDDR6 memory for a very healthy throughput of ~432 GB/s. Error correction can be turned off if desired. The fact that error correction is present here proves that the RTX 4000 is indeed targeted at professional users.

Just like Ampere-based cards, the RTX 4000 makes use of the PCI-Express 4 protocol. 8K SUHD monitors are supported, however DP 1.4a video outputs can potentially prove to be a bottleneck down the line.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system featuring an RTX 4000 Ada Generation as of February 2024, we have plenty of performance data for the GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop, a graphics card with very similar specifications. Based on that, we fully expect the RTX 4000 to deliver:

  • a Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA score of around 23 seconds
  • a 3DMark 11 GPU score of around 57,000
  • at least 115 fps in GTA V (1440p - Highest settings possible, 16x AF, 4x MSAA, FXAA)
  • close to 50 fps in Cyberpunk 2077 (1440p - High settings, Ultra RT, "Quality" DLSS)

Nvidia's marketing materials mention "up to 33.5 TFLOPS" of performance which is impressive. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation delivers a little over 42 TFLOPS, for reference.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the TGP power target of the RTX 4000 is. One other thing worth mentioning is that enabling error correction appears to reduce the amount of video memory that is available to applications and games by up to a gigabyte.

Power consumption

Nvidia no longer divides its laptop graphics cards into Max-Q and non-max-Q models. Instead, laptop makers are free to set the TGP according to their needs, and the range can sometimes be shockingly wide. This is the case with the RTX 4000, as the lowest value recommended for it sits at just 60 W while the highest is more than two times higher at 175 W (this most likely includes Dynamic Boost). The slowest system built around an RTX 4000 Ada can easily be 60% slower than the fastest one. This is the kind of delta that we've already seen on consumer-grade laptops featuring the latest GeForce RTX cards.

Last but not the least, the improved 5 nm process (TSMC 4N) the RTX 4000 Ada is built with makes for very decent energy efficiency, as of mid 2023.

NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

► remove from comparison NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

The Nvidia RTX 3000 Ada Generation, not to be confused with the A3000, P3000 or RTX 3000 Turing Generation, is a higher-end professional graphics card for use in laptops that sports 4,608 CUDA cores and 8 GB of ECC GDDR6 VRAM (error correction can be turned off if desired). It would be fair to say that this is a GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop in disguise; consequently, the graphics card is fast enough for many games at 1440p with quality set to High. Brought into existence in 2023, the RTX 3000 leverages TSMC's 5 nm process and Nvidia's Ada Lovelace architecture to achieve very decent performance combined with moderate power consumption. The Nvidia-recommended TGP range for the card is very wide at 35 W to 140 W leading to bizarre performance differences between different systems powered by what is supposed to be the same product.

Quadro series graphics cards ship with much different BIOS and drivers than GeForce cards and are targeted at professional use rather than gaming. Commercial product design, large-scale calculations, simulation, data mining, 24 x 7 operation, certified drivers - if any of this sounds familiar, then a Quadro card will make you happy.

Architecture and Features

Ada Lovelace brings a range of improvements over older graphics cards utilizing the outgoing Ampere architecture. It's not just a better manufacturing process and a higher number of CUDA cores that we have here (up to 16,384 versus 10,752); under-the-hood refinements are plentiful, including an immensely larger L2 cache, an optimized ray tracing routine (a smarter technique is used to determine what is transparent and what isn't), and other changes. Naturally, these graphics cards can both encode and decode some of the most widely used video codecs, AVC, HEVC and AV1 included; they also support a host of Nvidia technologies, including Optimus and DLSS 3, and they can certainly be used for various AI tasks.

The RTX 3000 Ada features 36 RT cores of the 3rd generation, 144 Tensor cores of the 4th generation and 4,608 CUDA cores, making it ~11% inferior to the RTX 3500 Ada Generation as long as we disregard clock speed differences. (The 3500 also has more VRAM). The RTX 3000 comes with 8 GB of 128-bit wide ECC GDDR6 memory for throughput of ~256 GB/s. The fact that error correction is present here proves that the graphics adapter is indeed targeted at professional users, and it can be disabled if desired.

Just like Ampere-based cards, the RTX 3000 makes use of the PCI-Express 4 protocol. 8K SUHD monitors are supported, however, DP 1.4a video outputs can potentially prove to be a bottleneck down the line.

Performance

Having reviewed the Dell Precision 5480 and its 50 W RTX 3000 Ada in September 2023, we can firmly say the graphics card is in the same league as the RTX 4060 Laptop and the RTX 4050 Laptop, despite sharing most of its specifications with the RTX 4070 Laptop. 48 seconds in the Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA test and a 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score of less than 30,000 points are nothing to write home about. The GPU's gaming talents are not mind-blowing, either, although it is certainly capable enough for 1080p gaming.

Nvidia's marketing materials mention "up to 20 TFLOPS" of performance, a very noticeable improvement over 14.5 TFLOPS delivered by the RTX 2000 Ada Generation. Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the TGP power target of the graphics card is. A 100 W RTX 3000 Ada might be able to come close to the average RTX 4070 Laptop.

One other thing worth mentioning is that enabling error correction appears to reduce the amount of video memory that is available to applications and games by up to a gigabyte.

Power consumption

Nvidia no longer divides its laptop graphics cards into Max-Q and non-max-Q models. Instead, laptop makers are free to set the TGP according to their needs, and the range can sometimes be shockingly wide. This is especially the case for the RTX 3000, as the lowest value recommended for it sits at just 35 W while the highest is 300% higher at 140 W (this most likely includes Dynamic Boost). This is the kind of delta that we've be seeing on consumer-grade laptops featuring the latest GeForce RTX cards.

Last but not the least, the improved 5 nm process (TSMC 4N) the RTX 3000 Ada is built with makes for very decent energy efficiency, as of mid 2023.

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPUNVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX Ada Generation Laptop GPU Series
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 9728 @ 0.93 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 20000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 7424 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 5120 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 4608 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 3072 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 2560 96 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 2048 64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 9728 @ 0.93 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 20000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 7424 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 5120 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 4608 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 3072 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 2560 96 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 2048 64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
ArchitectureAda LovelaceAda Lovelace
Pipelines7424 - unified4608 - unified
Raytracing Cores5836
Tensor / AI Cores232144
Theoretical Performance33.6 TFLOPS FP32
Memory Speed16000 effective = 2000 MHz16000 effective = 2000 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory12 GB8 GB
Shared Memorynono
Memory Bandwidth432 GB/s256 GB/s
APIDirectX 12 Ultimate, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3DirectX 12 Ultimate, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption150 Watt (60 - 150 Watt TGP)115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
technology5 nm5 nm
PCIe4.0 x164.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a
Notebook Sizelargelarge
Date of Announcement21.03.2023 21.03.2023
Link to Manufacturer Pageimages.nvidia.comimages.nvidia.com
PredecessorRTX A3000 Laptop GPUQuadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
TMUs144
ROPs48
CacheL2: 32 MB

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 8254     avg: 8533     median: 8532.5 (25%)     max: 8811 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 7959     avg: 8155     median: 8155 (22%)     max: 8351 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
45774 Points (49%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
82612 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 18368     avg: 18608     median: 18607.5 (33%)     max: 18847 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 20233     avg: 20571     median: 20570.5 (23%)     max: 20908 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 25317     avg: 26200     median: 26200 (36%)     max: 27083 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 28283     avg: 28847     median: 28847 (25%)     max: 29411 Points
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 44     avg: 46     median: 46 (7%)     max: 48 Seconds
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 27     avg: 27.5     median: 27.5 (10%)     max: 28 Seconds
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 159.9     avg: 171.9     median: 171.9 (43%)     max: 183.9 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 163.39     avg: 169.1     median: 169.1 (25%)     max: 174.85 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 88.34     avg: 90.2     median: 90.2 (20%)     max: 91.96 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 133.1     avg: 138     median: 138 (38%)     max: 142.99 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 123.21     avg: 136.8     median: 136.8 (55%)     max: 150.32 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 174.33     avg: 186.4     median: 186.4 (31%)     max: 198.45 fps
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 162.23     avg: 170.7     median: 170.7 (46%)     max: 179.23 fps
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 296.88     avg: 304.5     median: 304.5 (34%)     max: 312.07 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 88.94     avg: 89.8     median: 89.8 (20%)     max: 90.72 fps
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 111.4     avg: 139.9     median: 139.9 (29%)     max: 168.45 fps
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 260.1     avg: 267.3     median: 267.3 (30%)     max: 274.54 fps
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 56.97     avg: 57.7     median: 57.7 (19%)     max: 58.34 fps
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 245.25     avg: 250.2     median: 250.2 (37%)     max: 255.24 fps
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 273.29     avg: 292     median: 292 (32%)     max: 310.7 fps
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 189.32     avg: 190.5     median: 190.5 (33%)     max: 191.68 fps
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-07 4k + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-07 4k
77.9 fps (23%)
specvp2020 solidworks-07 1080p + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-07 1080p
193.6 fps (52%)
specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
196.5 fps (38%)
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 290.6     avg: 302.5     median: 302.5 (49%)     max: 314.39 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 55.19     avg: 76.1     median: 76.1 (54%)     max: 96.95 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 310.86     avg: 312.6     median: 312.6 (46%)     max: 314.35 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 57.2     avg: 57.5     median: 57.5 (46%)     max: 57.85 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 113.79     avg: 125.2     median: 125.2 (62%)     max: 136.69 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 78.93     avg: 81.4     median: 81.4 (52%)     max: 83.77 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 80.93     avg: 83.6     median: 83.6 (38%)     max: 86.19 fps
specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k
77.2 fps (23%)
specvp2020 snx-04 4k + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
min: 189.79     avg: 190.6     median: 190.6 (20%)     max: 191.49 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 4k + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
min: 19.91     avg: 28.2     median: 28.2 (27%)     max: 36.49 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 4k + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
min: 138.82     avg: 139.8     median: 139.8 (23%)     max: 140.78 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 4k + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
min: 20     avg: 30.6     median: 30.6 (7%)     max: 41.16 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 4k + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
min: 51.74     avg: 63.3     median: 63.3 (30%)     max: 74.79 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 4k + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
min: 44.93     avg: 45.1     median: 45.1 (29%)     max: 45.26 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
min: 51.62     avg: 52.3     median: 52.3 (22%)     max: 53 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 235     avg: 261.5     median: 261.5 (15%)     max: 288 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 900     avg: 903     median: 902.5 (6%)     max: 905 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 91678     avg: 92046     median: 92045.5 (27%)     max: 92413 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 88420     avg: 90522     median: 90521.5 (30%)     max: 92623 Points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
79.8 Watt (11%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
86.5 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 90.4     avg: 91.8     median: 91.8 (20%)     max: 93.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.854     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (82%)     max: 0.871 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.9 fps per Watt (75%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 49.9     avg: 50     median: 50 (80%)     max: 50.1 dB(A)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty

Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty

2023
low 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
87.2  fps
med. 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
72.7  fps
high 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
60.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
52.1  fps
low 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
92  fps
med. 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
78.8  fps
high 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
70.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
68.8  fps
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
162.7 183.6 ~ 173 fps
med. 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
159.6 168 ~ 164 fps
high 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
127.5 133.4 ~ 130 fps
ultra 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
50.4 51.1 ~ 51 fps
low 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
153.9 156 ~ 155 fps
med. 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
125.4 131.4 ~ 128 fps
high 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
88 88.5 ~ 88 fps
ultra 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
69 70.2 ~ 70 fps
low 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
92.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
72.4  fps
high 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
61.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
56.2  fps
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
282 400 ~ 341 fps
med. 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
182.4 191.3 ~ 187 fps
high 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
151.4 160.1 ~ 156 fps
ultra 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
132.5 140.7 ~ 137 fps
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
115 155 ~ 135 fps
med. 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
105 116 ~ 111 fps
high 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
104 106 ~ 105 fps
ultra 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
96 101 ~ 99 fps
low 1280x720
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
109.9 152 ~ 131 fps
med. 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
102.1 126.8 ~ 114 fps
high 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
76.7 102 ~ 89 fps
low 1280x720
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
128.8 155.1 ~ 142 fps
med. 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
91.9 108 ~ 100 fps
high 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
72.9 78.9 ~ 76 fps
low 1280x720
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
168 175.7 ~ 172 fps
med. 1366x768
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
151.3 160.8 ~ 156 fps
high 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
136 151.5 ~ 144 fps
ultra 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
123.3 142.9 ~ 133 fps
low 1024x768
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
344 364.1 ~ 354 fps
med. 1366x768
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
242.5 249.5 ~ 246 fps
high 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
145.8 150.1 ~ 148 fps
ultra 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
78.7 79.5 ~ 79 fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
183.2  fps
med. 1366x768
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
177  fps
high 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
164.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU:
88.2  fps
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPUlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty87.272.760.752.1
Baldur's Gate 39278.870.168.8
F1 2217316413051
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands1551288870
Cyberpunk 2077 1.692.372.461.256.2
Strange Brigade341187156137
Far Cry 513511110599
X-Plane 11.1113111489
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark14210076
Dota 2 Reborn172156144133
The Witcher 335424614879
GTA V183.2177164.188.2
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


3
9


6
6


7
5

3
5
2






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 08. 06:52:52

#0 checking url part for id 11607 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11603 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 May 2024 05:40:33 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.163s ... 0.164s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.164s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.164s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11607 +0.037s ... 0.201s

#8 got single benchmarks 11607 +0.001s ... 0.202s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11603 +0.002s ... 0.204s

#10 got single benchmarks 11603 +0.024s ... 0.228s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.228s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.143s ... 0.371s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.371s

#14 Got 76 rows for game benchmarks. +0.045s ... 0.416s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.416s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.01s ... 0.426s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.031s ... 0.457s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.457s

#19 return log +0.053s ... 0.51s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)