Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Processor N95 vs Intel Core i7-10610U

Intel Processor N95

► remove from comparison Intel N95

The Intel Processor N95 (sometimes also called Celeron N95 or Pentium N95) is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.4 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. Compared to the similar Processor N100, the N95 offers a slightly higher TDP and therefore maybe a slightly improved sustained performance.

Performance

The average N95 in our database is in the same league as the Pentium 7505 and the Core i3-1115G4, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. That's not a great result, to put it mildly.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers only 16 of the 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 1200 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds, and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N95 has a base power consumption of 12 W (compared to the 6 W of the N100) and is therefore well suited for thin and light systems. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

Intel Core i7-10610U

► remove from comparison Intel i7-10610U

The Intel Core i7-10610U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks based on the Comet Lake (CML-U) generation and was announced in August 2019. Compared to the similar Whiskey Lake processors (e.g. Core i7-8665U), the only difference is support for higher memory speeds (DDR4-2666 vs 2400) and two additional cores in the top model (not in this i7-10610U). The processor cores are clocked between 1.8 and 4.9 GHz (unverified). Thanks to Hyper-Threading 8 threads can be used. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Compared to the similar Core i7-10510U, the 10610U supports vPro.

The integrated graphics adapter however is still the same as in the previous generations. It should be still called Intel UHD Graphics 620 and clock from 300 - 1150 MHz in the i7. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a VP9 and H.265 de- and encoder and an integrated dual channel DDR4-2666 / LPDDR4x 2933 / LPDDR3-2133 memory controller.

Performance

The average 10610U in our database is in the same league as the Core i5-1035G1 and also the Core i5-8257U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term power limit of 25 W, the HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 is among the fastest laptops built around the 10610U that we know of. It can be about 30% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Core i7 has a default TDP of 15 W (also known as the long-term power limit). Laptop manufacturers are free to change that value to anything between 10 W and 25 W, with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly. Perhaps more importantly, short-term power consumption of 10th gen Comet Lake U processors can be as high as 80 W or even 90 W, making passively cooled designs rather unlikely to appear.

Core i7-10610U is manufactured on an old, as of late 2022, 14 nm Intel process for subpar energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Processor N95Intel Core i7-10610U
CodenameAlder Lake-NComet Lake-U
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-NIntel Comet Lake
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-U
Intel Core i3-N305 compare1.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 compare - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 compare1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 compare - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 « - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 compare1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N50 compare1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10810U compare1.1 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10710U compare1.1 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10610U « 1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10510U compare1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10310U compare1.7 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210U compare1.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110U compare2.1 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6405U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 5305U compare2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron 5205U compare1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock <=3400 MHz1800 - 4900 MHz
L3 Cache6 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
4 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
4 / 8
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1264BGA1528
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHALPDDR3-2133/DDR4-2666/LPDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N95
24.8 pt (41%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-10610U
28.5 pt (47%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 N95 +
60 Points (30%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 N95 +
min: 181     avg: 182.3     median: 182 (3%)     max: 184 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
N95 +
min: 2528     avg: 2711     median: 2769 (3%)     max: 2786 Points
min: 3852     avg: 4049     median: 4048.5 (4%)     max: 4245 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
N95 +
min: 618     avg: 820     median: 914 (37%)     max: 935 Points
min: 1151     avg: 1207     median: 1207 (49%)     max: 1263 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
N95 +
min: 229     avg: 306.8     median: 350 (38%)     max: 357 Points
min: 349     avg: 438     median: 446 (49%)     max: 482 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
N95 +
min: 976     avg: 1030     median: 1030 (3%)     max: 1067 Points
min: 1271     avg: 1466     median: 1477 (4%)     max: 1663 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
N95 +
min: 408     avg: 437     median: 445 (3%)     max: 452 Points
min: 548     avg: 620     median: 604.5 (4%)     max: 738 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
N95 +
min: 98     avg: 136.2     median: 151 (42%)     max: 155 Points
min: 133     avg: 175.8     median: 178 (49%)     max: 200 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
N95 +
min: 5.18     avg: 5.5     median: 5.6 (7%)     max: 5.62 Points
7.5 Points (10%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
N95 +
min: 1.3     avg: 1.7     median: 1.8 (43%)     max: 1.86 Points
2.1 Points (49%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
N95 +
min: 3562     avg: 4529     median: 4783 (29%)     max: 5141 Points
7163 Points (43%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
N95 +
min: 12582     avg: 13741     median: 13854 (10%)     max: 14545 Points
17253 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 N95 +
min: 20429     avg: 21521     median: 22075 (14%)     max: 22275 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 N95 +
min: 5904     avg: 7259     median: 7574 (9%)     max: 8177 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
N95 +
min: 519.662     avg: 541     median: 537.3 (6%)     max: 568.939 s
295.5 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
N95 +
min: 16.449     avg: 17.2     median: 17 (3%)     max: 18.213 s
6.7 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
N95 +
min: 2181     avg: 2303     median: 2319.5 (4%)     max: 2391 Points
4786 Points (8%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
100%
N95 +
min: 11654     avg: 12003     median: 12177 (7%)     max: 12224 MIPS
min: 15369     avg: 18407     median: 18717.5 (11%)     max: 20332 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
N95 +
min: 2972     avg: 3521     median: 3803 (45%)     max: 3866 MIPS
min: 3653     avg: 4460     median: 4666.5 (55%)     max: 4853 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
N95 +
min: 29.65     avg: 31.7     median: 32.4 (1%)     max: 32.45 fps
43.9 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
N95 +
min: 145.25     avg: 158.2     median: 162.2 (4%)     max: 163.3 fps
183.1 fps (5%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
N95 +
min: 3.03     avg: 3.2     median: 3.2 (6%)     max: 3.29 fps
min: 4.54     avg: 4.9     median: 4.6 (8%)     max: 5.66 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
N95 +
min: 0.236     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (7%)     max: 0.244 GB/s
0.5 GB/s (15%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
N95 +
min: 0.492     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (9%)     max: 0.501 GB/s
0.9 GB/s (15%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
N95 +
min: 2.4     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (7%)     max: 2.8 GB/s
5 GB/s (13%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 N95 +
min: 2161     avg: 2202     median: 2186.5 (28%)     max: 2275 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
N95 +
min: 1103     avg: 1120     median: 1113 (8%)     max: 1152 Seconds
min: 641     avg: 754     median: 791 (6%)     max: 816 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
N95 +
min: 0.83     avg: 0.9     median: 0.8 (18%)     max: 1.135 sec
min: 0.637     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (14%)     max: 0.855 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
N95 +
min: 5612     avg: 5863     median: 5952 (13%)     max: 6017 Points
8163 Points (17%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
N95 +
min: 7.058     avg: 18.8     median: 19.4 (4%)     max: 24.428 s
7.8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
N95 +
min: 17.513     avg: 39.7     median: 40.5 (2%)     max: 50.772 s
17.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
N95 +
min: 532.8     avg: 845     median: 824.7 (4%)     max: 1025.92 s
467.3 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N95 +
min: 13896     avg: 14556     median: 14595 (11%)     max: 14929 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
N95 +
min: 5084     avg: 5571     median: 5661 (14%)     max: 5806 Points
min: 7306     avg: 8865     median: 8616.5 (21%)     max: 10773 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
N95 +
min: 36089     avg: 44673     median: 46477 (38%)     max: 47272 Points
min: 46042     avg: 53030     median: 53030 (43%)     max: 60018 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
N95 +
min: 36329     avg: 44756     median: 46489 (38%)     max: 47322 Points
min: 49886     avg: 54889     median: 54888.5 (45%)     max: 59891 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
N95 +
min: 47145     avg: 48606     median: 49062 (39%)     max: 49955 Points
59103 Points (47%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
N95 +
min: 4105     avg: 4214     median: 4217 (11%)     max: 4345 Points
min: 5974     avg: 7273     median: 7267.5 (18%)     max: 9051 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
N95 +
min: 5701     avg: 5923     median: 5952 (11%)     max: 6062 Points
min: 8558     avg: 10716     median: 10982 (20%)     max: 13033 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
N95 +
min: 2081     avg: 2301     median: 2346 (10%)     max: 2386 Points
min: 2902     avg: 3339     median: 3123 (13%)     max: 4075 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
100%
N95 +
min: 934     avg: 1132     median: 1227 (28%)     max: 1234 Points
1412 Points (33%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
100%
N95 +
min: 2800     avg: 2958     median: 2961 (11%)     max: 3114 Points
4311 Points (17%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
100%
1 N95 +
min: 902     avg: 1109     median: 1177 (37%)     max: 1181 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
100%
1 N95 +
min: 2661     avg: 2835     median: 2850.5 (12%)     max: 2978 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N95 +
min: 761     avg: 917     median: 999 (34%)     max: 1013 Points
min: 1155     avg: 1228     median: 1243.5 (42%)     max: 1261 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N95 +
min: 2391     avg: 2577     median: 2566 (5%)     max: 2793 Points
min: 3731     avg: 4134     median: 4123.5 (7%)     max: 4622 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N95 +
min: 749     avg: 910     median: 993 (4%)     max: 1005 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N95 +
min: 2382     avg: 2537     median: 2531 (8%)     max: 2737 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N95 +
min: 3411     avg: 4100     median: 4450 (44%)     max: 4553 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N95 +
min: 9662     avg: 10169     median: 10228 (10%)     max: 10798 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
N95 +
min: 1026     avg: 1186     median: 1056 (1%)     max: 1577 ms
min: 807     avg: 833     median: 819.5 (1%)     max: 899 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
51613 Points (34%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 N95 +
min: 93.2     avg: 121.3     median: 126.8 (33%)     max: 138.3 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
N95 +
min: 121.3     avg: 163.5     median: 178.3 (32%)     max: 183.4 Points
min: 190     avg: 207.5     median: 211 (38%)     max: 213 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 N95 +
min: 555     avg: 716     median: 764 (29%)     max: 820 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N95 +
min: 20.3     avg: 25.3     median: 24.4 (4%)     max: 31.5 Watt
min: 37.5     avg: 50.9     median: 50.9 (9%)     max: 64.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N95 +
min: 18.9     avg: 21.4     median: 20.8 (4%)     max: 25.5 Watt
min: 47.8     avg: 57.3     median: 57.3 (10%)     max: 66.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N95 +
min: 6.24     avg: 8.4     median: 7.3 (5%)     max: 12.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
100%
1 N95 +
21.1 Points per Watt (16%)
min: 10.1     avg: 10.8     median: 10.8 (8%)     max: 11.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N95 → 100% n=40

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-10610U → 151% n=40

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 01. 05:46:21

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14981 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12200 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1761972381s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Nov 2025 05:19:33 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14981 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 14981 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12200 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#10 got single benchmarks 12200 +0.011s ... 0.024s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.024s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.035s ... 0.059s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.062s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)