Verdict
Similar to the Yoga series, the IdeaPads often stand for a good mix of price, performance and mobility. The 2026 version of the IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 with the suffix 14IPH11 also impresses in many aspects. Starting with a successful chassis, featuring a stylish design and a flip-down screen that gives the 14-inch device the character of a multi-talent that is suitable for various situations (tablet mode, stand mode, ...).
The convertible also looks modern under the hood, whether it's the Wi-Fi 7 chip or the Panther Lake processor. Nevertheless, the Core Ultra 5 322 could only convince us to a limited extent in the test. While the CPU performance is on a par with older chips, the speed of the iGPU is rather disappointing, as we will show in the course of the article. Meanwhile, there are plus points for the moderate power consumption and the resulting generous battery runtimes.
Pros
Cons
Price and availability
The tested Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 is available from around 800 euros from various online stores (e.g. Computeruniverse).
- $549.00Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14" WUXGA Touchscreen Intel Core Ultra 5 AI 8GB Ram 512 SSD Luna Grey Windows 11 83KR0047US
- $459.97Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14" FHD(1920 x 1200) IPS Touchscreen 2-in-1 Laptop, Intel Core i5-1235U, Backlit KB, Wi-Fi 6, Fingerprint, Thunderbolt™ 4, w/Stylus (8GB RAM | 512GB SSD)
- $430.00Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i Chromebook Plus 14" FHD+ 2-in-1 Touchscreen Laptop (Intel Core i3-1315U, 8GB RAM, 128GB eMMC + 128GB SD Card), Home, Students, Business, Backlit, Lightweight, Webcam, Chrome OS
As comparison devices for this test, we used other 14-inch convertibles such as the slightly more expensive Yoga 7a 2-in-1 with Ryzen AI 5 435 and the older Intel representatives Acer Aspire Spin 14 (Core Ultra 5 115U), HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (Core Ultra 7 258V) and Dell Inspiron 14 2-in-1 (Core i7-1255U) in order to better classify the processor and graphics unit respectively.
Specifications
Case & equipment
As mentioned at the beginning, the case is an absolute all-rounder thanks to the fold-down function, with solid hinges and good workmanship. Despite the compact dimensions, there is hardly anything to complain about in terms of stability, and the weight of around 1.6 kg is reasonable for a 14-inch device.
We would describe the number of connections as decent. Although there is no RJ45 port, there is an HDMI output, an audio jack, and a medium-fast microSD reader. Four USB ports (2x Type-C including DisplayPort & PowerDelivery + 2x Type-A) are also useful, although Lenovo has only opted for the 3.0 standard.
The performance of the wireless module - Wi-Fi 7 or not - also falls somewhat short of expectations and possibilities. The Full HD webcam offers typical notebook quality and could be even sharper and more color-accurate. The manufacturer could also work on the chassis opening mechanism, as the base plate is extremely firmly anchored in some places. On the other hand, the fact that the IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 has two classic SO-DIMM slots for RAM and two M.2 slots is very nice, which is no longer a matter of course these days, especially in the 14-inch range. Incidentally, a power supply unit is not included in the scope of delivery; standard Type-C models with 45 to 65 watts are compatible.
SD Card Reader
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Convertible (28.1 - 197, n=24, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Convertible (28.9 - 254, n=23, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Communication
| Networking | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE213 160MHz (n=1) | |
| Average of class Convertible (n=1last 2 years) | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE213 160MHz (n=1) | |
| Average of class Convertible (n=1last 2 years) | |
| iperf3 transmit RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| Average of class Convertible (n=1last 2 years) | |
| iperf3 receive RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| Average of class Convertible (n=1last 2 years) | |
Webcam
Maintenance
Input devices
The input devices are - as you would expect from Lenovo - relatively good. The keyboard scores with white illumination and a well-thought-out layout, although the middle directional arrows are a bit puny. The typing feel is decent, as is the approx. 12 x 7.5 cm touchpad, although its click areas sound a little rickety.
Display
The 60 Hz touchscreen, which has a 16:10 format and a resolution of 1,920 x 1,200 pixels, is very reflective due to the glossy surface, which makes outdoor use problematic, although the brightness of just under 400 cd/m² is basically acceptable. Like most IPS panels, the contrast cracks the 1,000:1 mark, while the color space cannot match the Yoga 7a 2-in-1 and the OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 at around 60% sRGB. You shouldn't expect too much from the color accuracy in the state of delivery either. The response times and viewing angles correspond to the typical IPS level.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 411 cd/m²
Contrast: 1284:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 6.88 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.73}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 5.8 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.98}
43.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
60.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
42% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.202
CCT: 6359 K
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 LEN140WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 Lenovo LEN140WUXGA, OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 NV140WUM-N41 (BOE0C63), IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Samsung SDC41AA, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 BOE NV14N42, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 109% | -6% | 108% | -8% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 42 | 99.9 138% | 39.1 -7% | 99.8 138% | 38.6 -8% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 60.9 | 100 64% | 57.9 -5% | 100 64% | 56.2 -8% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 43.4 | 97.5 125% | 40.5 -7% | 96.7 123% | 39.9 -8% |
| Response Times | 93% | -10% | 96% | -10% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 26.8 ? | 1.5 ? 94% | 28.8 ? -7% | 0.86 ? 97% | 27.2 ? -1% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 17.5 ? | 1.4 ? 92% | 19.7 ? -13% | 1.01 ? 94% | 20.8 ? -19% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 60 ? | 469 ? | |||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 20 | 33.3 | |||
| Screen | 33% | 4% | 41% | -17% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 411 | 376 -9% | 357 -13% | 363.9 -11% | 269.4 -34% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 397 | 373 -6% | 344 -13% | 366 -8% | 260 -35% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 91 | 96 5% | 87 -4% | 99 9% | 89 -2% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.32 | 0.26 19% | 0.41 -28% | ||
| Contrast (:1) | 1284 | 1373 7% | 657 -49% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.88 | 2.19 68% | 6 13% | 0.84 88% | 6.53 5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.85 | 6.96 65% | 22.87 -15% | 2.72 86% | 19.76 -0% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.8 | 1.6 72% | 3.5 40% | 1.1 81% | 5.4 7% |
| Gamma | 2.202 100% | 2.224 99% | 1.992 110% | 2.18 101% | 2.05 107% |
| CCT | 6359 102% | 6453 101% | 6585 99% | 6330 103% | 6007 108% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.76 | 4.46 | 0.82 | 3.13 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 78% /
64% | -4% /
-0% | 82% /
69% | -12% /
-14% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 17.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 26.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.1 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7819 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Performance
With 16 GB DDR5 RAM (2x 8) and a 512 GB NVMe SSD, the test configuration is neither meager nor particularly rich. The processor sits comfortably between the low-end and mid-range segments when all aspects are considered.
Test conditions
The Fn+Q key combination can be used to switch between three performance profiles. Our tests were carried out in Performance mode, which is typically based on Adaptive mode (see table).
| Mode | battery | Adaptive | Performance |
| Cyberpunk 2077 Noise | 33 dB(A) | 35 dB(A) | 42 dB(A) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 frame rate (FHD/Ultra) | 8.5 fps | 8.8 fps | 8.9 fps |
| CPU PL1 | 16 W | 19 W | 24 W |
| CPU PL2 | 40 W | 45 W | 45 W |
| Cinebench R15 Multi Score | 990 Points | 1156 Points | 1168 Points |
Processor
The Core Ultra 5 322 is manufactured using the modern 1.8 nm process and offers a total of six cores without hyper-threading. However, the performance often fails to stand out from that of older chips. In our benchmarks, for example, it only reaches the level of the Core i7-1255U. At least the Panther Lake offshoot is slightly faster than the Core Ultra 5 115U. However, the Core Ultra 7 258V and the Ryzen AI 5 435 are around 20% faster. To the Ultra 5 322's credit, it also has to make do with fewer cores than the aforementioned models. The pure single-core performance is even impressive.
Cinebench R15 Multi loop
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 -1! | |
| Average of class Convertible | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 -1! | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 -1! | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 -1! | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322 -1! | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Convertible (1480 - 64158, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322 (n=1) | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (v6.50.5800) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Convertible (11392 - 184800, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322 (n=1) | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (v6.50.5800) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average of class Convertible (797 - 8291, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322 (n=1) | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (v6.50.5800) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average of class Convertible (14686 - 148874, n=42, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (v6.50.5800) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Convertible (1120 - 29155, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (v6.50.5800) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Convertible (4929 - 97193, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322 (n=1) | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (v6.50.5800) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Convertible (5271 - 190280, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (v6.50.5800) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Convertible (218 - 2017, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (v6.50.5800) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Convertible (1169 - 34297, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322 (n=1) | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (v6.50.5800) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Convertible (14193 - 85327, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322 (n=1) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (v6.50.5800) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Convertible (1413 - 4402, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322 (n=1) | |
System performance
In terms of system performance, the IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14 takes its place in the midfield of the comparison devices. The system responds pleasantly quickly in everyday use.
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Average of class Convertible | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 -1! | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 -4! | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average of class Convertible (3229 - 10123, n=46, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Average of class Convertible (7233 - 12222, n=46, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Average of class Convertible (5062 - 17914, n=46, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average of class Convertible (2496 - 16551, n=46, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average of class Convertible (524 - 2274, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average of class Convertible (554 - 1942, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average of class Convertible (550 - 2949, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Average of class Convertible (381 - 1719, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| Average of class Convertible (171 - 426, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| Average of class Convertible (91.2 - 317, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (386 - 1089, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 6331 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average of class Convertible (23880 - 161475, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322 (n=1) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average of class Convertible (19931 - 131960, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| Average of class Convertible (17473 - 216896, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322 (n=1) | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Convertible (6.9 - 536, n=48, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
* ... smaller is better
Mass storage
The 512 GB drive from SanDisk (model SN5100S) is based on the 2242 format and is one of the medium-fast NVMe representatives. If required, another SSD can be added; this one up to the 2280 format.
* ... smaller is better
Continuous read performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU performance
The iGPU installed in the Ultra 5 322 is Graphics 2 Xe3, which features 16 pipelines and two ray tracing cores; it is therefore the biggest weakness of the 14-incher. In the 3DMark tests, the IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 brings up the rear in the test field and ranks behind both the old Iris Xe Graphics G7 with 96EUs as well as behind the Graphics 4-Core iGPU. Compared to the Radeon 840M in its Yoga colleague, the graphics chip doesn't stand a chance either.
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 27030 points | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 19754 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4114 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 145115 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 18029 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2936 points | |
Help | ||
Gaming performance
It is therefore not surprising that the Lenovo computer has a hard time with games. Apart from old or undemanding titles such as Dota 2, most games stutter even at minimum settings, which is why even casual gamers should definitely look for another notebook with a more powerful iGPU.
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average of class Convertible (8.2 - 79.5, n=48, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra FPS chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 91.7 | 72.6 | 52.2 | 34.6 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 22.9 | 22.9 | 22.9 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 18.8 | 14 | 12.2 | 8.9 |
| Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 (2025) | 16.1 | 11.4 | 9.2 | |
| The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered (2025) | 6.5 | 6.2 | 6 | |
| F1 25 (2025) | 29 | 23 | 18 | |
| Borderlands 4 (2025) | 8.5 | 7 | 5.1 | |
| ARC Raiders (2025) | 29.2 | 18.3 | 9.1 | |
| Call of Duty Black Ops 7 (2025) | 25 | 22 | 15 | |
| Pragmata (2026) | 14.4 | 10.4 | 8.4 | |
| 007 First Light (2026) | 7.3 | 6.5 | 5.9 |
Emissions & Energy
Noise emissions
While the IdeaPad 5 remains fairly quiet in Adaptive mode, the fans can definitely draw attention with 42 to 44 dB(A) in Performance mode, whereby the competition sometimes achieves similar values here. In idle mode, the 14-incher is pleasantly quiet.
Noise level
| Idle |
| 24 / 25 / 26 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 43 / 44 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 PTL | Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 Ryzen AI 5 435, Radeon 840M | Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 Ultra 5 115U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -5% | -7% | 12% | 7% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24 | 25 -4% | 25 -4% | 22.9 5% | 23.1 4% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 24 | 25 -4% | 25 -4% | 23.2 3% | 24.7 -3% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 25 | 29 -16% | 28 -12% | 23.2 7% | 24.7 1% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 26 | 33 -27% | 29 -12% | 23.2 11% | 24.7 5% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 43 | 41 5% | 37 14% | 27.8 35% | 27.7 36% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 42 | 40 5% | 47 -12% | 33.6 20% | |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 44 | 42 5% | 51 -16% | 43.4 1% | 45.1 -3% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 45.1 |
* ... smaller is better
Temperature
As with its counterparts, the underside of the chassis heats up more than the top, although the palm area is always pleasantly cool. The processor reached just under 80 °C in our stress test, which is completely acceptable.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-2 °C / -3.6 F).
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 PTL | Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 Ryzen AI 5 435, Radeon 840M | Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 Ultra 5 115U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -17% | 13% | 27% | 18% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 47 | 59 -26% | 41 13% | 35.8 24% | 38.2 19% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 54 | 58 -7% | 47 13% | 37.6 30% | 45.6 16% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 27 | 27 | 25.2 | 27.4 | |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 28 | 31 | 26.6 | 28.4 |
* ... smaller is better
Speaker
The speakers provide a decent to good sound and reach a usable maximum volume.
Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 0.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Power consumption
With an idle consumption of 4 to 7 watts, the 14-inch device is one of the most economical in the comparison field. We measured a maximum of 71 watts under load.
| Off / Standby | 0.1 / 1 Watt |
| Idle | 4 / 4.8 / 7.4 Watt |
| Load |
36 / 71 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 PTL | Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 Ryzen AI 5 435, Radeon 840M | Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 Ultra 5 115U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -12% | -9% | -9% | -29% | -18% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 4 | 4.3 -8% | 5 -25% | 3 25% | 5.2 -30% | 4.29 ? -7% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 4.8 | 4.7 2% | 6 -25% | 4.4 8% | 8.2 -71% | 7.1 ? -48% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 7.4 | 5.7 23% | 9 -22% | 9.4 -27% | 9.9 -34% | 8.68 ? -17% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 36 | 50 -39% | 32 11% | 42.3 -17% | 44.4 -23% | 44.1 ? -23% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 34 | 51.1 -50% | 34.4 -1% | 51.1 -50% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 71 | 72 -1% | 67 6% | 65 8% | 62.5 12% | 67.2 ? 5% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 45.5 | 32 | 49.9 | |||
| Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt) | 35 |
* ... smaller is better
Battery life
The lavish runtime turns out to be the absolute highlight. More than 15 hours in the WLAN test, with the brightness reduced to 150 cd/m², deserve respect and beat all competitors.
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 PTL, 60 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 Ryzen AI 5 435, Radeon 840M, 70 Wh | Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 Ultra 5 115U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), 50 Wh | HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 64 Wh | Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 54 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -5% | -18% | -8% | -50% | -22% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 15.3 | 14.6 -5% | 12.5 -18% | 14 -8% | 7.6 -50% | 11.9 ? -22% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 15.9 | 27 ? | ||||
| Load (h) | 2.1 | 1.805 ? |
Notebookcheck overall rating
The Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14IPH11 is a successful convertible, but its Core Ultra 5 322 has a very low GPU performance.
Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11
- 05/29/2026 v8
Florian Glaser
Total Sustainability Score: Possible alternatives in comparison
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 81.1%  | Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 Intel Core Ultra 5 322 ⎘ Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: 1. $549.00 Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14"... 2. $459.97 Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14" F... 3. $430.00 Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i Chrom... List Price: 800 EUR | 1.6 kg | 17.4 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
2. 81.5%  | Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 ⎘ AMD Radeon 840M ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: 1. $17.90 KEANBOLL 2-Pack Tempered Gla... 2. $49.99 Laptop Case Cover for Lenovo... 3. $53.99 WODBAO Laptop Case for Lenov... List Price: 1100 EUR | 1.4 kg | 15.4 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED |
3. 78.3%  | Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 Intel Core Ultra 5 115U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $29.99 65W Charger for Acer Aspire ... 2. $481.77 Acer Aspire 14 AI Copilot+ P... 3. $23.99 45W Laptop Charger Power Ada... List Price: 800 EUR | 1.6 kg | 21.1 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
4. 88.7%  | HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1250 USD | 1.3 kg | 15 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
5. 83.7% v7 (old)  | Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-1255U ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $128.00 GBOLE Screen Replacement for... 2. $95.98 Replacement for Dell Inspiro... 3. $849.99 Dell Inspiron 14 7440 2-in-1... List Price: 1050 USD | 1.6 kg | 17.86 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
No comments for this article
