, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Intel UHD Graphics P630

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

► remove from comparison Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

The Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 (GT3e) is a processor graphics card for Kaby Lake models announced in January 2017. As the successor to the Intel Iris Graphics 540 (Skylake), the Iris Plus Graphics 640 is used for 15-Watt ULV models and is equipped with 64 MB eDRAM cache. There should not be any big changes compared to the Iris Graphics 540.

The so called GT3e version of the Kaby Lake GPU still has 48 Execution Units (EUs), which can reach up to 1050 MHz depending on the model. Besides eDRAM cache, the Iris 640 can also access the system memory (2x 64 Bit DDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-1866/DDR4-2400) via processor interface.

Compared to the Iris Plus 650 from the 28-Watt models, the Iris 640 only has a slightly lower maximum clock as well as the lower TDP, so the utilization of the Turbo Boost potential should be worse.

Performance

The exact performance of the Iris Plus Graphics 640 depends on the CPU model, because maximum clock as well as the size of the L3 cache can differ a bit. The system memory (DDR3/DDR4) will influence the performance as well.

The fastest chips are high-clocked Core i7 models like the Core i7-7660U. Depending on the game, the Iris Plus 640 will probably be similar to the previous model somewhere between a dedicated GeForce 920M and GeForce 940M and is usually limited to low settings in modern games.

Features

The reworked video engine now fully supports hardware decoding of H.265/HEVC videos. Contrary to Skylake, however, Kaby Lake can now also decode H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The video output is possible via DP 1.2/eDP 1.3 (up to 3840 x 2160 @60 Hz), whereas HDMI is also supported in the older 1.4a standard. An HDMI 2.0 output can be added via converter from DisplayPort. The GPU can drive up to three displays simultaneously.

Power Consumption

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is used for 15-Watt ULV processor and therefore thin notebooks and Ultrabooks.

Intel UHD Graphics P630

► remove from comparison Intel UHD Graphics P630

The Intel UHD Graphics P630 (GT2) is a professional integrated graphics card, which can be found in various Xeon desktop and notebook processors of the Coffee-Lake generation. The "GT2" version of the GPU offers 24 Execution Units (EUs) and the clocks depend on the CPU model. Due to its lack of dedicated graphics memory or eDRAM cache, the UHD P630 has to access the main memory (2x 64-bit DDR3L-1600 / DDR4-2133). Compared to the older HD Graphics P630 (Kaby-Lake), the newer UHD GPU is identical but can be clocked slightly higher. Compared to the regular UHD 630, the P630 supports ECC main memory and is intended for professional applications.

Performance

The exact performance of the UHD Graphics P630 depends on various factors like TDP, L3 Cache, memory (DDR3/DDR4) and maximum clock rate of the specific model. However, it should be fairly similar to the HD Graphics 530 and HD Graphics 630 and therefore only suited for low demanding games like Overwatch or Farming Simulator 2017 (low details).

Features

The features of the UHD P630 are the same as for the HD 630 and therefore H.265/HEVC Main10 profile at 10-bit color depth are supported in hardware. Furthermore, HDCP 2.2 is also supported in all chips, which allows Netflix 4K videos, for instance. HDMI 2.0 however is still only supported with an external converter chip (LSPCon).

Power Consumption

The UHD Graphics P630 can be found in several notebook and desktop processors of different TDP classes.

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640Intel UHD Graphics P630
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Gen. 9.5 Series
Iris Plus Graphics 655 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 650 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
Iris Plus Graphics 645 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 640 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics P630 24 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics P630 compare 24 64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 620 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 620 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 617 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 615 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 615 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
Iris Plus Graphics 655 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 650 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
Iris Plus Graphics 645 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 640 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics P630 24 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics P630 compare 24 64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 620 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 620 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 617 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 615 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 615 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
CodenameKaby Lake GT3eCoffee-Lake-GT2
ArchitectureGen. 9.5 Kaby LakeGen. 9.5
Pipelines48 - unified24 - unified
Core Speed300 - 1050 (Boost) MHz300 - 1200 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus Width64/128 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3/DDR4
Max. Amount of Memory64 MB
Shared Memoryyesyes
DirectXDirectX 12_1DirectX 12_1
technology14 nm14 nm
FeaturesQuickSyncQuickSync
Date of Announcement03.01.2017 01.10.2017
CPU in Iris Plus Graphics 640GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i7-7660U2 x 2500 MHz, 15 W300 MHz1050 MHz
Intel Core i7-7560U2 x 2400 MHz, 15 W300 MHz1050 MHz
Intel Core i5-7360U2 x 2300 MHz, 15 W300 MHz1000 MHz
Intel Core i5-7260U2 x 2200 MHz, 15 W300 MHz950 MHz
min. - max.300 MHz950 - 1050 MHz
CPU in UHD Graphics P630GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Xeon W-10885M8 x 2400 MHz, 45 W350 MHz1200 MHz
Intel Xeon E-2276M6 x 2800 MHz, 45 W350 MHz1200 MHz
Intel Xeon E-2176G6 x 3700 MHz, 80 W350 MHz1200 MHz
Intel Xeon W-10855M6 x 2800 MHz, 45 W350 MHz? MHz
min. - max.300 - 350 MHz? - 1200 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 467     avg: 500     median: 494.5 (3%)     max: 543 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 413     avg: 443     median: 437 (2%)     max: 483 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 142163     avg: 147298     median: 145481 (23%)     max: 154251 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 7558     avg: 8025     median: 8067 (11%)     max: 8711 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 10486     avg: 11119     median: 11248 (6%)     max: 11495 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 1236     avg: 1349     median: 1310 (3%)     max: 1509 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 1315     avg: 1411     median: 1393.5 (3%)     max: 1541 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 2136     avg: 2440     median: 2561 (6%)     max: 2664 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1980     avg: 2275     median: 2379 (4%)     max: 2493 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
3DMark 06
min: 13164     avg: 14118     median: 14117.5 (26%)     max: 15071 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
6.5 fps (3%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 8824     avg: 9678     median: 9703 (46%)     max: 10506
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
46.1 fps (20%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 41.32     avg: 54     median: 56.2 (16%)     max: 62.34 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.8     avg: 98.2     median: 97.8 (98%)     max: 99.3 %
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
171 fps (1%)
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
59.8 fps (2%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
31.2 fps (3%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
77 fps (21%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
40.7 fps (9%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
15.6 fps (6%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 315     avg: 325     median: 325 (3%)     max: 335 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 748     avg: 779     median: 778.5 (2%)     max: 809 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 1575     avg: 1677     median: 1677 (4%)     max: 1779
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 30.8     avg: 33.6     median: 31.5 (6%)     max: 38.5 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 28     avg: 33.5     median: 33.5 (6%)     max: 38.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 31.7     avg: 34.9     median: 34.9 (8%)     max: 38.1 Watt
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
min: 748     avg: 823     median: 823 (43%)     max: 898 MHz
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
min: 570     avg: 634     median: 634 (25%)     max: 698 MHz

Average Benchmarks Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
13.8  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
28  fps
FIFA 18

FIFA 18

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
69.5 (!)  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
38.8 (!)  fps
F1 2017

F1 2017

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
33 38 ~ 36 fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
15 15 ~ 15 fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
22.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
99  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
48 fps  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
31.8  fps
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
med. 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
27.5 (!)  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
69.3 96 101 103 ~ 92 fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
33.9 35.8 42.6 48.2 ~ 40 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
24.9 25.3 29.3 33.6 ~ 28 fps
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
39.9 45.4 ~ 43 fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
17.9 18.1 ~ 18 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
14.8  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
33.8  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
20.4  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
16 16.6 ~ 16 fps
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
30.8 33.5 ~ 32 fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
11.8 12.7 ~ 12 fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
42.9 45 ~ 44 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
31.4  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
22.9  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
121  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
91  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
31.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
17.8  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
26.6 29.2 38.6 ~ 31 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
19.6 24.2 ~ 22 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
9.2 11.1 ~ 10 fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
20.2  fps
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
53.6 56.1 63.3 67.3 ~ 60 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
24.1 36.5 41 52.9 ~ 39 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
15.9 29.9 36.5 ~ 27 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
19.5  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
24.9  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
28  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
13  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
23.5 25.8 ~ 25 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
16.7 19.4 ~ 18 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
9.1  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
45.4 (!) 50.5 59.2 ~ 52 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
29 30.7 (!) 32.9 ~ 31 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
16.4 16.6 (!) 18.7 ~ 17 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
14.2  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
44.7  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
26.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
12.9  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
68 92 ~ 80 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
55 63.7 ~ 59 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
27.6 29.5 ~ 29 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
19.8 23 ~ 21 fps
low 1024x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
16.4 17.5 21 21.7 fps ~ 19 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
13.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
4  fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
56.7  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
28.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
11.8  fps
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
high 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
28.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
20.2 20.8 ~ 21 fps
low 1024x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
43.1 60.3 ~ 52 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
29.7 42 ~ 36 fps
high 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
23.2 30.7 ~ 27 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
8.2 9.9 ~ 9 fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
61 68.2 ~ 65 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
40.2 45.1 ~ 43 fps
high 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
33.5 38.3 ~ 36 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
10.7 12.5 ~ 12 fps
low 1024x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
103 132.6 ~ 118 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
54.1 68.7 ~ 61 fps
high 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
37 47.1 ~ 42 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
17.2 21.6 ~ 19 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
35.2  fps
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
high 1280x1024
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 640:
28.5  fps

Average Gaming Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 16. 00:40:39

#0 checking url part for id 7656 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9906 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 14 Jun 2021 17:20:49 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.008s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 7656 +0.012s ... 0.021s

#8 got single benchmarks 7656 +0.011s ... 0.032s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9906 +0s ... 0.032s

#10 got single benchmarks 9906 +0s ... 0.032s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.032s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.01s ... 0.042s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.042s

#14 Got 133 rows for game benchmarks. +0.013s ... 0.055s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.055s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.058s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.018s ... 0.076s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.076s

#19 return log +0.003s ... 0.079s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)