HP Pavilion Plus 14 laptop review: OLED, 90 Hz, and 12th gen Core H
The HP Pavilion Plus 14 is the "Pro" model to the standard Pavilion 14. It carries higher-end options such as Core H-series CPUs and an OLED display to contrast the typical Core U-series and IPS options of the standard Pavilion 14.
Our test unit in review comes with the Core i7-12700H CPU, integrated Iris Xe graphics, and a 90 Hz 16:10 1800p OLED display for approximately $850 USD retail. Other SKUs are available as well as shown by the table below. The Pavilion Plus 14 competes with other midrange or higher 14-inch Ultrabooks like the Asus VivoBook Pro 14, Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro, or the MSI Modern 14 series.
Core i5-1240P | Core i5-1240P | Core i7-12700H | Core i7-1255U |
Iris Xe | Iris Xe | Iris Xe | GeForce RTX 2050 |
14-inch IPS 2.2k 300-nit | 14-inch IPS 2.2k 300-nit | 14-inch OLED 2.8k 400-nit | 14-inch OLED 2.8k 400-nit |
8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
256 GB SSD | 512 GB SSD | 256 GB SSD | 512 GB SSD |
More HP reviews:
Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Wanted:
- News translator (DE-EN)
- Review translation proofreader (DE-EN)
Details here
Potential Competitors in Comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85.4 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 18.3 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.5 kg | 19 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
83.7 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2022 | Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.6 kg | 17.86 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
87.6 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2022 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.3 kg | 14.6 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
82.2 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2021 | MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450 | 1.3 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
84.8 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2022 | HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.4 kg | 19 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
Case — The Pavilion Pro
The Pavilion Plus 14 retains the aluminum look and feel of the original Pavilion 14 despite all the internal changes likely to save on costs. Had HP introduced any significant design improvements, then this Pavilion Plus model would have essentially been an Envy product which is a costlier series from HP. This isn't to say that there are no superficial changes, however, as the Pavilion Plus 14 is visibly flatter around the edges and with a different bottom plate design to cut down on overall thickness by about 0.7 mm.
Chassis rigidity is good around the base with very little flexing. The lid and inner plastic bezels, however, are noticeably more susceptible to twists and damage especially since there is no Gorilla Glass option to reinforce the panel. Build quality is still comparable to the competing Vivobook or IdeaPad series nonetheless.
Dimensions are shorter in width but longer in length than on the standard Pavilion 14 due to the new 16:10 aspect ratio. Overall weight remains the same at about 1.4 kg.
Connectivity — No Thunderbolt Support
Port options are mostly the same as on the standard Pavilion 14 but with one big change: HP has dropped the proprietary AC adapter barrel port for a second USB-C port. We expect most if not all non-gaming Pavilion models in the near future to move to USB-C charging as well.
Port positioning may be unfavorable to some users as most of the ports are along the right edge potentially occupying valuable desk space.
Thunderbolt is unfortunately not supported as such a feature is still reserved for higher-end models like the Envy or Spectre for the time being.
SD Card Reader
The integrated spring-loaded MicroSD reader offers decent transfer rates of ~80 MB/s considering the Pavilion price range. Pricier alternatives like the Spectre x360 14 can move files from card to desktop at over 3x the speed.
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) |
Communication — No Wi-Fi 6E
The unit ships with a budget Realtek RTL8852AE module for Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5 connectivity. Transfer rates, while consistent and serviceable for streaming and most scenarios, are much slower than the more common Intel AX200/201 series.
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr |
Webcam — 5 MP Camera
The model incorporates a 5 MP webcam unlike the 1 MP webcam on the standard Pavilion 14 for sharper images. There is no privacy shutter or IR sensor for Windows Hello support, however.
Maintenance
The bottom panel is relatively easy to remove with just a Philips screwdriver and sharp edge. There are thankfully no hidden screws underneath any rubber feet unlike on older generation Pavilion models. In fact, HP even has a handy video for users who want to service the laptop.
Once inside, users can swap out the WLAN, battery, or M.2 modules as needed. RAM is soldered and not user-upgradeable.
Accessories and Warranty
There are no extras in the box other than the AC adapter and paperwork. The standard one-year limited manufacturer warranty applies if purchased in the US.
Input Devices
Keyboard
Both the keyboard and clickpad remain identical to the regular Pavilion 14 which is hardly a complaint since we loved the keyboard on the Pavilion 14. When compared to the keyboards on the Asus Vivobook or Lenovo IdeaPad, the keyboard on this Pavilion is surprisingly crisp and with satisfying travel when pressed. Our main complaint continues to be the white backlight which contrasts poorly with the white key caps. We suspect that this won't be an issue on any of the other four color options.
Touchpad
The clickpad is large at 12.5 x 8 cm compared to the already large 12 x 7.5 cm on the competing Yoga Slim 7i Pro. Cursor control feels spacious as a result and also very smooth because of the 90 Hz refresh rate of the display. Meanwhile, the feedback from clicking is satisfactory albeit slightly spongy and a bit on the loud side. It's one of the more comfortable clickpads we've used on a Pavilion-class laptop nonetheless.
Display — 90 Hz, OLED, 1800p, 100% DCI-P3
The Pavilion Plus 14 uses the same or similar 1800p Samsung OLED panel as found on the Vivobook Pro 14. Thus, the viewing experience between the two laptops is nearly identical. We can say, however, that the Asus laptop includes more OLED care features not found on the HP such as blue-light settings, flicker reduction slider, burn-in abatement, and easier color space changes that enthusiasts can appreciate. Beyond that, it's tough going back to 60 Hz IPS after experiencing 90 Hz OLED.
It's worth noting that the OLED panel exhibits a flickering of 357 Hz on all brightness settings including maximum. This appears to be a common trait on newer OLED panels with native refresh rates above 60 Hz. If your eyes are sensitive to flickering, then it may be best to avoid using such OLED laptops for long periods.
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 388.3 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.51 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr Samsung SDC4170, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T SAMSUNG: SDC4171, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 BOE NV14N42, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 LEN140WQ+, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 BOE CQ NV140FHM-N4V, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng LGD0619, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -1% | -55% | -14% | -53% | -27% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 99.41 0% | 38.6 -61% | 77.7 -22% | 39.9 -60% | 62 -38% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.94 0% | 56.2 -44% | 100 0% | 58.8 -41% | 92 -8% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 98.9 | 94.79 -4% | 39.9 -60% | 78.4 -21% | 41.2 -58% | 63 -36% |
Response Times | -88% | -1777% | -1995% | -1033% | -2049% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.2 ? | 3 ? -150% | 27.2 ? -2167% | 35.2 ? -2833% | 25 ? -1983% | 37 ? -2983% |
Response Time Black / White * | 1.4 ? | 3 ? -114% | 20.8 ? -1386% | 17.6 ? -1157% | 16 ? -1043% | 17 ? -1114% |
PWM Frequency | 357 ? | 360 1% | 92 ? -74% | |||
Screen | 20% | -108% | -17% | -40% | -58% | |
Brightness middle | 388.3 | 384 -1% | 269.4 -31% | 469 21% | 347 -11% | 387 0% |
Brightness | 391 | 385 -2% | 260 -34% | 445 14% | 311 -20% | 359 -8% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 98 0% | 89 -9% | 90 -8% | 81 -17% | 84 -14% |
Black Level * | 0.07 | 0.41 | 0.12 | 0.55 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.51 | 1.75 61% | 6.53 -45% | 3.5 22% | 5.05 -12% | 4.04 10% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.06 | 3.41 52% | 19.76 -180% | 5.3 25% | 16.98 -141% | 8.28 -17% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 1.06 12% | 5.4 -350% | 3.3 -175% | 1.63 -36% | 5 -317% |
Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.39 92% | 2.05 107% | 1.97 112% | 2.3 96% | 2.62 84% |
CCT | 6290 103% | 6440 101% | 6007 108% | 6512 100% | 6666 98% | 7123 91% |
Contrast | 5486 | 657 | 2892 | 704 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.32 | 3.13 | 1.7 | 1 | ||
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -23% /
-12% | -647% /
-397% | -675% /
-376% | -375% /
-291% | -711% /
-411% |
* ... smaller is better
We're able to record 100 percent P3 color coverage to back up HP's claim of full DCI-P3 colors. Most IPS displays in this price range only promise full sRGB coverage in comparison such as the one on the Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14. The OLED panel on the Pavilion is not calibrated at factory, however, likely to save on costs.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6 ms rise | |
↘ 0.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6 ms rise | |
↘ 0.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 357 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 357 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 357 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
The high black levels of OLED make it more comfortable for viewing outdoors when compared to IPS at the same brightness setting. Nonetheless, glare is still visible on our glossy OLED panel in most outdoor conditions. Maximum brightness is otherwise above average for a Pavilion to be comparable to the Asus Vivobook Pro 14 or Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14.
Performance — Same CPU As The Dell XPS 17 9720
Testing Conditions
We set our unit to Performance mode via Windows and the HP Command Center software prior to running any benchmarks below. We recommend that users become familiar with HP Command Center as both performance and network settings are toggled here.
Processor
Raw multi-thread performance is about 20 percent slower than expected from a Core i7-12700H laptop. The Dell XPS 17 9720, for example, ships with the same Core i7-12700H CPU and yet it offers 40 to 45 percent faster multi-thread performance even after accounting for any throttling. The deficit is wide enough that even the more power efficient Core i5-1240P is only about 10 to 15 percent slower than our H-series Core i7-powered HP. It's a fast laptop for the size, but it could have certainly been faster given what we've observed on other laptops with the same processor.
Users can configure with the slower Core i5-1240P or Core i7-1255U if desired. The latter in particular is the only SKU with a discrete GeForce RTX 2050 option albeit at the cost of ~40 percent slower multi-thread performance compared to our Core i7-12700H. The Nvidia option is not available on the Core-P or Core-H configurations likely due to thermal limitations.
Running CineBench R15 xT in a loop shows a performance drop of about 10 percent after the initial run as shown by the graph below.
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (2585 - 17957, n=62) | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (12439 - 90760, n=62) | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (833 - 4242, n=62) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (57923 - 103202, n=62) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (3249 - 9939, n=62) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (7135 - 44760, n=62) | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (31839 - 144360, n=62) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (305 - 1171, n=62) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1437 - 9692, n=62) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (12863 - 52207, n=62) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
System Performance
PCMark results are where we expect them to be relative to other laptops equipped with the same Core i7-12700H CPU if not a tad bit slower. CrossMark results in particular are slower than average likely due to the slow CineBench results recorded above.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5541 - 6281, n=7) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10569 - 11699, n=7) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6690 - 8038, n=7) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6207 - 7401, n=7) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1492 - 1907, n=7) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1499 - 1832, n=7) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1507 - 2016, n=7) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1384 - 1831, n=7) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T |
PCMark 10 Score | 5893 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (25615 - 80511, n=62) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (25586 - 79442, n=62) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (23679 - 88660, n=62) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (76.2 - 133.9, n=60) | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latency
LatencyMon shows DPC issues when opening multiple browser tabs on our homepage. 4K video playback is otherwise perfect with low resource utilization as to be expected from a modern Core H-series processor.
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
HP Pavilion Plus 14 eh0097nr | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Devices — One Drive Only
Our unit ships with the midrange 256 GB SK Hynix BC711 PCIe3 x4 NVMe SSD offering excellent sequential read rates of about 3400 MB/s but much slower sequential write rates of only about 1000 MB/s. Higher-end PCIe3 drives like the Samsung PM981a series can offer over two times the write rates.
The drive in our test unit exhibits no throttling when subjected to DiskSpd in a loop. However, performance would sometimes dip to the 2550 MB/s range before jumping back up to 3400 MB/s likely due to some interrupting background activity. We made sure to uninstall any automatic backup and McAfee processes beforehand and yet the small dips would continue.
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU Performance — Iris Xe
Graphics performance is slightly slower than expected. Our HP returns frame rates that are a few percentage points lower when compared to the average laptop with the same Iris Xe 96 EUs GPU. It's still good enough to play most games at low settings, but it is now outclassed by the recent Radeon 680M.
Upgrading to the GeForce RTX 2050 option is expected to increase graphics performance by roughly 150 to 180 percent over our Iris Xe.
Strangely, 3DMark results are inconsistent between Balanced and Performance mode even after repeated runs. When running actual games, however, we can see the differences in clock rates and power consumption as shown in our Stress Test section below.
3DMark 11 Performance | 7081 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 20292 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4044 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1630 points | |
Help |