, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel HD Graphics 2500 vs Intel HD Graphics 2000

Intel HD Graphics 2500

► remove from comparison Intel HD Graphics 2500

The Intel HD Graphics 2500 (or Ivy Bridge GT1) is an integrated graphics card in the Ivy Bridge codenamed desktop processors. It is the successor the the Intel HD Graphics 2000 in the Sandy Bridge CPUs and performs between the old HD 2000 and 3000 GPU (see benchmarks below). Usually it is used in the cheaper desktop Ivy bridge CPUs. The mobile version is simply called Intel HD Graphics and integrated in the Pentium and Celeron line.

Compared to the faster HD Graphics 4000, the 2500 one features less Execution Units (6 versus 16) and only one texture sampler. Therefore, the performance is clearly worse and only suited for low demanding gaming. Intel states a 10 to 15% higher performance compared to the old Sandy Bridge based HD Graphics 2000. Therefore, only older casual games with low requirements are playable with the HD 2500.

A speciality of the Ivy Bridge GPUs is that 4x MSAA is supported in hardware now. However, 2x is only supported through software.  The algorithm to support 2x is going through the 4x pipeline with a software algorithm, so performance is similar to 4x MSAA.

The integrated video decoder called Multi Format Codec Engine (MFX) was also improved and should allow even simultaneus 4K video decoding. DXVAChecker lists MPEG2, VC1, WMV9, and H264 as supported codecs. QuickSync for fast transcoding of videos was also optimized for higher performance and better image quality.

Another new feature is the support for up to 3 independent displays as AMD offers with theirs Eyefinity support (up to 6 displays).

Due to the 22nm 3D Tri-Gate production process, the power consumption is relatively low (the development was focused on performance per Watt). 

Intel HD Graphics 2000

► remove from comparison

The Intel HD Graphics 2000 (or Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD 2000 or GMA HD 2000) is an integrated graphics card in the Sandy Bridge codenamed processors. It is included in slower mobile processors (Pentium brand e.g. but called only Intel HD Graphics) and in most desktop processors. The HD Graphics 2000 has no dedicated memory but shares the fast Level 3 Cache with the CPU cores and also part of the main memory. Due to Turbo Boost, the GPU can be overclocked depending on the current CPU load and power consumption. The GMA HD 2000 offers only half of the 12 Execution Units (EUs) of the Intel GMA HD 3000.

Because of the halfed amount of shaders, the gaming performance is only compareable to the old Intel GMA HD (in the Arrandale CPUs). Our tests with a desktop i5-2400 showed a performance level of a Geforce G 105M e.g. which is slightly faster. Therefore, only low demanding games like Sims 3 or World of Warcraft can be played in low detail settings fluently.

Altought 2x Antialiasing (AA) is supported, the chip is as fast as when rendering 4x AA. In the Unigine Valley benchmark a similar HD 3000 i7-2637M for example reached the same score with 2x AA and 4x AA.

In addition to the GPU, the chip also houses some dedicated units for decoding and encoding HD videos. On the IDF Intel demonstrated the encoding of a 3 minute long 1080p video to an iPhone compatible format in 640x360 in only 14s. Another novelty of the Sandy Bridge GPU is the embedded DisplayPort eDP to connect internal Displays.

Due to the integration in the 32nm built CPU and the halfed amount of shaders, the power consumption of the GPU should be quite low and also suited for small and light laptops.

Intel HD Graphics 2500Intel HD Graphics 2000
ManufacturerIntelIntel
HD Graphics Series
HD Graphics P530 compare 24 @ 0.35 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5600 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 6000 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4600 compare 20 @ 0.2 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5500 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5000 compare 40 @ 0.2 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4400 compare 20 @ 0.2 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5300 compare 24 @ 0.1 - 0.9 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4000 compare 16 @ 0.35 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Broadwell) compare 12 @ 0.1 - 0.85 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4200 compare 20 @ 0.2 - 0.85 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Skylake) compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.8 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell) compare 16 @ 0.32 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Braswell) compare 16 @ 0.32 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) compare 12 @ 0.32 - 0.64 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Haswell) compare 10 @ 0.2 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) compare 16 @ 0.2 - 0.6 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 3000 compare 12 @ 0.35 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 2500 6 @ 0.65 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) compare 6 @ 0.35 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 2000 6 @ 0.85 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) compare 6 @ 0.35 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Bay Trail) compare 4 @ 0.31 - 0.9 GHz32/64/128 Bit
HD Graphics P530 compare 24 @ 0.35 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5600 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 6000 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4600 compare 20 @ 0.2 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5500 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5000 compare 40 @ 0.2 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4400 compare 20 @ 0.2 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5300 compare 24 @ 0.1 - 0.9 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4000 compare 16 @ 0.35 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Broadwell) compare 12 @ 0.1 - 0.85 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4200 compare 20 @ 0.2 - 0.85 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Skylake) compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.8 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell) compare 16 @ 0.32 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Braswell) compare 16 @ 0.32 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) compare 12 @ 0.32 - 0.64 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Haswell) compare 10 @ 0.2 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) compare 16 @ 0.2 - 0.6 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 3000 compare 12 @ 0.35 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 2500 6 @ 0.65 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) compare 6 @ 0.35 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 2000 6 @ 0.85 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) compare 6 @ 0.35 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Bay Trail) compare 4 @ 0.31 - 0.9 GHz32/64/128 Bit
CodenameIvy Bridge GT1Sandy Bridge
ArchitectureGen. 7 Ivy BridgeGen. 6 Sandy Bridge
Pipelines6 - unified6 - unified
Core Speed650 - 1150 (Boost) MHz850/1100 - 1350 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus Width64/128 Bit64/128 Bit
Shared Memoryyesyes
DirectXDirectX 11.0, Shader 5.0DirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1
technology22 nm32 nm
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement01.04.2012 01.02.2011
CPU in HD Graphics 2500GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i5-35504 x 3300 MHz, 77 W650 MHz1150 MHz
Intel Core i5-34704 x 3200 MHz, 77 W650 MHz1100 MHz
Intel Core i3-32202 x 3300 MHz, 55 W650 MHz1050 MHz
min. - max.650 MHz1050 - 1150 MHz
CPU in HD Graphics 2000GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i5-24004 x 3100 MHz, 95 W850 MHz1100 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - HD Graphics 2500
2.1 pt (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 1906     avg: 2659     median: 2817 (4%)     max: 3095 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 2301     avg: 2584     median: 2604.5 (1%)     max: 2825 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 257     avg: 293     median: 294.5 (1%)     max: 327 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 289     avg: 320     median: 318 (1%)     max: 353 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 21978     avg: 23693     median: 24058 (3%)     max: 24676 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 374     avg: 419     median: 430 (1%)     max: 449 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 321     avg: 349     median: 350.5 (1%)     max: 374 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + Intel HD Graphics 2500
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 1375     avg: 1849     median: 1930.5 (2%)     max: 2068 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. total + Intel HD Graphics 2000
min: 789     avg: 896     median: 895.5 (1%)     max: 1002 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + Intel HD Graphics 2500
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 1115     avg: 1369     median: 1400.5 (1%)     max: 1561 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + Intel HD Graphics 2000
min: 626     avg: 695     median: 694.5 (1%)     max: 763 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
20814 Points (22%)
15201 Points (16%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
10138 Points (5%)
min: 6077     avg: 7083     median: 7083 (4%)     max: 8089 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 6341     avg: 6627     median: 6627 (10%)     max: 6913 Points
min: 4585     avg: 5194     median: 5193.5 (8%)     max: 5802 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel HD Graphics 2500
3DMark 06
min: 3300     avg: 3933     median: 3816 (7%)     max: 4442 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel HD Graphics 2000
min: 1217     avg: 2222     median: 2288 (4%)     max: 3162 Points
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
5.3 fps (1%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + Intel HD Graphics 2500
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
1.6 fps (1%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + Intel HD Graphics 2500
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
2.7 fps (4%)
specvp11 sw-02 + Intel HD Graphics 2500
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
6.8 fps (8%)
specvp11 proe-05 + Intel HD Graphics 2500
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
1.9 fps (8%)
specvp11 maya-03 + Intel HD Graphics 2500
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
12.9 fps (10%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + Intel HD Graphics 2500
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
15.6 fps (17%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + Intel HD Graphics 2500
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
2.4 fps (1%)
specvp11 catia-03 + Intel HD Graphics 2500
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
0 fps (0%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
5.6 Points (71%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
min: 4.5     avg: 4.9     median: 4.9 (61%)     max: 5.2 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel HD Graphics 2500
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 3409     avg: 5543     median: 6037 (28%)     max: 6687
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel HD Graphics 2000
min: 1169     avg: 2298     median: 2298 (11%)     max: 3427
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 2500
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 9.09     avg: 10.6     median: 10.8 (5%)     max: 11.98 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 2000
min: 2.69     avg: 5.1     median: 5.9 (3%)     max: 6.68 fps
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 30     avg: 31     median: 31 (0%)     max: 32 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 47     avg: 50     median: 50 (0%)     max: 53 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 282     avg: 287     median: 286 (1%)     max: 294

Average Benchmarks Intel HD Graphics 2500 → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks Intel HD Graphics 2000 → 59% n=8

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
11.1  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
9.8  fps
high 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
9.6  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
17.7  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
8  fps
high 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
7  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
145  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
26  fps
high 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
13.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
4.3  fps
SimCity

SimCity

2013
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
14.8  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
8  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
20.1  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
10.9  fps
high 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
7.1  fps
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
13.8  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
43 46.2 ~ 45 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
18.8  fps
high 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
13.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
7.3  fps
Far Cry 3

Far Cry 3

2012
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
18 20.5 ~ 19 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
11.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
13.8  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
18.4 20.1 ~ 19 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
10.7 11.6 ~ 11 fps
high 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
3.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
1.9  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
18  fps
Fifa 13

Fifa 13

2012
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
29.7 99 101 ~ 77 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
23.6 51 52 60 ~ 47 fps
high 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
17.2 28 31.2 32 ~ 27 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
14.5  fps
F1 2012

F1 2012

2012
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
37 40 ~ 39 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
21 26 ~ 24 fps
high 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
21 22 ~ 22 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
12 12 ~ 12 fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
37  fps
high 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
8  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
77 82 ~ 80 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
36 39 ~ 38 fps
high 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
18 20.6 ~ 19 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
11.7  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
21.7  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
15.5  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 2000:
24.1  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 2000:
11.9  fps
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
23.2  fps
86%
HD Graphics 2000:
18.9 21.5 ~ 20 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
9.8  fps
82%
HD Graphics 2000:
8  fps
high 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
5.2  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 2000:
14  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
16.8  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
11  fps
Fifa 12

Fifa 12

2011
low 800x600
HD Graphics 2000:
117  fps
med. 1024x768
HD Graphics 2000:
56  fps
high 1360x768
HD Graphics 2000:
37  fps
ultra 1920x1080
HD Graphics 2000:
21  fps
F1 2011

F1 2011

2011
low 800x600
HD Graphics 2000:
37  fps
med. 1024x768
HD Graphics 2000:
19  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 2000:
23.3 26 ~ 25 fps
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
HD Graphics 2000:
53  fps
med. 1024x768
HD Graphics 2000:
21.4  fps
high 1360x768
HD Graphics 2000:
13.3  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 2000:
9  fps
Crysis 2

Crysis 2

2011
low 800x600
HD Graphics 2000:
18  fps
Total War: Shogun 2

Total War: Shogun 2

2011
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 2000:
43.2  fps
low 800x600
HD Graphics 2000:
26  fps
med. 1024x768
HD Graphics 2000:
17  fps
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
med. 1024x768
HD Graphics 2000:
68 71 ~ 70 fps
high 1360x768
HD Graphics 2000:
34 40 ~ 37 fps
ultra 1920x1080
HD Graphics 2000:
19 22 ~ 21 fps
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
HD Graphics 2000:
-1 16.9 ~ 8 fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 2000:
62  fps
med. 1360x768
HD Graphics 2000:
12  fps
high 1360x768
HD Graphics 2000:
9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
HD Graphics 2000:
5  fps
low 800x600
HD Graphics 2000:
27  fps
med. 1360x768
HD Graphics 2000:
11  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 2000:
26.4  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 2000:
10.4  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 2000:
21.2 23 ~ 22 fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 2000:
12 13.5 ~ 13 fps
low 800x600
HD Graphics 2000:
50  fps
med. 1024x768
HD Graphics 2000:
14  fps
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
HD Graphics 2000:
26 48 ~ 37 fps
med. 1024x768
HD Graphics 2000:
11 15.5 ~ 13 fps
high 1366x768
HD Graphics 2000:
7.8  fps
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
low 800x600
HD Graphics 2000:
62  fps
high 1360x768
HD Graphics 2000:
12.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
HD Graphics 2000:
6.1  fps
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
low 800x600
HD Graphics 2000:
30  fps
med. 1024x768
HD Graphics 2000:
12  fps
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
HD Graphics 2000:
27.1  fps
med. 1024x768
HD Graphics 2000:
17.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
HD Graphics 2000:
12.7  fps
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 2000:
32  fps
ultra 1280x1024
HD Graphics 2000:
5  fps
Sims 3

Sims 3

2009
low 800x600
HD Graphics 2000:
107  fps
med. 1024x768
HD Graphics 2000:
24  fps
high 1280x1024
HD Graphics 2000:
13  fps
F.E.A.R. 2

F.E.A.R. 2

2009
low 800x600
HD Graphics 2000:
73  fps
med. 1024x768
HD Graphics 2000:
20  fps
GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

2008
low 800x600
HD Graphics 2000:
-1  fps
Left 4 Dead

Left 4 Dead

2008
high 1024x768
HD Graphics 2000:
31  fps
Far Cry 2

Far Cry 2

2008
low 640x480
HD Graphics 2000:
27.9 49 ~ 38 fps
high 1024x768
HD Graphics 2000:
13 13 ~ 13 fps
ultra 1920x1080
HD Graphics 2000:
5.2  fps
Crysis Warhead

Crysis Warhead

2008
low 800x600
HD Graphics 2000:
30  fps
ultra 1024x768
HD Graphics 2000:
4  fps
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
low 640x480
HD Graphics 2000:
166  fps
high 1024x768
HD Graphics 2000:
39.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
HD Graphics 2000:
13.7  fps
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

2007
low 800x600
HD Graphics 2000:
74  fps
med. 1024x768
HD Graphics 2000:
27  fps
high 1280x1024
HD Graphics 2000:
11  fps
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
46  fps
59%
HD Graphics 2000:
27  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
22.2  fps
72%
HD Graphics 2000:
16  fps
high 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
18.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
7.6  fps
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
48.8 52.8 ~ 51 fps
61%
HD Graphics 2000:
25 37 ~ 31 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
20.2 21.6 ~ 21 fps
67%
HD Graphics 2000:
13.8 14.7 ~ 14 fps
high 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
12  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
3  fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 2000:
33.3  fps
med. 1024x768
HD Graphics 2000:
13.7  fps
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
low 800x600
HD Graphics 2000:
78  fps
med. 1024x768
HD Graphics 2000:
21  fps
high 1024x768
HD Graphics 2000:
10  fps
ultra 1920x1080
HD Graphics 2000:
4  fps
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

2005
high 1024x768
HD Graphics 2000:
100.6  fps
Quake 4

Quake 4

2005
ultra 1024x768
HD Graphics 2000:
44  fps
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
104  fps
138%
HD Graphics 2000:
144  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 2500:
29  fps
124%
HD Graphics 2000:
36  fps
high 1280x1024
HD Graphics 2000:
9  fps
Counter-Strike Source

Counter-Strike Source

2004
low 640x480
HD Graphics 2000:
210  fps
high 1024x768
HD Graphics 2000:
70  fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
HD Graphics 2000:
52  fps
ultra 1024x768
HD Graphics 2000:
44.1  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
HD Graphics 2000:
243  fps

Average Gaming Intel HD Graphics 2500 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Intel HD Graphics 2000 → 86%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 92%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.17
log 15. 22:15:36

#0 checking url part for id 2887 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1958 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 12 Oct 2021 17:22:22 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.045s ... 0.046s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.046s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.046s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 2887 +0.029s ... 0.075s

#8 got single benchmarks 2887 +0.01s ... 0.085s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 1958 +0s ... 0.085s

#10 got single benchmarks 1958 +0.017s ... 0.102s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.102s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.018s ... 0.121s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.005s ... 0.126s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.126s

#15 Got 181 rows for game benchmarks. +0.009s ... 0.135s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.135s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.012s ... 0.147s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.056s ... 0.203s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.203s

#20 return log +0.046s ... 0.249s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)