Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Max-Q

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI is a high-end DirectX 11-compatible graphics solution for laptops, consisting of two GeForce GTX 965M. Each card has a 28 nm GM204 GPU based on the Maxwell architecture, which is the same chip as found on the GTX 980M, GTX 970M as well as several desktop cards. The clocks for the SLI-setup are usually identical to a single GTX 965M (924 MHz GPU, 1250 MHz memory).

With SLI, each card renders a single frame (AFR mode). Therefore, it may suffer from micro stuttering in low fps ranges of 30 fps. This happens because of different timespans between two frames (e.g., irregular delays between sequential frames).

Architecture

GM204 is based on Nvidia's Maxwell architecture, which replaces the previous Kepler generation. Among other changes, Nvidia have restructured the streaming multi processors (SMM) in order to increase workload and efficiency. Now each SMM contains only 128 shader units and 8 TMUs, which is noticeably less than an equivalent Kepler GPU. The GM204 features four GPCs, and each consists of four SMMs. But, in the GeForce GTX 965M, Nvidia have deactivated 8 of 16 SMMs. As a result, only 1024 shader ALUs and 64 TMUs are active. In addition, there are 32 ROPs in two clusters with 16 units each.

The memory interface has a bandwidth of 128-bits (2x 64 bit) for each of the two GPUs. Thanks to an improved compression algorithm, the connection to the GDDR5 memory should be significantly more efficient per MHz. Furthermore, the L1 (96 KB per SMM) and L2 caches (2 MB) have been significantly increased to lower the needed bandwidth. Compared to the mid-range GM107, the newer and larger GM204 has several additional features and changes. Aside from the improved polymorphic engine in the SSMs, it is also the first Nvidia chip to support DirectX 12 Feature Level 12_1.

Performance

With good driver support, SLI almost doubles the performance of a single card. In this case, the GTX 965M SLI beats a single GeForce GTX 980M by about 10 percent. Therefore, the GTX 965M SLI is powerful enough to run even the most demanding games with highest details, AA/AF and/or resolutions exceeding FullHD.

Features

Most of the features are identical to the GeForce GTX 800M series. With the GTX 965M, there can be up to 4 active displays, but this will likely decrease due to Optimus. Displays can be connected with a maximum resolution of 3840 x 2160 pixels via DisplayPort 1.2 or HDMI 2.0 (no HDCP @ 4K). HD audio formats like Dolby True HD and DTS HD can be sent to a compatible receiver as bitstream. As with previous models, 3D Vision is not supported with Optimus.

The video processor VP6 supports the usual formats like H.264 and can also decode and encode H.265 with a resolution of up to 4K via the NVENC API (hybrid H.265 decoder, not fully fixed function). Several parallel streams, such as picture-in-picture in a Blu-Ray movie, are also possible.

Further features of the GTX 900M series, which are also partly supported by older cards, include Battery Boost (longer battery life during gaming), Shadowplay (recording of gaming videos up to 4K60p and 130 Mbit/s) and Gamestream (game streaming on Shield console). More information on these features are available here.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of each GeForce GTX 965M including its MXM board and memory should be around 70 W, leading to a total TDP of about 140 W. Therefore, the SLI setup can only be used in very large and heavy gaming notebooks with powerful cooling systems. Under low load, dynamic clock rates help the GPUs to save energy.

NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Max-Q

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Max-Q

The Nvidia Quadro P5000 Max-Q (official Nvidia Quadro P5000 with Max-Q Design) is a mobile high-end workstation graphics card for notebooks. It is the power efficient variant of the normal Quadro P5000 for laptops and offers slightly reduced clock speeds (1101 - 1366 MHz versus 1164 - 1506 MHz) and a greatly reduced power consumption (80 versus 100 Watt TGP). Similar to the consumer GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (Laptop), it is based on a slimmed-down GP104 chip with 2048 shaders. The graphics card is designed for the Kaby Lake generation. 

The Quadro GPUs offer certified drivers, which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.

Performance

The theoretical performance should be slightly below the normal Quadro P4000 due to the reduced clock speeds.

Power Consumption

With an TGP of 80 Watt, the P5000 Max-Q is only slightly higher rated (5 Watt) as the much slower Quadro P3000 (75 Watt) and therefore similar sized laptops can use the P5000 Max-Q. 

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLINVIDIA Quadro P5000 Max-Q
Quadro P Series
GeForce GTX 980M SLI compare 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.13 GHz2x 256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 970M SLI compare 2560 @ 0.92 - 1.04 GHz2x 192 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 965M SLI 2048 @ 0.92 - 0.95 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 980M compare 1536 @ 1.04 - 1.13 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 970M compare 1280 @ 0.92 - 1.04 GHz192 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 965M compare 1024 @ 0.92 - 0.95 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 960M compare 640 @ 1.1 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 950M compare 640 @ 0.91 - 1.12 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 - 5000 MHz
Quadro P5200 compare 2560 @ 1.32 - 1.57 GHz256 Bit @ 7216 MHz
Quadro P4200 compare 2304 @ 1.22 - 1.48 GHz256 Bit @ 7132 MHz
Quadro P5000 compare 2048 @ 1.16 - 1.51 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P5000 Max-Q 2048 @ 1.1 - 1.37 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P4000 compare 1792 @ 1.2 - 1.23 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P4000 Max-Q compare 1792 @ 1.11 - 1.24 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P3200 compare 1792 @ 0.71 - 1.23 GHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P3000 compare 1280 @ 1.09 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P3000 Max-Q compare 1280 @ 1.08 - 1.24 GHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P2000 compare 768 @ 1.22 - 1.47 GHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P2000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 1.22 - 1.47 GHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P1000 compare 512 @ 1.49 - 1.52 GHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P620 compare 512 @ 1.18 - 1.44 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
ArchitectureMaxwellPascal
Pipelines2048 - unified2048 - unified
Core Speed924 - 950 (Boost) MHz1101 - 1366 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed5000 MHz6006 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory2x 4096 MB16 GB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5
Transistors0 Billion
technology28 nm16 nm
FeaturesBattery Boost, GameStream, ShadowPlay, GPU Boost 2.0, Optimus, PhysX, CUDA, SLI, GeForce ExperienceOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebook Sizelargelarge
Date of Announcement05.01.2015 11.01.2017
CodenameN17E-Q5 Max-Q
Power Consumption100 Watt
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - GeForce GTX 965M SLI
3.8 pt (11%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
250259 Points (25%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
73221 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
22188 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
51182 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
7815 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
10207 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
73450 Points (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
11638 Points (14%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
14428 Points (11%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6789 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
68.4 fps (23%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
116.3 fps (7%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
1513 Samples/s (5%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
2699 Samples/s (5%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
3818 Points (3%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

med. 1366x768
100%
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
69  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
40  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
27  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
105.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
71.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
72  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
49.8  fps
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
high 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
115  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
90  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
61.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
58.8  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
89.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
69.2  fps
Thief

Thief

2014
high 1366x768
100%
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
84.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
60.1  fps
high 1366x768
100%
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
85.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
56.9  fps
high 1366x768
100%
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
165.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
93.1  fps
high 1366x768
100%
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
145  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
76.2  fps
high 1366x768
100%
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
244.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
117.6  fps
high 1366x768
100%
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
64.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
57.3  fps
high 1366x768
100%
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
159.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 965M SLI:
62.8  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLI → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLINVIDIA Quadro P5000 Max-Q
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Batman: Arkham Knight694027
Battlefield Hardline105.271.9
Dragon Age: Inquisition7249.8
F1 201411590
Ryse: Son of Rome61.258.8
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor89.569.2
Thief84.760.1
Metro: Last Light85.856.9
BioShock Infinite165.393.1
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm14576.2
Tomb Raider244.5117.6
Guild Wars 264.557.3
Sleeping Dogs159.962.8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M SLINVIDIA Quadro P5000 Max-Q
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps





1

1
8
4
1
4
8






< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


















For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 30. 10:35:20

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6375 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8084 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753864520s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:18:01 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.036s ... 0.036s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.036s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.036s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6375 +0.022s ... 0.058s

#9 got single benchmarks 6375 +0.004s ... 0.063s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 8084 +0s ... 0.063s

#11 got single benchmarks 8084 +0s ... 0.063s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.063s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.008s ... 0.071s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.071s

#15 Got 27 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.074s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.074s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.075s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.006s ... 0.08s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.08s

#20 return log +0.002s ... 0.083s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)