Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N4000 vs Intel Processor N100 vs Intel Celeron N4100

Intel Celeron N4000

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4000

The Intel Celeron N4000 is a dual-core SoC designed for affordable laptops and mini-PCs and was announced late 2017. It runs at 1.1 GHz to 2.6 GHz (Single Core Burst, Multi Core Burst maxes out at 2.5 GHz) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessor, the chip is manufactured on a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, all in a smaller package. Partial Wi-Fi 5 support is baked into the chip. Besides two CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture was slightly reworked and is now called Goldmont Plus. It features a larger L2 cache (4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not anywhere near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average N4000 in our database only just matches the Core i5-4300Y, a fairly old dual-core processor of nearly the same energy efficiency, in multi-thread performance. In other words, the Celeron is a very slow processor that's good enough for the most basic of tasks only. Expect long load times no matter the app.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics 600 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Generation 9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 650 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 (8-bit color-depth).

Power consumption

Like most other N-class Intel chips, the Celeron N4000 has a 6 W TDP (also known as the long-term power limit). This is not much at all, allowing laptop makers to build passively cooled laptops, tablets, mini-PCs around the chip. The SoC can briefly consume up to 15 W, though, depending on how a system is configured.

Last but not the least, this Celeron is manufactured on one of the old 14 nm Intel processes leading to poor, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Processor N100

► remove from comparison Intel N100

The Intel Processor N100 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with 1 to 3.4 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache.

Performance

The average N100 in our database delivers unimpressive multi-thread benchmark scores that are most similar to those of the Core i3-1115G4. The chip is fast enough for many day-to-day tasks, but not much more than that; the other thing to keep in mind is that of the two N100-toting systems tested by us as of October 2023, both have rather high CPU power limits. The chip will be noticeably slower if limited to just six or seven Watts.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers only 24 of the 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 450 - 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds, and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N100 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

Intel Celeron N4100

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4100

The Intel Celeron N4100 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and was announced late 2017. It runs at 1.1-2.4 GHz (Single Core Burst, Multi Core Burst max 2.3 GHz) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessor, the chip is manufactured on a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, a smaller package, a new generation of monitor outputs (Gen 10) and a partly integrated WiFi chip. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is permanently soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture was slightly reworked and is now called Goldmont Plus. It features an increased Level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average N4100 in our database directly competes with AMD's 3020e and 3050e, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. The Intel Core m3-8100Y and the Celeron 6305 are close nearby as well. Routinely described as "entry-level" in 2019 and 2020, the Celeron N4100 is a slow processor that is good for the most basic tasks only such as Web browsing with no more than two or three tabs open at a time.

The LapBook Pro is among the fastest systems built around the N4100 that we know of. It can be around 50% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics 600 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 700 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power Consumption

Celeron N4100 has a default TDP of 6 W (also known as PL1), making it a great option for passively cooled setups.

The fairly old 14 nm process this Celeron is built with makes for so-so, as of mid-2022, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Celeron N4000Intel Processor N100Intel Celeron N4100
CodenameGemini LakeAlder Lake-NGemini Lake
SeriesIntel Gemini LakeIntel Alder Lake-NIntel Gemini Lake
Series: Gemini Lake Gemini Lake
Intel Pentium Silver J50051.5 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J41051.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N50001.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J40052 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J41151.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N41001.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4000 « 1.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N2001 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 « 1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver J50051.5 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J41051.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N50001.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J40052 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J41151.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4100 « 1.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N40001.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1100 - 2600 MHz1000 - 3400 MHz1100 - 2400 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 4
4 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
4 / 4
TDP6 Watt6 Watt6 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1090BGA1264BGA1090
FeaturesDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGXDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 600 (200 - 650 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600 (200 - 700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$107 U.S.$128 U.S.$107 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
L3 Cache6 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4000
14.7 pt (24%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N100
24.4 pt (41%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4100
15.7 pt (26%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 60     avg: 60.5     median: 60.5 (30%)     max: 61 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 194     avg: 195     median: 195 (4%)     max: 196 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1577     avg: 2449     median: 2559.5 (2%)     max: 2983 Points
min: 955     avg: 961     median: 960.5 (1%)     max: 966 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 747     avg: 885     median: 910.5 (37%)     max: 942 Points
min: 382     avg: 386.5     median: 386.5 (16%)     max: 391 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
160 Points (17%)
217%
N100 +
min: 285     avg: 338     median: 347 (38%)     max: 358 Points
min: 151     avg: 152.6     median: 152 (17%)     max: 155 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
273 Points (1%)
358%
N100 +
min: 590     avg: 934     median: 978.5 (2%)     max: 1139 Points
min: 368     avg: 440     median: 391 (1%)     max: 560 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 121     avg: 132.7     median: 138 (1%)     max: 139 Points
291%
N100 +
min: 246     avg: 384.6     median: 401.5 (3%)     max: 479 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 65     avg: 70.3     median: 70.9 (20%)     max: 75 Points
209%
N100 +
min: 118.8     avg: 143.8     median: 147.9 (41%)     max: 155 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.7 Points (2%)
256%
N100 +
min: 3.84     avg: 4.6     median: 4.2 (5%)     max: 5.99 Points
min: 2.13     avg: 2.4     median: 2.2 (3%)     max: 2.9 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.9 Points (21%)
198%
N100 +
min: 1.55     avg: 1.7     median: 1.8 (42%)     max: 1.87 Points
min: 0.8     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (20%)     max: 0.83 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2152 Points (13%)
226%
N100 +
min: 4604     avg: 4896     median: 4869 (29%)     max: 5179 Points
min: 1664     avg: 1951     median: 2013 (12%)     max: 2049 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
4030 Points (3%)
278%
N100 +
min: 9608     avg: 12281     median: 11207 (8%)     max: 15336 Points
min: 4915     avg: 5999     median: 5904 (4%)     max: 7123 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 N100 +
min: 14514     avg: 18829     median: 16948 (11%)     max: 24225 Points
10929 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 N100 +
min: 7171     avg: 7699     median: 7750 (9%)     max: 8227 Points
3337 Points (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1007 s (12%)
171%
N100 +
min: 481.652     avg: 569     median: 588.3 (7%)     max: 645.884 s
min: 591     avg: 724     median: 790 (9%)     max: 790 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
31.9 s (6%)
197%
N100 +
min: 15.795     avg: 16.5     median: 16.2 (3%)     max: 17.7 s
min: 18.97     avg: 20.3     median: 19.4 (4%)     max: 22.5 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
760 Points (1%)
312%
N100 +
min: 2187     avg: 2343     median: 2372 (4%)     max: 2501 Points
min: 1093     avg: 1148     median: 1139 (2%)     max: 1212 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
4114 MIPS (2%)
284%
N100 +
min: 7532     avg: 11072     median: 11663.5 (7%)     max: 13291 MIPS
min: 5620     avg: 6674     median: 6608 (4%)     max: 7835 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2298 MIPS (27%)
159%
N100 +
min: 3046     avg: 3629     median: 3653.5 (43%)     max: 3958 MIPS
min: 2125     avg: 2209     median: 2158 (25%)     max: 2459 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
9.5 fps (0%)
254%
N100 +
min: 20.85     avg: 27.1     median: 24.1 (1%)     max: 34.7 fps
min: 11.8     avg: 13.3     median: 11.8 (0%)     max: 16.3 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
47.3 fps (1%)
256%
N100 +
min: 101.8     avg: 134.8     median: 121.2 (3%)     max: 173 fps
min: 57.7     avg: 64.5     median: 58.2 (1%)     max: 77.7 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
0.8 fps (1%)
375%
N100 +
min: 1.72     avg: 2.8     median: 3 (5%)     max: 3.49 fps
min: 0.974     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (2%)     max: 1.5 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (3%)
300%
N100 +
min: 0.257     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (8%)     max: 0.263 GB/s
min: 0.156     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (5%)     max: 0.162 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (2%)
422%
N100 +
min: 0.529     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (9%)     max: 0.538 GB/s
min: 0.222     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (4%)     max: 0.236 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.9 GB/s (2%)
318%
N100 +
min: 2.8     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (8%)     max: 2.9 GB/s
1.7 GB/s (4%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1992     avg: 2545     median: 2067 (26%)     max: 3964 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
4736 Seconds (33%)
395%
N100 +
min: 1017     avg: 1322     median: 1198.5 (8%)     max: 1956 Seconds
min: 2437     avg: 3032     median: 3176 (22%)     max: 3527 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.7 sec (36%)
191%
N100 +
min: 0.822     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (19%)     max: 1.06 sec
min: 1.75     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (38%)     max: 1.786 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2259 Points (5%)
214%
N100 +
min: 4091     avg: 5232     median: 4838 (10%)     max: 6441 Points
min: 2748     avg: 2985     median: 2805 (6%)     max: 3580 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
25.3 s (5%)
131%
N100 +
min: 19.264     avg: 19.4     median: 19.4 (4%)     max: 19.531 s
min: 27.42     avg: 28.3     median: 28.5 (6%)     max: 28.94 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
57.5 s (2%)
142%
N100 +
min: 40.302     avg: 40.5     median: 40.4 (2%)     max: 40.679 s
min: 61.9     avg: 63.1     median: 62.6 (3%)     max: 64.8 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1295 s (6%)
158%
N100 +
min: 816.966     avg: 836     median: 818.8 (4%)     max: 863.891 s
min: 1381     avg: 1462     median: 1474 (7%)     max: 1532 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N100 +
min: 9434     avg: 12661     median: 11998 (9%)     max: 15625 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1638     avg: 1713     median: 1712.5 (4%)     max: 1787 Points
347%
N100 +
min: 3723     avg: 5317     median: 5940 (15%)     max: 6486 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 N100 +
min: 34828     avg: 42619     median: 41217 (33%)     max: 51063 Points
min: 12964     avg: 20919     median: 19160 (16%)     max: 31380 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 N100 +
min: 34083     avg: 42751     median: 41809 (34%)     max: 51420 Points
min: 12613     avg: 20195     median: 19086 (15%)     max: 29271 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 N100 +
min: 50867     avg: 52331     median: 52418.5 (42%)     max: 53373 Points
min: 19890     avg: 24471     median: 23934 (19%)     max: 32203 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 N100 +
min: 3133     avg: 3959     median: 4061.5 (10%)     max: 4693 Points
min: 1591     avg: 1967     median: 1818 (5%)     max: 2555 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
1974 Points (4%)
323%
N100 +
min: 4589     avg: 5806     median: 6371 (11%)     max: 6602 Points
min: 2146     avg: 2954     median: 2910 (5%)     max: 3799 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1407     avg: 1999     median: 2054 (9%)     max: 2519 Points
min: 611     avg: 711     median: 706 (3%)     max: 841 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
1389 Points (16%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1070     avg: 1195     median: 1221.5 (28%)     max: 1245 Points
358 Points (8%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 2283     avg: 2937     median: 3157 (12%)     max: 3282 Points
1083 Points (4%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 571     avg: 1024     median: 1173 (37%)     max: 1177 Points
328 Points (10%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1356     avg: 2544     median: 2846.5 (12%)     max: 3126 Points
833 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 431     avg: 433.5     median: 433.5 (15%)     max: 436 Points
227%
N100 +
min: 915     avg: 981     median: 986 (33%)     max: 1018 Points
min: 378     avg: 403.3     median: 405 (14%)     max: 414 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 797     avg: 802     median: 801.5 (1%)     max: 806 Points
353%
N100 +
min: 1911     avg: 2598     median: 2829 (5%)     max: 2896 Points
min: 1082     avg: 1267     median: 1271 (2%)     max: 1419 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
434 Points (2%)
229%
N100 +
min: 968     avg: 990     median: 993 (4%)     max: 1008 Points
min: 377     avg: 400.5     median: 408 (2%)     max: 409 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
791 Points (2%)
348%
N100 +
min: 2278     avg: 2624     median: 2753 (9%)     max: 2862 Points
min: 1078     avg: 1238     median: 1232 (4%)     max: 1409 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1862 Points (19%)
240%
N100 +
min: 4278     avg: 4440     median: 4467 (45%)     max: 4549 Points
min: 1731     avg: 1779     median: 1795 (18%)     max: 1799 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3219 Points (3%)
348%
N100 +
min: 10361     avg: 11002     median: 11197 (11%)     max: 11264 Points
min: 4713     avg: 5188     median: 5259 (5%)     max: 5404 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1813     avg: 1825     median: 1825 (20%)     max: 1837 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5056     avg: 5123     median: 5122.5 (7%)     max: 5189 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4998     avg: 5042     median: 5041.5 (9%)     max: 5085 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 1623     avg: 1629     median: 1629 (21%)     max: 1635 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5490 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1762 Points (26%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2306     avg: 2382     median: 2381.5 (3%)     max: 2457 ms
232%
N100 +
min: 1004     avg: 1049     median: 1024.5 (1%)     max: 1122 ms
min: 2561     avg: 3127     median: 3214 (4%)     max: 3865 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
446.5 ms (5%)
233 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
15679 Points (10%)
325%
N100 +
50984 Points (34%)
min: 10309     avg: 11163     median: 11328 (7%)     max: 11852 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 N100 +
min: 128.3     avg: 133.5     median: 134.3 (35%)     max: 138.3 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 71.2     avg: 78.6     median: 78.6 (14%)     max: 86 Points
217%
N100 +
min: 156.3     avg: 170.5     median: 170.9 (31%)     max: 187.4 Points
min: 71.4     avg: 77     median: 75.2 (14%)     max: 84 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
6152 Points (32%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
22786 Points (49%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
7604 Points (50%)
7616 Points (50%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
10205 Points (51%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 N100 +
min: 706     avg: 779     median: 786 (29%)     max: 839 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 12.2     avg: 21.2     median: 21.7 (4%)     max: 29.1 Watt
min: 6.4     avg: 11.3     median: 11.3 (2%)     max: 16.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 12.4     avg: 20.9     median: 24 (4%)     max: 26.1 Watt
6.7 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 2.84     avg: 7.3     median: 7.6 (5%)     max: 10.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 3.92     avg: 5.3     median: 5.3 (4%)     max: 6.77 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
100%
1 N100 +
min: 17.6     avg: 18.4     median: 18.4 (14%)     max: 19.1 Points per Watt
24 Points per Watt (18%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4000 → 100% n=36

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N100 → 264% n=36

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4100 → 125% n=36

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.35
log 11. 15:31:11

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9426 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14932 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 9424 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1768141871s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 10 Jan 2026 05:18:44 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9426 +0.003s ... 0.01s

#9 got single benchmarks 9426 +0.013s ... 0.023s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14932 +0.003s ... 0.026s

#11 got single benchmarks 14932 +0.013s ... 0.04s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 9424 +0.004s ... 0.044s

#13 got single benchmarks 9424 +0.012s ... 0.055s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.055s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.081s ... 0.136s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.136s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)