Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Athlon 300U vs AMD 3020e vs AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

AMD Athlon 300U

► remove from comparison

The AMD Athlon 300U is a mobile entry level dual core SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines two Zen cores (with SMT / Hyperthreading so running 4 threads) clocked at 2.4 - 3.3 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 3 graphics card with 3 CUs (192 Shaders) clocked at up to 1000 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. It is quite similar to the AMD Ryzen 3 3200U (2.6 - 3.5 GHz).

Compared to the Picasso APUs of the Ryzen 3000 series, the Athlon 300U is still based on the first generation of the 2000 series. Only the PRO variant is based on the new Zen+ microarchitecture that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvement.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

In contrast to the faster quad-core Picasso APUs, the Athlon 300U only supports 3 instead of 4 displays in total.

Performance wise, the Athlon 300 should be slightly slower than the Ryzen 3 2200U (2.5 - 3.4 GHz Dual Core with SMT).

AMD 3020e

► remove from comparison AMD 3020e

The AMD 3020e (Codename Dali) is a mobile APU that integrates two Zen cores (without SMT, therefore 2 threads) clocked at 1.2 to 2.6 GHz. The TDP is specified at 6 Watt and therefore the chip can be passively cooled. The integrated Radeon graphics card offers 3 CUs at up to 1,000 MHz (Radeon RX Vega 3). The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-2400.

More information on Raven Ridge product family can be found in our launch article.

Performance

The average 3020e in our database sits close to the Celeron N4100 and the Core m3-8100Y, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Neither of the three is a performance monster, their fairly low power consumption figures being their main advantage.

Much like the two Intel chips, the 3020e will let you binge-watch Netflix and type e-mails but anything tougher than that will bring the APU to its limits quickly.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

This little APU has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 6 W. Which is low and thus good enough for tablets, laptops and mini-PCs featuring no active cooling solution.

The AMD 3020e is built with a 14 nm process leading to low, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

► remove from comparison

The AMD Ryzen 3 2200G is a desktop APU that was announced in early 2018. It combines four Zen cores (4 threads as no SMT/HyperThreading support) clocked at 3.5 - 3.7 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 8 graphics card with 8 CUs (512 of the 704 Shaders on the chip) clocked at up to 1100 MHz. The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR-2933. The TDP is specified at 65 Watt and the CPU, GPU and memory are unlocked for overclocking. More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

ModelAMD Athlon 300UAMD 3020eAMD Ryzen 3 2200G
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
CodenameZenDali (Zen)Zen
Series: Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) Zen
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon 300U « 2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon Silver 3050e1.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD 3020e « 1.2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G « 3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon 300U2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock2400 - 3300 MHz1200 - 2600 MHz3500 - 3700 MHz
L1 Cache192 KB192 KB384 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB2 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 42 / 24 / 4
TDP15 Watt6 Watt65 Watt
Transistors4500 Million4500 Million
Technology12 nm14 nm14 nm
SocketAM4AM4
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDDR4-2400, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comproducts.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - 3020e
18.8 pt (26%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R3 2200G
26.8 pt (37%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 3020e +
943 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 3020e +
603 Points (26%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
308 Points (34%)
236 Points (26%)
363 Points (40%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
637 Points (2%)
369 Points (1%)
1446 Points (4%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
308 Points (2%)
196 Points (1%)
min: 561     avg: 574     median: 577 (4%)     max: 581 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
119 Points (36%)
92 Points (28%)
min: 142     avg: 145.8     median: 145.6 (44%)     max: 150 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
6.7 Points (9%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.7 Points (42%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
3968 Points (24%)
4625 Points (28%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
8724 Points (6%)
16684 Points (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
510 s (6%)
903 s (11%)
333 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
15.4 s (3%)
29 s (6%)
10.8 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1623 Points (3%)
1232 Points (2%)
3229 Points (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
100%
1 3020e +
4963 MIPS (3%)
14790 MIPS (8%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 3020e +
2597 MIPS (31%)
3948 MIPS (47%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
18.5 fps (6%)
12.8 fps (4%)
39.7 fps (14%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
88.6 fps (20%)
65.3 fps (15%)
184 fps (42%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
1.8 fps (3%)
1.2 fps (2%)
4.3 fps (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (5%)
0.2 GB/s (3%)
0.5 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.9 GB/s (5%)
1.1 GB/s (3%)
3.1 GB/s (8%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 3020e +
2964 Seconds (21%)
min: 825     avg: 826     median: 826 (6%)     max: 827 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 3020e +
1.6 sec (34%)
0.7 sec (15%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
6636 Points (14%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
14.1 s (3%)
17 s (4%)
11.7 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
31.8 s (1%)
26.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
807 s (4%)
879 s (4%)
651 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
3427 Points (9%)
2618 Points (7%)
min: 6549     avg: 6805     median: 6805 (18%)     max: 7061 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
41974 Points (34%)
59%
1 3020e +
24677 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
41029 Points (33%)
60%
1 3020e +
24593 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
45359 Points (38%)
26064 Points (22%)
71141 Points (60%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
3217 Points (8%)
2128 Points (5%)
5655 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
4729 Points (8%)
2961 Points (5%)
7706 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1361 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
867 Points (37%)
638 Points (27%)
min: 950     avg: 1087     median: 1086.5 (46%)     max: 1223 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1840 Points (3%)
1188 Points (2%)
min: 3391     avg: 4882     median: 4881.5 (9%)     max: 6372 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
765 Points (3%)
646 Points (3%)
959 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1552 Points (5%)
1195 Points (4%)
3431 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3287 Points (33%)
2809 Points (28%)
min: 4148     avg: 4249     median: 4249 (42%)     max: 4350 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
6053 Points (7%)
4803 Points (5%)
min: 11266     avg: 11897     median: 11896.5 (13%)     max: 12527 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3213 Points (44%)
4082 Points (56%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5763 Points (14%)
11105 Points (27%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
6134 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
2919 Points (57%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
6471 Points (10%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3196 Points (48%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
4852 Points (39%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
4449 Points (40%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
9250 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
6447 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
6868 Points (18%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1452 ms (2%)
min: 1532     avg: 1545     median: 1545 (2%)     max: 1558 ms
min: 954     avg: 997     median: 997 (1%)     max: 1040 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
133.6 ms (1%)
92.7 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
22253 Points (20%)
20692 Points (19%)
34670 Points (31%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
143 Points (30%)
73%
1 3020e +
105 Points (22%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 3020e +
12.6 Watt (2%)
95.4 Watt (16%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 3020e +
12.8 Watt (2%)
69 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 3020e +
15.3 Points per Watt (11%)
8.4 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Athlon 300U → 100% n=27

Average Benchmarks AMD 3020e → 75% n=27

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 2200G → 163% n=27

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 18. 12:18:02

#0 checking url part for id 11201 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12720 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9896 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:21:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.028s ... 0.029s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11201 +0.002s ... 0.032s

#8 got single benchmarks 11201 +0.01s ... 0.042s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12720 +0.017s ... 0.059s

#10 got single benchmarks 12720 +0.019s ... 0.079s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9896 +0.015s ... 0.094s

#12 got single benchmarks 9896 +0.011s ... 0.105s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.105s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.365s ... 0.469s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.469s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)