Notebookcheck Logo

Apple's entry-level M5 SoC in the MacBook Air 13 only consumes 7-8 Watts in games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Baldur's Gate 3

Apple M5 SoC in the MacBook Air 13
ⓘ Apple
Apple M5 SoC in the MacBook Air 13
Apple's new MacBook Air with the small M5 SoC is extremely efficient while gaming. During our tests, we recorded a SoC consumption of just 7-8 Watts, which means the gaming performance is also rock solid despite the passive cooling solution.

We just reviewed the new Apple MacBook Air 13 in the base configuration with the M5 SoC. Contrary to the 15-inch model of the MacBook Air or the MacBook Pro 14 M5, the base model of the Air 13 is equipped with a slightly slower M5 SoC, which only offers 8 instead of 10 GPU cores. The performance is still very good and we were particularly surprised about the efficiency during our gaming tests, where the SoC only consumed between 7-8 Watts. 

The Air is a passively cooled device, which means the performance is throttled under sustained workloads and the M5 SoC will quickly level off at around 8 Watts under combined workloads. You might say that the processor also quickly stabilizes at this level (7-8W) while gaming, but this is not the case. While playing Cyberpunk 2077, for example, the SoC consumption is just 6.9-7.2 Watts, so still below the possible value of 8 Watts. This is sufficient to reach 19.6 fps in 1080p with ultra graphics settings, and this result does not change even after one hour. If you reduce the details slightly and also use MetalFX upscaling, it means you can enjoy smooth gameplay in demanding titles like Cyberpunkt 2077 or Baldur's Gate 3 (consumption between 7.5-7.8 Watts) on the MacBook Air without throttling.

Power Consumption / Cyberpunk 2077 ultra Efficiency
Apple M5 8-Core GPU
Apple MacBook Air 13 M5, M5 10-Core
1.107 fps per Watt
Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H, Ultra X7 358H
0.793 fps per Watt -28%
Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA, Ultra X7 358H
0.754 fps per Watt -32%
Apple M5 10-Core GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5, M5 10-Core
0.686 fps per Watt -38%
AMD Radeon 8060S
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA, Ryzen AI Max+ 395
0.66 fps per Watt -40%
Apple M4 8-Core GPU
Apple MacBook Air 13 M4 Entry, M4 10-Core
0.647 fps per Watt -42%
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake, Core Ultra 7 268V
0.646 fps per Watt -42%
Intel Arc B370 10 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026, Ultra 5 338H
0.615 fps per Watt -44%
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 Intel, Core Ultra 5 228V
0.593 fps per Watt -46%
Apple M4 10-core GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4, M4 10-Core
0.4652 fps per Watt -58%
Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro, M4 Pro 14-Core
0.4547 fps per Watt -59%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14, SD X Elite X1E-80-100
0.4455 fps per Watt -60%
Intel Arc Graphics 140T
Honor MagicBook Art 14 2025, Ultra 7 255H
0.4018 fps per Watt -64%
AMD Radeon 880M
Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA, Ryzen AI 9 465
0.3895 fps per Watt -65%
Power Consumption / Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor)
AMD Radeon 8060S
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA, Ryzen AI Max+ 395
103.5 (99.9min, 100.3P1 - 107.1max) Watt * -485%
Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro, M4 Pro 14-Core
80.5 (78.5min, 78.7P1 - 83max) Watt * -355%
Intel Arc B370 10 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026, Ultra 5 338H
66 (64.7min, 64.8P1 - 70max) Watt * -273%
Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA, Ultra X7 358H
61.4 (58.1min, 59.6P1 - 62.9max) Watt * -247%
AMD Radeon 880M
Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA, Ryzen AI 9 465
57 (55.7min, 56.1P1 - 59.7max) Watt * -222%
Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H, Ultra X7 358H
51.2 (30.8min, 50.4P1 - 56.9max) Watt * -189%
Intel Arc Graphics 140T
Honor MagicBook Art 14 2025, Ultra 7 255H
44.3 (41.5min, 43.1P1 - 46max) Watt * -150%
Apple M5 10-Core GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5, M5 10-Core
42.4 (41.4min, 41.7P1 - 44.2max) Watt * -140%
Apple M4 10-core GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4, M4 10-Core
40.2 (39.2min, 39.3P1 - 44.1max) Watt * -127%
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake, Core Ultra 7 268V
39 (38.4min, 38.6P1 - 40.1max) Watt * -120%
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 Intel, Core Ultra 5 228V
37.1 (30.6min, 30.7P1 - 46.8max) Watt * -110%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14, SD X Elite X1E-80-100
22 (18.2min, 18.6P1 - 30.4max) Watt * -24%
Apple M4 8-Core GPU
Apple MacBook Air 13 M4 Entry, M4 10-Core
21.5 (17.5min, 17.6P1 - 29.3max) Watt * -21%
Apple M5 8-Core GPU
Apple MacBook Air 13 M5, M5 10-Core
17.7 (17.3min, 17.4P1 - 18.2max) Watt *

* ... smaller is better

This makes the small MacBook Air the most efficient laptop in our database by quite a margin without unplayable frame rates. We measure just 19 Watts for the whole system including the display, which is once again very efficient. The M5 SoC with 10 GPU cores inside the actively cooled MacBook Pro 14 is not as efficient, but also offers more gaming performance in return.

Please see our in-depth review of the Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 for more details.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > News > News Archive > Newsarchive 2026 03 > Apple's entry-level M5 SoC in the MacBook Air 13 only consumes 7-8 Watts in games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Baldur's Gate 3
Andreas Osthoff, 2026-03- 7 (Update: 2026-03- 7)