Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 660 vs Samsung Xclipse 940 vs Qualcomm Adreno 640

Qualcomm Adreno 660

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 660

The Qualcomm Adreno 660 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SoC. The chip will be available from early 2020 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 660 GPU offers a 35% improved performance over the Adreno 650, its predecessor, which is integrated into the Snapdragon 865 SoC. Qualcomm also states that the energy efficiency improved by 20% which might be due to the new 5nm process at Samsung where the chip is produced.

The Adreno 650 supports Vulkan 1.1, DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, and OpenCL 2.0 FP. Furthermore, games and videos can use HDR10+ and Dolby Vision (with a supported display).

Samsung Xclipse 940

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 940

The Samsung Xclipse 940 is a graphics chip for smartphones and tablets, integrated in the Samsung Exynos 2400 SoC (iGPU). It is based on the AMD RDNA 3 architecture and includes hardware ray tracing support. #

The performance is similar or slightly better than the older Adreno 740 in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2.

The Exynos 2400 is the first Exynos processor to use a Fan-out Wafer Level Package (FOWLP) to boost thermal management.

The SoC is manufactured in the 4nm process at Samsung.

Qualcomm Adreno 640

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 640

The Qualcomm Adreno 640 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SoC. The chip will be available from early 2019 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 640 GPU offers a 20% improved performance over the Adreno 630, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 845 SoC. The enhanced performance is achieved by the Adreno 640 having 50% more FP16 and FP32 compute units (ALUs) than the Adreno 630, while its 7 nm FinFET manufacturing process makes it 20% more efficient too.

The Adreno 640 will also support the Vulkan 1.1 API, something which is possible for other Adreno 600 series GPUs too.

Qualcomm Adreno 660Samsung Xclipse 940Qualcomm Adreno 640
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Xclipse 950 8
Xclipse 940
Xclipse 920 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2
technology7 nm4 nm10 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement02.12.2020 09.10.2023 12.02.2018
CPU in Adreno 660GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 18 x 1800 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G8 x 1800 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G8 x 1800 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G8 x 1800 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Xclipse 940GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 240010 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 2400e10 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 640GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8608 x ? MHz, 5 W250 MHz675 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus8 x ? MHz, 5 W250 MHz675 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8558 x 2840 MHz, 5 W? MHz585 MHz
min. - max.? - 250 MHz585 - 675 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
200519 Points (20%)
min: 15466     avg: 17363     median: 17362.5 (75%)     max: 19259 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 10491     avg: 15129     median: 15637.5 (34%)     max: 17179 Points
min: 34989     avg: 35721     median: 35720.5 (79%)     max: 36452 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 5094     avg: 8481     median: 8770 (37%)     max: 9839 Points
min: 15675     avg: 16588     median: 16451 (69%)     max: 17638 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 7930     avg: 11533     median: 11753 (29%)     max: 12914 Points
min: 23545     avg: 25100     median: 25121 (63%)     max: 26633 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 7991     avg: 8422     median: 8055 (72%)     max: 9221 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 10111     avg: 11212     median: 10261 (62%)     max: 13263 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 6140     avg: 6868     median: 6868 (34%)     max: 7596 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 6816     avg: 8126     median: 8126 (27%)     max: 9436 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 3959     avg: 5588     median: 5761.5 (3%)     max: 5925 Points
min: 12652     avg: 13199     median: 13098 (7%)     max: 13847 Points
min: 3079     avg: 3323     median: 3436 (2%)     max: 3455 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 974     avg: 1423     median: 1498 (2%)     max: 1564 Points
min: 3933     avg: 4182     median: 4235 (5%)     max: 4378 Points
min: 864     avg: 936     median: 970 (1%)     max: 974 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 11     avg: 12.3     median: 13 (5%)     max: 13 fps
min: 30     avg: 32     median: 32 (12%)     max: 34 fps
6.6 fps (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 19     avg: 26.8     median: 27.5 (5%)     max: 32 fps
min: 69     avg: 77.7     median: 75 (13%)     max: 89 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 39     avg: 69.2     median: 71 (5%)     max: 87 fps
min: 153     avg: 161     median: 154 (11%)     max: 176 fps
min: 130     avg: 133.3     median: 131 (12%)     max: 139 fps
min: 214     avg: 224.3     median: 215 (5%)     max: 244 fps
min: 269     avg: 289.3     median: 289 (12%)     max: 310 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 660
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 940
min: 378     avg: 388.3     median: 384 (3%)     max: 403 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 640
min: 204205     avg: 204715     median: 204715 (20%)     max: 205225 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 613580     avg: 637825     median: 617384 (49%)     max: 682510 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 107.62     avg: 108.5     median: 108.5 (3%)     max: 109.3 fps
min: 239     avg: 245.7     median: 249 (6%)     max: 249 fps
64.9 fps (2%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 4055     avg: 4338     median: 4337.5 (1%)     max: 4620 Points
min: 16906     avg: 16942     median: 16932 (4%)     max: 16987 Points
2968 Points (1%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 4370     avg: 4532     median: 4532 (1%)     max: 4694 Points
min: 16011     avg: 16059     median: 16078 (4%)     max: 16087 Points
2419 Points (1%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
53822 Points (18%)
min: 10504     avg: 18251     median: 14922.5 (5%)     max: 40654 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
42266 Points (70%)
min: 4244     avg: 11804     median: 5422.5 (9%)     max: 44840 Points
min: 10.2     avg: 11.5     median: 11 (4%)     max: 13.2 Watt
7.8 Watt (3%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 660 → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 940 → 238% n=16

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 640 → 64% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
100%
Adreno 660:
60  fps
high
100%
Adreno 660:
118 119.2 ~ 119 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 660:
60 60.2 ~ 60 fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
100%
Adreno 660:
91  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 660:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Adreno 660:
59.3  fps
99%
Xclipse 940:
58 59 60 ~ 59 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 660:
58.8  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 660:
55.6  fps
99%
Xclipse 940:
47 58 59 ~ 55 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 660:
30 30 56 78 120 120 ~ 72 fps
42%
Adreno 640:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 660:
59.3 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 90 91 ~ 66 fps
132%
Xclipse 940:
81 90 90 ~ 87 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 660:
60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
high
100%
Adreno 660:
30 30 30 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 54 fps
109%
Xclipse 940:
57 60 60 ~ 59 fps
80%
Adreno 640:
30 30 30 40 40 40 59 60 60 ~ 43 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 660:
39.5 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Xclipse 940:
40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
high
Adreno 640:
60  fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Adreno 640:
59 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra
Adreno 640:
30 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 61 62 ~ 57 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
Adreno 640:
59 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
high
Adreno 640:
59 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
high
Adreno 640:
60  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 660:
166  fps
69%
Xclipse 940:
105 119 119 ~ 114 fps
54%
Adreno 640:
60 120 ~ 90 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Adreno 660:
60  fps
60%
Adreno 640:
28 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 60 60 ~ 36 fps
high
100%
Adreno 660:
59 60 60 ~ 60 fps
55%
Adreno 640:
28 29 30 30 30 30 30 30 60 ~ 33 fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
100%
Adreno 660:
60  fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
Adreno 640:
120  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Adreno 640:
60 120 ~ 90 fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 660 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 940 → 101%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 102%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 640 → 58%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 65%

Qualcomm Adreno 660Samsung Xclipse 940Qualcomm Adreno 640
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift6011960
Call of Duty Mobile9160
Genshin Impact59.358.855.65955
Armajet7230
PUBG Mobile6660544087594043
Dead Trigger 216611490
Asphalt 9: Legends60603633
Real Racing 360
Qualcomm Adreno 660Samsung Xclipse 940Qualcomm Adreno 640
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
4

1
1

1
4
1

2
2






< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
1




1
1

2







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1





3
1









For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 30. 09:49:43

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10603 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12422 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 9446 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753861783s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:18:01 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.025s ... 0.025s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.025s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10603 +0.022s ... 0.048s

#10 got single benchmarks 10603 +0.029s ... 0.076s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12422 +0s ... 0.077s

#12 got single benchmarks 12422 +0.006s ... 0.083s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 9446 +0s ... 0.084s

#14 got single benchmarks 9446 +0.024s ... 0.107s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.107s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.029s ... 0.137s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.137s

#18 Got 196 rows for game benchmarks. +0.022s ... 0.159s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.159s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.16s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.006s ... 0.166s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.166s

#23 return log +0s ... 0.167s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)