Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 619 vs Qualcomm Adreno 512 vs Qualcomm Adreno 510

Qualcomm Adreno 619

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 619 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is 60% better compared to the Adreno 612 graphics card and in our benchmarks on par with the 700 series cards.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 512

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 512 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SoCs and based on the Adreno 500 architecture (like the Adreno 520 in the S820, which should be fully compatible in software).

According to Qualcomm up to 30% faster than the previous generation (Adreno 510?).

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2 in other sources), OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 12.1 according to Wikipedia, 11.1 according to Qualcomm). Furthermore, the GPU supports Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to save memory bandwidth.

 

Qualcomm Adreno 510

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 510

The Qualcomm Adreno 510 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 and 652 SoCs and based on the Adreno 500 architecture (like the Adreno 520 in the S820, which should be fully compatible in software).

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2 in other sources), OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 12.1 according to Wikipedia, 11.1 according to Qualcomm). Furthermore, the GPU supports Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to save memory bandwidth.

Compared the the faster Adreno 530, the 510 is currently produced in the older 28nm process (650 and 652) and should offer less ALUs. The clock speed is not disclosed.

Early benchmarks and performance ratings from Qualcomm position the GPU on a level with the old Adreno 330 (former high end GPU) in the Snapdragon 810. Therefore, it should be able to handle most Android games up to Full HD fluently.

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 619Qualcomm Adreno 512Qualcomm Adreno 510
Adreno 500 Series
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 540 @ 0.71 GHz
Adreno 530 @ 0.62 GHz
Adreno 512
Adreno 510
Adreno 509
Adreno 508 @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 506 @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 505 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 504 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 540 @ 0.71 GHz
Adreno 530 @ 0.62 GHz
Adreno 512
Adreno 510
Adreno 509
Adreno 508 @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 506 @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 505 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 504 @ 0.45 GHz
ArchitectureAdreno 600Adreno 500Adreno 500
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan
technology8 nm14 nm14 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
Date of Announcement15.12.2015 15.12.2015 15.12.2015
CPU in Adreno 619GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G8 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 18 x 1804 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
» show 2 more
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 512GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6608 x 2200 MHz? MHz850 MHz
CPU in Adreno 510GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM89768 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM89566 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 54788     avg: 55662     median: 55911 (6%)     max: 56286 Points
min: 25561     avg: 28454     median: 29060 (3%)     max: 29496 Points
min: 21087     avg: 21766     median: 21533 (2%)     max: 23175 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3602     avg: 4041     median: 4118 (18%)     max: 4286 Points
min: 1887     avg: 2062     median: 2120 (9%)     max: 2161 Points
min: 1381     avg: 1454     median: 1441.5 (6%)     max: 1579 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3817     avg: 4280     median: 4298 (9%)     max: 4573 Points
min: 1734     avg: 1942     median: 2001 (4%)     max: 2033 Points
min: 1354     avg: 1395     median: 1389.5 (3%)     max: 1459 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2536     avg: 2906     median: 2981.5 (15%)     max: 3107 Points
min: 1270     avg: 1400     median: 1432 (7%)     max: 1442 Points
971 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2412     avg: 2788     median: 2834 (8%)     max: 3008 Points
min: 1134     avg: 1237     median: 1257 (4%)     max: 1268 Points
867 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 635     avg: 1108     median: 1194.5 (1%)     max: 1227 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 189     avg: 327.8     median: 351 (0%)     max: 371 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 2.9     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (1%)     max: 4 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 3.3     avg: 7.4     median: 7.7 (1%)     max: 8.9 fps
min: 3     avg: 3.2     median: 3.2 (1%)     max: 3.3 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 17     avg: 20.1     median: 21 (2%)     max: 23 fps
min: 7.9     avg: 8.6     median: 8.6 (1%)     max: 8.8 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 16     avg: 18.5     median: 19 (2%)     max: 20 fps
min: 8     avg: 8.8     median: 9 (1%)     max: 9.1 fps
min: 3.2     avg: 5.2     median: 5.4 (1%)     max: 6 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 26     avg: 32.4     median: 34 (1%)     max: 35 fps
min: 8.2     avg: 13.6     median: 15 (0%)     max: 15 fps
min: 4.6     avg: 8.9     median: 9.5 (0%)     max: 10 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 33     avg: 45.4     median: 46 (3%)     max: 68 fps
min: 20     avg: 22.1     median: 22.5 (1%)     max: 23 fps
min: 9.2     avg: 14.2     median: 14.5 (1%)     max: 17 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 55     avg: 87.8     median: 91 (1%)     max: 96 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 512
min: 43     avg: 48.4     median: 50 (0%)     max: 51 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 510
min: 22     avg: 30.8     median: 31 (0%)     max: 36 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 65241     avg: 91217     median: 97281.5 (12%)     max: 102780 Points
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
44.8 fps (74%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
15120 Points (34%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
26078 Points (58%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 19.62     avg: 26.6     median: 26.8 (0%)     max: 29.71 fps
12.8 fps (0%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 1363     avg: 1377     median: 1377.5 (0%)     max: 1391 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 1119     avg: 1168     median: 1160 (0%)     max: 1231 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 8763     avg: 23246     median: 25388 (25%)     max: 30058 Points
min: 6741     avg: 13532     median: 6900 (7%)     max: 26954 Points
6078 Points (6%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 3274     avg: 19611     median: 22384 (39%)     max: 28746 Points
min: 2286     avg: 6896     median: 2290 (4%)     max: 16113 Points
2559 Points (4%)
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
4270 Points (93%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 2.69     avg: 3.6     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 7.31 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 512 → 43% n=11

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 510 → 30% n=11

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
100%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
ultra Ultra
100%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
100%
Adreno 619:
30  fps
high
100%
Adreno 619:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Adreno 619:
20 45 54 ~ 40 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 619:
36  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 619:
20 28 30 ~ 26 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 30 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 77 86 89 90 95 98 ~ 60 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 619:
29 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 39 fps
77%
Adreno 512:
30  fps
med.
100%
Adreno 619:
40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
68%
Adreno 512:
24 30 ~ 27 fps
high
100%
Adreno 619:
28 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 60 ~ 31 fps
97%
Adreno 512:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
high
Adreno 512:
30 60 ~ 45 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Adreno 512:
60  fps
ultra
Adreno 512:
30 60 60 ~ 50 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
Adreno 512:
60  fps
high
Adreno 512:
60  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 619:
60 60 93 115 121 ~ 90 fps
33%
Adreno 512:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
54%
Adreno 510:
30 50 57 60 ~ 49 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
Adreno 510:
29 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
Adreno 512:
28 29 30 ~ 29 fps
Adreno 510:
20 29 30 30 ~ 27 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
93%
Adreno 512:
28 28 ~ 28 fps
high
100%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
97%
Adreno 512:
28 28 28 30 ~ 29 fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
100%
Adreno 619:
90  fps
67%
Adreno 512:
60  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 512 → 76%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 67%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 510 → 54%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 54%

Qualcomm Adreno 619lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal3030
League of Legends: Wild Rift3060
Genshin Impact403626
Armajet60
PUBG Mobile394031
Dead Trigger 290
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
Subway Surfers90
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
5


2


2
4
1
1







Qualcomm Adreno 512lowmed.highultraQHD4K
PUBG Mobile302730
World of Tanks Blitz45
Arena of Valor6050
Shadow Fight 36060
Dead Trigger 230
Asphalt 8: Airborne29
Asphalt 9: Legends2829
Subway Surfers60
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		1
1
2
1


2
3
2

1







Qualcomm Adreno 510lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dead Trigger 249
Asphalt 8: Airborne3027
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1




1
1










For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 29. 13:07:44

#0 checking url part for id 10584 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8778 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 7360 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 28 May 2024 05:35:22 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.102s ... 0.103s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.103s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.103s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10584 +0.038s ... 0.14s

#9 got single benchmarks 10584 +0.105s ... 0.245s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 8778 +0.002s ... 0.247s

#11 got single benchmarks 8778 +0.034s ... 0.281s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 7360 +0.002s ... 0.283s

#13 got single benchmarks 7360 +0.038s ... 0.321s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.321s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.144s ... 0.465s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.465s

#17 Got 150 rows for game benchmarks. +0.041s ... 0.506s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.506s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.005s ... 0.511s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.025s ... 0.536s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.536s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.538s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)