Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3580U vs AMD Athlon Gold 3150U

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

► remove from comparison AMD R5 2600

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is a six-core desktop processor that can handle twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Simultaneous Multithreading (SMT). This technology is equivalent to Intel's Hyper-Threading. Launched in April 2018, the Ryzen 5 2600 is the second fastest Ryzen 5 processor and is much more economical than its flagship sibling. The Ryzen 5 2600 has a 65 W TDP, which is nearly 40% more efficient than the 95 W TDP Ryzen 5 2600 X. This energy efficiency comes at a cost to performance though.

The Ryzen 5 2600 has a base clock speed of 3.4 GHz, which can be boosted by Extended Frequency Range (XFR) up to 3.9 GHz. The power gain is still high in multi-threaded applications, although this is some way off the Ryzen 5 2600X. The Ryzen 5 2600 benefits from AMD's new Zen+ architecture, with a greater number of instructions per cycle (IPC) and higher clock speeds than last year's Zen chips. The Ryzen 5 2600's six cores are divided into two clusters that are connected by Infinity Fabric, a subset of HyperTransport. Each cluster has its own L3 cache.

The Ryzen 5 2600 has good performance in games. Moreover, the Ryzen 5 2600 has a higher base clock than the Ryzen 7 2700. Seeing as many games currently lack multi-core support, this means that the Ryzen 5 2600 performs better than its technically superior sibling.

Detailed information, benchmarks and values can be found in our review of the Ryzen 5 2600.

AMD Ryzen 5 3580U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 3580U

The AMD Ryzen 5 3580U, a Microsoft Surface Edition chip, is a mobile SoC that was announced in October 2019 as part of the Surface Book 15. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.2 - 3.8 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 9 graphics adapter with 9 CUs (576 Shaders) clocked at up to 1300 MHz. Compared to the similar Ryzen 5 3500U, the 3580 integrates a faster GPU with 9 instead of 8 CUs.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

Performance

The average 3580U in our extensive database is in the same league as the Core i5-1035G7 and also the Core i7-10510U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a fairly decent result, as of mid 2021.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop manufacturers - or should we say, Microsoft - are allowed to change to anything between 12 W and 35 W with clock speeds and performance changing correspondingly. Those values are not low enough to allow for fan-free designs, for better or worse.

The CPU is built with a fairly old, as of late 2022, 12 nm process for lower-than-average energy efficiency.

AMD Athlon Gold 3150U

► remove from comparison AMD Athlon 3150U

The AMD Athlon Gold 3150U is a mobile processor for thin and light entry level laptops. It is based on the Dali series (Raven Ridge Dual Core) and offers two Zen cores clocked at 2.6 to 3.3 GHz with SMT (four threads at once) and 4 MB L3-Cache. The integrated graphics card is called Radeon RX Vega 3 and offers only 3 CUs (192 Shaders) clocked at up to 1000 MHz.

In Chromebooks, AMD calles the APU AMD Athlon Gold 3150C, but with the exact same specifications (and performance).

Performance

The average 3150U in our database is in the same league as the Core i3-10110U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. In other words, this is an entry-level chip, as of mid 2022. While not slow by any means, it is anything but fast, either.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

The Athlon has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 15 W that laptop makers are free to change to anything between 12 W and 25 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. Most will go for a higher value to reach higher performance levels. Either way, an active cooling solution will be needed to dissipate the heat.

The AMD 3150U is built with a 14 nm manufacturing process resulting in low, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 2600AMD Ryzen 5 3580UAMD Athlon Gold 3150U
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
CodenamePinnacle Riege (Zen+)Picasso-U (Zen+)Dali (Zen)
Clock3400 - 3900 MHz2100 - 3700 MHz2400 - 3300 MHz
L2 Cache3 MB2 MB1 MB
L3 Cache16 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 124 / 82 / 4
TDP65 Watt15 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4940 Million4500 Million4500 Million
Technology12 nm12 nm14 nm
Die Size213 mm2
max. Temp.95 °C105 °C95 °C
SocketAM4 (LGA1331)FP5FP5
FeaturesDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHADDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Dali (Zen)
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U « 2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U « 2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U2.3 - 3.2 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
L1 Cache384 KB192 KB
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 9 ( - 1300 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 2600
29.7 pt (41%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 3580U
26.2 pt (36%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Athlon 3150U
22.8 pt (32%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
380 Points (42%)
352 Points (39%)
303 Points (34%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2793 Points (7%)
1549 Points (4%)
795 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1245     avg: 1254     median: 1248 (8%)     max: 1270 Points
693 Points (4%)
352 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 155.9     avg: 157.4     median: 157.3 (47%)     max: 159 Points
139 Points (42%)
117 Points (35%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
13.7 Points (18%)
7.8 Points (10%)
4 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.8 Points (44%)
1.7 Points (41%)
1.4 Points (34%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4726 Points (29%)
4525 Points (27%)
3639 Points (22%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
28173 Points (20%)
18307 Points (13%)
7566 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 R5 2600 +
45033 Points (31%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 R5 2600 +
8024 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
140.9 s (2%)
274.7 s (3%)
1280 s (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
5.5 s (1%)
7.2 s (1%)
40.1 s (8%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4517 Points (7%)
2924 Points (5%)
1631 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
30898 MIPS (18%)
15209 MIPS (9%)
8752 MIPS (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4020 MIPS (48%)
3572 MIPS (43%)
3065 MIPS (37%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
75 fps (26%)
40.1 fps (14%)
22.5 fps (8%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
205.3 fps (47%)
135.3 fps (31%)
106.6 fps (25%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 7.79     avg: 7.8     median: 7.8 (14%)     max: 7.82 fps
4.1 fps (7%)
2 fps (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.7 GB/s (0%)
0.4 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1 GB/s (17%)
0.6 GB/s (10%)
0.3 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
7.5 GB/s (20%)
3.5 GB/s (9%)
2.2 GB/s (6%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 374.2     avg: 375     median: 375 (3%)     max: 375.7 Seconds
710 Seconds (5%)
1348 Seconds (9%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 R5 2600 +
0.7 sec (14%)
0.9 sec (19%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
9290 Points (20%)
5545 Points (12%)
4189 Points (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11.2 s (2%)
12 s (3%)
13.9 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 R5 2600 +
24.3 s (1%)
27.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
615 s (3%)
694 s (3%)
727 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 R5 2600 +
43794 Points (38%)
21501 Points (19%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
12405 Points (34%)
6856 Points (19%)
4287 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 R5 2600 +
69692 Points (57%)
47473 Points (39%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 R5 2600 +
69478 Points (56%)
48287 Points (39%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 R5 2600 +
70522 Points (59%)
52082 Points (44%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
11219 Points (28%)
6687 Points (17%)
3923 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
17063 Points (30%)
9805 Points (17%)
5692 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
6265 Points (26%)
2898 Points (12%)
1862 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1014     avg: 1119     median: 1118.5 (47%)     max: 1223 Points
900 Points (38%)
751 Points (32%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5767     avg: 6070     median: 6069.5 (11%)     max: 6372 Points
2990 Points (5%)
1847 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 R5 2600 +
1020 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 R5 2600 +
5885 Points (19%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 R5 2600 +
min: 4631     avg: 5109     median: 5109 (51%)     max: 5587 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 R5 2600 +
min: 20633     avg: 23018     median: 23018 (25%)     max: 25403 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3908 Points (53%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
11829 Points (29%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 R5 2600 +
951 ms (1%)
1243 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
28517 Points (26%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 R5 2600 +
179 Points (37%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R5 2600 +
157.5 Watt (27%)
41.1 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R5 2600 +
149.5 Watt (27%)
40 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 R5 2600 +
8.5 Points per Watt (6%)
17.3 Points per Watt (13%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 2600 → 100% n=29

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 3580U → 70% n=29

Average Benchmarks AMD Athlon Gold 3150U → 52% n=29

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 10. 20:24:00

#0 checking url part for id 10032 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11514 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11693 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 10 May 2024 05:37:21 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.034s ... 0.035s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.035s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10032 +0.016s ... 0.051s

#8 got single benchmarks 10032 +0.012s ... 0.063s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11514 +0.016s ... 0.08s

#10 got single benchmarks 11514 +0.008s ... 0.088s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11693 +0.016s ... 0.104s

#12 got single benchmarks 11693 +0.009s ... 0.113s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.113s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.368s ... 0.48s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.481s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)