Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-10850K vs AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs AMD Ryzen 9 7900

Intel Core i9-10850K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10850K

The Intel Core i9-10850K is a high-end processor for desktops with ten cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 3.6 and 5.2 GHz (all 10 cores up to 4.8 GHz) and can execute up to twenty threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 5.2 GHz can be only achieved below 70°C core temperature (Thermal Velocity Boost of 100 MHz). Compared to the fastest CML-S CPU, the Core i9-10900K, the 10850K clocks 100 MHz lower (base and Turbo clocks).

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Thanks to the free multiplicator, the CPU can also be easily overclocked (but may not have much headroom).

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

Thanks to the high Turbo Boost, the CPU is a very fast gaming CPU available at the time of announcement. Using all cores, the i9 however is slower than the top Ryzen CPUs (like the Ryzen 9 3950X) which offer more cores.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9900K. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 125 Watts (PL1) but under full load up to 250 Watt are consumed (PL2). In default mode these 250 Watt and therefore high clock speeds can be maintained for up to 56 seconds, however, all boards offer the option to alter these settings.

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

► remove from comparison AMD R7 7800X3D

The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a high-end desktop processor from the Raphael series with 8 Zen 4 cores and SMT (Simultaneous Multithreading), allowing it to handle up to 16 threads simultaneously. After its announcement in January 2023 at CES in Las Vegas, it was launched in April 2023. Following the launch of the two top models, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D, the third model was introduced, which offers significantly more gaming performance with the 3D V-Cache.

The CPU cores have a base clock of 4.2 GHz and can be boosted up to 5 GHz (single-core turbo). The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D features a CCD with 8 cores, which includes the fast 3D V-Cache. This differs significantly from the two Ryzen 9 models, as they have two CCDs, but only one of them can utilize the 3D V-Cache.

The performance of the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is consistently good, although its multi-threaded performance suffers a bit due to the eight native compute cores. However, the real strength of the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D lies in gaming performance, where it excels. In tests, we see consistently high gaming performance, even surpassing that of an Intel Core i9-13900K.

In terms of power consumption, the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D aligns with the other two models featuring 3D V-Cache, making the 8-core processor extremely power-efficient. In numbers, this means that the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is specified with a TDP of up to 120 watts. The PPT (Package Power Tracking) is also rated up to 162 watts. For comparison, an AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is specified with 170 watts (TDP) or 230 watts (PPT).

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

► remove from comparison AMD R9 7900

The AMD Ryzen 9 79 00 is a high-end desktop processorfrom the Raphael series with 12 cores and hyperthreading (SMT), which means it can process up to 24 threads simultaneously. Launched in early 2023, the Ryzen 9 7900 is the fastest 12-core processor with 65 watts TDP.

The Ryzen 9 7900 clocks at 3.7 GHz base clock and reaches up to 5.4 GHz on one core in Turbo mode. This is also the difference to the higher clocked Ryzen 9 7900X.

At first glance, the internal structure of the processor has not changed fundamentally. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 is still based on the chiplet design consisting of two CCD clusters, each containing a CCX with 8 cores. However, the manufacturing process has been scaled down to 5 nm, which ensures higher clock rates. There is also the IO die, which contains the memory controller and the iGPU, among other things. This is now manufactured in a 6 nm structure width.

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 can impress in games thanks to the significantly improved IPC.

ModelIntel Core i9-10850KAMD Ryzen 7 7800X3DAMD Ryzen 9 7900
SeriesIntel Comet LakeAMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000)AMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000)
CodenameComet Lake-SRaphael (Zen4)Raphael (Zen4)
Series: Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000) Raphael (Zen4)
Intel Core i9-10850K « 3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-109103.6 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i3-103203.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores7.9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-101003.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D4.2 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X4.7 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 79003.7 - 5.4 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X4.5 - 5.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 77003.8 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D « 4.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X4.7 - 5.3 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 76003.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D4.2 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X4.7 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 « 3.7 - 5.4 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X4.5 - 5.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 77003.8 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D4.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X4.7 - 5.3 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 76003.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Clock3600 - 5200 MHz4200 - 5000 MHz3700 - 5400 MHz
L1 Cache640 KB0.1 MB768 KB
L2 Cache2.5 MB0 MB12 MB
L3 Cache20 MB96 MB64 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 208 / 1612 / 24
TDP125 Watt162 Watt65 Watt
14 nm5 nm5 nm, 0.650 - 1.475V
max. Temp.100 °C89 °C95 °C
Socket1200AM5 (LGA 1718)AM5 (LGA 1718)
FeaturesTVB, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, VirtualizationMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, BMI1, BMI2, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT SHA, XFR2, Precision Boost 2MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) ( - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$453 U.S.$449 U.S.
Announced
Transistors6570 Million9.9 Million
Die Size1x 71 mm² (CCD) + 121 mm² (I/O) mm2262 mm2
Manufacturerwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10850K
40.2 pt (56%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 7800X3D
48.3 pt (67%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 7900
54.2 pt (75%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15538 Points (14%)
min: 16688     avg: 17387     median: 17387 (16%)     max: 18086 Points
24776 Points (23%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1314 Points (56%)
min: 1713     avg: 1767     median: 1766.5 (75%)     max: 1820 Points
1966 Points (84%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
511 Points (57%)
min: 663     avg: 686     median: 686 (76%)     max: 709 Points
762 Points (85%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5961 Points (15%)
min: 6488     avg: 6805     median: 6804.5 (17%)     max: 7121 Points
9703 Points (24%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2457 Points (16%)
min: 2783     avg: 2879     median: 2878.5 (18%)     max: 2974 Points
4020 Points (25%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
215 Points (65%)
min: 272     avg: 281.5     median: 281.5 (85%)     max: 291 Points
315 Points (95%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
28.1 Points (37%)
33.5 Points (44%)
45.3 Points (59%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.5 Points (61%)
3.4 Points (85%)
3.7 Points (92%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6829 Points (41%)
8026 Points (48%)
8339 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
58453 Points (42%)
51950 Points (38%)
60934 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
76123 Points (53%)
94035 Points (65%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
6828 Points (8%)
14485 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
68.1 s (1%)
62.7 s (1%)
46.8 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.7 s (1%)
2.4 s (0%)
3 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
9424 Points (15%)
16585 Points (26%)
10154 Points (16%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
70932 MIPS (41%)
min: 75558     avg: 80313     median: 80312.5 (46%)     max: 85067 MIPS
112881 MIPS (65%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5914 MIPS (71%)
min: 7412     avg: 7824     median: 7823.5 (94%)     max: 8235 MIPS
7936 MIPS (95%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
146.5 fps (51%)
169.3 fps (59%)
207 fps (72%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
285.5 fps (66%)
344 fps (79%)
355.5 fps (82%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
20.3 fps (36%)
min: 22.1     avg: 23.3     median: 23.3 (41%)     max: 24.4 fps
31.2 fps (55%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.5 GB/s (0%)
1.3 GB/s (0%)
2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.5 GB/s (43%)
2.1 GB/s (36%)
3.1 GB/s (53%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
14.5 GB/s (38%)
15.3 GB/s (40%)
21.5 GB/s (56%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 266     avg: 282.5     median: 282.5 (4%)     max: 299 Seconds
101%
1 R9 7900 +
199 Seconds (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
181.2 Seconds (1%)
min: 169     avg: 178     median: 178 (1%)     max: 187 Seconds
125 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (12%)
min: 0.4152     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4479 sec
0.4 sec (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
16892 Points (36%)
115%
1 R9 7900 +
19451 Points (41%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.6 s (2%)
7.1 s (2%)
6.7 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.9 s (1%)
15.3 s (1%)
13.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
419.8 s (2%)
337.6 s (1%)
329 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
97391 Points (85%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
22639 Points (61%)
min: 30767     avg: 32947     median: 32947 (89%)     max: 35127 Points
26325 Points (71%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
72388 Points (59%)
89617 Points (73%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
72353 Points (59%)
89287 Points (72%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
73572 Points (62%)
91846 Points (77%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
19764 Points (50%)
25510 Points (65%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
28058 Points (50%)
min: 30333     avg: 31839     median: 31839 (57%)     max: 33345 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
14278 Points (60%)
min: 11975     avg: 13037     median: 13036.5 (55%)     max: 14098 Points
14817 Points (62%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2634 Points (71%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
14288 Points (56%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1401 Points (59%)
min: 1856     avg: 1934     median: 1920 (81%)     max: 2027 Points
2203 Points (93%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
11436 Points (20%)
min: 12073     avg: 13013     median: 12715 (23%)     max: 14252 Points
17880 Points (32%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1412 Points (6%)
1938 Points (8%)
2096 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
11426 Points (36%)
13888 Points (44%)
17581 Points (55%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6425 Points (64%)
9097 Points (91%)
8861 Points (89%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
44146 Points (48%)
54840 Points (60%)
65241 Points (72%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
717 ms (1%)
min: 487     avg: 504     median: 503.5 (1%)     max: 520 ms
452 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
282 Points (81%)
107%
1 R9 7900 +
302 Points (87%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
253 Points (53%)
353 Points (74%)
366 Points (76%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2216 Points (85%)
105%
1 R9 7900 +
2322 Points (89%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
302.2 Watt (52%)
218 Watt (38%)
136%
1 R9 7900 +
203 Watt (35%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
259.3 Watt (47%)
207 Watt (38%)
122%
1 R9 7900 +
196.9 Watt (36%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
121.6 Watt (80%)
150%
1 R9 7900 +
106.9 Watt (71%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
9.5 Points per Watt (7%)
14.4 Points per Watt (11%)
215%
1 R9 7900 +
20.4 Points per Watt (15%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10850K → 100% n=36

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D → 117% n=36

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 7900 → 132% n=36

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 15. 23:12:44

#0 checking url part for id 13162 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15064 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15014 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 05:33:43 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.031s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13162 +0.022s ... 0.053s

#8 got single benchmarks 13162 +0.01s ... 0.063s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 15064 +0.019s ... 0.082s

#10 got single benchmarks 15064 +0.013s ... 0.095s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 15014 +0.018s ... 0.113s

#12 got single benchmarks 15014 +0.009s ... 0.122s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.122s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.563s ... 0.685s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.685s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)