Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-12800H vs Intel Core i5-7267U

Intel Core i7-12800H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-12800H

The Intel Core i7-12800H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.4 to 4.8 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.8 to3.7 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. Compared to the 12900H, the 12800H is lower clocked and also features  the full "Enterprise" set of vPro features (for remote management).

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.4 GHz.

Performance

The average 12800H in our database matches the Ryzen 9 6900HS and the Core i9-11900H in multi-thread performance. Which is fairly impressive, as of mid 2022.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 70 W, the ZBook Studio 16 G9 is among the fastest laptops built around the 12800H that we know of. It can be about 70% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Core i7 series chip has a "minimum assured" power consumption of 35 W, with 45 W being its Base power consumption. The maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption sits at 115 W.

The i7-12800H is built with Intel's fourth-gen 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i5-7267U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-7267U is a fast dual-core SoC for notebooks based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in January 2017. The CPU has two processor cores clocked at 3.1-3.5 GHz (two cores also up to 3.5 GHz). The processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper Threading. It is also equipped with an Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 GPU with 64 MB eDRAM, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR4) as well as VP9 and H.265 video decoding as well as encoding. The chip is still manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

The performance of the 28-Watt CPU should be on par with the Core i7-7500U (2.7-3.5 GHz, no eDRAM, 15 Watts), but it should be a bit slower on practice due to the missing level 4 eDRAM and the lower TDP. This means the i5 is still one of the faster dual-core processors and should be sufficient for most scenarios. Some games might still require a real quad-core processor and therefore nit run perfectly on the dual-core processor, despite Hyper Threading.

Graphics

The integrated Intel Iris Plus 650 Graphics is the GT3e model of the Kaby Lake GPU (Intel Gen. 9.5). It has 48 Execution Units running at 300-1050 MHz and the performance is comparable to a GeForce 920MX thanks to fast eDRAM cache. However, there aren't any significant improvements compared to the old Iris Pro 550, so modern games can often not be played smoothly or only at the lowest or medium settings, respectively.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel specifies the TDP with 28 Watts, which can be reduced to 23 Watts (cTDP Down) depending on the usage scenario. The TDP is pretty high compared to the common 15-Watt TDP for dual-core processors, but allows a better utilization of CPU and GPU Turbo.

ModelIntel Core i7-12800HIntel Core i5-7267U
CodenameAlder Lake-HKaby Lake
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-PIntel Kaby Lake
Series: Kaby Lake Kaby Lake
Intel Core i9-12900HK compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12800H « 1.8 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12650H compare1.7 - 4.7 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600H compare2 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12500H compare1.8 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12450H compare1.5 - 4.4 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U « 3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Clock1800 - 4800 MHz3100 - 3500 MHz
L1 Cache1.2 MB128 KB
L2 Cache11.5 MB512 KB
L3 Cache24 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads14 / 202 / 4
TDP45 Watt28 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1744BGA1356
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thread Director, DL Boost, GNA, Remote Platform Erase, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHADual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1400 MHz)Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 (300 - 1050 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
$304 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-12800H
38.6 pt (64%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 9777     avg: 14387     median: 15283 (14%)     max: 16597 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1796     avg: 1824     median: 1828 (77%)     max: 1859 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 690     avg: 703     median: 706 (77%)     max: 714 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3741     avg: 5443     median: 5731 (14%)     max: 6433 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1566     avg: 2236     median: 2222 (14%)     max: 2697 Points
383 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 242     avg: 260     median: 265 (73%)     max: 269 Points
141 Points (39%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
4.1 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.5 Points (37%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5010 Points (30%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
11403 Points (8%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
492 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
15.6 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
3243 Points (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 44553     avg: 59950     median: 62100 (36%)     max: 68930 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5726     avg: 5835     median: 5820 (69%)     max: 5976 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
21.9 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
119.4 fps (3%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 11.7     avg: 16.3     median: 16.8 (30%)     max: 19.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.9 GB/s (5%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
337 Seconds (4%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 192     avg: 233.2     median: 222 (2%)     max: 306 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4442     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4715 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
4378 Points (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
12.1 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
27.7 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
626 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 15130     avg: 21336     median: 22022 (54%)     max: 24746 Points
4896 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
79353 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
44493 Points (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 12719     avg: 17648     median: 18989 (48%)     max: 19895 Points
3712 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 21866     avg: 27059     median: 27907 (50%)     max: 29584 Points
5169 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 9325     avg: 11508     median: 11786 (50%)     max: 13353 Points
2044 Points (9%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2209 Points (53%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
12290 Points (48%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1739     avg: 1790     median: 1771 (67%)     max: 1842 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9607     avg: 11957     median: 12434 (22%)     max: 12940 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3972     avg: 4182     median: 4181.5 (42%)     max: 4391 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8084     avg: 8706     median: 8706 (9%)     max: 9328 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 510     avg: 520     median: 513 (1%)     max: 542 ms
820 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
110.3 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
91965 Points (67%)
38960 Points (29%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
265 Points (73%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 284     avg: 294.8     median: 294.5 (53%)     max: 306 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1768     avg: 1800     median: 1790 (67%)     max: 1843 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 67.7     avg: 108.7     median: 118 (20%)     max: 126 Watt
42.8 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 84.3     avg: 135.4     median: 143 (26%)     max: 158 Watt
29.5 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 14.1     avg: 16.4     median: 16.5 (12%)     max: 18.6 Points per Watt
13 Points per Watt (10%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-12800H → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-7267U → 32% n=8

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 07. 16:36:31

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14045 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8454 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759847791s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Oct 2025 05:18:31 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14045 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 14045 +0.009s ... 0.018s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8454 +0.001s ... 0.018s

#10 got single benchmarks 8454 +0.004s ... 0.022s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.022s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.029s ... 0.051s

#13 return log +0.008s ... 0.06s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)