Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-8500T vs Intel Core i3-9100F vs Intel Core i7-8086K

Intel Core i5-8500T

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-8500T is a desktop processor of the Coffee Lake generation. It offers 6 cores clocked at 2.1 - 3.5 GHz and is manufactured in the again improved 14nm process (14nm++). As a "T" model, te i5-8500T is rated with a low 35 Watt TDP and therefore sometimes even used in laptops.

Thanks to the additional 2 cores, the Coffee Lake 6-core CPUs can offer a performance uplift of up to 50% in multithreaded workloads compared to the Kaby Lake predecessors. 

Intel Core i3-9100F

► remove from comparison Intel i3-9100F

The Intel Core i3-9100F is an entry level Quad-Core processor for desktop PCs based on the Coffee Lake architecture. It offers four cores clocked at 3.6 - 4.2 GHz without HyperThreading / SMT support (4 threads only). The CPU is still manufactured in 14nm++ and does not feature an integrated graphics card. 

Compared to the older Core i3-8100, the i3-9100F offers around 10 to 15 percent higher performance. Therefore, the CPU is well suited for simple office tasks but less for high end gaming or demanding applications.

Intel specifies the CPU with a TDP of 65 Watt. For desktops that means that the processor wont need big cooling solutions and can be used in small cases.

Intel Core i7-8086K

► remove from comparison Intel i7-8086K

The Intel Core i7-8086K is a high-end desktop processor with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture and was announced in mid 2018. It is a limited edition for the 40 year X86 anniversary and at the time of announcement the fastest Coffee-Lake CPU. The processor clocks at between 3.7 and 5 GHz and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. The i7-8086K is comparatively easy to overclock thanks to the unlocked multiplier. Compared to the cheaper i7-8700K (-66 Dollars) only the single core Turbo clock speed is faster (5 GHz versus 4.7 GHz).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 50% compared to the Core i7-7700K when all cores are in use. Compared to the cheaper Core i7-8700K, the 8086K offers only a higher single core Turbo Boost and therefore in daily usage and gaming not faster. As a high-end model, the i7-8086K is suitable for the most demanding applications and games.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz. The build is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 95 watts. Therefore, well-dimensioned cooling systems should easily manage to deal with the created heat. We expect increased efficiency due to the higher performance.

ModelIntel Core i5-8500TIntel Core i3-9100FIntel Core i7-8086K
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee Lake
CodenameCoffee Lake-SCoffee Lake-RCoffee Lake-S
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-S
Intel Core i7-8086K3.7 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8700K3.7 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-87003.2 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8600K3.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-85003 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-84002.8 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8500T « 2.1 - 3.5 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900KS4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-97003 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F « 3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8086K « 3.7 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8700K3.7 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-87003.2 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8600K3.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-85003 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-84002.8 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8500T2.1 - 3.5 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Clock2100 - 3500 MHz3600 - 4200 MHz3700 - 5000 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB256 KB384 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB1 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache9 MB6 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 64 / 46 / 12
TDP35 Watt65 Watt95 Watt
Technology14++ nm14 nm14 nm
SocketFCLGA1151LGA 1151-2FCLGA1151
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProDual-Channel DDR4-2400 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX, Quick Sync, VirtualizationDual-Channel DDR3(L)-1600/DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1100 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
Die Size126 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
$122 U.S.$425 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-9100F
29.5 pt (41%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-8086K
35.2 pt (49%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
8686 Points (8%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1260 Points (54%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
414 Points (46%)
min: 488     avg: 495     median: 495 (55%)     max: 502 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1175 Points (3%)
min: 2998     avg: 3111     median: 3111 (8%)     max: 3224 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
843 Points (5%)
634 Points (4%)
min: 1340     avg: 1366     median: 1349 (9%)     max: 1408 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
145 Points (44%)
171 Points (52%)
min: 202     avg: 205     median: 206 (62%)     max: 207 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
8.6 Points (11%)
5.4 Points (7%)
min: 14.67     avg: 15     median: 15 (20%)     max: 15.41 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.7 Points (41%)
2 Points (49%)
min: 2.2     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (57%)     max: 2.35 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5493 Points (33%)
6509 Points (39%)
min: 6541     avg: 7216     median: 7216 (44%)     max: 7891 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
25971 Points (19%)
18118 Points (13%)
min: 33064     avg: 35896     median: 35896 (26%)     max: 38728 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
30617 Points (21%)
21908 Points (15%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
7199 Points (9%)
8472 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
235.1 s (3%)
345.9 s (4%)
min: 119.7     avg: 119.8     median: 119.8 (1%)     max: 119.9 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
8 s (2%)
11.8 s (2%)
min: 4.041     avg: 4.1     median: 4.1 (1%)     max: 4.21 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4331 Points (7%)
4052 Points (6%)
min: 6637     avg: 6752     median: 6751.5 (11%)     max: 6866 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
17150 MIPS (10%)
min: 35473     avg: 36060     median: 36059.5 (21%)     max: 36646 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4682 MIPS (56%)
min: 5325     avg: 5417     median: 5416.5 (65%)     max: 5508 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
51.8 fps (18%)
44.4 fps (15%)
min: 85.1     avg: 85.5     median: 85.5 (30%)     max: 85.8 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
196 fps (45%)
218 fps (50%)
min: 227.5     avg: 230.6     median: 230.6 (53%)     max: 233.6 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
6.3 fps (11%)
6.1 fps (11%)
min: 11.2     avg: 11.3     median: 11.3 (20%)     max: 11.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.4 GB/s (0%)
0.3 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.792     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (0%)     max: 0.795 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.6 GB/s (11%)
0.5 GB/s (9%)
1.4 GB/s (24%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
3.4 GB/s (9%)
3 GB/s (8%)
min: 7.8     avg: 7.9     median: 7.9 (20%)     max: 7.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
561 Seconds (4%)
687 Seconds (5%)
min: 315     avg: 383.7     median: 316 (2%)     max: 520 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (14%)
min: 0.567     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.5974 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
8062 Points (17%)
min: 10397     avg: 11218     median: 11218 (24%)     max: 12039 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
10.7 s (2%)
9.3 s (2%)
min: 7.74     avg: 8.5     median: 8.5 (2%)     max: 9.261 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
24 s (1%)
21 s (1%)
min: 17.06     avg: 18.8     median: 18.8 (1%)     max: 20.59 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
567 s (3%)
495.5 s (2%)
min: 429.9     avg: 467     median: 467 (2%)     max: 504 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
25448 Points (22%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
8816 Points (24%)
8742 Points (24%)
min: 11434     avg: 12861     median: 11554 (31%)     max: 15596 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
59535 Points (48%)
68492 Points (56%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
59859 Points (49%)
68473 Points (56%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
61363 Points (52%)
68727 Points (58%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
6928 Points (18%)
6295 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
10393 Points (19%)
8958 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
4801 Points (20%)
4218 Points (18%)
6745 Points (28%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1152 Points (49%)
1240 Points (52%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4074 Points (7%)
5485 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1146 Points (5%)
min: 1234     avg: 1276     median: 1276 (6%)     max: 1318 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4060 Points (13%)
min: 5618     avg: 5644     median: 5644 (18%)     max: 5670 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4626 Points (46%)
5301 Points (53%)
min: 5768     avg: 5821     median: 5792 (58%)     max: 5904 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
18335 Points (20%)
15937 Points (17%)
min: 22817     avg: 24618     median: 24527 (27%)     max: 26509 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
866 ms (1%)
min: 861     avg: 862     median: 862 (1%)     max: 863 ms
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
204 Points (43%)
min: 216     avg: 217     median: 217 (45%)     max: 218 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
132.7 Watt (23%)
139 Watt (24%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
108.1 Watt (20%)
101.5 Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
7.8 Points per Watt (6%)
6.3 Points per Watt (5%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8500T → 100% n=23

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-9100F → 95% n=23

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8086K → 144% n=23

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 16. 00:52:56

#0 checking url part for id 10946 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12190 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10106 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 05:33:43 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.03s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10946 +0.004s ... 0.034s

#8 got single benchmarks 10946 +0.008s ... 0.043s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12190 +0.022s ... 0.065s

#10 got single benchmarks 12190 +0.008s ... 0.073s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 10106 +0.023s ... 0.096s

#12 got single benchmarks 10106 +0.026s ... 0.122s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.122s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.525s ... 0.647s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.647s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)