Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-8259U vs Intel Core i7-1195G7

Intel Core i5-8259U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-8259U is a quad-core SoC for notebooks based on the Coffee Lake architecture and was announced in April 2018. Compared to its predecessor Core i5-7267U, the CPU is now a quad-core with Hyperthreading support for the execution of up to 8 threads simultaneously. The base frequency is 2.3 GHz, but the Turbo goes all the way up to 3.8 GHz. It is also equipped with an Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 GPU with 128 MB eDRAM, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR4) as well as VP9 and H.265 video decoding as well as encoding. The chip is still manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Compared to faster Core i5 and i7 models with eDRAM and 28 Watts, the i5-8259U only features 6 MB smart cache and the slowest clock of the Iris Plus GPU.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Kaby Lake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

Considering the clocks of the Core i5-8259U, its performance should be between the 15W models Core i5-8350U and Core i7-8550U. The i5-8259U should still be faster than the i7-8550U in practice thanks to the increased TDP, especially during sustained workloads.

Graphics

The integrated Intel Iris Plus 655 Graphics is the GT3e model of the Kaby Lake GPU (Intel Gen. 9.5). It has 48 Execution Units running at 300-1050 MHz (slowest clock of the 655, the fastest is 1200 MHz in combination with the i7-8559U) and the performance is comparable to a GeForce 930M or 940MX thanks to fast eDRAM cache. However, there aren't any significant improvements compared to the old Iris Plus 650, so modern games can often not be played smoothly or only at the lowest or medium settings, respectively.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel specifies the TDP with 28 Watts, which can be reduced to 23 Watts (cTDP Down) depending on the usage scenario. The TDP is pretty high compared to the common 15-Watt TDP for quad-core processors, but allows a better utilization of CPU and GPU Turbo.

Intel Core i7-1195G7

► remove from comparison Intel i7-1195G7

The Intel Core i7-1195G7 is a quad-core SoC from the Tiger Lake-UP3 product family designed for thin laptops and Ultrabooks that was introduced in 2021. It integrates four Willow Cove processor cores (8 threads thanks to Hyper-Threading). The base clock (minimum) depends on the configured TDP and can range from 1.3 GHz (12 Watt TDP) up to 2.9 GHz (28 W). The Turbo on one core can reach up to 5 GHz (Turbo Boost 3.0). All cores can reach up to 4.6 GHz. The i7-1195G7 is part of the Tiger Lake UP3 refresh and is the fastest CPU of the Tiger-Lake U line.

Furthermore, Tiger Lake SoCs supports four lanes of PCIe 4, AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 and Wi-Fi 6E in the chip.

The 1195G7 integrates the Intel Iris Xe graphics adapter with 96 EUs clocked at 400 - 1400 MHz. The GPU and CPU can together use the 12 MB of L3 cache.

Performance

The average 1195G7 in our database matches the Intel Core i5-10300H in multi-thread performance while, perhaps surprisingly, lagging behind the AMD Ryzen 3 5300U. The makes the i7 a decent lower mid-range chip, as of early 2022. It'll run most apps with virtually no delays or slowdowns which is what the vast majority of users wants.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of slightly more than 30 W, the VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K is among the fastest laptops built around the 1195G7 that we know of. It can be about 40% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Core i7 series chip has a default TDP of 12 W to 28 W, the expectation being that laptop makers will go for a higher value in exchange for higher performance. Either way, that's a tad too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

The i7-1195G7 is built with Intel's 3rd generation 10 nm process marketed as SuperFin for below average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i5-8259UIntel Core i7-1195G7
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Tiger Lake
CodenameCoffee Lake-UTiger Lake-UP3
Series: Tiger Lake Tiger Lake-UP3
Intel Core i7-8559U compare2.7 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8557U compare1.7 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8269U compare2.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8279U compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8259U « 2.3 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8257U compare1.4 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8109U compare3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1195G7 « 2.9 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1185G7 compare3 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1165G7 compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1155G7 compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1145G7 compare2.6 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1135G7 compare2.4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1125G4 compare2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1115G4 compare3 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock2300 - 3800 MHz2900 - 5000 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB320 KB
L2 Cache1 MB5 MB
L3 Cache6 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 8
TDP28 Watt28 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFCBGA1528BGA1449
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, Intel SSE4.1, Intel SSE 4.2DDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (300 - 1050 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (400 - 1400 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-8259U
27.6 pt (38%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-1195G7
34.9 pt (48%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
89 Points (62%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
307 Points (6%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 3592     avg: 3792     median: 3728 (3%)     max: 4025 Points
min: 3142     avg: 5022     median: 5337 (5%)     max: 6806 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 959     avg: 976     median: 976.5 (42%)     max: 991 Points
min: 1290     avg: 1457     median: 1455 (62%)     max: 1624 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 369     avg: 378     median: 381 (42%)     max: 386 Points
min: 498     avg: 563     median: 559 (62%)     max: 620 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1385     avg: 1473     median: 1471 (4%)     max: 1567 Points
min: 1212     avg: 1907     median: 1932 (5%)     max: 2590 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 575     avg: 622     median: 615 (4%)     max: 687 Points
min: 574     avg: 853     median: 940 (6%)     max: 999 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 132     avg: 147.1     median: 148.7 (45%)     max: 154 Points
min: 198     avg: 221.4     median: 222 (67%)     max: 238 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
7.1 Points (9%)
10.6 Points (14%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.7 Points (42%)
2.7 Points (67%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5706 Points (34%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
21869 Points (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
27377 Points (19%)
40873 Points (28%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
7397 Points (9%)
12384 Points (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
248.6 s (3%)
281.4 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.5 s (2%)
8.2 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5348 Points (8%)
6334 Points (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 17799     avg: 20778     median: 19104.5 (11%)     max: 28824 MIPS
min: 17053     avg: 23469     median: 24669 (14%)     max: 26183 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3753     avg: 3949     median: 3975.5 (48%)     max: 4022 MIPS
min: 5059     avg: 5409     median: 5386 (64%)     max: 5890 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 38.5     avg: 39.5     median: 39.5 (14%)     max: 40.5 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 162.3     avg: 165.1     median: 165.1 (38%)     max: 167.95 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 4.72     avg: 5.2     median: 5.4 (9%)     max: 5.49 fps
min: 4.23     avg: 6.5     median: 6.6 (12%)     max: 8.8 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
0.6 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.8 GB/s (13%)
1 GB/s (17%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
4.1 GB/s (11%)
6.4 GB/s (17%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
1331 Seconds (17%)
min: 1058     avg: 1105     median: 1105 (14%)     max: 1152 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 688     avg: 730     median: 729.5 (5%)     max: 769 Seconds
min: 473     avg: 691     median: 597.5 (4%)     max: 1211 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.738     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (17%)     max: 0.818 sec
min: 0.53     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 0.611 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
7916 Points (17%)
9989 Points (21%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11.1 s (2%)
6.7 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
24.3 s (1%)
14.7 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
589 s (3%)
354.2 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
25093 Points (22%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 7105     avg: 8348     median: 8528.5 (23%)     max: 9276 Points
min: 6684     avg: 10304     median: 10438.5 (28%)     max: 13153 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 47878     avg: 49579     median: 49578.5 (40%)     max: 51279 Points
min: 63087     avg: 67596     median: 67595.5 (55%)     max: 72104 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 47855     avg: 49509     median: 49509 (40%)     max: 51163 Points
min: 64343     avg: 67940     median: 67939.5 (55%)     max: 71536 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 17718     avg: 40451     median: 49722 (42%)     max: 53914 Points
min: 65247     avg: 71962     median: 71962 (61%)     max: 78677 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5946     avg: 6904     median: 6670.5 (17%)     max: 7927 Points
min: 5428     avg: 8477     median: 8745 (22%)     max: 10705 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 8348     avg: 9726     median: 9743 (17%)     max: 11006 Points
min: 7982     avg: 12497     median: 13225 (24%)     max: 15514 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2752     avg: 3096     median: 3132 (13%)     max: 3346 Points
min: 2687     avg: 4165     median: 4266 (18%)     max: 5913 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 1896     avg: 2064     median: 2064 (63%)     max: 2232 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 7596     avg: 7644     median: 7644 (30%)     max: 7692 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 948     avg: 961     median: 951 (40%)     max: 984 Points
min: 1519     avg: 1569     median: 1536 (65%)     max: 1649 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3359     avg: 3602     median: 3607 (6%)     max: 3839 Points
min: 4241     avg: 4940     median: 4734 (8%)     max: 6349 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 944     avg: 957     median: 948 (4%)     max: 979 Points
min: 1575     avg: 1606     median: 1605.5 (7%)     max: 1636 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3335     avg: 3571     median: 3567 (11%)     max: 3811 Points
min: 4683     avg: 5066     median: 5066 (16%)     max: 5449 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4200     avg: 4265     median: 4211 (42%)     max: 4383 Points
min: 6818     avg: 6894     median: 6894 (69%)     max: 6970 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13421     avg: 14122     median: 13961 (16%)     max: 14984 Points
min: 18904     avg: 20630     median: 20629.5 (23%)     max: 22355 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1010     avg: 1054     median: 1068 (1%)     max: 1095 ms
min: 594     avg: 664     median: 612 (1%)     max: 1047 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
118.3 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
69945 Points (63%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
140.3 Points (40%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 173.3     avg: 176.9     median: 176 (37%)     max: 182.4 Points
min: 195     avg: 255     median: 261 (54%)     max: 271 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
954 Points (37%)
min: 1341     avg: 1412     median: 1435 (55%)     max: 1460 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 36.1     avg: 42     median: 39.5 (7%)     max: 50.3 Watt
min: 15.6     avg: 40.8     median: 36.7 (6%)     max: 65.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 37.6     avg: 44.2     median: 43.7 (8%)     max: 51.3 Watt
min: 18.4     avg: 46     median: 49.3 (9%)     max: 66 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
13.9 Watt (9%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.32     avg: 3.8     median: 3.8 (4%)     max: 4.34 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 12.4     avg: 13.9     median: 13.9 (10%)     max: 15.3 Points per Watt
min: 15.1     avg: 21.6     median: 20 (15%)     max: 35.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8259U → 100% n=42

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1195G7 → 134% n=42

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 06. 18:52:56

#0 checking url part for id 10068 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13181 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.022s ... 0.023s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.023s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10068 +0.017s ... 0.041s

#7 got single benchmarks 10068 +0.017s ... 0.058s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13181 +0.016s ... 0.074s

#9 got single benchmarks 13181 +0.041s ... 0.116s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.116s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.341s ... 0.457s

#12 return log +0.023s ... 0.48s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)