Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-8210Y vs Intel Core i5-8350U vs Intel Core i7-8500Y

Intel Core i5-8210Y

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-8210Y is a very efficient dual-core SoC for (passively) cooled notebooks based on the Amber Lake generation and was announced on 30th October 2018 with the new MacBook Air. The CPU consists of two processor cores clocked at 1.6 - 3.6 GHz and a TDP of 7 Watt. Thanks to Hyper Threading, the processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously. The chips also includes the Intel HD Graphics 617 GPU, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L/LPDDR3) as well as VP9 and H.265 video de- and encoder. Compared to the Kaby Lake-Y predecessors (e.g. Core i7-7Y75), Amber Lake uses the same architecture produced in the improved 14nm+ FinFET process (no 14nm++) but offers higher clock speeds at an increased TDP rating. The Core i5-8200Y is very similar when configured to 7 Watt (cTDP up) and offers even higher Turbo clocks, but a slightly slower GPU (-100 MHz).

Architecture

Intel basically used the familiar micro architecture from the Skylake / Kaby Lake generation, so the per-MHz performance is identical.

Performance

The performance of the Y series is highly depending on the cooling solution of the laptop / tablet and the TDP settings for sustained load. Therefore, the differences between a Core m3 and a i7 may be rather slim, if the thermals are very limited. The high Turbo clock speeds in Amber Lake should however lead to a very good single thread performance for short bursts.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 617 GPU has 24 Execution Units (EUs) like the old HD Graphics 515 and runs with clocks between 300 and 1050 MHz in combination with this processor. The performance heavily depends on the TDP limit as well as the memory configuration; with fast LPDDR3-1866 RAM in dual-channel mode, the GPU should sometimes be able to compete with the HD Graphics 520, but can also be much slower in other scenarios. Modern games from 2016 will, if at all, only run smoothly in the lowest settings.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake and Amber Lake now also supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in the 14 nm+ process with FinFET transistors. The typical TDP for the Amber Lake Y-series is specified at 5 Watts, but the i5-8210Y is specified at 7 Watt (for the MacBook Air).

Intel Core i5-8350U

► remove from comparison Intel i5-8350U

The Intel Core i5-8350U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Kaby Lake Refresh generation and was announced in August 2017. Contrary to its direct predecessor the Core i5-7300U, which were still dual-cores, the i7-8350U is equipped with four cores but at a lower base frequency of 1.7 GHz. The Turbo Boost can go up to 3,6 GHz and therefore also offer good short term single core speeds. The GPU is now named Intel UHD Graphics 620 but otherwise identical to the Intel HD Graphics 620. The integrated memory controller supports DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133 and dual channel memory.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

According to Intel, the new quad core models are up to 40% faster than their dual core predecessors. Due to the reduced TDP and the same 14nm+ process, the long term performance and throttling behaviour will be interesting and depending on the laptop design. Therefore, the older 35 Watt quad-core models should be faster in applications that demand longer CPU loads.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm+), the same as the 7th Gen Kaby Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

Intel Core i7-8500Y

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i7-8500Y is a very efficient dual-core SoC for tablets and passively cooled notebooks based on the Amber Lake generation and will be announced around August 2018. It is the fastest Amber Lake-Y CPU at the time of announcement and consists of two processor cores clocked at 1.5 - 4.2 GHz. Thanks to Hyper Threading, the processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously. The chips also includes the Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L/LPDDR3) as well as VP9 and H.265 video de- and encoder. Compared to the Kaby Lake-Y predecessors (e.g. Core i7-7Y75), Amber Lake uses the same architecture produced in the improved 14nm+ FinFET process (no 14nm++) but offers higher clock speeds at an increased TDP rating.

Architecture

Intel basically used the familiar micro architecture from the Skylake / Kaby Lake generation, so the per-MHz performance is identical.

Performance

The performance of the Y series is highly depending on the cooling solution of the laptop / tablet and the TDP settings for sustained load. Therefore, the differences between a Core m3 and a i7 may be rather slim, if the thermals are very limited. The high Turbo clock speeds in Amber Lake should however lead to a very good single thread performance for short bursts.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU has 24 Execution Units (EUs) like the old HD Graphics 515 and runs with clocks between 300 and 950 MHz in combination with this processor. The performance heavily depends on the TDP limit as well as the memory configuration; with fast LPDDR3-1866 RAM in dual-channel mode, the GPU should sometimes be able to compete with the HD Graphics 520, but can also be much slower in other scenarios. Modern games from 2016 will, if at all, only run smoothly in the lowest settings.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake and Amber Lake now also supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in the second generation 14 nm+ process with FinFET transistors. The typical TDP for the Amber Lake Y-series is specified at 5 Watts (previous generations were 4.5 Watt), and can be adjusted in both directions depending on the usage scenario.

ModelIntel Core i5-8210YIntel Core i5-8350UIntel Core i7-8500Y
SeriesIntel Amber LakeIntel Kaby Lake RefreshIntel Amber Lake
CodenameAmber Lake-YKaby Lake RefreshAmber Lake-Y
Series: Amber Lake Amber Lake-Y
Intel Core i5-10310Y1.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210Y1 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8500Y1.5 - 4.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110Y1 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8210Y « 1.6 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8200Y1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100Y1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core m3-8100Y1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6500Y1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8650U1.9 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8550U1.8 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8350U « 1.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8250U1.6 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8130U2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4417U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10310Y1.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210Y1 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8500Y « 1.5 - 4.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110Y1 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8210Y1.6 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8200Y1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100Y1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core m3-8100Y1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6500Y1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock1600 - 3600 MHz1700 - 3600 MHz1500 - 4200 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB256 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1 MB512 KB
L3 Cache4 MB6 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 44 / 82 / 4
TDP7 Watt15 Watt5 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGABGA1356BGA
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-2133 Memory Controller (16 GB max), HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, vPro, TXTDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-1866 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, vPro, TXT
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 617 (300 - 1050 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1100 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 615 (300 - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$281 U.S.$297 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-8210Y
23.4 pt (32%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-8500Y
24.6 pt (34%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
312 Points (35%)
min: 304     avg: 312     median: 312 (35%)     max: 320 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
601 Points (1%)
min: 584     avg: 588     median: 587.5 (1%)     max: 591 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 254     avg: 269.5     median: 269.5 (2%)     max: 285 Points
min: 245     avg: 252.3     median: 246.5 (2%)     max: 271 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 127     avg: 129.5     median: 129.5 (39%)     max: 132 Points
min: 126     avg: 129.8     median: 130.5 (39%)     max: 132 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 5.48     avg: 6.3     median: 6 (8%)     max: 7.33 Points
min: 2.45     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (3%)     max: 2.53 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.62     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (42%)     max: 1.71 Points
min: 1.43     avg: 1.5     median: 1.5 (36%)     max: 1.47 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 5152     avg: 5461     median: 5460.5 (33%)     max: 5769 Points
min: 4898     avg: 5027     median: 5027 (30%)     max: 5156 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 16222     avg: 17931     median: 17931 (13%)     max: 19640 Points
min: 8493     avg: 8706     median: 8706 (6%)     max: 8919 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
28684 Points (20%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
7593 Points (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 305.7     avg: 330.5     median: 330.5 (4%)     max: 355.2 s
673 s (8%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 7.517     avg: 9.7     median: 9.7 (2%)     max: 11.89 s
15.5 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1960     avg: 2961     median: 2961 (5%)     max: 3962 Points
2483 Points (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
7936 MIPS (5%)
min: 7982     avg: 10709     median: 10709 (6%)     max: 13436 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3405 MIPS (41%)
min: 3568     avg: 4368     median: 4367.5 (52%)     max: 5167 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 34     avg: 37.3     median: 37.3 (13%)     max: 40.55 fps
14.1 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 145     avg: 152.9     median: 152.9 (35%)     max: 160.7 fps
83.3 fps (19%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
2.3 fps (4%)
2.1 fps (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.363     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (0%)     max: 0.456 GB/s
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.623     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (12%)     max: 0.754 GB/s
0.4 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 3.7     avg: 4.1     median: 4.1 (11%)     max: 4.4 GB/s
2.2 GB/s (6%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
1680 Seconds (12%)
705 Seconds (5%)
min: 1772     avg: 1966     median: 1965.5 (14%)     max: 2159 Seconds
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
3544 Points (8%)
min: 5852     avg: 6131     median: 5925 (13%)     max: 6617 Points
min: 3015     avg: 3056     median: 3056 (7%)     max: 3097 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 10     avg: 10.9     median: 10.9 (2%)     max: 11.88 s
9.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 23     avg: 25.3     median: 25.3 (1%)     max: 27.62 s
22.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 580     avg: 637     median: 637 (3%)     max: 694 s
657 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
8123 Points (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3311     avg: 3571     median: 3571 (10%)     max: 3831 Points
min: 2942     avg: 3242     median: 3254.5 (9%)     max: 3516 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 39950     avg: 43226     median: 43226 (35%)     max: 46502 Points
min: 25064     avg: 29890     median: 28391 (23%)     max: 36216 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 38261     avg: 42913     median: 42913 (35%)     max: 47565 Points
min: 26981     avg: 31559     median: 31558.5 (26%)     max: 36136 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
17419 Points (15%)
min: 51828     avg: 52962     median: 53024 (45%)     max: 54034 Points
min: 35630     avg: 38017     median: 38016.5 (32%)     max: 40403 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
2252 Points (6%)
min: 5408     avg: 6288     median: 6155 (16%)     max: 7190 Points
min: 2260     avg: 2753     median: 2896 (7%)     max: 2959 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3028     avg: 3110     median: 3110 (6%)     max: 3192 Points
min: 7603     avg: 8941     median: 8945.5 (16%)     max: 10362 Points
min: 3308     avg: 3993     median: 4201 (7%)     max: 4261 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 1194     avg: 1205     median: 1204.5 (5%)     max: 1215 Points
min: 2484     avg: 2537     median: 2537 (11%)     max: 2590 Points
min: 1204     avg: 1292     median: 1240 (5%)     max: 1431 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
660 Points (3%)
858 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1433 Points (5%)
1504 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4162 Points (42%)
min: 3646     avg: 4185     median: 4225 (42%)     max: 4685 Points
min: 3910     avg: 4398     median: 4397.5 (44%)     max: 4885 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
7474 Points (8%)
min: 11004     avg: 13358     median: 13605 (15%)     max: 15464 Points
min: 6223     avg: 7224     median: 7224 (8%)     max: 8225 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4160     avg: 4210     median: 4210 (57%)     max: 4260 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12679     avg: 12800     median: 12799.5 (31%)     max: 12920 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
12270 Points (22%)
5614 Points (10%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
3439 Points (67%)
3245 Points (63%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 817     avg: 906     median: 906 (1%)     max: 995 ms
min: 1017     avg: 1193     median: 1216 (1%)     max: 1289 ms
min: 1281     avg: 1499     median: 1446 (2%)     max: 1822 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 78.9     avg: 161.1     median: 156.5 (2%)     max: 252.7 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 29470     avg: 33003     median: 33003 (30%)     max: 36536 Points
min: 28223     avg: 32497     median: 31171 (28%)     max: 38722 Points
min: 22283     avg: 24377     median: 24631.5 (22%)     max: 25962 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 164     avg: 183.5     median: 183.5 (38%)     max: 203 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
9887 Points (52%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
15717 Points (34%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
11958 Points (78%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
19602 Points (98%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8210Y → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8350U → 179% n=13

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8500Y → 110% n=13

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 04. 05:35:51

#0 checking url part for id 10886 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9214 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10088 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 04 Jun 2024 05:34:21 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.031s ... 0.033s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.033s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10886 +0.02s ... 0.053s

#8 got single benchmarks 10886 +0.012s ... 0.065s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9214 +0.004s ... 0.069s

#10 got single benchmarks 9214 +0.026s ... 0.095s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 10088 +0.017s ... 0.112s

#12 got single benchmarks 10088 +0.025s ... 0.137s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.137s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.4s ... 0.538s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.538s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)