Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-1235U vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100

Intel Core i5-1235U

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1235U

The Intel Core i5-1235U is a mid-range mobile CPU for thin and light laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 2 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 12 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 1.3 to 4.4 GHz on the performance cluster and 0.9 to 3.3 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 12 MB L3 cache. Compared to the i5-1245U, the 1235U offers lower base clock speeds and only "Essentials" vPro management features. Compared to the P-series (28W) or H-series (45W), the 15W TDP may limit the sustained performance.

Performance

The average 1235U in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U and also, surprisingly enough, the i7-1250U and the i7-1260U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very respectable result, as of mid 2023.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 27 W, the Beelink SEi12 is among the fastest systems built around the 1235U that we know of. It can be twice as fast in CPU-bound workloads as the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Architecture

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 80 of the 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.2 GHz.

Power consumption

This ULV processor has a Base power consumption of 15 W (also known as the long-term power limit), with 55 W being its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption. Both values are too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

Core i5-1235U is manufactured on Intel's fourth-gen 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for decent, as of mid-2022, energy efficiency.

Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD X1-26-100

The 8-core Snapdragon X (X1-26-100) is an affordable ARM architecture processor for use in Windows laptops. Unveiled in Jan 2025, this Qualcomm SoC features 8 Oryon CPU cores running at up to 2.98 GHz, along with the 1.7 TFLOPS X1-45 iGPU and the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU. The super-fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller, USB 4.0 support, TB 4 support and PCIe 4 support are all onboard as well.

Architecture and Features

The Oryon cores (2 clusters of essentially identical cores; 8 threads) are mostly based on Nuvia IP and reportedly make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 (with no eGPU support).

The X1-26-100 is based on the smaller die codenamed Purwa, unlike most X Elite and some X Plus processors. It is believed to have at least 8 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5x-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU present for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

The CPU should be about 10% slower than its faster brother named X1P-42 due to the latter's higher CPU clock speeds. Generally speaking, a performance level similar to recent U-class Intel Core 5 chips is to be expected.

Graphics

The X1-45 used here delivers up to 1.7 TFLOPS of performance. Unlike the much faster 3.8 TFLOPS and 4.6 TFLOPS X1-85 iGPUs, this little guy here has much fewer unified shaders and runs at lower clock speeds, too. Games put it a little behind the GeForce MX350; this kind of performance is sufficient for older games and sub-900p resolutions only.

AVC, HEVC and AV1 video codecs can be both hardware-decoded and hardware-encoded whereas with VP9, only decoding is possible. The highest monitor resolution supported is UHD 2160p.

Power consumption

Expect to see anything between 15 W and 30 W under long-term workloads depending on the system and the power profile chosen. The number includes RAM power consumption.

The SoC is built with TSMC's N4P process for decent power efficiency, as of H1 2025.

ModelIntel Core i5-1235UQualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100
CodenameAlder Lake-UOryon
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-MQualcomm Snapdragon X
Series: Snapdragon X Oryon
Intel Core i7-1265U compare1.3 - 4.8 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1255U compare1.2 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1245U compare1.2 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1235U « 0.9 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1260U compare0.8 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1250U compare0.8 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1240U compare0.8 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1230U compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1215U compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Pentium 8505 compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1210U compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Pentium 8500 compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Celeron 7305 compare0.9 - 1.1 GHz5 / 5 cores8 MB L3
Intel Celeron 7300 compare0.7 - 1 GHz5 / 5 cores8 MB L3
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE compare3.8 - 4.3 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 compare - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 compare - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 compare - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100 compare - 4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 compare - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 « - 2.98 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Clock900 - 4400 MHz <=2980 MHz
L1 Cache928 KB2.3 MB
L2 Cache9.5 MB12 MB
L3 Cache12 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 128 / 8
8 x 3.0 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
TDP15 Watt
Technology10 nm4 nm
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketBGA1744
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, vPro Ess., MMX SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs ( - 1200 MHz)Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
Architecturex86ARM
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1235U
33.4 pt (56%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - SD X1-26-100
28 pt (47%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
93 Points (52%)
96 Points (54%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
406 Points (8%)
min: 646     avg: 684     median: 698 (13%)     max: 708 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 2485     avg: 6365     median: 6623 (6%)     max: 9208 Points
min: 6897     avg: 7294     median: 7446 (7%)     max: 7539 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1444     avg: 1587     median: 1597 (67%)     max: 1698 Points
min: 965     avg: 973     median: 975 (41%)     max: 978 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 566     avg: 613     median: 617 (67%)     max: 651 Points
min: 359     avg: 363     median: 364 (40%)     max: 366 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1783     avg: 2709     median: 2801 (7%)     max: 3537 Points
min: 2644     avg: 2771     median: 2826 (7%)     max: 2842 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 785     avg: 1125     median: 1093.5 (7%)     max: 1587 Points
min: 1338     avg: 1388     median: 1404 (9%)     max: 1421 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 151.5     avg: 213.2     median: 217.5 (60%)     max: 242.3 Points
min: 181.2     avg: 182.9     median: 181.5 (50%)     max: 186 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
14.8 Points (19%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.9 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2299 Points (14%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
14395 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
308.5 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
9.5 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
9297 Points (15%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 20166     avg: 30566     median: 30361.5 (17%)     max: 38643 MIPS
min: 29312     avg: 29548     median: 29424 (17%)     max: 29907 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4371     avg: 5000     median: 5137.5 (61%)     max: 5233 MIPS
min: 4041     avg: 4077     median: 4088 (48%)     max: 4102 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 4.99     avg: 7.8     median: 8.6 (15%)     max: 9.43 fps
min: 4.44     avg: 5.1     median: 5.2 (9%)     max: 5.52 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 707     avg: 955     median: 872 (11%)     max: 1374 Seconds
min: 773     avg: 805     median: 791 (10%)     max: 851 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 366     avg: 491     median: 470 (3%)     max: 662 Seconds
min: 440     avg: 453.3     median: 443 (3%)     max: 477 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4986     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.603 sec
min: 0.861     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (19%)     max: 0.888 sec
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
20 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
43.1 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
995 s (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 7465     avg: 11105     median: 10290 (25%)     max: 15604 Points
min: 11816     avg: 11947     median: 11946.5 (29%)     max: 12077 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
67708 Points (55%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 6543     avg: 9959     median: 10446 (26%)     max: 12476 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 9965     avg: 15291     median: 15301.5 (27%)     max: 19386 Points
min: 12446     avg: 12499     median: 12498.5 (22%)     max: 12551 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 3133     avg: 5151     median: 5180.5 (22%)     max: 7083 Points
5659 Points (24%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 1981     avg: 2095     median: 2094.5 (52%)     max: 2208 Points
min: 2070     avg: 2248     median: 2123.5 (53%)     max: 2675 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 6703     avg: 6875     median: 6874.5 (27%)     max: 7046 Points
min: 10492     avg: 11665     median: 10584 (41%)     max: 14998 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 1688     avg: 1897     median: 1897 (60%)     max: 2106 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 5677     avg: 6161     median: 6160.5 (25%)     max: 6644 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1426     avg: 1553     median: 1591.5 (62%)     max: 1643 Points
1576 Points (62%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5528     avg: 6774     median: 6084.5 (11%)     max: 8571 Points
6244 Points (11%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1402     avg: 1539     median: 1592 (7%)     max: 1602 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5450     avg: 7106     median: 7643 (24%)     max: 8558 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 485.6     avg: 571     median: 585 (1%)     max: 634 ms
min: 518.4     avg: 520     median: 519.5 (1%)     max: 520.6 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
99.6 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 78578     avg: 80181     median: 79131 (60%)     max: 83104 Points
min: 65692     avg: 68056     median: 68055.5 (51%)     max: 70419 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 206     avg: 224     median: 226 (62%)     max: 236 Points
min: 248     avg: 248.5     median: 248.5 (68%)     max: 249 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 233     avg: 262.6     median: 251 (45%)     max: 305 Points
min: 353     avg: 355     median: 355 (64%)     max: 357 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 9253     avg: 10006     median: 10006 (4%)     max: 10759 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 11508     avg: 11533     median: 11533 (42%)     max: 11558 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 983     avg: 1383     median: 1430.5 (53%)     max: 1644 Points
min: 1093     avg: 1104     median: 1103.5 (41%)     max: 1114 Points
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
min: 162     avg: 169.5     median: 169.5 (94%)     max: 177 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 27.8     avg: 43.5     median: 39.8 (7%)     max: 63.2 Watt
59 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 28.9     avg: 46.9     median: 44.9 (8%)     max: 69.5 Watt
min: 41.4     avg: 44.1     median: 44.1 (8%)     max: 46.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 5.22     avg: 7.9     median: 6.3 (4%)     max: 16.6 Watt
min: 3.25     avg: 4.1     median: 4.1 (3%)     max: 4.99 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.41     avg: 5.4     median: 5.6 (6%)     max: 7.17 Watt
min: 4.16     avg: 4.4     median: 4.4 (5%)     max: 4.72 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 20.3     avg: 25.3     median: 25.4 (19%)     max: 29 Points per Watt
min: 28.6     avg: 31.3     median: 31.3 (23%)     max: 33.9 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1235U → 100% n=26

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 → 101% n=26

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 26. 13:32:10

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14078 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18623 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753529530s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 25 Jul 2025 05:17:52 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14078 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 14078 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18623 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#10 got single benchmarks 18623 +0.006s ... 0.021s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.021s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.026s ... 0.047s

#13 return log +0s ... 0.047s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)