Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Xclipse 920 vs Qualcomm Adreno 616 vs Qualcomm Adreno 619

Samsung Xclipse 920

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 920

The Samsung Xclipse 920 GPU is an integrated graphics card in the Samsung Exynos 2200 SoC that is used in Android based smartphones and tablets. It was introduced in some models of the Galaxy S21 line. The iGPU is the first that uses an architecture by AMD (RDNA 2, like the Radeon 660M in the Ryzen 6000 chips). Current information from Geekbench ML points to 3 CUs (=192 shaders).

The performance is slightly below current high end iGPUs for phones like the Adreno 730 (Snapdrageon 8 Gen 1) or Apple A15 GPU, but still sufficient for all mobile games in 2022.

The Xclipse 920 is produced in the modern 4nm EUV process at Samsung (as its integrated in the Exynos 2200).

Qualcomm Adreno 616

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 616 is a mobile graphics card for upper mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

According to Qualcomm up to 30% faster than the previous generation (Adreno 512 in the Snapdragon 660).

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 619

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 619 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is 60% better compared to the Adreno 612 graphics card and in our benchmarks on par with the 700 series cards.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

show full text
Samsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 616Qualcomm Adreno 619
Adreno 600 Series
Xclipse 950 8
Xclipse 940
Xclipse 920 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
CodenameRDNA 2
ArchitectureRDNA 2Adreno 600Adreno 600
Pipelines192 - unified
Core Speed555 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
technology4 nm14 nm8 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
Date of Announcement18.01.2022 15.12.2015 15.12.2015
Link to Manufacturer Pagesemiconductor.samsung.com
APIDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan
CPU in Xclipse 920GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 22008 x 1820 MHz? MHz555 MHz
CPU in Adreno 616GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7128 x 2300 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7108 x 2200 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6708 x 2016 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 619GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 38 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G8 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 18 x 1804 MHz? MHz? MHz
» show 3 more
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 22381     avg: 37106     median: 38288.5 (4%)     max: 43514 Points
min: 54788     avg: 55662     median: 55911 (6%)     max: 56286 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 10206     avg: 10662     median: 10610 (46%)     max: 11221 Points
min: 2217     avg: 2635     median: 2636 (11%)     max: 2859 Points
min: 3602     avg: 4041     median: 4118 (18%)     max: 4286 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 17842     avg: 19764     median: 18631.5 (41%)     max: 23949 Points
min: 2146     avg: 2733     median: 2847 (6%)     max: 3248 Points
min: 3817     avg: 4280     median: 4298 (9%)     max: 4573 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 8268     avg: 8617     median: 8547.5 (36%)     max: 9105 Points
min: 1742     avg: 1917     median: 1913.5 (8%)     max: 2217 Points
min: 2536     avg: 2906     median: 2981.5 (13%)     max: 3107 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 11774     avg: 12830     median: 12432.5 (31%)     max: 14680 Points
min: 1611     avg: 1825     median: 1853.5 (5%)     max: 2147 Points
min: 2412     avg: 2788     median: 2834 (7%)     max: 3008 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
0 Points (0%)
min: 2073     avg: 2569     median: 2567.5 (23%)     max: 2978 Points
min: 2825     avg: 3855     median: 3993.5 (35%)     max: 4156 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
min: 1980     avg: 2609     median: 2727.5 (16%)     max: 3100 Points
min: 3647     avg: 4097     median: 4145 (25%)     max: 4414 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
0 Points (0%)
min: 1594     avg: 1805     median: 1826 (9%)     max: 2073 Points
min: 1757     avg: 2728     median: 2812.5 (14%)     max: 2983 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min:      avg: 0 (0%)     max: 0 Points
min: 1451     avg: 1676     median: 1705.5 (6%)     max: 1980 Points
min: 1593     avg: 2593     median: 2655.5 (9%)     max: 2845 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 6440     avg: 7269     median: 7373 (4%)     max: 7890 Points
min: 635     avg: 1119     median: 1196 (1%)     max: 1578 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1702     avg: 1852     median: 1885.5 (2%)     max: 1935 Points
min: 189     avg: 329.9     median: 351 (0%)     max: 410 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
12 fps (4%)
min: 2.9     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (1%)     max: 4 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 28     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (5%)     max: 31 fps
min: 4.4     avg: 5.2     median: 5.1 (1%)     max: 7.8 fps
min: 3.3     avg: 7.4     median: 7.7 (1%)     max: 8.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 60     avg: 68     median: 67.5 (5%)     max: 77 fps
min: 12     avg: 13.6     median: 14 (1%)     max: 16 fps
min: 17     avg: 20.2     median: 21 (2%)     max: 23 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 63     avg: 67.5     median: 67.5 (6%)     max: 72 fps
min: 8.5     avg: 12.5     median: 13 (1%)     max: 15 fps
min: 16     avg: 18.5     median: 19 (2%)     max: 21 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 101     avg: 120.3     median: 125 (3%)     max: 130 fps
min: 19     avg: 22.4     median: 23 (0%)     max: 26 fps
min: 26     avg: 32.5     median: 34 (1%)     max: 36 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 135     avg: 182.3     median: 190 (8%)     max: 214 fps
min: 29     avg: 31.8     median: 32 (1%)     max: 36 fps
min: 33     avg: 45.5     median: 46 (2%)     max: 68 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 920
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 218     avg: 285.5     median: 302 (2%)     max: 320 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 616
min: 46     avg: 62.4     median: 65 (1%)     max: 74 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619
min: 55     avg: 88.2     median: 91 (1%)     max: 100 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 306511     avg: 328113     median: 319781 (32%)     max: 366379 Points
min: 65241     avg: 91752     median: 97328 (10%)     max: 106719 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
402385 Points (32%)
min: 82963     avg: 85356     median: 83461 (7%)     max: 91538 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
136.6 fps (3%)
min: 19.62     avg: 27.1     median: 26.9 (1%)     max: 31.27 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
8042 Points (2%)
min: 1363     avg: 1377     median: 1377.5 (0%)     max: 1391 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
8695 Points (2%)
min: 1119     avg: 1168     median: 1160 (0%)     max: 1231 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 8622     avg: 9428     median: 9192.5 (3%)     max: 10698 Points
min: 8763     avg: 68002     median: 26723 (9%)     max: 291780 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 2466     avg: 2689     median: 2629.5 (4%)     max: 2911 Points
min: 3274     avg: 20485     median: 22822.5 (38%)     max: 28746 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 8.3     avg: 9.8     median: 9.2 (4%)     max: 12.6 Watt
min: 2.69     avg: 3.7     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 7.31 Watt

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 920 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 616 → 19% n=10

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 29% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 619:
29.7 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 619:
29.4 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
Adreno 619:
30  fps
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
100%
Adreno 619:
60  fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
59.5  fps
62%
Adreno 619:
20 29.8 45 54 ~ 37 fps
med.
100%
Xclipse 920:
59.3  fps
61%
Adreno 619:
36  fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 920:
58.2  fps
46%
Adreno 619:
20 28 29.3 30 ~ 27 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 103 ~ 67 fps
90%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 30 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 77 86 89 90 95 98 ~ 60 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 58.3 ~ 44 fps
82%
Adreno 616:
30 38 40 ~ 36 fps
89%
Adreno 619:
29 38.7 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 39 fps
med.
100%
Xclipse 920:
39.5  fps
101%
Adreno 619:
40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 30 30 39.8 ~ 32 fps
94%
Adreno 616:
27 30 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
97%
Adreno 619:
28 29.3 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 60 ~ 31 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Adreno 616:
31 60 60 60 ~ 53 fps
ultra
Adreno 616:
54 57 60 60 ~ 58 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
Adreno 616:
59 60 60 ~ 60 fps
high
Adreno 616:
59 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 616:
30 60 60 ~ 50 fps
Adreno 619:
60 60 93 115 121 ~ 90 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 616:
26 29 30 30 30 ~ 29 fps
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
Adreno 616:
22 27 29 29 29 29 30 30 ~ 28 fps
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Adreno 619:
90  fps

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 920 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 616 → 88%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 82%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 81%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 86%

Samsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 616Qualcomm Adreno 619
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal3030
League of Legends: Wild Rift603060
Genshin Impact59.559.358.2373627
Armajet6760
PUBG Mobile4439.5323630394031
Dead Trigger 25090
Asphalt 9: Legends29283030
Subway Surfers90
Samsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 616Qualcomm Adreno 619
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2


2


1
2

1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		1
1




1
2










< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
5


2


2
4
1
1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 19. 06:14:55

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11147 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9401 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 10584 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752898495s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 19 Jul 2025 05:20:12 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.029s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.029s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11147 +0.019s ... 0.048s

#10 got single benchmarks 11147 +0.006s ... 0.053s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9401 +0s ... 0.054s

#12 got single benchmarks 9401 +0.011s ... 0.065s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 10584 +0s ... 0.065s

#14 got single benchmarks 10584 +0.035s ... 0.1s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.1s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.008s ... 0.108s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.109s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.11s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.111s

#20 min, max, avg, median took s +0.016s ... 0.127s

#21 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.127s

#22 Got 175 rows for game benchmarks. +0.019s ... 0.146s

#23 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.146s

#24 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.147s

#25 benchmarks composed for output. +0.004s ... 0.151s

#26 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.151s

#27 return log +0.001s ... 0.152s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)