Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 7 155U vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

Intel Core Ultra 7 155U

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 7 155U

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155U is a mid-range Meteor Lake chip that debuted in December 2023. This 1st Gen Core Ultra processor has come to replace 13th generation Core processors; it has 12 cores (2 + 8 + 2) and 14 threads at its disposal. Its Performance cores, of which there are 2, are HT-enabled and run at up to 4.8 GHz while its Efficient cores, of which there are 10 (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) run at up to 3.8 GHz. The 4-core Intel Arc Graphics, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 1.95 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well such as the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestmont architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.1 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 7 155U comes with 12 MB of L3 cache which is a significant reduction compared to the 24 MB that the 155H, the 165H and the 185H have. The processor has a decent number of PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 7.8 GB/s; it supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the 155U features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support. It is also worth mentioning that Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 155U is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

While we have no way of knowing what the 155U will be like, as of December 2023, it's safe to expect the chip to be almost as fast as the Core i7-1340P (Raptor Lake, 12 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.6 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 4-core Arc Graphics runs at up to 1.95 GHz. We expect the iGPU to be about as fast as the aging 96 EU Iris Xe meaning it's good enough for most games, as long as one sticks to 1080p and mostly low quality settings.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc Graphics is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is.

Power consumption

This Core Ultra 7 series processor has a Base power consumption of 15 W, with 57 W being its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption. An active cooling solution is a must for a system powered by this chip.

The 155U is comprised of several small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD X Elite X1E-80-100

The Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 is a pretty fast ARM architecture processor (SoC) for use in Windows laptops. The X1E-80-100 is the second-fastest member of the Snapdragon X series, as of May 2024; as such, it has 12 Oryon CPU cores (3 clusters of equally powerful cores; 12 threads) running at up to 4.0 GHz, the 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 GPU, the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU and an impressively fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller.

The faster Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 is thought to be based on the same die with the same NPU and the same number of CPU cores but with higher GPU and CPU clock speeds.

Architecture and Features

Qualcomm Oryon cores are in part based on Nuvia IP; they most likely make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 but it remains to be seen if it is is compatible with GeForce or Radeon discrete graphics cards.

The Qualcomm SoC is thought to have at least 12 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5X-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

When all of the 12 cores are under load, they can run at up to 3.4 GHz. The much more desirable 4.0 GHz clock speed is only achievable under single-thread or dual-thread loads.

Given the very similar clock speeds, its multi-thread benchmark scores should be about the same as that of the X1E-78-100 for Ryzen 7 7840U and Apple M3-like performance in most real-world tasks. We'll make sure to update this section once we get our hands on a system powered by the X1E-80-100.

Like any other Windows on ARM platform, the Snapdragon X chip works best with applications and games compiled specifically for ARM processors. If making use of the built-in x86 to ARM emulation mode, a performance penalty of about 20% is to be expected.

Graphics

The integrated 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 GPU is DirectX 12-enabled but not DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled, despite featuring VRS and ray tracing support. The 3.8 TFLOPS of performance that it delivers pale in comparison to the slowest current-generation professional Nvidia Ada graphics card for laptops, the RTX 500 Ada, that delivers up to 9.2 TFLOPS.

Its gaming performance is somewhat underwhelming. While slightly faster than the aging Iris Xe (96 EUs), the Adreno is not fast enough to outpace the Radeon 780M meaning there is little point in comparing it with full-fat discrete graphics cards. Baldur's Gate 3, a triple-A title released in 2023, is pretty much unplayable at 1080p / Low. GTA V, a game that saw the light of day in 2015, is playable at 1080p / High.

The Qualcomm iGPU will let you use up to 3 UHD 2160p monitors simultaneously. 2160p120 integrated displays are supported, as are the popular AV1, HEVC and AVC video codecs (both decoding and encoding). The hardware does not support the VVC codec; that feature remains a Lunar Lake exclusive for now.

Power consumption

The X1E-80-100 is most likely going to be less power-hungry than its more powerful brother (the latter can be set to consume up to 80 Watts). Expect to see anything between 20 W and 45 W under long-term workloads because that's what Ryzen HS chips normally consume.

The SoC is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for decent, as of H1 2024, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 7 155UQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
CodenameMeteor Lake-UOryon
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-UQualcomm Snapdragon X
Series: Snapdragon X Oryon
Intel Core Ultra 7 165U compare3.8 - 4.9 GHz12 / 14 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155U « 3.8 - 4.8 GHz12 / 14 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U compare3.8 - 4.8 GHz12 / 14 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 134U compare3.6 - 4.4 GHz12 / 14 cores12 MB L3
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE compare3.8 - 4.3 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 « - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 compare - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 compare - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100 compare - 4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 compare - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 compare - 2.98 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Clock3800 - 4800 MHz <=4000 MHz
L3 Cache12 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 14
2 x 4.8 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.1 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
12 / 12
12 x 4.0 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
TDP15 Watt
Technology7 nm4 nm
max. Temp.110 °C
SocketBGA2049
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Essen., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) ( - 1950 MHz)Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Architecturex86ARM
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.qualcomm.com
L1 Cache2.3 MB
L2 Cache12 MB
TDP Turbo PL280 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 7 155U
34.7 pt (58%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - SD X Elite X1E-80-100
33.7 pt (56%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 90.3     avg: 96.2     median: 98.5 (55%)     max: 99.9 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 487     avg: 549     median: 549 (10%)     max: 611 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 7884     avg: 9627     median: 9674.5 (9%)     max: 10780 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1265     avg: 1627     median: 1666 (70%)     max: 1782 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 485     avg: 624     median: 640.5 (70%)     max: 682 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3075     avg: 3721     median: 3721 (9%)     max: 4167 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1378     avg: 1588     median: 1585 (10%)     max: 1740 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 230     avg: 240     median: 238.5 (66%)     max: 256 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 33897     avg: 38450     median: 38494.5 (22%)     max: 41498 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3666     avg: 4665     median: 4868 (57%)     max: 4920 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 8.41     avg: 10.7     median: 10.9 (19%)     max: 12.4 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 548     avg: 628     median: 626 (8%)     max: 749 Seconds
min: 593     avg: 677     median: 632.5 (8%)     max: 899 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 309     avg: 346     median: 343.5 (2%)     max: 410 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4853     avg: 0.6     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.947 sec
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 12165     avg: 13883     median: 14097 (35%)     max: 15332 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
70865 Points (58%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
71152 Points (58%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
74670 Points (60%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 11846     avg: 12733     median: 12710 (32%)     max: 13666 Points
min: 10549     avg: 10757     median: 10756.5 (27%)     max: 10964 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 17833     avg: 19594     median: 19796 (35%)     max: 21085 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5579     avg: 6483     median: 6534.5 (28%)     max: 7373 Points
min: 3589     avg: 4841     median: 5077 (21%)     max: 5323 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 1534     avg: 2195     median: 2312 (58%)     max: 2382 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 7592     avg: 8981     median: 9278 (36%)     max: 9829 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 891     avg: 1561     median: 1690 (66%)     max: 1717 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6989     avg: 8093     median: 8339.5 (15%)     max: 8805 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 525     avg: 548     median: 543.5 (1%)     max: 581 ms
min: 390.9     avg: 403.9     median: 400.3 (0%)     max: 422.3 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 88198     avg: 92454     median: 92123 (67%)     max: 98705 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 244     avg: 247.5     median: 246.5 (68%)     max: 253 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 136.4     avg: 249.2     median: 267 (48%)     max: 286 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1393     avg: 1485     median: 1483 (55%)     max: 1566 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 37.9     avg: 49.6     median: 48.2 (8%)     max: 57.7 Watt
min: 54.2     avg: 56.1     median: 56.9 (10%)     max: 57.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 51.5     avg: 63.1     median: 68.6 (13%)     max: 69.2 Watt
min: 41.1     avg: 57.8     median: 61.5 (11%)     max: 67.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.25     avg: 5.3     median: 4.9 (3%)     max: 6.42 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.85     avg: 6.3     median: 6.3 (7%)     max: 7.59 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 25.1     avg: 27.5     median: 27.5 (20%)     max: 29.8 Points per Watt
min: 28.8     avg: 32     median: 31.6 (24%)     max: 35.9 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 155U → 100% n=24

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 → 108% n=24

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 08. 09:13:37

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16915 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17575 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1757315617s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 07 Sep 2025 05:18:17 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 16915 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#8 got single benchmarks 16915 +0.013s ... 0.025s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17575 +0.004s ... 0.029s

#10 got single benchmarks 17575 +0.01s ... 0.039s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.039s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.034s ... 0.073s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.076s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)