The birthplace of Silicon Valley is said to be a small garage in Palo Alto. It was there that, in 1939, William Hewlett and David Packard built their first products. Today, HP has little in common with that small garage. The manufacturer's electronic devices, ranging from laptops and computers to printers, are sold across the globe.
Even the HP Envy series itself has accumulated a certain history by now. It has been around since 2009 – we even published a review on an HP Envy 15 at the time. Then and now, Envy laptops are sold as premium devices (it's all in the name, after all), and today's test unit is no exception. At least that's what you would expect from the sleek aluminum and glass chassis. HP is marketing the device to creatives and freelancers. But, as you will find out in our review, not everything about the HP Envy 17-da0076ng is premium.
Nonetheless, the laptop featuring Nvidia graphics is an attractive alternative to the LG Gram Pro, the Samsung Galaxy Book4 or the Lenovo Yoga Pro 9, not least because its market prices tend to be a lot cheaper, depending on the features.
Comparison of potential competitors
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
80 % | v8 | 09 / 2024 | HP Envy 17-da0076ng Ultra 7 155U, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 20.5 mm | 17.00" | 1920x1080 | |
81.2 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.3 kg | 14.4 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
91.7 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 06 / 2024 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 18.3 mm | 16.00" | 3200x2000 | |
90.4 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 17 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
82 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 i7-1355U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 1.8 kg | 19.7 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | HP Envy 17-cr0079ng i7-1255U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 2.6 kg | 19.6 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 |
Please note: We recently updated our rating system. The results of version 8 are not comparable to those of version 7. Find out more about this change here.
Case
The case, which features lots of aluminum and glass, makes the HP Envy 17 feel classy and appear to be of high quality. But these materials also impact the laptop's weight, explaining why the manufacturer decided to use more lightweight plastic for the cover of the base unit. Still, the HP Envy 17 weighs over 2 kg. Fortunately, workmanship, haptics and stability are excellent. There is hardly anything that can be twisted, bent or pressed in. The touchscreen has a smooth-running hinge that still keeps the screen in position.
Mulitmedia laptops with a 17-inch display are rather rare in our database. But you can still see that the Envy 17 is a lot heavier than its competitors. The LG Gram is clearly a feather-weight, but the Envy's 2.5 kg are more like gaming laptops than anything else.
Connectivity
Apart from a card reader, the Envy 17 features everything you would expect from a modern laptop. USB-C with Thunderbolt, USB 3.1 and USB-C charging, which also means that one of the two ports on the right side is usually occupied.
Communication
The Envy 17 is equipped with an Intel AX211NGW module that supports Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth. The Wi-Fi connection with the 6-GHz network is very fast and we didn't encounter any issues. The Wi-Fi module can easily be replaced by a Wi-Fi 7 module (which some other configurations are already equipped with).
Webcam
The Envy's webcam has 2,816 x 1,584 pixels, good colors and appropriate image sharpness. It can be closed off with a privacy shutter when not in use.

Maintenance
The HP Envy 17 has good maintenance features. The cover of the base unit is held in place with only a few screws and clips and can easily be removed with the appropriate tool and a screwdriver. Once inside, you will have access to an M.2 NVMe SSD, the Wi-Fi module and a RAM module that is slotted, not soldered. It consists of SO-DIMM modules. HP PartSurfer allows us to identify many of the parts in our test unit, though ordering replacement parts can be a hassle in Europe as the only authorized HP parts resellers are in the US and Canada.
Sustainability
The HP Envy 17-da has a carbon footprint of 370 kg CO2 equivalents according to HP's data sheets. 81% of this footprint comes from production. We were unable to find any information about the use of recycling materials in the laptop.
At least the packaging is largely plastic-free. Only the power supply unit is wrapped in a protective film. Even the black bag our test device is wrapped in is made of cellulose, according to the recycling label, and can be disposed of with paper waste.
Warranty
According to the data sheet, label and imprint on the casing, our test device has a two-year warranty ex works. This is region-independent.
Input Devices
Keyboard
The HP Envy 17 has an excellent keyboard, leaving nothing to be desired in terms of haptics and travel (>1.4 mm). Only the layout of HP's laptop keyboards take a bit of getting used to. The manufacturer uses the ANSI keyboard layout, which means that, at least in the German version, you need to use a combination with the Fn key to enter |, > or <. This may sound unimportant for everyday users but is likely to cause an issue for coders or home office users.
The keyboard has multi-level backlighting and large lettering, making for perfect readability in the dark. Attentive observers will note the Windows Co-Pilot key, which now replaces the right Ctrl key. This feature is still not consistently available in our test.
Touchpad
The touchpad always feels nice and cool compared to the surrounding aluminum and has good gliding qualities. The feel is flawless and the precision of the input device is good.
Touchscreen
Installing a touchscreen on a clamshell laptop isn't always very practical. Still, the touch-sensitive surface of the panel works well, recognizing and responding to inputs quickly. An oleophobic coating ensures that not every touch automatically turns into an ugly smear.
Display
The screen is the first aspect that might have users of the Envy 17 enviously eyeing the competition. The Envy 17 is currently only available with a Full-HD display that isn't particularly bright or colorful. It covers about 97% of the sRGB color space and offers 300 nits, which make it sound more like a mid-range device. The 60-Hz refresh rate is also no more than mediocre. With its 4K resolution, the predecessor had a lot more to offer in terms of screen quality. Fortunately for readers based in the US, the HP Envy 17 is also available with a 4K panel in the United States.
The black values, contrast and brightness distribution are good; backlight bleeding is next to invisible.
|
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 318 cd/m²
Contrast: 781:1 (Black: 0.407 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.83, calibrated: 1
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
70.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.155
HP Envy 17-da0076ng BOE0C70, IPS, 1920x1080, 17", 60 Hz | LG gram Pro 16Z90SP ATNA60CL06-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 LEN160-3.2K, IPS, 3200x2000, 16", 165 Hz | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra ATNA60CL07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 LP156WFH-SPD5, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 60 Hz | HP Envy 17-cr0079ng BOE0A66, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3", 60 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 27% | 22% | 24% | -43% | 23% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 68.6 | 99.8 45% | 95.6 39% | 98.6 44% | 38.11 -44% | 98.31 43% |
sRGB Coverage | 96.9 | 100 3% | 99.9 3% | 99.9 3% | 57.7 -40% | 100 3% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 70.4 | 94.6 34% | 86.5 23% | 88.5 26% | 39.41 -44% | 87.03 24% |
Response Times | 55% | 57% | 98% | -18% | 81% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 30 ? | 6 ? 80% | 12.4 ? 59% | 0.54 ? 98% | 33.6 ? -12% | 1 97% |
Response Time Black / White * | 20 ? | 14 ? 30% | 8.9 ? 55% | 0.69 ? 97% | 24.8 ? -24% | 7 ? 65% |
PWM Frequency | 481 | 240 ? | ||||
PWM Amplitude * | 41 | |||||
Screen | 995% | 25% | 40% | -77% | 26% | |
Brightness middle | 318 | 420 32% | 404.9 27% | 390 23% | 257.4 -19% | 390 23% |
Brightness | 290 | 421 45% | 390 34% | 393 36% | 248 -14% | 385 33% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 99 16% | 91 7% | 98 15% | 88 4% | 86 1% |
Black Level * | 0.407 | 0.006 99% | 0.4 2% | 0.3209 21% | 0.395 3% | |
Contrast | 781 | 70000 8863% | 1012 30% | 802 3% | 987 26% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3 | 1.66 45% | 2.42 19% | 1.4 53% | 6.26 -109% | 1.66 45% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6 | 4.92 18% | 4.65 22% | 2.7 55% | 18.28 -205% | 2.9 52% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1 | 3.39 -239% | 0.93 7% | 4.99 -399% | 1.16 -16% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.9 | 1.3 73% | 1.1 78% | 2.1 57% | 3.7 24% | 1.83 63% |
Gamma | 2.155 102% | 2.27 97% | 2.22 99% | 2.27 97% | 2.186 101% | 2.25 98% |
CCT | 6569 99% | 6609 98% | 6468 100% | 6431 101% | 6606 98% | 6727 97% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 359% /
653% | 35% /
29% | 54% /
46% | -46% /
-61% | 43% /
33% |
* ... smaller is better
The HP Envy just misses the target value of ΔΕ2000 3 ex works, but fortunately the panel is easy to calibrate using our color profile (available for download above). The average color deviation of ΔΕ2000 1.58 makes it suitable for professional use. We were surprised to note the visible turquoise cast ex works.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.5 ms rise | |
↘ 8.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.5 ms rise | |
↘ 16.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8354 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Approx. 300 cd/m² are not very bright for a screen with a reflective surface. Even in studio lighting, we can see that reflections can significantly impair readability. When used outside, even in the evening sun, it becomes clear that the combination of glass surfaces and low brightness is not necessarily beneficial.
Performance
The HP Envy 17 is available in various configurations. Our test unit is equipped with the Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, 32 GB of DDR-5 RAM, a 2-TB NVMe-SSD and a 4-GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050. The U series Intel processors are now equipped with an Intel iGPU with four cores. But as the Nvidia graphics is available to do the heavy lifting, the smaller and more energy-efficient iGPU is the right choice. Other configurations are also available without a dedicated GPU with an Intel Core Ultra 7 155H or Intel Core Ultra 5 125H. In these cases, the Arc iGPU is capable of taking on more demanding graphics tasks too. Depending on the processor, the Envy is available with 16 or 32 GB of RAM and between 512 GB and 2 TB of storage.
Testing conditions
The myHP application lets you access performance management settings. After each startup, the program looks for other HP devices, which often takes a lot of time. There are five modes available for performance management, with Energy Saving only available when running on battery.
Smart Sense, Balanced and Performance all offer very similar levels of performance in our tests and also seem to have very little impact on noise emissions. Performance mode lets GPU performance increase to about 40 watts while Smart Sense and Balanced aim for 35 watts. The CPU's boost performance lies at around 50 watts in all three cases. Continuous performance fluctuates between 20 and 15 watts depending on the temperature of the device. We did not notice a power shift between the GPU and the CPU.
One thing we noticed during testing: As soon as the Nvidia GPU does some work, the laptop turns up its cooling system. This also increases processor performance. If the dGPU is active, the processor's power consumption often increases by 10 watts.
The laptop is set to the Smart Sense mode as a standard, which is why we used this mode for testing.
Processor
Don't expect any major changes from the predecessor, as Intel's mature CPU architecture has changed little in recent years. From the Intel Core i7-1255U to the Core Ultra 7 155U, the number of P and E cores remains constant. Only the UE cores are new. They have little processing power but are very energy-efficient. We appreciate that the performance of our test unit remained constant for a long period of time but noted that the processor is supplied with very little electrical power, which means that, ultimately, performance is reduced. The working memory is also comparably slow and most competitors of the HP Envy 17 are faster in these benchmarks.
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 -2! | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng -2! | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (4861 - 30783, n=83, last 2 years) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (7884 - 10780, n=5) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1128 - 2290, n=75, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (1265 - 1782, n=5) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (1887 - 11924, n=67, last 2 years) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (3075 - 4167, n=5) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (420 - 853, n=67, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (485 - 682, n=5) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (856 - 5224, n=74, last 2 years) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (1378 - 1740, n=5) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (230 - 256, n=5) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (309 - 410, n=5) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average of class Multimedia (100 - 557, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (29095 - 130368, n=62, last 2 years) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (33897 - 41498, n=5) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (3666 - 7545, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (3666 - 4920, n=5) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (4983 - 25760, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (7592 - 9829, n=5) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 3927, n=75, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (1534 - 2382, n=5) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (4652 - 23059, n=66, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (6989 - 8805, n=5) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2555, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (891 - 1717, n=5) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 34.3, n=62, last 2 years) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (8.41 - 12.4, n=5) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (44.3 - 146.7, n=5) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average of class Multimedia (23.9 - 146.7, n=63, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (0.4853 - 0.947, n=5) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (5121 - 50388, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (7048 - 9320, n=5) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 201874, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (34928 - 48070, n=5) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1188 - 8623, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (1827 - 2564, n=5) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 181505, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (44936 - 46759, n=5) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 28794, n=62, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (4251 - 5883, n=5) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 105740, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (17116 - 23999, n=5) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (26066 - 169946, n=62, last 2 years) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (38152 - 48762, n=5) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (440 - 2022, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (546 - 755, n=5) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (2759 - 26875, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (3521 - 4932, n=5) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average of class Multimedia (12860 - 58844, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (25065 - 44831, n=5) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 |
System Performance
Our HP Envy 17 ran smoothly at all times during testing. Again, the system performance benchmarks are highly impacted by the slow RAM and the Core Ultra 7's watt limitation. Overall, our test unit's performance can't quite keep up with the times, despite being equipped with up-to-date hardware for the most part.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (4325 - 8670, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU (n=1) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (8025 - 12420, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Average of class Multimedia (6763 - 10615, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 15187, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU (n=1) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (866 - 2255, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2050, n=68, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (907 - 2795, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (605 - 2094, n=68, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU (n=1) |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Average of class Multimedia (167.3 - 353, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (254 - 835, n=75, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 4542 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Average of class Multimedia (21158 - 104459, n=62, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (36706 - 77717, n=5) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average of class Multimedia (24312 - 125604, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (37978 - 64033, n=5) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (24382 - 117933, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (38436 - 63600, n=5) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (123.2 - 253, n=5) | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=62, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Devices
The SK Hynix again proves to be an excellent SSD in the Envy 17. For the most part, it offers high read and write rates and also has the necessary stamina.
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Graphics
As soon as the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 is active, the laptop's cooling turns up too. The GPU works at 35 watts in almost all cooling modes, confirming that the RTX 3050 is a significant step up compared to our test unit's predecessor. Still, the 3050 isn't the newest chip Nvidia has to offer and the Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 and Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro both perform even better in a direct comparison of graphics performance.
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 -1! | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra -1! | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | |
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP -1! | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng -1! | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 -1! | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G -2! |
3DMark 11 Performance | 12523 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8972 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3905 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 50 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 3812 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Gaming Performance
Despite HP Envy 17 having the weight and size worthy of a gaming laptop, it remains a multimedia laptop with moderate graphics performance. The 3050's raytracing performance is rather poor, which also means that there is little chance of using raytracing in games without upscaling. Current titles should be playable at 60 Hz in FullHD with decent FPS and even the highest quality settings as long as raytracing is deactivated.
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (11 - 121, n=46, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (9.38 - 141.6, n=62, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G |
The Cinebench loop has already shown that the performance of our test unit remains constant over long periods. Our Cyberpunk benchmark scene confirms this, only displaying the typical fluctuations that come from the recurring interactions of NPCs.
Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 128.7 | 89.9 | 48.3 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 111.4 | 99.7 | 97 | 90 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 88.5 | 55.8 | 39.5 | 28.1 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 76.2 | 63.5 | 51.6 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 195.9 | 85.3 | 69.6 | 60.4 | |
F1 23 (2023) | 73.8 | 63.7 | 48.9 | 12.6 | |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 37.1 | 35.7 | |||
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 47.6 | 21.1 | |||
F1 24 (2024) | 91 | 38 |
Emissions
Noise emissions
We measured a maximum of 43.7 dB(A) when gaming with the HP Envy 17. The cooling fan produces more of a buzzing in the mid-frequency range in this scenario, which isn't particularly disruptive despite the audible volume. When the Nvidia GPU is off, the fan's noise level quickly drops to only 36 dB(A) despite the processor running on full load. The fans usually remain silent or close to inaudible while idling.
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25.4 / 25.4 / 26.2 dB(A) |
Load |
| 32.5 / 43.2 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155U, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N | LG gram Pro 16Z90SP GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-1355U, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK | HP Envy 17-cr0079ng GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-1255U, Samsung PM991a MZVLQ1T0HBLB | LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -1% | -7% | 2% | -3% | -12% | 3% | |
off / environment * | 25.4 | 25.2 1% | 23.6 7% | 24.2 5% | 25.04 1% | 26.5 -4% | 24.95 2% |
Idle Minimum * | 25.4 | 25.2 1% | 23.6 7% | 24.2 5% | 26.3 -4% | 28.5 -12% | 24.95 2% |
Idle Average * | 25.4 | 26.3 -4% | 25.4 -0% | 24.2 5% | 26.3 -4% | 28.5 -12% | 24.95 2% |
Idle Maximum * | 26.2 | 26.7 -2% | 25.4 3% | 24.2 8% | 26.3 -0% | 29.7 -13% | 25.3 3% |
Load Average * | 32.5 | 31.8 2% | 44.2 -36% | 37.9 -17% | 32.5 -0% | 39.5 -22% | 38.54 -19% |
Load Maximum * | 43.2 | 45.1 -4% | 52.6 -22% | 41.7 3% | 49 -13% | 48 -11% | 32 26% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 52 | ||||||
Witcher 3 ultra * | 48.9 | 41.7 | 46.7 |
* ... smaller is better
Temperature
The HP Envy 17 doesn't heat up particularly while idling or under low load. During our stress test, the device in its aluminum case did heat up significantly in certain areas. While the wrist rest and touchpad remain cool, the central area of the keyboard gets rather warm. Fortunately, the plastic doesn't feel uncomfortable despite the surface temperature of 40 °C.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.4 °C / 132 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.4 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23 °C / 73.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+5.8 °C / 10.4 F).
HP Envy 17-da0076ng Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 Intel Core i7-1355U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | HP Envy 17-cr0079ng Intel Core i7-1255U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -14% | 1% | 15% | 11% | 5% | 4% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 42 | 49 -17% | 41 2% | 38.5 8% | 35.7 15% | 47.1 -12% | 40.1 5% |
Maximum Bottom * | 55.4 | 48.5 12% | 40.6 27% | 41.2 26% | 36.8 34% | 43.8 21% | 42.9 23% |
Idle Upper Side * | 24.2 | 33.5 -38% | 30.2 -25% | 23.5 3% | 27.9 -15% | 25.2 -4% | 26.8 -11% |
Idle Bottom * | 31 | 35 -13% | 31.4 -1% | 24.1 22% | 27.9 10% | 25.9 16% | 31.1 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
Stress test
Speaker
HP Envy 17-da0076ng audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Energy Management
Energy Consumption
HP has included a USB-C-power supply with a maximum output of 100 watts. In all measurements, the power supply almost never requires this much power. At the most, the 100 watts are needed briefly for the boost. When idling, the laptop is comparably energy-efficient, consuming between 6 and 7 watts. When gaming and during the stress test, the Envy 17's power consumption is between 60 and 80 watts. These results are appropriate for the hardware.
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
HP Envy 17-da0076ng Ultra 7 155U, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N, IPS, 1920x1080, 17" | LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N, IPS, 3200x2000, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 i7-1355U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Envy 17-cr0079ng i7-1255U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Samsung PM991a MZVLQ1T0HBLB, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -60% | -144% | -12% | 5% | -65% | 16% | -54% | -49% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.35 | 10.15 -133% | 9.9 -128% | 4.8 -10% | 4.31 1% | 5.8 -33% | 3.4 22% | 7.17 ? -65% | 6.38 ? -47% |
Idle Average * | 4.95 | 11.65 -135% | 16.6 -235% | 7.5 -52% | 6.52 -32% | 14.3 -189% | 6.1 -23% | 10.4 ? -110% | 11.4 ? -130% |
Idle Maximum * | 12.5 | 14.33 -15% | 29.2 -134% | 7.9 37% | 8.037 36% | 18.4 -47% | 9.9 21% | 14.8 ? -18% | 13.2 ? -6% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 66.1 | 85.3 -29% | |||||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 79.3 | ||||||||
Load Maximum * | 103.2 | 91.7 11% | 182.2 -77% | 125 -21% | 89.5 13% | 93 10% | 60 42% | 124.8 ? -21% | 114.1 ? -11% |
Load Average * | 67.5 | 100.9 | 79.3 | 75.2 | 70 | 31.29 | 89.7 ? | 68.5 ? | |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 151.8 | 79.2 | 60.8 | 69.4 | 40.9 |
* ... smaller is better
Energy Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress test
Energy Consumption w/ External Monitor
Battery Life
HP specifies a battery life of 9 hours and 15 minutes for the Envy 17. But our test unit managed to keep going for longer in some of our test. It was able to offer 12 hours of surfing in our applied websurfing test, which also places the Envy 17 above its competition – with the exception of the LG Gram 17, which is more economical without a dGPU.
This indicates that the test unit's battery life has increased massively compared to the previous year. The improvements are not only due to the larger battery but are also connected to new chips, which are a lot more energy-efficient, as well as to the lower screen resolution.
HP Envy 17-da0076ng Ultra 7 155U, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 84 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh | Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 i7-1355U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 48 Wh | HP Envy 17-cr0079ng i7-1255U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 55 Wh | LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 77 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -7% | -26% | -11% | -29% | -62% | 25% | 23% | |
Reader / Idle | 718 | 1262 ? 76% | ||||||
WiFi v1.3 | 734 | 686 -7% | 540 -26% | 656 -11% | 522 -29% | 279 -62% | 918 25% | 681 ? -7% |
Gaming | 92 | 92 ? 0% | ||||||
H.264 | 1076 | 397 | 332 | 920 ? | ||||
Load | 78 | 118 | 95 | 140 | 99.7 ? |
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The technical specification sheet for the HP Envy 17 looks promising. Besides the Nvidia graphics, it lists a modern processor, a strong battery and plenty of ways to adapt hardware. An appealing design and excellent workmanship are standard for laptops of this price range, and the Envy complies. While the laptop's performance wasn't overly impressive in our benchmarks, this shouldn't be noticeable in day-to-day use. The multimedia laptop will definitely allow you to work smoothly and fit in an occasional game as well. On the other hand, the HP Envy 17 has a lot of competition. A glance at our database shows that Full-HD resolution is fairly rare, with most competitors using higher resolutions and 16:10 ratios. The HP Envy 17 is also very heavy for its kind, though much of this is also due to its size. Other than the LG Gram 17, there are only very few 17-inch devices that call themselves a multimedia laptop.
The HP Envy 117 is a decent laptop, despite seeming a little out of touch with the times. A modern Intel Core Ultra 7 meets the no-longer-cutting-edge RTX 3050 and a screen that only offers Full HD in sRGB colours.
Last year, the Envy 17's highlight was its screen. But, at least in Germany, the manufacturer chosen to let go of this excellent image quality, making the new HP Envy 17 stand out not for its qualities but for its disappointments. The LG Gram 17 and LG Gram Pro as well as the Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 or the Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra all offer much better image quality for the same price. Their performance also appears to surpass that of the HP Envy 17 in many areas. One aspect we have seen real improvement in is the Envy 17's battery life, thanks to a larger battery and more efficient hardware. The device also gets slightly better marks than its competition in terms of sustainability: Many components are easy to replace, its packaging is largely made of carboard and paper and HP openly communicates on carbon emissions.
Price and Availability
A configuration similar to our test unit is currently available for $ 1,700 from the HP website. Buyers in the US also have access to a 4K version of the device for $ 1,850 here as well as a range of other configurations here.
Hinweis: Wir haben unser Rating-System kürzlich aktualisiert und die Ergebnisse von Version 8 sind nicht mit den Ergebnissen von Version 7 vergleichbar. Weitere Informationen dazu sind hier verfügbar.
HP Envy 17-da0076ng
- 09/17/2024 v8
Marc Herter
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.