Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X vs Intel Core Ultra 5 135H vs AMD Ryzen 7 5700X

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

► remove from comparison AMD R9 5950X

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is a high-end 16-core, hyperthreaded (SMT) Vermeer Series desktop processor. With 32 threads, the new flagship offers as many threads as the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X. Introduced on October 8, 2020, the Ryzen 9 5950X is the fastest 16-core processor and is specified at 105 watts TDP.

The Ryzen 9 5950X runs at 3.4 GHz to 4.9 GHz (single core). Wen all 16 cores are loaded, up to 4.5 GHz are still possible.

The internal structure of the processor has not changed fundamentally at first glance. The CCX structure has changed a bit compared to Zen 2, because now a CCX consists of up to 8 CPU cores. So each individual core can access the complete L3 cache (32 MByte). Furthermore the CCX modules are connected to each other via the same I/O die, which we already know from Zen2. According to AMD, the Infinity fabric should now reach clock rates of up to 2 Ghz, which in turn allows a RAM clock of 4,000 MHz without performance loss.

Performance

The average 5950X in our database matches the Core i9-12900K, the Core i9-12900HX and also the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX in multi-thread performance, making this Ryzen a great processor for pretty much any task imaginable as of mid 2022.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 105 W. It will, however, happily consume much more than that as long as the cooling solution is able to handle the heat - even before one starts considering the possibility of overclocking the thing.

The Ryzen 9 5950X is built with TSMC's 7 nm process for average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core Ultra 5 135H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 5 135H

The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H is a mid-range Meteor Lake family chip that debuted in December 2023. This 1st Gen Core Ultra processor has come to replace 13th generation Core processors; it has 14 cores (4 + 8 +2) and 18 threads at its disposal. Its Performance cores, of which there are 4, are HT-enabled and run at up to 4.6 GHz while its Efficient cores, of which there are 10 (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) run at up to 3.6 GHz. The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.20 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well such as the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestmont architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 5 135H comes with 18 MB of L3 cache which is a significant reduction compared to the 24 MB that the 155H, the 165H and the 185H have. The processor has a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s; it supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). vPro Enterprise and business-centric features such as the Remote Platform Erase are onboard as well. Naturally, the 135H also features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support. It is also worth mentioning that Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 135H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

While we have no way of knowing what the 135H will be like, as of December 2023, it's safe to expect the chip to be at least as fast as the Ryzen 7 7735HS (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.75 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.20 GHz is set to give the Radeon 780M something to think about. The Arc is set to be miles ahead of aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. As long as one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This Core Ultra 5 series processor has a Base power consumption of 28 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. Its Base power consumption is supposed to be around 64 W, however, most laptop makers will probably go for a higher value to get higher clock speeds and thus higher performance. Either way, a powerful cooling solution will be needed to sort out this chip's hot temper.

The 135H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

AMD Ryzen 7 5700X

► remove from comparison AMD R7 5700X

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X is a desktop processor with 8 cores and simultaneous multithreading (SMT), which means it can process 16 threads simultaneously. In April 2022, AMD presented the Ryzen 7 5700X, a new 8-core processor that is very similar to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X. However, due to the lower TDP, there are no restrictions on the clock frequency. Nevertheless, the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X reaches up to 4.6 GHz in boost, which is only 100 MHz less than the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X. However, the base clock drops significantly to 3.4 GHz.

The performance of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X is consistently excellent in all applications. The native 8-core can really show off its strengths, especially in multi-threaded applications, although the single-core performance has also been significantly improved compared to the older Zen 2 architecture.

The internal structure of the processor is similar to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X. The CCX modules are also connected to each other via the I/O die, which we already know from Zen2. However, according to AMD, the Infinity Fabric should now achieve clock rates of up to 2 GHz, which in turn enables a RAM clock rate of 4,000 MHz without any loss of performance.

In terms of manufacturing processes, AMD also relies on TSCM for the 7nm production of the CPU cores in the Vermeer processors, although the I/O die is still supplied in 12 nm by Globalfoundries.

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X is impressive in gaming thanks to the significantly improved IPC compared to Zen2. In terms of power consumption, the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X impresses with its low TDP of just 65 watts. This means that the processor can also be operated with a compact air cooler without any problems. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is operated with a TDP of 105 watts.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 5950XIntel Core Ultra 5 135HAMD Ryzen 7 5700X
CodenameVermeer (Zen 3)Meteor Lake-HVermeer (Zen 3)
SeriesAMD Vermeer (Ryzen 5000)Intel Meteor Lake-HAMD Vermeer (Ryzen 5000)
Series: Vermeer (Ryzen 5000) Vermeer (Zen 3)
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X « 3.4 - 4.9 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3.8 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3.4 - 4.6 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H « 3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X3.4 - 4.9 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3.8 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X « 3.4 - 4.6 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Clock3400 - 4900 MHz3600 - 4600 MHz3400 - 4600 MHz
L1 Cache1 MB512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB4 MB
L3 Cache64 MB18 MB32 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 3214 / 18 4.6 GHz
4 x 3.6 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x Intel Crestmont E-Core
8 / 16
TDP105 Watt28 Watt65 Watt
Technology7 nm7 nm7 nm
Die SizeCPU cores: 2x 80.7 sq. mm., I/O: 125 mm22 x 74 sq. mm; I/O = 125 sq. mm mm2
SocketAM4BGA20491331
FeaturesDDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Enerp., RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHAMMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2
Architecturex86x86x86
$799 U.S.$299 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comwww.amd.com
max. Temp.110 °C90 °C
iGPUIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2200 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 5950X
41.8 pt (70%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 5700X
37.8 pt (63%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
99.2 Points (56%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
575 Points (11%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 24972     avg: 26017     median: 26017 (24%)     max: 27062 Points
min: 10951     avg: 11876     median: 11875.5 (11%)     max: 12800 Points
13184 Points (12%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1579     avg: 1614     median: 1614 (68%)     max: 1649 Points
min: 1672     avg: 1700     median: 1700 (72%)     max: 1728 Points
1499 Points (63%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 617     avg: 629     median: 629 (69%)     max: 641 Points
652 Points (71%)
595 Points (65%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 9640     avg: 10061     median: 10061 (25%)     max: 10482 Points
4228 Points (10%)
5405 Points (13%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4156     avg: 4324     median: 4324 (27%)     max: 4492 Points
1718 Points (11%)
2329 Points (15%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 261     avg: 266.5     median: 266.5 (74%)     max: 272 Points
244 Points (68%)
253 Points (70%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 46.05     avg: 47.8     median: 47.8 (62%)     max: 49.6 Points
26.5 Points (34%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.02     avg: 3.1     median: 3.1 (73%)     max: 3.14 Points
2.9 Points (70%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6564     avg: 6690     median: 6689.5 (40%)     max: 6815 Points
9317 Points (56%)
6527 Points (39%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 55185     avg: 56641     median: 56640.5 (41%)     max: 58096 Points
42283 Points (31%)
42876 Points (31%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 99617     avg: 102128     median: 102128 (65%)     max: 104638 Points
74898 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 12655     avg: 12967     median: 12967 (16%)     max: 13279 Points
12419 Points (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 52     avg: 58.5     median: 58.5 (1%)     max: 64.9 s
506 s (6%)
89.6 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.538     avg: 4.2     median: 4.2 (1%)     max: 5.928 s
4.7 s (1%)
3.4 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 12503     avg: 12736     median: 12735.5 (20%)     max: 12968 Points
12478 Points (20%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 118165     avg: 122979     median: 122978 (71%)     max: 127792 MIPS
65777 MIPS (38%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6729     avg: 6852     median: 6851.5 (81%)     max: 6974 MIPS
4839 MIPS (57%)
6522 MIPS (77%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 203     avg: 212     median: 212 (5%)     max: 221 fps
98 fps (2%)
134.7 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 321.5     avg: 330     median: 330 (8%)     max: 338.5 fps
271.5 fps (7%)
305 fps (8%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 29.9     avg: 30.9     median: 30.9 (54%)     max: 31.8 fps
12.5 fps (22%)
17.1 fps (30%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 2.3     avg: 2.4     median: 2.4 (69%)     max: 2.4 GB/s
1.1 GB/s (32%)
1.2 GB/s (35%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 3.3     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (60%)     max: 3.7 GB/s
1.3 GB/s (22%)
1.9 GB/s (33%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 25.1     avg: 26     median: 26 (68%)     max: 26.9 GB/s
7.3 GB/s (19%)
13.4 GB/s (35%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
542 Seconds (7%)
374 Seconds (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 112.8     avg: 117.7     median: 117.7 (1%)     max: 122.5 Seconds
338 Seconds (2%)
221 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4556     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4698 sec
0.5 sec (11%)
0.5 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 17229     avg: 17657     median: 17656.5 (38%)     max: 18084 Points
12383 Points (26%)
14862 Points (32%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.065     avg: 7.2     median: 7.2 (2%)     max: 7.405 s
9.4 s (2%)
9.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 15.28     avg: 15.7     median: 15.7 (1%)     max: 16.02 s
20.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 349.3     avg: 361.5     median: 361.5 (2%)     max: 373.7 s
457.8 s (2%)
460.7 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 84237     avg: 85367     median: 85367 (66%)     max: 86497 Points
77709 Points (60%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 23012     avg: 25067     median: 25154.5 (62%)     max: 27383 Points
14970 Points (37%)
20010 Points (49%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 70120     avg: 77979     median: 79716 (65%)     max: 84100 Points
76741 Points (62%)
90009 Points (73%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 69902     avg: 78121     median: 80185 (65%)     max: 84275 Points
90305 Points (73%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 82412     avg: 82452     median: 82452 (66%)     max: 82492 Points
92849 Points (75%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 21419     avg: 22558     median: 22436 (57%)     max: 23939 Points
13970 Points (35%)
20598 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 34080     avg: 37236     median: 37498.5 (67%)     max: 39600 Points
19468 Points (35%)
27800 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 11111     avg: 12919     median: 13441 (57%)     max: 14559 Points
7281 Points (31%)
10432 Points (44%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2256 Points (56%)
min: 2257     avg: 2278     median: 2278 (57%)     max: 2299 Points
2186 Points (55%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
13355 Points (52%)
min: 10077     avg: 10368     median: 10368 (40%)     max: 10659 Points
9331 Points (36%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2100 Points (67%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
9252 Points (38%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1621     avg: 1652     median: 1651.5 (63%)     max: 1682 Points
min: 1640     avg: 1652     median: 1651.5 (63%)     max: 1663 Points
1647 Points (63%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 15605     avg: 16248     median: 16248 (29%)     max: 16891 Points
min: 8637     avg: 9226     median: 9225.5 (17%)     max: 9814 Points
9353 Points (17%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1625     avg: 1654     median: 1654 (7%)     max: 1683 Points
1587 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 15396     avg: 15983     median: 15983 (50%)     max: 16570 Points
9214 Points (29%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7021     avg: 7119     median: 7118.5 (71%)     max: 7216 Points
6693 Points (67%)
6928 Points (69%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 57584     avg: 60409     median: 60408.5 (59%)     max: 63233 Points
32577 Points (32%)
37730 Points (37%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 558     avg: 570     median: 569.5 (1%)     max: 581 ms
571 ms (1%)
579 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
57.2 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
92150 Points (67%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
234 Points (64%)
236 Points (65%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 288     avg: 289.5     median: 289.5 (52%)     max: 291 Points
264 Points (47%)
310 Points (56%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1495 Points (56%)
1465 Points (55%)
1423 Points (53%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 232.8     avg: 242.6     median: 242.6 (42%)     max: 252.3 Watt
52.9 Watt (9%)
185.9 Watt (32%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 226.1     avg: 227.4     median: 227.4 (41%)     max: 228.7 Watt
53.4 Watt (10%)
155.2 Watt (28%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
14.5 Watt (10%)
40.9 Watt (27%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 18.2     avg: 19.1     median: 19.1 (14%)     max: 19.9 Points per Watt
32.2 Points per Watt (24%)
15 Points per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 5950X → 100% n=36

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 5 135H → 71% n=36

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 5700X → 80% n=36

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 29. 14:37:41

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12787 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 16909 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 15075 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759149461s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 29 Sep 2025 12:06:34 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12787 +0.005s ... 0.012s

#9 got single benchmarks 12787 +0.011s ... 0.023s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 16909 +0.001s ... 0.024s

#11 got single benchmarks 16909 +0.005s ... 0.029s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 15075 +0.004s ... 0.033s

#13 got single benchmarks 15075 +0.005s ... 0.038s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.038s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.071s ... 0.109s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.109s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)