Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX vs AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX vs AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX

AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX

► remove from comparison AMD R7 7745HX

The AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Dragon Range series. It offers 8 cores based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (16 threads). The cores clock from 3.6 (base) up to 5.1 GHz (single core boost).

The Dragon Range series still uses a chiplet design with two CCD-clusters (each with 8 possible cores, the 7745HX only uses one CCD) in 5nm and an IO-die (including the memory controller and the Radeon 610M iGPU) in 6nm. The chip integrates 4x USB 3.2 Gen2 (10 Gbps) ports (no USB4), 28 PCIe 5.0 lanes (for GPU and SSDs) and a dual-channel DDR5-5200 memory controller.

Performance

The average 7745HX in our database is in the same league as the Core i5-13500HX and the Core i7-13705H, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very fast chip, as of early 2023, and it will make both content creators and gamers happy - for the next two years or so, at least. Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your system is and how high the CPU power limits are.

The R7 7745HX is rated at a TDP of 55 Watt and can be configured up to 75 Watt (cTDP).

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX

► remove from comparison AMD R9 7940HX

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX is a high-end notebook processor from the Dragon Range series with 16 cores and hyperthreading (SMT), which means it can process up to 32 threads simultaneously. The CPU uses the current Zen 4 architecture for the 16 cores and clocks these from 2.4 GHz (base clock) up to 5.2 GHz (single-core boost). The CPU offers 16 MB L2 cache and 64 MB L3 cache (i.e. a total of 80 MB cache). The 7940HX consists of three chiplets, two CCD clusters with 8 CPU cores each made with a 5nm node (71mm²) and one IO die on 6nm (122mm²), are all manufactured at TSMC's fabs.

The performance of the Ryzen 9 should be comparable to a Core i9-13900HX (24 hybrid cores, max 5.4 GHz) in the top range of mobile processors from 2024. AMD itself advertises a clear lead over the old Ryzen 9 6900HX (8 Zen 3 cores, 4.9 GHz), which can be explained by the additional cores, improved architecture and higher frequencies. Compared to the top model, the Ryzen 9 7945HX, the 7940HX is slightly lower clocked.

The chip also integrates 4x USB 3.2 Gen2 (10 Gbps) ports (no USB 4), 28 PCIe 5.0 lanes (for GPUs and SSDs), a dual-channel DDR5-5200 memory controller and a small AMD Radeon 610M graphics card (2CUs, 400 - 2200 MHz).

The R9 7940HX is specified with 55 watts TDP and can be configured up to 75 watts (cTDP).

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX

► remove from comparison Dragon Rage AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX

The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Dragon Range series. It offers 16 cores based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (32 threads). The cores clock from 2.5 (base) up to 5.4 GHz (single core boost). The 7945HX is the fastest mobile Ryzen CPU at launch and derived from the desktop Ryzen 9 7950X.

The Dragon Range series still uses a chiplet design with two CCD-clusters (each with 8 possible cores) in 5nm and an IO-die (including the memory controller and the Radeon 610M iGPU) in 6nm. The chip integrates 4x USB 3.2 Gen2 (10 Gbps) ports (no USB4), 28 PCIe 5.0 lanes (for GPU and SSDs) and a dual-channel DDR5-5200 memory controller.

Performance

The Ryzen 9 7945HX is among the fastest processors in our database, as of August 2023. It is in the same league as the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D and noticeably ahead of the Core i9-13980HX, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. It is outrageously, unbelievably fast, and those fortunate enough to purchase a laptop built around this CPU will have no performance issues for at least three years.

Thanks to its powerful cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 128 W, the ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 is one of the fastest laptops built around the 7945HX that we know of.

The R9 7945HX is rated at a TDP of 55 Watt and can be configured up to 75 Watt (cTDP).

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 7745HXAMD Ryzen 9 7940HXAMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
CodenameDragon Range (Zen 4)Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4)Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4)
SeriesAMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7X4X/8X4X)AMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7X4X/8X4X)AMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7X4X/8X4X)
Clock3600 - 5100 MHz2400 - 5200 MHz2500 - 5400 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB1 MB1 MB
L2 Cache8 MB16 MB16 MB
L3 Cache32 MB64 MB64 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 1616 / 32
16 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4
16 / 32
16 x 5.4 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP55 Watt55 Watt55 Watt
Transistors9900 Million9900 Million9900 Million
TechnologyCCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm5 nmCCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketFL1FL1FL1
FeaturesDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 5, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 5, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 5, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon 610M (400 - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon 610M (400 - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon 610M (400 - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
Series: Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7X4X/8X4X) Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D2.3 - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX2.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX « 2.4 - 5.2 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX3 - 5.2 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7840HX2.9 - 5.1 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D2.3 - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX « 2.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX2.4 - 5.2 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX3 - 5.2 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7840HX2.9 - 5.1 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 7745HX
42.6 pt (71%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 7945HX
46.8 pt (78%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
110 Points (62%)
min: 109.6     avg: 113     median: 113.6 (64%)     max: 116 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1062 Points (20%)
min: 1677     avg: 1739     median: 1716 (32%)     max: 1828 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 18060     avg: 18453     median: 18452.5 (17%)     max: 18845 Points
29400 Points (27%)
min: 30783     avg: 33078     median: 33459 (31%)     max: 34613 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1846     avg: 1850     median: 1850 (78%)     max: 1854 Points
1807 Points (76%)
min: 1861     avg: 1919     median: 1940 (82%)     max: 1957 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 717     avg: 718     median: 718 (78%)     max: 719 Points
703 Points (77%)
min: 712     avg: 742     median: 753 (82%)     max: 760 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 7072     avg: 7236     median: 7235.5 (18%)     max: 7399 Points
12200 Points (30%)
min: 10025     avg: 12651     median: 13057 (32%)     max: 13769 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2978     avg: 2986     median: 2986 (19%)     max: 2994 Points
min: 4998     avg: 5363     median: 5289 (33%)     max: 5663 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 294     avg: 294.5     median: 294.5 (82%)     max: 295 Points
min: 290     avg: 304.3     median: 308 (85%)     max: 311 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
35.1 Points (45%)
min: 59.93     avg: 61.6     median: 61 (79%)     max: 64.29 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.5 Points (83%)
min: 3.65     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (87%)     max: 3.67 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8006 Points (48%)
min: 8262     avg: 8390     median: 8408.5 (51%)     max: 8481 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
54762 Points (40%)
min: 68510     avg: 70846     median: 71596.5 (52%)     max: 71681 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
99215 Points (63%)
min: 127197     avg: 128938     median: 128360 (82%)     max: 131256 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15010 Points (18%)
min: 15601     avg: 15764     median: 15801 (19%)     max: 15889 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
60.7 s (1%)
min: 34.561     avg: 66.2     median: 35.8 (0%)     max: 158.7 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.3 s (0%)
min: 1.917     avg: 2.7     median: 2.1 (0%)     max: 4.9 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
14476 Points (23%)
min: 10253     avg: 13106     median: 13822 (22%)     max: 15242 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 75557     avg: 79413     median: 79412.5 (46%)     max: 83268 MIPS
min: 123364     avg: 135923     median: 139757 (80%)     max: 140932 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 7244     avg: 7260     median: 7259.5 (86%)     max: 7275 MIPS
min: 7319     avg: 7468     median: 7381 (87%)     max: 7711 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
173.3 fps (58%)
min: 228     avg: 236.7     median: 239 (80%)     max: 243 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
358.5 fps (83%)
min: 360.5     avg: 366.5     median: 362 (84%)     max: 377 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 23.2     avg: 23.7     median: 23.7 (42%)     max: 24.1 fps
min: 33.8     avg: 35.8     median: 35.4 (62%)     max: 37.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.4 GB/s (41%)
min: 2.6     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (78%)     max: 2.7 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.2 GB/s (38%)
min: 4     avg: 4.1     median: 4.1 (71%)     max: 4.2 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
16.4 GB/s (43%)
min: 25.3     avg: 27.7     median: 27.7 (72%)     max: 29.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 272     avg: 274.5     median: 274.5 (3%)     max: 277 Seconds
min: 138     avg: 151.4     median: 152 (2%)     max: 160 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 169     avg: 171.5     median: 171.5 (1%)     max: 174 Seconds
min: 87     avg: 95     median: 95 (1%)     max: 100 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4141     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.421 sec
min: 0.3884     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4159 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
16933 Points (36%)
min: 19481     avg: 19804     median: 19820 (42%)     max: 20110 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
6.8 s (1%)
min: 6.4     avg: 6.8     median: 6.6 (1%)     max: 7.49 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
14.7 s (1%)
min: 13.9     avg: 14.6     median: 14.2 (1%)     max: 15.978 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
354.8 s (2%)
min: 336.106     avg: 339.6     median: 337 (1%)     max: 345.75 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 97894     avg: 99684     median: 99683.5 (77%)     max: 101473 Points
min: 97328     avg: 100508     median: 100877 (77%)     max: 102949 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 25054     avg: 25688     median: 25687.5 (63%)     max: 26321 Points
min: 24017     avg: 26697     median: 26667 (66%)     max: 30404 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
64563 Points (52%)
min: 79423     avg: 82378     median: 82128.5 (67%)     max: 86375 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
99923 Points (81%)
min: 79397     avg: 82262     median: 81750 (66%)     max: 86844 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
43537 Points (35%)
min: 81621     avg: 84162     median: 83710 (67%)     max: 89010 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
17466 Points (44%)
min: 22457     avg: 23233     median: 23020 (58%)     max: 24017 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 19932     avg: 25710     median: 25709.5 (46%)     max: 31487 Points
min: 29626     avg: 38324     median: 39095 (70%)     max: 42342 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 11051     avg: 11264     median: 11264 (47%)     max: 11477 Points
11440 Points (48%)
min: 6283     avg: 12174     median: 12954.5 (55%)     max: 13694 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
2807 Points (70%)
2751 Points (69%)
min: 2797     avg: 2870     median: 2876 (72%)     max: 2940 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
14825 Points (58%)
16094 Points (62%)
min: 16223     avg: 16828     median: 16765 (65%)     max: 17892 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2697 Points (86%)
min: 2800     avg: 3003     median: 3105 (99%)     max: 3105 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
14249 Points (58%)
min: 16132     avg: 19379     median: 21003 (86%)     max: 21003 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2040     avg: 2054     median: 2053.5 (80%)     max: 2067 Points
min: 1960     avg: 2088     median: 2103 (82%)     max: 2158 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12378     avg: 12920     median: 12920 (23%)     max: 13462 Points
min: 18372     avg: 19614     median: 19745 (35%)     max: 20394 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1971     avg: 1980     median: 1980 (9%)     max: 1989 Points
min: 1882     avg: 2002     median: 2014.5 (9%)     max: 2095 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12179     avg: 12761     median: 12760.5 (40%)     max: 13342 Points
min: 19315     avg: 19802     median: 19649.5 (62%)     max: 20593 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8243 Points (82%)
min: 7646     avg: 8264     median: 8534 (85%)     max: 8613 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
54665 Points (54%)
min: 75652     avg: 77236     median: 76265 (76%)     max: 79791 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 471     avg: 476     median: 476 (1%)     max: 481 ms
min: 446     avg: 460.3     median: 457.5 (1%)     max: 479 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 92275     avg: 96361     median: 97339 (71%)     max: 99470 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 280     avg: 281.5     median: 281.5 (77%)     max: 283 Points
min: 259     avg: 285.9     median: 289 (79%)     max: 295 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 345     avg: 347     median: 347 (62%)     max: 349 Points
min: 311     avg: 347.1     median: 351 (63%)     max: 387 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2027     avg: 2103     median: 2103 (79%)     max: 2179 Points
min: 1929     avg: 2067     median: 2061 (77%)     max: 2240 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 130.1     avg: 138.7     median: 138.7 (24%)     max: 147.3 Watt
min: 134.4     avg: 163     median: 145 (25%)     max: 225 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 127.5     avg: 136.9     median: 136.9 (25%)     max: 146.3 Watt
min: 139.1     avg: 173.2     median: 166.1 (30%)     max: 221 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 12.5     avg: 31.6     median: 16.3 (11%)     max: 65.9 Watt
min: 13.9     avg: 38.7     median: 31.2 (21%)     max: 71.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
13.6 Watt (15%)
min: 17.1     avg: 27     median: 24.1 (27%)     max: 37 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 20.4     avg: 22     median: 22 (16%)     max: 23.5 Points per Watt
min: 25.1     avg: 31.3     median: 30.2 (23%)     max: 38 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX → 119% n=7

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX → 129% n=7

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 23. 11:04:13

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14940 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17464 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 14936 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755939853s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 22 Aug 2025 05:18:47 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.01s ... 0.01s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14940 +0.006s ... 0.016s

#9 got single benchmarks 14940 +0.008s ... 0.025s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 17464 +0.001s ... 0.025s

#11 got single benchmarks 17464 +0.004s ... 0.03s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 14936 +0.005s ... 0.035s

#13 got single benchmarks 14936 +0.021s ... 0.055s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.055s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.098s ... 0.154s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.154s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)