Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 6600U vs Intel Core i5-1250P

AMD Ryzen 5 6600U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 6600U

The AMD Ryzen 5 6600U is a processor for thin and light laptops based of the Rembrandt generation. The Ryzen packs six of the eight cores based on the Zen 3+ microarchitecture. They are clocked at 2.9 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.5 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (12 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 6 nm process at TSMC. Compared to the similar R5 6600H, the 6600U offers a lower base clock speed and a lower TDP.

In the 6000 series, AMD finally switched to the current RDNA 2 graphics architecture for the iGPU. The 6600U only offers the small Radeon 660M with 6 of the 12 CUs enabled and 1.9 GHz max. clock rate.

The new Zen 3+ is a refresh of the Zen 3 architecture and should not offer a lot of changes. The chip itself however, offers a lot of new features, like support for USB 4 (40 Gbps), PCI-E Gen 4, DDR5-4800MT/s or LPDDR5-6400MT/s, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth LE 5.2, DisplayPort 2, and AV1 decode.

Performance

The average 6600U in our database matches the Ryzen 7 5800U in multi-thread performance, making this Ryzen 5 series chip a great CPU for most activities as of mid 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your system is and how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 5 series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 15 W to 28 W, the expectation being that laptop makers will go for a higher value in exchange for higher performance. Either way, that's too much to allow for passively cooled designs.

The R5 6600U is manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm manufacturing process for good, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i5-1250P

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1250P

The Intel Core i5-1250P is a mid-range Alder Lake-P family SoC designed for use in ultra-light, ultra-thin (yet actively cooled) laptops. It was announced in early 2022 and it has 4 performance cores, as opposed to the 6 cores of the top-of-the-line i7-1280P (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) mated to 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The i5's P-cores are Hyper-Threading-enabled for a total of 16 threads when combined with its E-cores. The clock speeds range from 1.7 GHz to 4.4 GHz for the performance cluster and 1.2 GHz to 3.3 GHz for the efficient cluster. The shortcomings of this processor as compared with the slightly faster Core i5-1260P include the smaller L3 cache, slower iGPU model, lower clock speeds. Full vPro feature set is enabled in the case of this i5, though ("Enterprise" tier, allowing for remote device management).

Architecture

The i5 is a continuation of Intel's efforts to use the ARM-developed big.LITTLE technology for its own benefit. A single "little" Alder Lake core is supposed to be as fast as a Skylake core (as found in the venerable Core i7-6700HQ among other options) which is six years old at this point. All of Core i5-1250P's CPU cores enjoy access to 12 MB of L3 cache. The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to LPDDR5-5200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR4x-4267 or DDR4-3200; Intel recommends using no more than 64 GB, for reference. Just like the other 12th Gen Intel Core processors, this Core i5 comes with the Thread Director which is a new functionality designed to help Windows 11 decide which cores to use for what workload for best performance and efficiency possible. Hardware acceleration of AI algorithms is supported via GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). The alluringly fast PCI-Express 5.0 spec has not found its way into Alder Lake P processors, so users will have to be content with PCI-Express 4.0 for the time being. Four PCI-Express 4 lanes allow for a read/write rate of up to 7.9 GB/s, provided a suitably fast NVMe SSD is used.

Please note this is not a user-replaceable CPU. It gets permanently soldered on to the motherboard (FCBGA1744 socket interface).

Performance

The average 1250P in our database nearly matches the Ryzen 5 5500U and the Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U in multi-thread performance, trailing behind the Core i5-1240P just slightly. This is a great CPU for nearly all tasks imaginable, as long as one does not expect it to be as fast as the mighty Core i7-12700H.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the Power Limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is. The latter is really important as a single Golden Cove core can eat more than 20 W when under heavy load.

Graphics

The built-in graphics adapter in the form of the 80 EU Iris Xe running at up to 1.4 GHz has seen little change from what was built into certain 11th Gen Tiger Lake UP3 processors, like a Core i5-1135G7, which is hardly a downside as this iGPU is loaded with modern features, AV1 video decoding capability and SUHD 4320p monitor support included. The Xe isn't a stranger to a bit of casual gaming; that said, your mileage may vary depending on how high the Power Limits are and how capable the cooling solution of a laptop is. Expect something close to NVIDIA's MX250 or in other words, acceptable framerates in most games when playing at 1080p / Low settings. Fast RAM is a prerequisite for decent performance as the Xe has to make do with no dedicated video memory.

Power consumption

The i5's base power consumption (also known as the default TDP or Power Limit 1) is 28 W; its maximum Turbo power consumption (also known as the PL2) is not supposed to exceed 64 W. As for the "Minimum Assured" power consumption, Intel's guidelines mention 20 W. All in all, an active cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this.

The i5-1250P is built with Intel's fourth-gen 10 nm manufacturing process marketed as Intel 7 for decent, as of late 2022, energy efficiency. Despite that, the i5 is more power-hungry than certain 7 nm U-class AMD Ryzen 5000 chips delivering similar, or even higher, performance.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 6600UIntel Core i5-1250P
SeriesAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)Intel Alder Lake-P
CodenameRembrandt-U (Zen 3+)Alder Lake-P
Series: Alder Lake-P Alder Lake-P
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U compare2.7 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 6600U « 2.9 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1280P compare1.3 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1270P compare1.6 - 4.8 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1260P compare1.5 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1250P « 1.2 - 4.4 GHz12 / 16 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1240P compare1.2 - 4.4 GHz12 / 16 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1220P compare1.1 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock2900 - 4500 MHz1200 - 4400 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB1.1 MB
L2 Cache3 MB10 MB
L3 Cache16 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 1212 / 16
TDP28 Watt28 Watt
Technology6 nm10 nm
max. Temp.95 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2BGA1744
FeaturesDDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200, PCIe 4, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, Remote Platform Erase, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon 660M ( - 1900 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs ( - 1400 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 6600U
37.8 pt (52%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1250P
32 pt (44%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
80 Points (56%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
408 Points (8%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 8491     avg: 9160     median: 9159.5 (9%)     max: 9828 Points
7282 Points (7%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1420     avg: 1457     median: 1456.5 (62%)     max: 1493 Points
1521 Points (65%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 558     avg: 570     median: 570 (63%)     max: 582 Points
536 Points (60%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3419     avg: 3623     median: 3623 (9%)     max: 3827 Points
2334 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1361     avg: 1493     median: 1493 (9%)     max: 1625 Points
1528 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 227     avg: 233     median: 233 (70%)     max: 239 Points
201 Points (61%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
17.2 Points (22%)
9.7 Points (13%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.7 Points (68%)
2.7 Points (68%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6242 Points (38%)
7918 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
32097 Points (23%)
38277 Points (28%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
54792 Points (38%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
11685 Points (14%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
146.6 s (2%)
340 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.7 s (1%)
9.6 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6937 Points (11%)
5561 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
44320 MIPS (25%)
24625 MIPS (14%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5486 MIPS (66%)
3532 MIPS (42%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
71.5 fps (25%)
79.6 fps (28%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
212 fps (49%)
201.1 fps (46%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
11.7 fps (21%)
6.8 fps (12%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.9 GB/s (0%)
1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.3 GB/s (22%)
1.9 GB/s (33%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
9.3 GB/s (24%)
9.5 GB/s (25%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 323     avg: 488.5     median: 488.5 (6%)     max: 654 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
415 Seconds (3%)
511 Seconds (4%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (11%)
0.6 sec (13%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9435     avg: 9908     median: 9908 (21%)     max: 10381 Points
11842 Points (25%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.1 s (2%)
8.4 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
19.9 s (1%)
18.5 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
692 s (3%)
461.5 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 38061     avg: 41628     median: 41627.5 (36%)     max: 45194 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 11630     avg: 12171     median: 12171 (33%)     max: 12712 Points
11666 Points (32%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 65694     avg: 66719     median: 66719 (54%)     max: 67744 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 66512     avg: 67032     median: 67032 (54%)     max: 67552 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 66942     avg: 70708     median: 70708 (60%)     max: 74474 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 10347     avg: 10513     median: 10513 (27%)     max: 10679 Points
9084 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 15902     avg: 15918     median: 15918 (28%)     max: 15934 Points
16016 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5114     avg: 5340     median: 5339.5 (23%)     max: 5565 Points
3227 Points (14%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
1977 Points (53%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
8310 Points (33%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1445     avg: 1477     median: 1483 (63%)     max: 1504 Points
1622 Points (68%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7034     avg: 7407     median: 7529 (13%)     max: 7658 Points
7672 Points (14%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1405     avg: 1481     median: 1481 (6%)     max: 1557 Points
1583 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6956     avg: 8603     median: 8602.5 (27%)     max: 10249 Points
8778 Points (28%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 6067     avg: 6383     median: 6382.5 (64%)     max: 6698 Points
7072 Points (71%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 26824     avg: 33338     median: 33338 (37%)     max: 39852 Points
35532 Points (39%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
7529 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1483 Points (22%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
619 ms (1%)
734 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
217 Points (62%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
274 Points (57%)
254 Points (53%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1517 Points (58%)
1554 Points (60%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
44.6 Watt (8%)
32.2 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
41.9 Watt (8%)
45.5 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
8.8 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
33.6 Points per Watt (25%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 6600U → 100% n=40

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1250P → 96% n=40

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 07. 02:05:26

#0 checking url part for id 14090 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14066 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 04 Jun 2024 05:34:21 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.048s ... 0.05s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.05s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14090 +0.027s ... 0.077s

#7 got single benchmarks 14090 +0.019s ... 0.096s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14066 +0.023s ... 0.119s

#9 got single benchmarks 14066 +0.01s ... 0.129s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.129s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.467s ... 0.595s

#12 return log +0.027s ... 0.623s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)